Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Drug use warning adds fuel to row over new Salvation Army centre



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 March 2008
A SALVATION Army centre for the homeless has warned people using the service to stay clear of drugs.
A notice has been posted in the window of the Bread Street centre saying people had been caught "burning up" – slang for preparing heroin to inject – and using drugs in nearby stairwells.

The warning has escalated a row over plans for a new Salvat
ion Army homeless centre in Newington.

The notice goes on to say: "Police have advised that if users are caught, the offenders will be charged with drug offences and breach of the peace.

"Actions like this compromise our service and damage our relationships with the community around Bread Street. We can also be closed down by the police. Your actions would then deprive other service users of this service."

The charity will soon be moving out of Bread Street after its current landlords decided not to renew the present lease.

Residents and businesses in Newington are protesting against the proposed drop-in centre at 25-29 Clerk Street on the grounds that it would make the area a focus for "undesirables".

They say the site would be unsuitable for people with addiction problems as it is near an off-licence and a casino.

Residents fear the drop-in will attract antisocial elements into the area, and held up the warning notice from the Bread Street hostel at a recent public meeting as evidence of their fears.

Last month the charity insisted the centre in Bread Street was "dry" and that it did not accept people under the influence of drink or drugs.

Newington resident Don Jardine said: "This notice proves that the drop-in will attract undesirables into the area, but when we challenged them about this our questions were met with a stony silence.

"Every question was met by the same spiel about how valuable the service will be, but no-one is saying they don't provide a valuable service. We're questioning the logic of siting it so close to an off-licence and a casino."

Casino owners Bluelock also fear a repeat of the problems they faced with homeless people that forced them to move to Clerk Street from their previous premises near Hunter Square.

A Salvation Army spokeswoman said: "The notice that was placed in Bread Street demonstrates that we do take action whenever our service users are caught engaging in this type of behaviour in and around our premises."

A police spokesman said: "We are aware of issues in the Bread Street area and our central policing team has taken action to resolve the situation. We were assisted by our partners in the council, who helped by boarding up buildings being used for unlawful activity."

Major Robert McIntyre, the Salvation Army's East Scotland divisional commander, said that the Bread Street facility was sited next to several bars and strip clubs without any detriment to the service it provided.

Mr Jardine added: "If you're addicted to drugs and don't have much money, the last thing you're going to do is go for a pint and a lap dance. But you are more likely to try your last few pennies in a slot machine before buying a cheap bottle of booze."





The full article contains 546 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 March 2008 11:05 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Drugs policy
 
1

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 24/03/2008 12:37:45
When will drugs be sold through self financing NHS clinics thereby ending all this nonsense, crime, prostitution and public nuisance?
2

R-M-L,

24/03/2008 13:15:05
Last month the charity insisted the centre in Bread Street was "dry" and that it did not accept people under the influence of drink or drugs.

The charity are bare faced liars if they really said the above.
3

Larry Hallatt,

Chesley Canada 25/03/2008 07:54:05
Good to see the salvation army is setting tough love rules for the centre.

The biggest problem facing our society is not the alcoholics or drug users but the fools who will not protect these people from themselves and have them placed under Public Medical trusteeship.

We place minors under Public trusteeship and the elderly who are incapable of taking care of themselves yet too often pretend we must not tread on one's civil liberties when and adults brain is incapacitated.

Addicts must be apprehended and sent to a medical detox reserve for at least a year to 18 months to dry out and learn social coping and employment skills.

Allowing the mentally ill or addicts to roam freely in our streets is inhumane. We do not even allow the same for stray dogs or cats.


4

Gorgie_Tony,

Edinburgh 25/03/2008 17:39:27
The Salvation Army cannot be trusted. During the homophobic campaign to retain Section 28 - they supported retaining the homophobic legislation. Well they can shake their tambourine at me - but no way I will be giving these homophobes a penny.
5

,

29/03/2008 16:43:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

famie,

australia 07/04/2008 10:51:36
A bit of hypocrysy the casino complaining when their recreation probably causes as much homelessness as the other addictions.
7

Don Jardine,

Newington 07/04/2008 16:05:23
Hi, I am Mr Jardine and I certainly do not own the casino. In fact I have no links to any business on or around Clerk Street. The owners are in fact Bluelock Ltd, 114 Gorgie road Edinburgh EH11 2NR. The area manager is Jaclyn Ellen McMillan.

Why the fuss about a notice? Well when I asked them if they were any problems at the drop in they said no they weren’t. I then had to produce a photo of their own notice that said that users of this service were breaking into stairs in the surrounding area and taking drugs.

We have very real concerns are based around issues of security, quality of life and a sense of community. We have lived here for 20 years, as has our neighbour. There are many people who have lived and raised families in the area for many years.

At a local community meeting the Salvation Army stated that currently up to 600 people use the service each week at a much smaller premises. Is it a presumption to think that more people would be using the much bigger premises here on Clerk Street?

Mr Henderson’s (Head of planning) statements was about the drop in centre ‘revitalising the area’. (Perhaps a presumption on his behalf?) I would like him to explain how this might happen. I can’t see how the area in Bread Street has been revitalised after the Drop In Centre’s 13 year presence in Tollcross.

Already one business has decided not to renew their lease on the basis of this possible decision to go ahead. They know 2 others who will probably be doing the same when their leases run out. So, we gain one drop-in centre and loose 3 others straight away. Revitalising?

I think, on the contrary, its very presence on the street makes the surrounding businesses less desirable to visit and any vacant sites even less likely to be replaced. I wonder how much longer the Odeon Cinema site will take to be developed if this goes ahead? Surely an important consideration too. (This site was refused planning for student accommodation on the grounds that the are
8

Don Jardine,

Newington Part Two 07/04/2008 16:07:45
area already has a high density of accommodation! Many people in the area supported this as the student population helps support business in the area and are welcomed here).

The main concern for us is not about the service the Salvation Army provides which, of course, is a very necessary one, but about what happens before and after the service is used. How is the behaviour of service users going to be policed?

- Access to the building: the pavement at this site is very narrow. It can be extremely
intimidating negotiating the pavement if people are being difficult.
- Restricted space to deal with dispersal issues.
- Loitering
- Access to tenement stairs to drink, use drugs, urinate
- Not knowing if, when you enter your stair, there may be people hanging around

Please could you convey all our very serious concerns to the Planning Committee meeting on Wednesday 9th April

Contact
steve.burgess@edinburgh.gov.uk
or
Cameron.rose@edinburgh.gov.uk
Thank you. Don Jardine

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.