Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 15th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Cubans get permission to holiday in their own hotels



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 April 2008
RAUL CASTRO'S government has opened luxury hotels and resorts to all Cubans, ending a ban despised across the island as "tourist apartheid" and taking another step toward the creation of a consumer economy in the communist state.
Cuba has made a series of crowd-pleasing announcements in the past few days: Cubans with enough cash were given the right to buy computers, DVD players and plasma televisions yesterday, and soon they can even have their own mobile phones – all consu
mer goods only companies and foreigners were previously allowed to buy.

However, the end of the hotels ban is being hailed as a particularly sweet victory. "I believe, as a Cuban, I have the right to it all," said Elizabeth Quintana, a Havana resident. "It's really good."

While there was no official word from the government, hotel staff said they were told by the Ministry of Tourism that Cubans can now stay in hotels and resorts across the island, and pay to use gyms, hair salons and other previously off-limit facilities. Cubans can even rent cars for the first time.

Few Cubans can afford a night at a hotel on a government salary, but this could change if Mr Castro succeeds in increasing citizens' spending power.

The government is creating the kind of consumer incentives any economy needs to thrive. For many years, Cubans have not been able to buy certain electronic goods, lounge by a hotel pool or enjoy a drink at sunset from a room at the historic Hotel Nacional, no matter how much money they earned.

As with other hotel guests, Cubans will be charged in convertible currency, or CUCs, worth 24 times the regular pesos most Cubans earn.

The four-star Ambos Mundos, a favourite of Ernest Hemingway in Old Havana, charges $173 a night in high season – more than eight times the average monthly state salary of about $20.

The initiatives will give Cubans more reason to spend money at government-run businesses, boosting Cuba's cash reserves, said Arch Ritter, an expert on the Cuban economy at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada.

However, the new government also risks increasing class tensions by making income discrepancies more evident in a society founded on the ideals of social and economic equality.

"Authorisation to stay in hotels is fine because it was unfair discrimination of Cubans with respect to foreigners," said Tatiana, a doctor in the capital's upmarket Vedado district, who declined to give her full name. "But what Cubans can pay for a night in a hotel with a normal salary?"

Analysts, meanwhile, said it was difficult to predict where the policies were leading.

"They're trickling out policy moves one by one, and there's no road map," said Phil Peters of the Lexington Institute, a pro-democracy think-tank based outside Washington.

Mr Ritter added: "Raul is going with things that work in the short run. And where it's going, I don't think he could even say."

ENDING BROTHER'S 'EXCESSIVE RESTRICTIONS'

FIDEL Castro spent decades rallying against any reforms that could promote a new class of rich Cubans, writing as recently as July that Cuba's poor were frustrated that the island is awash in convertible pesos.

However, since taking over as president in February, Raul Castro has begun to end what he called "excessive restrictions" on daily life.

The hotel ban has been a historical contradiction within the Cuban revolution. When the Castro brothers' rebels took power in 1959, they overran beach resorts and hotels that were the playgrounds of wealthy tourists and declared them open to all Cubans.

Hotel restrictions were imposed after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Cuba's chief economic benefactor, as Cuba embraced tourism to jump-start its economy.

Hotel guards have stopped anyone who looks Cuban and police have turned away Cubans trying to enter the best beaches at the white-sand resort of Varadero.





The full article contains 652 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 April 2008 9:52 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Cuba
 
1

Dáithí,

San Jose 02/04/2008 03:51:04
From the article:

"Hotel guards have stopped anyone who looks Cuban and police have turned away Cubans trying to enter the best beaches at the white-sand resort of Varadero."

Hahaha! And this is AMERICA's fault? Blame it on Bush/Blair? Hahahaha!

So this is the 'great anti-American communist hope? This is CHE GUEVARA'S utopia, ARMED GUARDS to keep THEIR OWN PEOPLE out of THEIR OWN HOTELS?

Fidel's lies sick and dying - and his 'Communist Utopia' is now being exposed as a farce ON A DAILY BASIS?

The people will be allowed cell phones? DVD's? I-Pods? Cuban's going into quality hotels?? Dogs sleeping with cats? WHAT WILL TOMORROW BRING??

I would say that 'Fidel's rolling over in his grave' - but heck, he's not even dead yet!!
2

Itchy,

02/04/2008 06:34:33
"Cubans with enough cash were given the right to buy computers, DVD players and plasma televisions yesterday, and soon they can even have their own mobile phones – all consumer goods only companies and foreigners were previously allowed to buy."

Blame the previous ban on America, why don't you, thickos? And how long will it be before the loathsome commie sympathizers start ranting about Batista?

"FIDEL Castro spent decades rallying against any reforms that could promote a new class of rich Cubans"

The heart of the matter. Communists just hate success. end of story.
3

Biker,

Ayr 02/04/2008 18:20:47
So now that the regime in Havana is liberalising, will the US drop its stupid embargo?
4

Itchy,

02/04/2008 19:11:13
#3 when will the lefty bozos blame all of Cuba's ills on the US embargo?
5

Media 1,

cape town 02/04/2008 19:48:48
Wont it be funny when Cuba opens its doors to foreign investment and places a ban on American companies? hahahahahaha!
6

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 02/04/2008 20:54:45
Hey Media 1,

I'd love to see it happen that way, UNTIL the last Castro is feeding the worms.

The Embargo Red Herring has been used for YEARS by the whacked out Rad Left, with nary a sense of reason at all, that Europe has been fully able to invest in Cuba for the entire time of the Embargo.

If anyone is to blame, please be so kind as to point the Fickle Finger of Fate at the Europeans, cause THEY'VE been FULLY ABLE to invest in Cuba for nearly 5 DECADES.

It's a splendid European past time to blame the USA for everything and anything, which is why I want to pull out ALL US military personnel from ALL bases world wide.

Let the Koreans deal with their own problems. Let the Japanese deal with the PRC as they wish to do. Let the Russian cut off Natural Gas/Petrol Supplies whenever they wish-the Europeans can kowtow or fight the Russians as they wish to do.

Same for what happens from here on in the Balkans: it's EUROPE so let the Europeans deal with it.

When the next Tsunami, Earthquake, or whatever disaster hits wherever in the world, CALL THE SCUM SUCKING EUROPEANS cause as an American, I will do EVERYTHING I can to convince my government to NOT send troops, treasure, or aid, to/for any of it.

That's the only positive side to the fact that a Rad Left Socialist will be the next President of the USA: hopefully a full and complete policy of NON-INTERVENTION.

Let the world go hang for all I care; I'm TIRED of being told I'm some sort of scum, when my tax dollars and the blood and lives of my countrymen are being/have been spent on bunch of ungrateful swine: European, Middle Eastern, and Asian, swine I must add.

No more blood or treasure for non-Americans.

Cheers from the Rockies
7

Biker,

AYR 03/04/2008 10:10:30
Neanderthal. Had your Tax dollars not been used to fund one illeagal war after another perhaps your country would be in better shape. Blame Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz (and the idiot Bush) for your current situation. Might be worth actually looking even further back at most of your previous administrations for picking fights they couldnt finish.
I actually like america and its population, its the administrations that lose the plot.
As for Cuba, As the US is the biggest and nearest potential trading partner it makes sound economic sence to deal with them. Europe trades with Cuba already so why dont the US?
8

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 03/04/2008 18:24:49
Biker,

I take it you don't like Git-Mo, do you? You'd like to see our prison there shut down?

Perhaps you've even demonstrated against it and the US Policy for it?

Just like thousands of other Brits, Europeans, and mindless Rad Left Americans.

Did you know that in the SAME CITY on the Cuban Side, there are 16 Prisons in that town? Take a wild guess at the conditions in those Cuban prisons and at how many people in them are Political Prisoners?

Have you ever protested THOSE prisons? Have you ever railed against the 16 to 1 prison ratio? Have you ever brow beaten the Cuban Govt. for not providing the same level of prison conditions in them, that exist for the prisoners at Git-Mo?

The health treatment available for those Jihadists at Git-Mo surpasses that available for ANY US citizens in any prison in the USA, and I can only dream of having access to that kind of medical treatment.

So when I read/hear Brits/Europeans bad mouthing the USA over Git-Mo, I'm not much inclined to listen, because the hypocrisy is readily apparent on the face of it.

Personally, if the Rad Left arguing in favor of letting the Jihadists from Git-Mo loose, I'm all for sending them to Great Britain: since they're so innocuous, you splendid people can house, feed, and provide for them-I'm sure the Rad Lefters are right and they'll present you with zero problems.

Pertainng to US-Cuban trade, it matters not one whit whether we trade or NOT, as to how poor or well the Cuban economy does: Europe matches the US in economic output and production, entoto, hence the EU right? So if you want to lament the sorry state of the Cuban Economy, please look in the mirror, because geography has NOTHING whatsoever with which to do about Cuba's economy: witness the People's Republic of China's economy as proof.

When it comes to fights and the ability to win them, I dearly love your hypocrisy: we have ROE (Rules of Engagement) which have hindered our military from fully doing their jobs.
9

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 03/04/2008 18:27:13
Biker CONT,

When it comes to fights and the ability to win them, I dearly love your hypocrisy: we have ROE (Rules of Engagement) which have hindered our military from fully doing their jobs. This directly translates into a LONGER conflict and you know it. Were the ROE's to be changed, allowing the 'gloves' to be taken off, the conflict with Sadr, Al Qaeda, et al, in Iraq would already have been over.

But that's the kind of warring that the Soviets/Russians wage, NOT the USA. So basically you're condemning us for tying our own hands militarily, so that as few innocent people die during the conflict as possible.

How truly humanitarian of you Biker.

Lastly, the war is NOT illegal, but you're not bright enough to understand that FACT. Go back and read the Armistice Docs of the UN, which the Coalition Forces signed with Saddam Hussein, at the end of Gulf War One: they allowed ANY of the Primaries to re-initiate hostilities, should Saddam NOT live up to ALL the provisions of the Armistice docs.

He didn't and finally, after nearly 12 YEARS of his violating those provisions to which he agreed (and shooting at our aircraft, at the Kurds, at the Shia in the South), the USA and Great Britain invoked their Armistice Rights to attack Iraq again.

You may not like that FACT, but your dislike doesn't change the validity of the US/UK legal right to launch the invasion.

Very lastly, I hate the war, I do NOT like the fact that we've almost bankrupt ourselves over it, and that taxes are going to go through the roof, after Obama or Hillary become President.

My country is screwed and dying, just as Britain was after WWII. I actually LOOK FORWARD to the USA playing Second Fiddle in world affairs, because then the Spineless EU can take the helm, and I can sit back and watch those feckless scum get blamed for all and sundry.

Enjoy the EU Hegemony, they'll have great sway; right up to the moment the Russians say 'no.'

I'll just kick back, light a good stogie, po
10

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 03/04/2008 18:30:50
Biker CONT,

Enjoy the EU Hegemony, they'll have great sway; right up to the moment the Russians say 'no.' Dear ole Tovarisch Putin will be in power for decades to come, and we've already seen that's he more than willing to shut off the natural gas supplies to the Continentals when push comes to shove, so when Russia says 'jump' Great Britain and the Continentals will simply ask "How high sir?" One EU member state can't abandon their fellows, now can they Biker?

I'll just kick back through it all, light a good stogie, pour a glass of armagnac (Larresingle thank you), and watch you people sweat blood at Russia's behest. I'll find it great fun. I might even drink one for you sorry lot-perhaps with a smile on my American face.

Cheers from the Rockies
11

Biker,

Ayr 04/04/2008 12:59:02
Thank you neanderthal for that heartwarming and totaly incorrect tome.
Yes I dissagree with Guantanamo as a matter of course. As I remember there have been no actual charges laid against any of the inmates and any trial will be militery. Why, non of the inmates are militery? Or is it because militery justice is generaly stacked against the defendant.
The war in Iraq is indeed illeagal and against the UN convention which asked the US and UK NOT to invade. Perhaps you can also tell me why they invaded, for what reason. Let me tell you why. It was a put up job by the US security and Donald Rumsfeld to try to pin 9/11 on Iraq. And that for no other reason than controling the oil.
Perhaps Mr Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld might also let us know why they decided to disband the Iraqi army at a crucial point in the proceedings (I believe without the president even being aware, if he ever was)
Rules of engagement, dont make me laugh. The number of incidents of civilians being killed or friendly fire incidents has been steadily rising along with infringements. Remember Abu Graiv? well the story continues along the same lines, and indeed has never stopped.
The problem with your WAR in Iraq is that it is being run by half assed politicians and not militey people. If it had been the situation might not have even happened.
So you hate war, dont we all. Remember who's government began the present situation and if all it was, was about oil, then The US and UK should stand accused of war crimes. We should NOT be in there.

Have a good day

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.