Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Moderates win latest battle on teaching evolution

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 August 2006
CONSERVATIVE Republicans who pushed for criticism of the theory of evolution in Kansas classrooms lost control of the state school board as moderates scored a narrow victory in an election this week.
The shake-up came after the Kansas State Board of Education voted 6-4 in November to approve new standards that science groups said were a product of religious zealotry because they challenged Darwin's theory.

The Kansas standards, meant to be gu
idelines for teachers across the state, were seen as a victory for the "intelligent design" movement, which holds that the world is so complex that a higher authority - God - must have created it.

Teachers and scientists joined with moderate and liberal political action groups to campaign against the conservatives and return to teaching what they consider conventional science.

With more than 90 per cent of the votes counted early yesterday, moderates had gained two seats and secured a third on the ten-member board, pushing conservatives - two held their seats - into the minority. "We're going to have a new majority on the school board," said Boo Tyson, the executive director of the MAINstream Coalition, which helped to fund the campaign against the conservatives.

"The people of Kansas have said they want their school board focused on something else than this hot-button issue."

The Kansas vote is the latest development in the renewed debate in the United States over evolution, which has been simmering since the famed "Scopes Monkey Trial" in Tennessee 80 years ago, in which John Scopes was convicted for teaching the theory of evolution. His conviction was later overturned on a technicality.

The Kansas standards say there is a lack of evidence or natural explanation for the genetic code, charge that fossil records are inconsistent with evolutionary theory and say certain evolutionary explanations "often reflect ... inferences from indirect or circumstantial evidence".

The Kansas school board has shifted repeatedly on the issue, with the conservatives regaining power last year and pushing through the anti- evolution standards.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 August 2006 9:31 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Creationism
 
1

Kaffir,

Edinburgh 03/08/2006 08:26:55

A victory for science and reason against primitive superstition.

If the good folk of Kansas want to teach creationism and ID, they can do it in religous studies classes where it belongs

2

Hugh Jars,

03/08/2006 11:40:42

- As stated by Alistair @ 1, everything in it's place.

- but then, wouldn't this apply to the "theory of evolution" too? After all, it is only a theory...

3

Eric,

USA 03/08/2006 12:35:15

davo: "After all, it is only a theory..."

can't get much better than that. A theory means you have an explanation, can use that explanation to predict, and can test the prediction.

for example, using the theory of evolution one could have predicted antibiotic resistance.

another great example of theory is the theory of gravity. We know what will happen when we push a glass off of the table.

What davo was hinting at is a conjecture, an opinion without any predictive or testable characteristics. Intelligent design is conjecture. You cannot predict what a mystical being will do to modify a life form.

It's a common confusion. just remember a theory is a concrete tool like a hammer or saw. You can do real work with it. Conjecture is hanging around the pub with your mates solving the problems of the world. Can be fun, even comforting but of no practical value.

4

exptscot,

montreal 03/08/2006 18:54:54

One point I have noticed concerning this whole arguement is that while i suspect the vast majority of logical thinking people would fully support and accept the Darwinian theory of evolution it strikes me there is still some room for conjecture of a higher order being invloved.

What caused the "big bang" that released the energy and atoms that would later become the solar systems, planets and single celled amobeas that would evolve into our own lifeforms? What was there before the "big bang"? What is the universe contained within or if it is infinite and expanding forever what does it expand into?

Evolution of life on earth is just one tiny part of a far greater and infinitely more complex process that yet seems to have a symmery and logic all of its own and which, at least to my knowledge, hasn't yet been fully explained by science. Couldn't this leave the door open for conjecture about a absolute power or intelligent design behind "life, the universe, and everything"?.. to quote the late great Douglas Adams. I'm not really a religious person but it does make one wonder.

5

cgrant,

tyler 05/02/2009 16:51:45
I find it incredable that so called scientists deny the very definition of a "theory".
There are several possible theories as to the origin of life.
Otherwise we would call it the "Law of evolution".
To exclude all other "theories" from the discussion is in itself a very unscientific action.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.