Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 9th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tyrannosaurus Rex's big brother identified by fossil student



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 December 2007
THE remains of one of the largest meat-eating dinosaurs ever found have been identified as a new species which more than rivals the Tyrannosaurus Rex.
Steve Brusatte, who is studying at Bristol University, made the discovery aged 20 while he was examining fossils at Chicago University in the US. The results have only now been published.

Only incomplete remains have ever been found but experts b
elieve Carcharodontosaurus iguidensis would have been up to 14 metres long, with a skull around 1.75 metres long and teeth the size of bananas.

The fossils assessed by Mr Brusatte were found in 1997 by a Chicago University academic. Mr Brusatte said: "When I came to Chicago, they were just sort of lying around waiting for somebody to work on them." The first remains of Carcharodontosaurus were found in the 1920s but later lost and other fossils discovered in Egypt were destroyed in the bombing of Munich in 1944.

Professor Mike Benton, the student's tutor at Bristol,

said: "It vies with the T-rex as the biggest flesh-eating dinosaur and most people would say it was the bigger of the two."

The monstrous pair would, however, never have come into contact: T-Rex roamed Earth about 30 million years after the Carcharodontosaurus.



The full article contains 218 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Scullion,

Canada 12/12/2007 02:02:37

It seems the more imposing the dinosaur, the greater number of letters in its name.

2

Guga II,

Rockall 12/12/2007 02:56:45

They do get carried away with themselves with the names they dream up. As it was bigger than a T-Rex, why not just call it a T-Emperor?

3

Nick_Byrne,

Glasgow 12/12/2007 09:40:17

In keeping with the Latin theme should it not be Tyrannosaurus Imperator

4

Sinnerman,

Another Planet 12/12/2007 10:28:53

#3. Caligula for short.

5

Guga II,

Rockall 12/12/2007 12:04:31

#4 :-)

6

Boy Wonder,

12/12/2007 13:59:15

#4. Nero is even shorter! :)


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.