Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

English Higher too English for critics



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 May 2008
THE Higher English exam is just a bit too, well, English. Discuss.
Academics have criticised last week's Higher English paper for featuring prose passages about countryside issues south of the border rather than Scots subjects and texts.

The controversial passages appeared in the "Close Reading" Higher English pa
per which thousands of Scottish schoolchildren sat last Thursday. One, by writer Richard Morrison, had as its first three words "The English middle classes" and then managed to mention England or English twice more in a piece less than a page long.

The Higher was set by the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA).

Gillian Beattie-Smith, a lecturer in English for the Open University and for Telford College in Edinburgh

said: "It has an Anglo-centric focus on English and cultural identity which is not what the curriculum is supposed to be about. I and others have spent years trying to make students feel positive about Scottish literature and Scottish language. And now all this is being undermined by the SQA. It really angers me."

William Maley, professor of English literature at Glasgow University agreed. He said: "We have a rich heritage of writing here and they could have juxtaposed the writing about the English countryside with a piece about the Scottish countryside or urban Scotland."

However, the quango rejected the criticisms. An SQA spokesman said: "As a subject area, English is universal and the purpose of this section is to let candidates show they understand what the author is expressing, regardless of an essay's locus."





The full article contains 258 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 May 2008 7:30 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

JG,

Fife 18/05/2008 00:23:16
So what is all the fuss about? As far as I remember, the 'close reading' section is all about the English language and its use; it is irrelevant what the subject is. The book study, poetry section etc. is where the choices are. My niece told me she studied the poems of Edwin Morgan and picked her book study herself. I'll be happy if she gets a good pass!
2

911 was an inside job.,

18/05/2008 09:17:25
Idiots! The English language was invented by the English, so why shouldn't English exams concentrate on the beauty of being English? We should celebrate our Anglo-Saxon roots.
3

Morningside Manners,

18/05/2008 09:36:52
#1 - I agree, isn't that paper about analysing the content of something you haven't seen before? In which case it wouldn't matter what it was actually about, because you're not meant to know about the content, but talk about it's construction, style, tone, strength of argument etc.
I also happen to know that the set texts you DO have to memorise and understand in advance include Edwin Morgan's poetry and Grassic-Gibbon's Sunset Song. Both Scottish!
4

DunCraig,

Brisbane 18/05/2008 23:24:01
#2, CRAP! We're don't ALL have anglo-saxon roots either!
5

Amy Flynn,

Edinburgh, 20/05/2008 21:45:18
#5, here here!
#4, those are not "set" texts, students have a flexible choice. It doesn't matter about the origin of texts for both personal study nor for Critical Essays (paper 2). Paper 2 states "texts used, may be Scottish" however.

I sat the Higher English exam this year and i found the close reading paper, especially passage 1 entitled "Rural Mania", absolutely tedious to read. It was about the rural English countryside... and extremely boring, about matters that were unfamiliar to me.
(strange since i am also studing Higher Geography which has a Rural Topic within.. which proved to be useless in helping me grasp the passage.)

Anywho, i agree it is about being able to analyse unfamiliar texts to test students ability. But surely they could have made it more relevant to todays Scottish youth. 2007's paper was about Google for heavens sake, and 2006 about obesity.. CLEARLY relevant issues for Scottish youngsters... While the English countryside, not so much.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.