Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


At-risk children left in danger of abuse

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 June 2009
THE aunt of toddler Brandon Muir called last night for senior council officials and social workers to be sacked following the release of the most scathing report into child protection services ever published in Scotland.
The damning report from a government watchdog highlighted the failures of public agencies in Dundee to protect vulnerable children from "significant harm" in the homes of drug addicts and alcoholics.

Publication of the study was brought forward after the death of 23-month-old Brandon.

He was killed by his mother's drug addict boyfriend, Robert Cunningham, who was sentenced to ten years in prison.

Investigators from HM Inspectorate of Education (HMIe) said they had "no confidence" that young people at risk in Dundee were being fully protected.

They also condemned front-line services for their failure to help many youngsters until their plight had reached crisis point.

Scottish Labour leader Iain Gray called yesterday for a national inquiry into child protection services throughout Scotland, insisting that it was a national issue.

"There is a crisis at the heart of child protection services in parts of Scotland," he said. "This damning report in Dundee quickly follows similar reports in both Aberdeen and Moray.

"We were told after the death of Brandon Muir that changes would be made. I have no confidence that that is happening. This is not a localised issue, but a national one. Doing nothing cannot be an option."

Brandon's aunt, Dayna Garty, told The Scotsman she was "appalled" at the report's conclusions. "Nothing that they can say or do is ever going to bring Brandon back or stop the suffering that they have let these other kids go through. It is absolutely shocking what has happened.

"I am absolutely raging about the findings. They are absolutely appalling. I am just staggered about the failures and weaknesses they found."

Although the report does not set out to blame individuals, she demanded that Alan Baird, the city council's director of social work, who is also the new chairman of the city's child protection committee, should quit his post.

"If he had any decency, he would resign," she said. "Somebody should be held responsible, and he is the top man."

She went on: "It's not just Brandon they have let down.

"Obviously, Brandon died through it all, but other kids are still at risk and they are doing absolutely nothing until it's too late. Apologies are not worth the paper they are written on."

The report on Dundee follows strong criticism directed against child protection services in both Aberdeen and Moray in earlier inspections by HMIe.

In this case, inspectors examined the workings of the city council, police, NHS Tayside, the Scottish Children's Reporter administration and voluntary and independent groups in February and March of this year.

The Brandon Muir trial was taking place at that time, although the case was not considered by inspectors. It will be the subject of a second independent report this summer by Peter Wilson, a former chief constable of Fife.

The HMIe report found that Dundee was "weak" in eight of the 18 "quality indicators" examined. Services were rated "satisfactory" in six areas and "good" in three.

Child protection services were rated "unsatisfactory" – which meant there were major weaknesses – in one area: that of making sure that children were helped in immediate response to concerns.

The report stated: "Inspectors were not confident that all children who were at risk of harm, abuse or neglect, and in need of protection, were identified and received the help and support they needed."

The latest figures showed 99 youngsters were on the child protection register in Dundee. In 48 per cent of those cases, drug abuse was a problem in the family. Alcohol addiction was an issue in 33 per cent of cases.

In response to the report, Mr Baird said that four additional social workers, some of them agency staff, had already been employed.

He added that the council was also spending up to £500,000 to make improvements to the service.

The NHS, the city council and police also promised to make improvements.

Mr Baird said: "You can never guarantee 100 per cent safety of our most vulnerable children – no council or health authority or police authority can do that.

"We will work tirelessly to ensure the improvements identified by HMIe will be put in place at an early stage.

"Staff from all the agencies involved in child protection are dedicated individuals who work in an extremely challenging environment. The contribution made by these staff must be recognised."

Scotland's children's minister Adam Ingram said: "This report … plainly shows that child protection services in Dundee are simply not good enough and must be urgently improved.

"Clearly, everyone has a responsibility to keep our children and young people safe, including the public.

"However, what we and they expect is that local services are doing all they can to protect the most vulnerable.

"As a government, we have continued to set out that we will not protect local systems if they are failing our children, and where this is found to be the case, we will expect robust and rapid action."

But he warned: "It is now for those agencies to build on that progress.

"The Scottish Government and HMIe will be closely monitoring the implementation of that action plan to ensure that vulnerable children in Dundee are not let down by the shortcomings identified in today's report.

"For our part, we have made clear that we will not fail to act if child protection lessons nationally are to be learned from Brandon's death. However, it is right that we await the outcome of the independent reviews so that we have a full picture of any action that may be required."

The agencies involved in child protection have been told by HMIe to prepare an action plan outlining how they will address the problems in the service. They have been given four months to submit a report to inspectors detailing the progress they have made on the action plan.

AT A GLANCE

THE areas in which HMIE rule the quality indicators are weak:


• Children's needs being met

• Recognising and assessing risks and needs

• Effectiveness of planning to meet needs

• Policies and procedures

• Operational planning

• Vision, values and aims of individual and collective leadership

• Leadership and direction

• Leadership of change and improvement

The agencies criticised:

Dundee City Council

Tayside Police

NHS Tayside

Scottish Children's Reporter administration

District procurator-fiscal


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 June 2009 10:27 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 00:23:47

All far too late for little tot Brandon Muir, and yes heads should roll, unbelievable that this took place in this day and age, when agencies such as the social service's, have the duty to protect our children at risk.
You would of thought, that the ones involved in protecting poor wee Brandon, were highly qualified, in all aspects of childcare, it is not an easy department to get into, unless you are qualified on all aspects of child-welfare.
My thoughts are with the family, on their loss of their special little boy, Brandon.

2

,

24/06/2009 00:49:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

brianmca3,

auld reekie 24/06/2009 00:49:55
Our associate George is the only person who knows,who our very own deep throat is and that will remain the case.

The workplace must be as safe as possible for staff to carry out their duties,and those that seek to abuse that must be removed from the workplace and at the very least never again be allowed to have authority over others
4

Fifi la Bonbon,

24/06/2009 00:52:11
"Scottish Labour leader Iain Gray called yesterday for a national inquiry into child protection services throughout Scotland, insisting that it was a national issue."


Iain has fallen victim to Nicola's Disease. Nicola Sturgeon, while in opposition, used to have an annoying habit of demanding a public inquiry over anything and everything. Headline grabbing, but pointless.

Iain should remember that he is a senior member of a conntinuous public inquiry, the Scottish Parliament. If he thinks a probe is needed, give the job to a committee of the parliament. They can compel witnesses and they already have a bank of experts to advise them.

But he should have a think first. Every time - EVERY time - a child known to social workers is cruelly murdered there is a plethora of inquiries and reports. He should take some time to read them. They all say more or less the same thing. Politicians posturing won't change the conclusion.

As the director of social work in Dundee said, you can never guarantee 100 per cent safety of our most vulnerable children – no council or health authority or police authority can do that. If Iain wants to really help, he and other MSPs should spend a month working in a child protection service during the summer recess and learn what really happens.


5

Fifi la Bonbon,

24/06/2009 00:58:07
I had to smile when I saw the post complaining about social workers being bullied. I imagine what happened was that staff who should have been out and about and doing their jobs were caught p1ssing about on the internet looking at complaint websites and got told to do their jobs for a change. Whether it's librarians arranging huge flegs around their desks, or polis playing the bagpipes when they ought to be out scaring criminals, our public service workers are another breed.
6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 01:20:26

Talking of “Bulling”, on the other foot, and again one of utter disgrace, were the social workers, ordered to take children into care, when there was no founded reason to do-so, this was to keep figures, to get department bonus finding.

(if I can find the news link, I will put the link in my next post)

7

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 01:21:50


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-511609/How-social-services-paid-bonuses-snatch-babies-adoption.html

8

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 01:23:07

Seems like Social Workers cant Win, sack their bosses!

9

The real dracula,

24/06/2009 02:03:48
Where was the aunt in all this ?

Did she try to get involved ? Did she voice her concerns??

If not why not , very easy to blame the state , extended familes have a duty too
10

W Smith,

Middle East 24/06/2009 03:25:56
It was Alex Salmond who supported the Social Work Department in this fiasco.

He likes backing incompetence.

From MacAskill to this lot.

Now we have the SNP supporters trying to blame the wee boy's aunty.

Disgrace.
11

brianmca3,

auld reekie 24/06/2009 07:44:21
#5 the bullying was so bad one of the victims mental health,caused geat alarm
all swept under the carpet,the sunday mail exposed muirhouse social work bullying this year if i remember
this was no telling off for surfing internet as you put it,this was a manager trying to act like a little hitler
http://www.sundaymail.co.uk/news/scottish-news/2009/01/18/social-worker-exposes-scotland-s-broken-community-service-system-78057-21049886/
bullying in the work place is not on and these cowards should be named and shamed
12

Charles Dexter Ward,

Stadium Bar Loyal 24/06/2009 08:09:28
#10

A damning report is published highlighting failings that lead to an avoidable and tragic death and all you can do is try to score cheap points.

You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself. And I am not an SNP supporter before you start.
13

mangerton,

Dundee 24/06/2009 08:36:53
#9 Where was the aunt in all this ?

Quite. And the father? And the grandparents? And other family members?
14

JayJay,

Right here 24/06/2009 09:00:13
Serious drug misuse and a normal family life are completely incompatible. You could write the script for these cases - chaotic home environment, a succession of boyfriends, drug addled lifestyle leading to child abuse or worse.

I don't envy social workers having to peer into a world most of us could scarcely imagine, populated by creatures such as Cunningham. That's not to excuse the many failings in this case, including those of the immediate family, who must have been more aware of the circumstances of this boy's awful life. But how on earth do you recruit people in social work who have the necessary nous to think like a drug abuser?

At the core of it all though is drugs, and I am afraid that I can see little to recommend leaving children with a parent who has serious drug issues. And rather than the usual pointless reviews and navel gazing that does nothing to save the next Brandon, the state needs to think very clearly about how much it is willing to commit to drug rehabilitation, what it is going to do to properly tackle the muppets who peddle this filth and how to finance the armies of foster parents who will be required if children are removed from the care of addicts.

And since all of these questions require more than the usual knee jerk enquiry and token sacking, I suspect nothing tangible will happen and we can all wait for the next horrific case to come along.
15

lilly3,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 09:19:54
Why did Brandon Muirs family not step in, and look after the little mite, why do people think that social workers etc are to blame for everything in society. The family of Brandon Muir should have done something about the situation before it got out of hand. If something like this was happening with my son, my nephew, my grandson etc, I would put a stop to it. Why wait for outsiders to do it.
16

Aggrieved Taxpayer 2,

24/06/2009 09:37:05
JayJay: Don't think that anyone could put it better. Well said.

17

Thistledhu,

24/06/2009 10:06:22
All this sadly does not surprise me. There is a inhouse disdain in the social work departments of all outside departments and agency's involvement in childcare/safety

A scotland wide root and branch reveiw and reform is required and quickly.
18

TSJ,

Dunfermline 24/06/2009 10:07:57
Speaking through personal experience. My children were placed on the At Risk Register through an assault on my son by my estranged wife; their mother (herself a social worker). Social workers appeared only to be interested in what lies their mother had to say and treated me with no respect whatsoever, paying lip-service to what I had to offer up. Again, the man is always perceived as the guilty one even though this was not the case. If they had listened to other parties the above may not have happened, sadly it was not the case. It is not as simple to say "where were others?" when attempts have been made by them but then just dismissed. I was only informed of the above the next day after she was released on bail and the children put back in her care. She admitted to one of the charges but it was dropped by the Fiscal as they would only have the evidence of the children to go on. What chance do they have if she loses it again? I have a court order in place for contact with my children which takes place, why could Fife Social Work not have informed me immediately and then they could have received the love and support they deserve and she might have had the chance to get the help she obviously needs. Social Work need to get look at all angles from an non-biased view (which in my opinion is not the case) and then make an informed decision on facts.
19

famie,

australian 24/06/2009 10:29:53
In a hierarchy every employee rises to his or heer level of incompetence.
20

chump,

24/06/2009 11:28:36
#18

Your experience sounds pretty sad, but in fairness, when there is an allegation of assault, especially from one of the parents, then it will usually end up in a Joint interview with Police and SW, and depending on that, a further case conference with regard to registering the children. It's not a case of one parent giving them love etc. If there are any risks, then the chances are if it has gone to case conference, then they will be on the at risk.

It makes me laugh that there are people on here postulating about how poor the SW are. Does anyone realise the actual numbers of children/families in Scotland that have input from the core agencies? It will run into the tens of thousands, if not more. And these are only the ones that are on the radar. There are thousands of others, who are anti establishment, have a chip on both shoulders, and until they have a screaming domestic, or batter their kids, the children fly under the radar. Families of addicts, be it drink or drugs have a moral obligation to get involved, as do neighbours.

I have read posts on this website recently tearing strips off labour, and wanting anyone but them in power. Almost every other major party are dying to cut public services, including the SW. Tell me, if we can't cope now, how will we when there are less people employed to at least try and change things.
21

Allan(handofgod137),

24/06/2009 11:52:10
And this sort of "tragedy" will continue for as long as the social security system encourages morons to breed. Time to tell the dole monkeys that their unwillingnes or inability to support themselves means that they will not be reproducing if they wish to remain on the dole, and if they ignore this, then stop their money, and all acess to NHS care.
Problem solved.
22

JAL,

Green Bay 24/06/2009 14:38:46
Pleased to see that many posters got to the heart of this. Politician's posture while social workers are on a hiding to nothing. The next headline to come along will be an outrage about children, "needlessly" being take away from their parents and into care. There's no real rights or wrongs in these sad cases. It's all a risk either way. I just hope that if there's a shift towards the safer option of more witholding that the same politicians remember their own words when faced with the liberal outcry.
23

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 24/06/2009 15:03:47
At the heart of the problem is the encouragement of feckless "parents" who use their children as convenient sources of money through benefits and the tolerance of drug and booze-fuelled lifestyles. I agree with other posters as regards what were the rest of the family including the aunt doing about it apart from blaming the authorities? They must have know what was going on and failed to do anything about it themselves. It's no use completely blaming social work departments who are overstretched enough as it is with this kind of feral activity and may in fact be encouraging it to an extent by being a safety net if and when the numpties screw up.
24

Stewart_in_Oz,

Alexandra Hills 24/06/2009 15:10:51
#19
It is called 'The Peter Principle'

#14
What a sad story.

Why blame drugs? The same sort of thing used to happen long before the Drug Culture became rampant in the UK. Have you not heard of 'Mother's Ruin'?

The problem is not so much the cause as the people.
As pointed out above, Drug Addiction and Family Life are incompatable so, far be it from 'Eugenics', some people are not fit to have children.

However, I read once on the subject of 'Possible Prevenative Abortion' of the child who would be born to very unsuitable parents and would abortion be recommended. It listed the conditions surrounding the pregnancy of one case and asked if the child should be aborted. The boy was born 'Ludvig van Beethoven'. While I realise that there are readers out there who think it might not have been a loss, the majority of us would realise what a tragedy that would have been.

The end result in all cases is that the children suffer, then grow up to raise another generation of unsuitable parents who try to escape the realities of life in unfettered sex and drug addiction, who grow up etc. . . . .
25

Glenesk ,

Little Rock USA (formerly, Montrose Scotland) 24/06/2009 16:28:51
I know this is a change of subject, but I can't believe that foul creature - Cunningham - received a sentence of only TEN years! For murder!! Am I missing something??
26

mangerton,

Dundee 24/06/2009 16:46:31
#26 Yes, you are. Cunningham was charged with murder, but was found guilty of the lesser crime of culpable homicide. For reasons not entirely clear, charges against the mother were dropped.
27

Barbarac,

Idaho USA 24/06/2009 22:13:26
Unless the mother lost custody of her child the extended family has no legal opportunity to take custody of the child.
If anyone took the child without the mother's consent they could be charged with kidnapping.
The extended has very little legal grounds for interfering. Sadly social services most often ignores the family.
I have noticed the child who is not likely in danger social services removes them from the family. When a child is in danger they look the other way.
28

missing home,

la verne 24/06/2009 23:03:01
I agree with the commentors calling for the responsibility of the family. The aunt is enraged at the system, shouldn't she be enraged at her sister and her sister's obviously poor choices? You can't randomly go having children and the expect the state to take care of them, that's on you and finger pointing after the fact doesn't make that little child have had a happy life. Jeez, you should have to pass a test and get a license to have children...
29

Pocket Dictionary,

25/06/2009 09:05:22
My local paper a Johnston Press title is carrying an ad today, ironically on page 3, for what can only be described as shop selling "adult themes" and "marital aids".

Two female models are featured. One who does look over 18, leaves you without any doubt as being dressed as schoolgirl. Complete with tartan mini-skirt, blouse and pigtails.

I know ad money is tight in the current climate but whoever allowed this made a serious error of judgement. They could have at least removed the "schoolgirl" image.
30

Allan(handofgod137),

28/06/2009 19:05:28
#27, could be because people I know from Douglas have said that she was well known for battering her bairn, and putting all the blame on a guy who was in her life for less than a month lets it be blamed on a tragic set of circumstances which occurred very quickly, rather than sustained abuse, which would have led to the head of social work being sacked. Or perhaps not, you decide.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.