Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Dundee United 3 - 0 Hearts: Hearts made to pay by lively United for performance hitch



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 September 2008
MONEY doesn't buy happiness. The Hearts players learned that lesson yesterday. Twenty-four hours after finally getting their wages, the Tynecastle side turned in one of their poorest performances of the season to ensure that payment won't be followed up with a win bonus. And Eggert Jonsson can probably expect a fine, too, after being sent off in the 74th minute.

Against a Dundee United side with the wherewithal to trouble them time and again with balls pinged in from the flanks and the necessary precision to punish them from set-pieces, Hearts were always onto a beating and can thank the woodwork and some fine goalkeeping from Marian Kello for ensuring the final score was not more embarrassing.

"I'm not happy with the result but we must accept and learn from this," said Hearts manager Csaba Laszlo. But he refused to blame the financial uncertainty of the past couple of weeks for the under-par performance. "I think if you are on the field, you don't think about this. You are a sportsman and want to win games and if the ball comes in and you don't header it, that is because you are not doing your job, not because you are thinking about other issues."

And Kello undermined any notion that the team were not mentally attuned. "I was thinking about my work, not thinking about money. The players don't think about money." His performance suggested that he at least was focused.

By the time half-time arrived he had already had to pull off a couple of important saves and, along with the woodwork, was responsible for keeping the scoreline respectable. But he couldn't do anything about the opener.

It was no surprise that Craig Conway was the man who netted it. He had been a nuisance all game and by the 25th minute the Hearts rearguard had been well and truly warned about the dangers he posed from a set piece. But this time, if fairness, there was little they could do to stop it. From 25 yards out, Scott Roberston, who is emerging as one of Craig Levein's best buys yet, touched the ball to his team-mate and Conway leathered it past the rooted Kello.

United were the team many pundits tipped as third-place finishers as the season got under way. Instead they have stuttered into the campaign and it is Hearts who have set the pace as best of the rest. That claim was questioned yesterday and it should be an interesting tussle in the months that lie ahead. Last night only five points seperated third place from second bottom.

The last time the teams had met at Tannadice there had been five goals and three sendings off, with United dominating the goals and the visitors responsible for the red cards. From the early signs this one had the makings a similarly engrossing encounter.

Hearts were under the cosh and even in open play the balls whipped in from wide were a cause of constant consternation in the away ranks. Neither Laryea Kingston nor Jonsson could contain Conway and it was his delivery from yet another free-kick which found Jon Daly in the 34th minute but again Kello was alert enough to push it onto the roof of the net.

Hearts weren't exactly pegged into their own half but with the midfielders occupied by the more effective United players in that department there was nothing up front to bother the home defence and time and again Hearts' ventures upfield proved impotent.

In the 40th minute, the visitors finally gave Craig Levein's men a taste of their own medicine when Audrius Ksanavicius swirled in a free-kick. Christos Karipidis got on the end of it he couldn't get it beyond Lukasz Zaluska. At the other end Morgano Gomis had an attempt from 30 yards out and only the woodwork could deny the home side. The second half started with Saulius Mikoliunas skipping into the United box. With others attempting to play the Hearts man offside, it was left to Lee Wilkie to get back and block.

But if they addressed the problem of getting players into the United area at half-time, Hearts had not come up with a solution to United's greater verve and were still unable to nullify the threat from the flanks and in the 50th minute United took a two-goal advantage, when Flood's delivery was headed past Kello by Daly, whose celebrations befitted the fact he became a new father this week.

In the 55th minute, Jonsson, out of ideas when it came to halting Conway, fouled the effervescent attacker. It earned him a booking and while United failed to make anything from the set piece, the tackle was to come back and haunt the Icelandic defender. Up against the same player in the 74th minute, he again resorted to illegal means and was dispatched for his second yellow card.

By then there was no way back for Hearts. They had conceded a third when Scott Robertson finished off a Conway free-kick and were being completely out-played by a United side displaying the ideas and finishing Levein had always said they were capable of.

Hearts put on Christian Nade and Mike Tullberg in a vain shot at a fightback but the best they could muster was a a Mikoliunas shot which pinged back off the post. On this evidence, the battle for the title of best of the rest is back on.

OVERVIEW

MAN OF THE MATCH

Dundee United's former Ayr player Craig Conway scored and set up the Tangerines' goals and was a source of so much for United, while riling the Hearts ranks. His 25-yard free kick in the first half was the catalyst for his side's march towards victory over their visitors from the capital.

QUICK FACT

Having secured their first win of the season at Pittodrie last week, United went into this one seeking a win at home. They duly delivered it to their fans with a clinical display against a Hearts side that failed to live up to the high benchmark it had set themselves in previous weeks.

TALKING POINT

All week the talking point surrounding the Tynecastle club had been the non-payment of wages to staff and players alike. Even with the money put into the players' accounts before yesterday's game, they didn't look like they could buy a win, slipping to their third defeat of the season.




The full article contains 1096 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Daillyman,

28/09/2008 00:16:28
1 bto

Gers 1-0, Novo in the 76 minute.
2

freewheelin franklin,

london 28/09/2008 06:22:52
it has been obvious from the very start that romanov is bad news for scottish football.things are about to get very serious for hearts.good luck to them.
3

Walter Ego,

Durness 28/09/2008 06:57:00
It is the end of the road for Hearts FC. They will be out of business by the end of the year. Mark my words.

PS And Dundee FC will fall as well.
4

GOA-JAMBO,

Back Hame 28/09/2008 08:30:02
We were well beat by more confident and skillful taem, it could have been more, the back four were all over the place with Wallace being once again the main culprit followed by Berra who can not pass a ball and should not be captain, Kingston, Mole, Ksanavicius and Nade should not be playing for the Heart of Midlothian, Dundee Utd have good players as do other teams and our scouting system ( do we have one )should be looking at these players with a view to bringing them to Tynecastle otherwise we will be fighting relagation. all in all a very bad performance yesterday with fans leaving early and scarfs being throwing away.
5

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 28/09/2008 08:55:07
#8 - If as you say Kingston, Mole, Ksanavicius and Nade shouldn't be playing for the team and as indicate Wallace and Berra not the standard you want, then who is proven and better in the squad?

Vlad has spent money on players, but that has put Hearts in huge debt, re wages on Makela, Beslija and Pinilla. Got to ask why these guys got big money and how much of it went to the players given the standard they played at and the few games they played in.

The scouting system you refer to IS Vlad. The television documentary showed a room full of files he keeps on players, in his house, based on his opinion.

Just as well he likes the colour maroon or he may have painted what he considers his subbuteo team by now.
6

GMCD,

dundee 28/09/2008 09:34:21
Hearts were shocking yesterday.

But good for a laugh.

I can't decide if I laughed more at Michael Stewart's first half strop, Kingston falling over off the pitch and claiming a foul, or the HEarts supporters suggesting that Conway dived for the booking and the sending off!!!
Mind you with Miko in your team you konw about diving!

7

Bleeding Heart...,

28/09/2008 09:49:57
#10 - Enjoy your moment, but don't get too cocky.

As soon as Levein goes (and I reckon he will go at the first suitable offer), your performances will plummet again.

'Twas ever thus...
8

Mooncat,

Button Moon 28/09/2008 09:50:39
As usual, Hearts are always just 1 game away from a crisis point and the sensationalist banter comes flowing out from the press and on these forums...

One thing IS for sure. If Hearts went bust, and had to reinvent themselves as "Edinburgh Hearts" (or whatever) and play their games on the Meadows, we'd STILL get bigger crowds than our esteemed city rivals.

Remember the Hearts v Hibs semi-final crowd?


www.fitbaw365.com
9

GOA-JAMBO,

Back Hame 28/09/2008 10:00:03
#9 Graham H.. This is the point we do not have players in the squad hence the need for new ones before we find we are in a dog fight down the bottom.
As for vlad being the only scout I do not think that is the case. Yes he runs the show and the reason for that is he owns the club, so unless someone else is willing to put money in and big money at that then we have to put up with what we have.









10

Thane of Kirkcaldy,

Dancing in the Streets of Raith 28/09/2008 10:14:43
#6
If you read the article by Pat Nevin in today's paper you will see where the 'good post' by #4 came from.
What a giggle !!!
11

Sarajevoiwasthere ,

London 28/09/2008 10:56:03
This performance looked very much like the dish that was served up all last season. The coach can say that the wages issue didn't effect the players but for sure the media savaging did. A parochial and xenophobic press has got the boot in to our lithuanian owners again and it was as bad for the image of scotland as the behaviour of Rangers fans in Manchester in May.
Hearts are not very good but you could see that the confidence that has slowly been building up had gone,thanks to the disgraceful behaviour of our media. Even our own Eric Milligan said he didn't want foreigners running the club. Transfer these views to the wider economy and Scotland will become a desolate wasteland run by sectarian and racist thugs, applauded by our comic book newspapers, but with no money, no jobs and no foreign investment.
You deserve it.

12

what a chancer,

up again 28/09/2008 11:01:03
as i said yesterday,two managers,one drops players that are poor to the bench the other drops players at the bus station,vlad picks the squad and the coach deals with the rest.do we blame the players for the level they can only play at or the coach who cannot get them to improve,over the past three years vlad has blamed the coaches,if the squad was good enough then there would be no need for this merrygoround of staff.
13

what a chancer,

point one 28/09/2008 11:14:23
did the manager say that hearts cannot win games with many goals thse games are over now as it is a new brand of football,well he didnt mention that we could be beat by many goals,if we had raked the league of players that were available around us at the end of last season we would have had a better squad than we have now and a easier wage level as well.does he not want to scout the scottish league or do we have to go foreign.
14

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 11:21:26
#10 Well dserved win by an impressive UTD side but make no mistake young CONWAY blatantly dived on more than one occasion. MIKO played well & was not guilty of any simulation.
It was a bad defeat .Only playersIMO who got pass marks were Kello/Miko & Stewart. With Kvan...& Mole particularly poor.
Csaba waited until 2-0 before changing the team whereas it was obvious after 20 mins(MAX) that it needed changed or we would loose.
Biggest dissapointment for me(other than result) was GLENS ommision from the squad.Based on seeing him for reserves he should be playing never mind on the bench(as should Palaz)

Changes needed & back on winning track next week. Draw for Hibs today & we remain 3rd..... not the end of the World as some would have you believe.

HHGH
15

busbyfh,

28/09/2008 13:38:23
Couldn't get to the game but am dismayed by the choosing of Ksanevicius who I do not rate and is not going to get any better in his thirties. As for Wallace .......I better keep my gob shut as his performance have bothered me since early last season.
16

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 13:48:44
#Busby.. agree re Ksan .. another poor game/finished IMO. I have also been on Wallaces case all season but was no worse than anyone else yesterday(Kello/Miko & Stewart apart IMO). However for sure JJ will recognise our weakness & throw someone with pace at Wallace on Saturday.
17

The Gorgie Boys Are In Town,

28/09/2008 13:50:03
Wallace seems short of confidence but i would hope that when Obua is fit he can slot in to the left back position.
Driver back in and Glen in and around the first team and Tullberg fully fit for another option and he will take a bit of time to ease him into the first team. Mole needs a rest i thought he looked very jaded yesterday and the whole team just performed poorly, these things happen and the next game is where we can put it right again.

HHGH
18

Bleeding Heart...,

28/09/2008 13:53:24
#18 + #19 - It seems to be the same players each week who are under-performing (or perhaps just not up to it?).

Perhaps if Romanov had brought in a manager sooner, that manager could have assessed the playing staff, decided the replacements needed, and made a few signings in the "window".

But not Romanov; once again, Hearts are left trailing.

Romanov kept us at Tynecastle, and without him we probably wouldn't have won the Cup in 2006. For all of that, we owe him gratitude.

But what use is Romanov NOW to HMFC?

If he won't/can't invest in the type of player necessary for Hearts to mount a challenge, why doesn't he actively seek a buyer for the club?

For example, an owner that perhaps someone like Craig Levein might want to work for..?


19

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 13:56:13
#21 more pace than confidence re wallace IMO particularly over 5/10 yards. Not sure if OBUA can play there. RAPNIK must be worth a run.

Agree Driver/Glen & Tullberg could give us a badly needed lift up front. NADE does not look any where near capable of holding a place.
20

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 14:00:06
#22 No boubt in my mind that VR has lost interest. The global crisis could have asilver lining in that he sells HEARTS. (well aware suitable purchaser thin on ground). However we can but hope.

In the meantime far from doom & gloom.Still 3rd in the league with players due to return from injury.
21

Roscoe P Coltrane,

28/09/2008 14:01:57
B*gger.
22

The Gorgie Boys Are In Town,

28/09/2008 14:05:40
23 If Johnson can play at right full back then don't see it as a problem for Obua, bombing forward from the left side linking with Driver and supplying Tullberg and Glen with the ammo needed. The problem is the squad is threadbare in those positions other than the youth players. I thought when Obua signed that was the thinking on that one but hasn't turned out that way up to now but he still could be a good attacking full back. Absolutely no problem with throwing the likes of Rapnik, Thompson and Glen in regardless of age as the can do no worse than present players, and is our tradition
23

,

28/09/2008 14:47:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

Ajax MacKindling,

28/09/2008 16:39:33
27. Are you really asking why Rangers are playing in red, white and blue?

May as well ask why Hibs are playing in green and white.

If you relate the colour of Rangers' socks to bigotry it says more about you than anything else.
25

Moira Gordon, Scotland on Sunday,

Edinburgh 28/09/2008 17:17:28
Hi everyone, I will be online for the next hour to chat about football matters.
26

Daillyman,

28/09/2008 17:19:15
Hibs humped 3-0
27

Wee Pal Joe,

28/09/2008 17:49:38
Hi Moira.

Very poor result for Hearts yesterday, obviously. How much part did the financial shenanigans play in that? Or was it down to Dundee Utd hitting form?

A fine win for Rangers this afternoon. Favourites for the title?
28

Moira Gordon, Scotland on Sunday,

28/09/2008 17:57:35
On this occasion, I think the Hearts manager summed it up when he said the cash matters should not really influence 90 minutes. I think United are beginning to find the form everyone believed them capable of and on the day they produced the better deliveries, were more organised in defence and definitely more clinical.
It was a similar story this afternoon for Rangers, who took their chances, while Hibs, although slightly unlucky infront of goal a couple of times, did not produce their best.
As for the title....it's still far too early to say.
29

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 18:10:53
Moira

Do you consider Scotsman/SoS articles on Hearts are balanced in that they fairly reflect the positives & negatives associated with VR time in charge.

IMO they are generally unbalanced and are more intent on 'blackening' the name of VR.

Anticipate your answer but i can assure you that there are many HEARTS supporters ,like me, who will not buy your paper/advertise(via our businesses) with your publications.

Either way cannot be helping a newspaper with thir own financial difficulties.
30

Wee Pal Joe,

28/09/2008 18:12:04
Fair enough. So far, so good for the Gers. But a long way to go.

As for Hearts, no doubt they will continue to be in the spotlight (and not because anyone's persecuting them). Not too long till they have to go to Easter Road....
31

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 18:33:18
#34 wee joe....correct . 1st Derby 19th October.

Presume you mean HEARTS will continue to win more games/points than anyone outside the OF & be the best of the rest & remain in 3rd place.

No one persecuting HEARTS but anti VR agenda transparent.
eg SoS headline
UEFA WARNS HEARTS TO GET THEIR FINANCES IN ORDER
then u read the article & UEFA do no such thing.

HHGH
32

Moira Gordon, Scotland on Sunday,

28/09/2008 18:41:19
Talk o' the Toun I can assure you that no-one I know at Scotland on Sunday or Scotsman wants to see a club such as Hearts in trouble and yes, I'm sorry I do believe we fairly reflect the highs and lows.
I think the problem is that because we are an Edinburgh-based paper we tend to run more stories and cover the dealings at the Edinburgh clubs in greater depth than others and as you know events at Hearts over the past few years have evoked strong opinions and emotions in Hearts supporters, with some wanting to believe the worst and others unwilling to see any faults. However, we are not a fanzine and we try to simply report matters as they are, going on information we gather from sources within and associated with the club, regardless how unpalatable they may be at times.
Although we have taken criticism in the past, events have supported the stories we have run.
33

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 18:57:06
Moira: see post 35 & point out where within the article the 'alarmist' headline is indeed factually correct.

The agenda is anti VR not anti Hearts. Do not dispute that his actions have not been the catalyst but as you say you are an Edinburgh based paper & IMO should rise above his bating.

No problem with any of the issues covered.All newsworthy in my opinion but generally reported in a 'tabloid' as opposed to informative form.

##you are not personally culpable but your EDITOR leads from the front IMO .

FACTS that will not be HIGHLIGHTED. Despite last seasons low point after 7 games HEARTS are 3rd & have won more games thn any other team outwith the OF.

BTW long in the tooth poster who has read articles on HEARTS over the last 40 years and always felt any bias was in favour of HEARTS(& Hibs) until VR dished out the peanuts.Surely time to move on?
34

LionheartFodithman,

28/09/2008 18:58:14
"UEFA warns Hearts to get their finances in order"

I would be interested to read anything that supports this headline.
35

Moira Gordon, Scotland on Sunday,

28/09/2008 19:09:32
Talk o' The Toun, I think you underestimate how thick the skin of SOS and Scotsman journalists is if you think there is an agenda because he served up peanuts and bananas (I actually wish they would do it at every home game as I enjoyed them more than the pies and sandwiches).
As I didn't write the article you refer to I cannot comment. The above match report is the only piece I have written about Hearts so far this season and in it I did mention they are currently 'best of the rest' behind the Old Firm.
The fact is most sports journalists would prefer not to have to write about Romanov (or any other business matters at any club) and concentrate instead on the football but due to certain actions and problems that has, sadly, not been possible. I do think some fans are a tad paranoid and perhaps that is understandable as their club means so much to them but I can only reiterate my earlier point, there is no agenda that I am aware of or party to.
36

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 19:19:47
Moira
Realise a bit deeper than the peanuts.
Definitly no agenda that you are party to & accept not aware of but agenda there is and the article that you 'cannot comment on'(understandably) is todays perfect example of same.
Respect you for answering & my advice would be find a better paper to reflect your obvious abilities.

BTW: an article on the sucess of Hearts 7's/work in the community would add a bit balance to VR reign.

In the interim beauty is in the eye of the beholder and i will not spend a penny with Scotsman etc until i feel they are fairly reflecting the positives as well as the obvious negatives associated with VR.
37

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 19:37:53
thanks SERG

Would a Turkey vote for Christmas
38

Addie,

28/09/2008 20:14:56
#40 Do my eyes deceive me - you have told Moira to find another job???

She has had the decency to come on the forum and even if you dont agree with the reporting that is well out of order.
39

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 20:28:30
#43 i certainly did....a compliment to her ability & a reflection on her current employers.

What is your problem with that?

serg: do you agree?
40

Addie,

28/09/2008 20:34:52
#44 I just think it is rather rude to tell someone to find another job IMO unless you work in that particular profession. I dont think the Scotsman is that bad, otherwise I wouldnt be on here regularly.
41

Gorgie's Finest,

28/09/2008 21:20:43
#39 Moira,

Perhaps if the Scotsman Publications steered away from the type of reporting more associated with the gutter press towards Hearts and concentrated more on balanced reports, there would not be as many fans discrediting this Newspaper or sister publications.

You claim you are not aware of any "Agenda" yet on another forum a certain talk show host on a football phone in (Who does have access to the media and its reporters) has admitted that certain journalists "Do have an agenda" when reporting on Hearts.

This past week alone has seen the Scotsman Publications constantly regurgetating the same story over and over again, as if that wasn't bad enough some reporters haven't even got the same FACTS or figures correctly from their previos articles and have contradicted themselves. How can you expect Fans to take seriously a publication that cannot even keep its storyline the same? I could sit here all night and pick holes in reporters articles where they have contradicted themselves, even down to the extreme of the morning edition quoting one set of figures and the afternoon News reporting different.

There are publications out there which criticise Romanov and his running of the club, but also give a fair and balanced view, and also report the positives, or at least allow its readers to draw their own conclusions without trying to sway them one way or the other. Im sure I don't have to name them. Perhaps if the Scotsman was to report in this manner and behave like an Edinburgh paper for edinburgh Football then there would not be so many fans ready and willing to slate it at every oppertunity
42

Gorgie's Finest,

28/09/2008 21:29:47
#45

I think what TOTT was trying to say was Moira is better than the Scotsman. She is working for a publication that clearly many fans, not just those on here, see as one that has an obvious agenda Towards Hearts and VR. That there are far better publications out there, where journalism is above having its vendettas, where she wouldnt be tarred with the same brush as those who clearly have an agenda in this publication.

I didnt see it as a dig or a slant, more of a compliment that Moira Gordon is better than this publication.
43

Moira Gordon, Scotland on Sunday,

28/09/2008 22:08:07
Thanks everyone for your opinions.
Just one thing re post #40.
Talk o' The Toun, you suggest that "an article on the sucess of Hearts 7's/work in the community would add a bit balance to VR reign". It's not that the paper would not like to carry positive articles about Hearts or Hearts players/football in general but for that we need to be met halfway by the clubs.
Only last week I wanted to write a positive article about Laryea Kingston's involvement with a very worthwhile worldwide football charity initiative but was told that the ban on players talking to the media still applied. Without that interview the idea of a page lead article focusing on the positives fell through.
Maybe it's not just the media who need to move on.
I don't mean this response to be argumentative, mearly informative.
44

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 22:10:59
#45 Addie.... nothing rude about telling someone that you think they are better than the publication they work for.Nor do you need to work for a paper to be entitled to an opinion.
If you do not think the scotsman is that bad & think my advice is misplaced then that is fair enough.
45

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 22:42:17
MOIRA.....point taken . Refusing to cooperate with the press(in particular the East of scot) publications is crass stupidity.
I am not defending VR.
For a start he could learn from your goodelve that communication is a two way thing.

Your comments are appreciated.

BTW i thought the report on the game was fair and accurately reflected the game.
46

Gorgie's Finest,

28/09/2008 23:14:27
#50 TOTT

I agree with that, can see where Moira is coming from with regard to co-operation being a two way thing.

Perhaps it just needs someone to lay the olive branch.

That does not stop my opinions though on certain reporters withing these publications. I believe there may be some willing and happy to write balanced views whether they are critiscism or positive articles, it is just unfortunate these reporters are not being allowed to do so. Were not mugs we know there is a lot to critiscise at Hearts we do it ourselves, but as you point out there is also positives.

Reporting correct FACTS and figures would help a long way as well, and instead of sports journalists trying to get involved in financial reports they should concentrate more on the sport side and let the business reporters and analysts concentrate on what they know best, finances. Because at present we have a couple of sports Journalists trying to push figures out each day and they cannot even get those correct from one article they write to the next.
47

LionheartFodithman,

28/09/2008 23:28:30
#51 GF howdy dude.
Printing facts never sold newspapers or got the relevant amount of hits on these sites iam afraid.

I dont believe it would serve any point to allow players to do interviews either due to the obvious.
Whatever Hearts do is scandalised no ifs or butts or politically correct journo's will ever convince me of
anything else.

By stating that the club does not allow players or staff to talk to the press only compounds the argument about the sources of some of the stories that actually get printed.
48

Gorgie's Finest,

28/09/2008 23:32:47
#52 LF

Evening old chap, your correct in what your saying there, something i failed to pick up on to be honest, If players and staff are not allowed to speak to the Scotsman then how do they come by there information, and how can they supposedly quote FACTS if they are not being told any. It only adds more weight to the argument that certain Journos are making the FACTS up as they go along. Speculation can be ok if speculation is used in a balanced way and it is made clear that the article is speculative, and not put over as FACT
49

LionheartFodithman,

28/09/2008 23:40:21
#53 GF
Imagine if the players were allowed to do interviews and after last weeks fiasco with the wages etc.
The players quite rightly would have been told that they cannot comment on those issues.
The headline would have been......Hearts players gagged over nonpayment of wages bla bla bla.

I dont know about you mate but if it doesnt pop up on the official site then i dont believe anything published.

The paper has to do its job though mate and nowadays its not about giving out facts its about selling papers

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.