Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Drink and drug services shake-up aims to tackle Scots addiction crisis

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 April 2009
MINISTERS will announce radical changes to streamline the way anti-drink and drug services are delivered in Scotland later today in an attempt to improve the country's appalling record on addiction.
The current 22 Alcohol and Drug Action Teams will be scrapped and replaced with a new structure, designed to fit in with the aims of the Scottish Government and the operations of health boards and local authorities.

A total of 32 new "partnerships
" will be set up, one for each local authority area. Each one will have to follow the overall strategy set out by the government and liaise closely with councils and health boards.

The changes will be unveiled at a "drugs summit" in Edinburgh today, hosted by the Community Safety Minister Fergus Ewing.

Annabel Goldie, the Scottish Conservative Leader, claimed credit for bringing the summit about, arguing that it was only because of Tory pressure in the run-up to last year's budget vote that secured the Scottish Government's agreement for a new approach to drug policy.

But she insisted that the summit had to mark a watershed in Scotland's dangerous relationship with drink and drugs.

She said: "The fact that this summit is happening at all is directly due to the Scottish Conservatives."

And she added: "This week must mark a turning point in Scotland's fightback against addiction. The well intentioned rhetoric of the last year must be turned into reality."

Politicians on all sides of the chamber agree that Scotland's record on drink and drugs is woeful, with an estimated 60,000 children living with drug-addicted parents and 65,000 living with alcohol-addicted parents.

A total of 500 children were being treated themselves for alcohol or drug addiction last year, statistics Miss Goldie described as "unbelievably sickening".

It was in this context that the Scottish Government devised a new drugs' strategy, at the heart of which was a shake-up for the way drug services are delivered locally.

A government report supported the principle of local drug and drink action teams but criticised the existing Alcohol and Drug Action Teams for not working closely enough with councils and health boards.

Mr Ewing will sign up to the new structure on behalf of the Scottish Government today. Shona Robison, the health minister, will sign on behalf of the Scottish Health Service and Councillor Ronnie McColl, the Cosla health spokesman, will sign for Scotland's local authorities.

A senior Scottish Government source insisted that there was no question of funding being cut for the new bodies and he stressed that funding for drug treatment was going up, by 13 per cent over three years.



TOWARDS PARTNERSHIP

THERE are currently 22 Alcohol and Drug Action Teams in Scotland.

They are to be replaced with 32 new "partnership" bodies, liaising more closely with local authorities and health boards and following the Scottish Government's anti-addiction strategy.

The path to this change started in 2007 with a review of the ADATs. It called for "greater clarity and consistency" in their role.

Then, in March this year, a report by an expert review group recommended that local anti-addiction bodies be linked in to councils, health boards and the Scottish Government. Today's conference marks the culmination of that process.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Riverkidca,

Swan River 20/04/2009 05:35:02
From 22 quangos to 32...way to spend your way out of a recession. I presume 2/3 of these will be redundant pub employees?
2

,

20/04/2009 06:54:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 20/04/2009 09:00:35
"A total of 32 new "partnerships" will be set up, one for each local authority area. Each one will have to follow the overall strategy set out by the government and liaise closely with councils..."

Deja Vue here???

Wasn't this precisely the strategy used with speed cameras in 1997?

Clearly there are laws to be twisted round, propaganda to be spread and ultimately (no doubt) money to be made from people's supposed addiction to alcohol and drugs.

The vast majority do not have a problem with alcohol and drugs. It's about time all this knee jerking and waste of money stopped.
4

Dungbeetle,

Stravaig 20/04/2009 09:20:01
And will there be any more money to provide professional services on the ground ?!

#3 As with almost all disease treatment, money spent early on saves a lot more than would be spent later.
5

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 20/04/2009 10:00:11
#4:

"As with almost all disease treatment, money spent early on saves a lot more than would be spent later."

Agreed, but you are missing the point I make. Speed cameras were (and still are) used to address a perceived problem that was created specifically to justify their use.

The same applies here. Yes, there are a few people who have drug and alcohol problems but they are a tiny minority and facilities already exist to deal with them. It wouldn't surprise me if these "partnerships" were tasked with bringing more people under the umbrella of "alcohol abuse" in order that ever more stringent laws, together with money-making penalties could be justified against people who do not have a problem.

I would love to be proven wrong but somehow I don't think I will be. Before speed cameras, most crashes were due to lack of skill or concentration. After speed cameras, they still are---only we are told that it is excessive speed that is the cause so that they can justify ripping us off.

Unfortunately, I can see that in a few years time, the anti-drink propaganda will be reaching into everyone's lives. The setting up of "partnerships" is just the start of this.
6

Mr Martin Holmes,

20/04/2009 12:51:09
I have an idea. Instead of setting up all these expensive centres and giving these people disability living allowance, lets just not give them MY TAX money to buy drugs and booze. I am sick to death of soppy do-gooder ideals that have led the country to be plagued by these parasitic leeches. No one made them take drugs, and the success rate of rehabilitation is so miniscule that it shows all these schemes to be a waste of time and a great deal of the tax payers money!
Just introduce the death penalty for these people, it would be quicker, far cheaper,take the load of the NHS , lower the crime rate and improve the areas for decent people to live in! Anyone like myself who is being forced to sell thier home because the caring government thinks its a wonderful idea to give these creatures hundreds of pounds of my hard earned tax money so they can rent houses in nice areas will agree with me.
Those do-gooder idiots who live in the most exclusive areas where they are not subjected to the sight, noise and general disregard for the rights of others by the woeful epidemic of filth they have created will obviously disagree.
7

The Sprucer,

21/04/2009 13:58:09
I have an even better idea. How about curing the illness instead of the symptoms.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should needles continue to be handed out to drug addicts?
Yes, it’s better than re-using old needles
Yes, but only if used needles are returned
No, this just keeps addicts hooked on drugs

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.