Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Spelman faces grilling on nanny pay as expenses row continues



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 June 2008
A CONSERVATIVE shadow Cabinet minister will face the parliamentary watchdog today to discuss her use of public funds to pay her nanny after the row over Tory expenses spread back to Westminster.
Caroline Spelman, who denies any wrongdoing, will meet John Lyons, the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, to discuss claims that she misused public funds.

Her meeting follows controversies over expenses embroiling three Conservative MEPs, leavi
ng David Cameron's mission to clear up sleaze in tatters.

However, in London, senior Conservatives have drawn a clear distinction with Mrs Spelman's case.

The deputy Conservative chairman had paid Tina Haynes, her nanny, from parliamentary allowances between 1997 and 1998, but insisted that she also carried out parliamentary work as her constituency secretary.

This weekend it emerged that a Scottish Tory MEP, John Purvis, had also admitted paying £120,000 in allowances to a family firm.

And in another revelation, it was reported that Sir Robert Atkins, a Tory MEP and former minister, used his parliamentary expenses to fly to his son's wedding in America.

Den Dover, the party's chief whip in Brussels, quit over the weekend after paying his wife and daughter a reported £758,000 over nine years through a company for secretarial and support services. On Thursday, Giles Chichester, the Conservative leader in the European Parliament, resigned his post after it emerged he transferred more than £400,000 of staff expenses to a private family company.

The Conservatives last night closed ranks around Mrs Spelman, insisting they found it difficult to believe she would do anything wrong.

David Davis, the shadow Home Secretary, said: "I would be amazed if there's any substance to this.

"She says this is something she did for one year, and thought it might be misrepresented or misinterpreted, it wasn't outside the rules at the time and she put it right then."

Andrew Mitchell, the shadow international development secretary, pointed out Mrs Spelman had referred herself to parliament's standards watchdog.

"Those of us who work with Caroline would find it very difficult to believe she would willingly do anything wrong," he said.

However, John Mann, a Labour MP, has called for more evidence to prove that Ms Haynes did work as Mrs Spelman's constituency secretary.



The full article contains 377 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 June 2008 9:55 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Conservative Party
 
1

democracy,

Scottish Borders 09/06/2008 04:33:01
I would like the questions to be asked, "Is she a qualified Nanny AND qualified Political Secretary, if so,check her credentials!
If she is only a qualified nanny and NOT a secretary,then why is she being paid tax payers money and therefor short changing her constituants?
If she is NOT a qualified nanny,but a qualified secretary,then why is she short changing her children?

Is she a qualified anything? check her credentials!
I doubt if anything is right here, she should resign!
2

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 09/06/2008 09:36:32
It will be interesting to see if these reports of good old fashioned Tory SLEAZE affect the party's opinion poll
ratings?

David Cameron must be hoping that other Opposition politicians are found to have indulged in the traditional practice of 'Tory snout in the trough'?
3

ThePeter,

Glasgae 09/06/2008 20:00:31
# 3, u sad or something?
Any meber of the Government got a rockery
Ex LABOUR PM has multiple mortgages
Barbara Follett (multi-millionaress) has us paying for her window cleaners
And somthing 10 years ago is NEWS??
sad prat
4

Paula,

09/06/2008 22:22:11
Well I suppose at least a nanny could be considered a valid expense against her job - if she had been honest about it.

I would have less problem with this than, say, a spouse using expenses to fund taxi journeys.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.