Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 5th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Councillor in Trump row: I'm victim of a totalitarian purge



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 February 2008
THE growing feud between a controversial councillor blamed for scuppering Donald Trump's £1 billion golf resort and the leader of Aberdeenshire Council deepened yesterday.
Councillor Martin Ford claimed he was being treated like the "victim of a political purge in a totalitarian regime".

Mr Ford was removed from his post as chairman of Aberdeenshire Council's main planning committee after he used his casting vote t
o reject the massive Trump development.

Last month, he accused leaders of the authority's ruling Liberal Democrat group of a "shabby backstreet assassination" after he was stripped of the joint chairmanship of the North-east's main strategic planning organisation.

However, in a further development, he has been removed from his positions on the North-east council's transport authority and two council working groups.

Mr Ford has now sent an e-mail to all 24 fellow members of the council's Lib Dem group, in which he accuses Anne Robertson, the group leader, of bringing the party into disrepute due to the way he has been treated. And he declares: "I have no trust or confidence left in the leadership of the Aberdeenshire Council Lib Dem group."

Last night, Mr Ford said: "I am not in dispute with my party or the Lib Dem group. I do have an issue, however, with the behaviour of the leadership of the Lib Dem group and, specifically, that relates to the way I have been removed from these various positions and how I have found out about it.

"The council would be taken to the cleaners if they treated an employee in this way."

Mr Ford added: "I find it deeply disturbing that these things are going on in the group in which I am a member. They are basic issues of dignity of the individual, courtesy and respect.

"The experience I am going through I find truly surreal. The nearest analogy I can find is that it is like being the victim of a political purge in a totalitarian regime, where one is declared officially a non-person and the 'disappeared'."

The Scotsman revealed last month that Mr Ford had been axed from his post as one of the two joint chairmen of the Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire joint strategic planning committee and replaced by fellow Lib Dem Peter Argyle, who succeeded him as chairman of the council's infrastructure services committee (ISC).

Mr Ford has been removed from his council place on Nestrans, the transport partnership for Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire, as well as the council's fisheries and waste-management working groups.

In the e-mail, Mr Ford claims he was kept in the dark about his removal from the three posts and that a letter was sent to Nestrans officials, informing them of his replacement on the board, four days before a meeting at which Ms Robertson allegedly gave assurances about how proposals to replace him would be handled in future.

Mr Ford's e-mail states: "With great regret, I have to say to you frankly that I have no trust or confidence left in the leadership of the Aberdeenshire Council Liberal Democrat group.

"The actions of Ms Robertson are, I believe, bringing our party into disrepute."

Last night, Ms Robertson rejected Mr Ford's claims, adding: "There has been nothing underhand. Nothing has gone on behind (Mr Ford's] back, that he's not aware of."





The full article contains 564 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 February 2008 9:41 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Donald Trump
 
1

Resolutions,

20/02/2008 00:25:24
I am not surprised at Mr Ford's unhappiness. Despite his 'problems' it has been well documented that he has been finding out about things, in what I would say is in a most underhand manner, which is NOT the way any operation should work.
The Lib Dems in the Council are not enhancing their party - mind you they were not helped by N. Stephen's shennanigans. But if they want to hang themselves......

2

Roberta Burns,

20/02/2008 00:26:22
Put it in SNP hands next time, Mr Ford. Problem solved.
3

ed.,

in edin 20/02/2008 00:43:20
<< Put it in SNP hands next time, Mr Ford. Problem solved. >>

And whose problem would that be?
4

jerrymanders,

Don't drive a Ford in Aberdeen. 20/02/2008 00:58:16
I see that Scape Goat is the flavour of the month up in Doric Land.
5

Legacy,

N.E. 20/02/2008 01:28:06
Only one man to blame and that was Himself, he really thought he would get away with it, he did what nobody with half a brain would have done, and now he wonders why he's persona non grata.
6

,

20/02/2008 01:34:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 20/02/2008 02:04:03
It's hard to tell who's to blame here, as there's insufficient detail in the article to make a reasoned judgement.

One thing's for sure though: The Lib Dem group on Aberdeenshire Council should hang their heads in shame over the shenanigans of the last 4 months. That includes Councillor Ford, who I must say, is not afraid to court publicity, whether he's on the receiving end or indeed dishing it out. (Nicol Stephen has been no Snow White either.)
8

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA........captured from Mexico 1845 20/02/2008 03:06:03
Councillor in Trump row: I'm victim of a totalitarian purge
--------------------------------------
This story reeks of backstabbing and anger against one man who voted his conscience that stopped Trump getting his way.
Trump would have ripped-off the Scots with a worthless over priced Golf Complex.

Trump is already into Puerto Rico trying on his con there.
GC

9

William of Liberton,

EDINBURGH 20/02/2008 03:17:31
Last night, Mr Robertson rejected Mr Ford's claims, adding: "There has been nothing underhand. Nothing has gone on behind (Mr Ford's] back, that he's not aware of."

An interesting remark, which admits everything: Mr Ford's well-founded complaint IS that everything has gone on behind his back. The fact that he is aware of such conduct by his political enemies in no way justifies it.

10

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 20/02/2008 05:31:56
The problems route cause was the LibDem council decision to put Martin Ford in charge of planning. Did they not realize this Holy Eco Warrior would not let something like common sense stand in the way of his personal agenda? I guess when your party is a collection of social misfits it makes it difficulty to seperate out the proactive numpty's from the passive numpty's. Faced with the wrath of the electorate they have all decided to tell him "On Your Bike Martin".
11

Happyhibee1956,

20/02/2008 05:37:15
As far as I'm concerned the S.O.B. ( Ford ) deserves everything comming to him.

A kingsize prat who believed his own publicity.

And has ruined an oppertunity for investment in the southeast of Scotland in PEOPLE and JOBS.

12

Cappo Del Monte,

20/02/2008 06:12:08
Why oh why dont people understand, there were 7 others who voted against this rug wearing clown's idea's, Mr Ford only made it 8 , sadly his was a casting vote, I see the others dont get this level of abuse.
#11, I see you have not an idea of the real story, away back to your wee football world where your usual drivel can be expelled.
13

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 20/02/2008 07:06:13
Ford deserves our support. He stood against a confidence trick (a housing scheme disguised as a golf course). His fellow councillors should be ashamed of their perfidy.
14

paulr,

edinburgh 20/02/2008 08:28:04
Wannabe politicians, therefore lies, backstabbing and dishonesty is normal practise.
15

William of Liberton,

EDINBURGH 20/02/2008 08:44:10
I wonder how many among the above posters and elsewhere who are hostile to Mr Ford are small time builders, builders' merchants, plumbers, etc who stand to gain in the very short term during the construction works. Thereafter the proceeds from selling the houses, letting them, maintaining them and keeping them secure (it is to be a gated estate) will go abroad to enhance Trump's profits. The sons and daughters of said hostile parties will find employment on the estate, as security guards, slaveys, and skivies of various sorts, "tartan coolies" one and all. Not much benefit for Scotland there. I hope Mr Swinney realises this in good time to refuse the planning application.

There is one other hope, however: with a world recession in sight there may be few takers for Trump's expensive offerings, and do not forget, Trump's business went down the drain once before. There is every possibility in the current economic climate of a repeat performance.
16

mr angry,

ayrshire 20/02/2008 08:55:58
Not a chance in todays climate that Swinney can turn down this application. They have to take the chance that it will be successful, worst case scenario is that there will be some nice houses and a new golf course.
17

shivago8,

livingston 20/02/2008 09:29:17
Donald,if I was you,I would leave this country.
We obviously have a crowd of people who want Scotland to stay in thr dark days.
This country has stood still for 300 years,shackled to the union.
Please get someone to get us out of the cloud that we live under.
Isee hovercraft a wonderful tool to ease our chronic traffic problem has been put on on hold because of the jambo mans [Foulks] jealosy.
Did I spell his name right.
Come on Scotland,forget the doom merchants and march us into the new century.
18

Duncan in Edinburgh,

20/02/2008 09:47:22
#17 Congratulations, you are today's winner in the "how many things can I completely misunderstand and misrepresent" competition! Please collect your prize from reception.

The hovercraft has been put on hold because of Foulkes' jealousy? How ON EARTH could you reach that conclusion from reading the facts?

And Ford was absolutely right. #13 has it precisely. He should be lauded as a level-headed hero.
19

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 20/02/2008 10:08:40
"The experience I am going through I find truly surreal."
As we found hid decision to use a casting vote to reverse the decision of the local authority planners. He should have referred the case back to the whole council for advice at the very least.
20

n/,

Perth 20/02/2008 10:09:58
#16
If you believe the promoters of climate change and global warming,"the worst case scenario is that there will be some nice houses and a new golf course", under feet of water.
21

It's me!,

20/02/2008 10:30:06
So he didn't sell part of Scotland for Trump's pieces of silver. It's a pity other politicians don't see the whole picture. Scotland doesn't need another golf course but there are plenty people in the north east who were rubbing their grubby hands believing they were onto a get rich quick bonanza. As things stand they will have to stay poor. Awww!
22

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 20/02/2008 11:57:49
22

I take it you've finished your rant, accompanied by unsubstantiated drivel.

Your grasp of the local economy of NORTH east Scotland is a joke.

Furthermore, Cllr Ford brought much of this on himself with his radical views and his piggy-backing of a mainstream party instead of the Greens. More power-hungry than self righteous. His constant courting of the media proves this point. Can he really compare himself to someone like Solzhenitsyn? I hardly think so.

He knows he should have used his casting vote to defer for further negotiation. Instead he chose to oppose in line with his own radical views, and oppose massive public and private support at the same time. Councillors must remember that they are public servants paid for and elected by the local people.
23

Arthur X,

20/02/2008 12:20:26
It does mystify me why he stays with the Liberals when they keep humiliating him. The Greens would have him in a flash, they actually agree with him, and he's got enough support to keep his seat next time through that.

I can only assume he's got Stockholm Syndrome.
24

David Harrington,

Edinburgh 20/02/2008 12:27:19
It is about time that somebody told Donald Trump that the planning process is the same, no matter how much money you (claim to) have, and that this development breaks numerous national and local guidelines. If the decision is overturned by the SNP government, it is them that are the laughing stock, not Martin Ford who followed the process rigorously and has indeed been treated as a scapegoat for doing as such.
25

Sanny,

20/02/2008 12:49:05
What was the downside to Trumps proposal? As others have said; if the project went belly-up then we would have been left with some nice houses, fine golf course and of course a lot of Donald Trump's money. Let's face it Mr. Trump cant take the land back to the US with him - now can he.

As for the green wellie Luddite's; golf courses provide a real haven for all forms of wildlife. You will find more of the local flora and fauna on a golf course than anywhere a near a farm.

This was a win-win project for Scotland in general and Aberdeenshire in particular. All of the idiots on Martin Ford's Committee who voted against, should be permanently removed from any position of responsibility or authority, on the grounds that they acted against the interest of the people they were elected to represent and instead pushed their own personal agenda.
26

CRAGman,

Edinburgh 20/02/2008 13:03:10
Cllr. Ford has acted with integrity throughout. I could understand his removal as joint chairman of the main north-east planning body once he had been removed from the chairmanship of the planning committee but NESTRANS will have a good number of members from Aberdeenshire Council - so this latest move seems petty and vindictive.

Of course, the Trump organisation should have appealed the refusal - on Cllr. Martin's casting vote - of their planning permission just like anyone else would have the right to do. Why didn't they? Why did they then in effect take it straight to the Scottish Government for them to call-in? That's what's really bizarre and this question really needs an answer.
27

GP,

20/02/2008 13:33:58
Post 10# sums it all up!
28

Duncan the first.,

20/02/2008 13:43:22
Perhaps I am missing something but doesn't the chairman of a committee have to vote to preserve the status quo? If so then Councillor Ford should perhaps be given the benefit of the doubt in spite of his green tendency. However, the report would appear to suggest that something is rotten in the Aberdeenshire Lib Dems. Either Anne Robertson is attempting to appease an angry populace or else she has some ulterior motive. As has been pointed out previously the Lib Dems are a party not to be trusted and this is highlighted when they can’t trust one another.
29

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 20/02/2008 13:45:19
Ford seems a bit full of himself but he has acted correctly and honestly. He has never disguised his views: those who put him in those various positions were well aware of his stance.
30

The Strategist,

20/02/2008 15:15:41
Ford thought he could get away with imposing his own personal agenda on the rest of the council. He didn't. End of story
31

,

20/02/2008 15:31:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

sceptic,

20/02/2008 15:32:00
Let us hope that the voters will seal this debacle by getting rid of the pathetic, posturing, poseur, Martin Ford.
33

sceptic,

20/02/2008 15:45:09
30
"those who put him in those various positions were well aware of his stance."
He was put there as a sop to the green nutters. It was never anticipated that he would be allowed to implement his daft notions
34

Banigan,

North Westminster 20/02/2008 15:59:19
Martin Ford should be given a medal for keeping trash like Trump from trashing Scotland. Trump is only about Trump, the jobs you will get will be as cleaners and servants to the Rich and will be low paying.
35

Duncan in Edinburgh,

20/02/2008 16:04:47
#33 I'm sure he speaks very highly of you too. How is it that you know him so intimately? You're on the council? You're a planning official in Aberdeen? Or, don't tell me, you're a spiteful, small-minded know-nothing who enjoys shouting from the sidelines about things more complex than your tiny mind can cope with? Is it the last one? Is it?
36

Sideshow Bob 2,

20/02/2008 16:05:22
The Lib Dems are quite clearly imploding if they’ve got no place for someone like Ford. Surely the main appeal of the party has always been its green credentials: what else does it have to distringuish itself from Labour or even the Nats non independence policies? No doubt the loonies up in Aberdeenshire will take their revenge on the Lib Dems and switch back to the Tories or their tartan counterparts. Am I the only one who frequently finds himself shaking his head at what goes on up there? It’s a different world politically and it’s a strange place!
37

,

20/02/2008 16:41:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

Nikostratos,

20/02/2008 17:09:44
Guardian/ICM poll


Conservatives: 37% Labour: 34% Liberal Democrats: 21% others including the snp 9% UK voting intentions
39

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 20/02/2008 17:21:31
36 Duncan

I can see you're trying to shout the loudest from the sidelines.
40

Chris,

Edinburgh 20/02/2008 17:23:07
Posts from the likes of #31 puzzle me. Ford used his casting vote, which means that the committee vote was tied. How does that translate to Ford "imposing his own personal agenda on the rest of the council"?
As for the Trump supporters - I hope for the sake of NE Scotland that you are right in your belief that he will be good for the local economy. He doesn't have a very good track record in that department - Scottish grandmother or not.
41

Resolutions,

20/02/2008 18:59:17
#41 and quite a few others

Cllr Ford was elected democratically in May(as far as those elections were) and in that there is no dispute. The fellow had to follow the established procedure as used by Aberdeenshire which he did, using his casting vote at the end of a process which was going against Trump anyway.

I just hope that there is careful consideration of the worth or otherwise of this proposal - personally It seems very dubious benefit.

Can I ask how many people have been served by SCOTTISH staff in NE hotels/ restaurants recently? Very few if our experience is to go by. What benefit is this place going to be to the NE?

Back to Ford - he followed procedures! I am none too sure that many of the others on the Council actually did and their behaviour of late has done nothing to retrieve their reputation.(I am NOT a Lib Dem)
42

Queen D,

Glasgow 20/02/2008 19:41:01
Resolutions , from The South East of England to the North of Scotland I have been served by many and various nationalities very few of them from the indigenous population.It would seem that the service industry is not for us! Bit like the Swiss used to think that it was below them to serve , therefore employed others to do it for them.
43

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 20/02/2008 20:22:12
42 Resolutions

You said:

"The fellow had to follow the established procedure as used by Aberdeenshire which he did, using his casting vote at the end of a process which was going against Trump anyway."

The Area Committee voted in favour of the development, the IS Committee was tied, that's why a casting vote was used. In what way was the process going against Trump anyway? Also, as was pointed out earlier, it is regular custom and practice for the Chairman to use his casting vote to preserve the status quo, i.e. defer for further negotiation. Ford voted against and was quoted as saying on the Politics show that the development was now "dead in the water". Clearly a radical viewpoint for a Chairman.

Secondly, what is wrong with non-indigeneous people working in the service industry? The Turks use Kurds in their successful tourist industry, the Californians use Mexicans, and in London, any ethnic origin person could serve you in a restaurant, bar or hotel. Are these financial disasters? Far from it.

44

Resolutions,

20/02/2008 20:23:39
So Queen D you have shown exactly what is meant - they are spouting that it will create employment for the area - presumeably thinking that it will be for those in the area. If we employ others to do the task, can you hear the screams of 'immigration out of control'? Keeping locals out of jobs. Most of the builders are employing overseas crafts people already so ditto.

Also there is no guarantee whatsoever, that the local area will get the slightest look in to send in local produce to keep down the carbon footprint.

It is on a fragile coast, with a rising sealevels(other areas are very concerned) and a none too well drained bit behind the dunes.

Expertise in flooding anyone?
45

JR Ewing,

Aberdeen 20/02/2008 20:52:48
Ford the eco warrior of double standards defended by people who haven't a clue what he was up to.
Ford the councillor who was quite happy to see the destruction of twenty juniper trees on an SSSI at Clashindarroch in support of a wind farm development against the wishes of the local community
The same Ford who insists on the bullsh*t excuse that he used his casting vote to uphold the status quo. The status quo had already been established by the Formartine Area Committee who approved the development. Ford actually ignored the normal protocol and used his double vote to thwart the development.

He has no credibility whatsoever

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.