Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Designs fit for a prince's architect, but not planners as art extension rejected

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 February 2010
THEY have joined forces with some of Britain's best-known artists to transform the grounds of their 17th century mansion on the outskirts of Scotland's capital.


Robert and Nicola Wilson in the grounds of their Jupiter Artland

The 80-acre estate run by Robert and Nicola Wilson ha
s been hailed as a major addition to the nation's cultural landscape after they unveiled their vast collection of outdoor artworks last summer.

Antony Gormley, Andy Goldsworthy, Charles Jencks and Marc Quinn are among the artists whose work attracted thousands of visitors to the new Jupiter Artland when it was opened to the public – after years of work by the couple.

But despite winning widespread plaudits from art critics, the well-heeled pair have fallen foul of Edinburgh city council's eagle-eyed planners.

Proposals to extend their historic home at Wilkieston, near Edinburgh Airport, to take advantage of growing interest have been rejected after talks between the Wilsons' architect and planning officials broke down.

Proposals for Bonnington House were rejected before they even reached the city's planning committee and councillors were not given the chance to visit.



The Wilsons, who bought the estate in 1999, had won backing from Historic Scotland, the Cockburn Association and the Architectural Heritage Society of Scotland (AHSS) and were hoping to build two modern extensions to either side of the A-listed building to provide overnight accommodation for visiting artists and guests.

The plans included a function hall for exhibitions and receptions, new kitchen and catering facilities with a home for the growing archive and storage rooms for artists' equipment.



Papers lodged with the council said they wanted to "re-make the house as the centre of an economically-active estate".

Leading Edinburgh architect Benjamin Tindall, said to be Prince Charles's favourite, was brought in to design the extensions to ensure they fitted in with the look of the original building without being seen as "pastiche".

But the council rejected the drawings on the grounds the extensions were "out of scale" with the original building and "inappropriate" for the estate.



Mr Tindall's submission to the council states: "The addition of wings to a category A-listed building is not a proposal to be made without good cause and to the highest standards. We believe the proposals demonstrate this."

Mr Tindall told The Scotsman: "We all were disappointed and surprised by the refusal, especially considering how much care was taken with the proposals and the support they received.

"Anyone who has visited Jupiter knows what exceptional standards Robert and Nicky Wilson have and what a major contribution their work is for the city."



Euan Leitch, spokesman for the AHSS, said: "The development of Bonnington House and estate is already of the highest quality and we are confident the current proposals will in no way damage the buildings's character or setting."

A spokesman for the council said the Wilsons' application had been dealt normally as a "household" application.

John Bury, the head of planning, added: "We were very disappointed that pre-application discussions, during which we made our concerns known to the applicant, were not seen through to a fitting conclusion prior to an application being made.

"We believe a positive outcome is achievable and have offered to meet the applicant and their agent to resume dialogue."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 February 2010 10:59 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Brianwci,

16/02/2010 01:13:37
This is an extremely well thought out development and Planners should remember their job is as much about facilitating projects as well as regulating.

I hope everyone concerned is getting round the table as we speak.
2

yamty175,

Silverknowes 16/02/2010 01:51:21
They have a huge chunk of land- let them do what they want with it.
3

Douglas,

Bathgate 16/02/2010 07:52:18
If they had any sense they'd apply for permission to upgrade to a world class boutique hotel. We're constantly being told it's what the capital needs and seems to be their goal anyway.
4

Duncan in Edinburgh,

16/02/2010 07:54:57
It sounds like the planners told them they wouldn't get these plans passed at draft stage, and they decided to press ahead anyway and then mount a media campaign instead of negotiating. These stories don't end up in the paper by accident.
5

paulr,

edinburgh 16/02/2010 08:12:08
They obviously did not "shake" the correct hands.
6

WJohn,

West Lothian 16/02/2010 08:33:37
Maybe Robert and Nicola Wilson should have called their planned extension at “Wilkieston a “complex” and had a tram stop. No trouble building any kind of monstrosity then.
See story on Gogar and all the rest of the spoiling of Edinburgh’s architechture with posts and cats-cradle of wires.
7

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 16/02/2010 08:46:44
Planners are people who can't do,they just stop people who can. This should be overruled by the elected officials.
8

DAVID,

Edinburgh 16/02/2010 09:48:16
Maybe they should have applied to knock the whole thing down, replacing it with something much worse designed by RMJM or Malcolm Fraser, then they would have got it approved.

9

W Adam,

Greyfriars Kirkyard 16/02/2010 11:20:53
Ben Tindall is an architect who designs with supreme sensitivity in historic contexts; it would have been useful to see the plans here.

However, this is a council which passed Richard Murphy's Haymarket Tower; not at all sure its planners have any idea of good design.

(But #9 you surely can't compare RMJM of Gazprom Tower, the mega global RMJM which has just employed Sir Fred Goodwin to flog its ghastly buildings to big businesses abroad, with Malcolm Fraser of Edinburgh's beautiful Poetry Library, Storytelling Centre and Dance Base? Unfair:-))

10

OscarDeutsch,

Glasgow 16/02/2010 12:54:34
The problem here is that they had the support of the Cockburn Association, the AHSS and Historic Scotland. The key to getting applications passed by Edinburgh's planning officers seems to be to *not* have such support. They may also have had better luck had their application involved the substantial demolition of the original property, rather than simply extending and enhancing... Cynical, moi??
11

W Adam,

16/02/2010 13:10:20
No, actually, I'd say realistic. In fact, substantial demolition and turning into an 'art hotel' might have been the answer? Clearly, sensitive additions by a very good architect aren't what's required, not er... 'iconic' enough.

(There's a picture on the Urban Realm website.)

Now, what will they say to the Gareth Hoskins additions proposed for the Royal High?

Bet as it's Hoskins they will simply rubber stamp it all through.





12

W Adam,

16/02/2010 13:19:42
And by the way, this is worth reading #9 David

Malcolm Fraser on RMJM and Sir Fred.


http://www.ianfraser.org/?p=1018

"Goodwin’s appointment reveals little has been learnt from the crash..."

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.