Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 7th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Sleaze watchdog launches full inquiry into Tory 'nannygate'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 June 2008
THE Conservative Party was facing renewed sleaze allegations last night after Westminster's standards watchdog announced he was to investigate the chairman, Caroline Spelman, over payments to her nanny.
John Lyon, the parliamentary standards commissioner, said there were exceptional reasons to conduct an inquiry despite the matter being beyond the normal seven-year deadline for investigations.

His recommendation was supported by the ten MPs who m
ake up the Commons standards and privileges committee, allowing the inquiry to proceed.

Mrs Spelman initially admitted employing the nanny, Tina Haynes, between 1997 and 1998 for secretarial work as well as for childcare outside school hours.

But it emerged at the weekend that she had in fact been employed until 1999 for constituency work – despite being based in Mrs Spelman's family home in Kent, 140 miles from her Meriden constituency in the West Midlands.

MPs are not allowed to use parliamentary expenses to pay personal bills.

After the story broke, Mrs Spelman had approached Mr Lyon asking him to investigate the matter in an attempt to prove her innocence.

A statement from his office said: "Having carefully considered the matter, the commissioner has recommended to the committee that, exceptionally, he should conduct an inquiry."

Mrs Spelman said: "Having personally referred this matter to the commissioner in the first place, I welcome his decision to look at it further and will of course co-operate in every way."

Mrs Spelman stopped paying her nanny after the then Conservative Chief Whip, James Arbuthnot, told her that the payments could be "open to misinterpretation".

She had recently been asked by the Tory leader, David Cameron, to improve the party's record on expenses. One MP, Derek Conway, was thrown out of the party after paying his son in exchange for little or no work.

Mr Cameron has also been embarrassed by his MEPs – last week Giles Chichester resigned when it emerged he transferred more than £400,000 of staff expenses into a family company.



The full article contains 333 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Angus Ogg,

17/06/2008 21:54:10

There is more than a little aroma of rodent about Ms Spellman's account when compared to the transcript of the interview by BBC Newsnight's Michael Crick.

The best thing David Cameron can do is have Spellman step down pending the resolution of this issue by an independent arbiter. Anything less is simply not good enough.
2

frank mcbride,

lusitania 18/06/2008 00:54:23
Call me a cynic, if you will but, why is NuLab sleaze (misappropriation/breach of Parliamentary Rules), considered in a different light?

Why can NuLab claim "diminished capacity", successfully?

I leave you to come to your own conclusions.
3

bring them on,

18/06/2008 02:06:31
The amount is not relevant. Any MP using tax payers' money for their private use should lose thier job abd any pension rights.

The " misunderstandings" and "I won't do it again, honest" are just not good enough.
4

donald,

glasgow 18/06/2008 07:04:59
Is it only Labsleaze that is immune?
5

it has always been allan,

18/06/2008 07:27:02
4# Donald why do you need to ask
6

JayJay,

Right here 18/06/2008 08:59:07
As yet another tale of "unintentional wrongdoing" is dragged screaming into the public domain, isn't it time we heard from the Inland Revenue on the ever so creative accounting that lies at the heart of every MSP, MP and MEP's expenses forms.
I suspect for many of these people the first thing they learn, on election, is how far they can go before they slip from grey area to outright fraud. But it does strike me that they probably all spend little of their salary on anything given that the sort of expenditure you and I have to dig deep to fund (naany, new garden, new wallpaper, taxis etc) seems to be allowable.
Politicians should be allowed to claim expenses for the same things as any other member of society. But setting up family trusts to avoid scrutiny, concocting tales of a hybrid nanny/secretary who can do work 150 miles outside the constituency, second homes allowances for homes owned outright from a family member etc etc really should be grounds for immediate sacking. Within the rules or not, they point to a body of people determined to exploit the state for every penny they can.
Cameron should just imagine these people to be social security swindlers, and treat them with the same ire arch-tories reserve for "scroungers".
7

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 18/06/2008 09:43:38
Today, it was announced that M.P.'s are seeking a 21 percent increase in their salaries taking them to £75,000
per year, and this does not include parliamentary expenses!

8

bluehead,

edinburgh 18/06/2008 10:48:12
perhaps they should have an enquiry into the EuroGate smething stinks about the whole business, I read there are people who have signed for this monstrosity who haven't evwn read it.
the Irish were very sensible to turn down the euro disease,
the whole system should be given a x-certificate.
9

,

18/06/2008 10:56:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Queen D,

Glasgow 18/06/2008 11:01:29
Considering the oops a daisy of the shredding of T Blairs , and others , expenses , this has to be small potatoes in comparison.
The lady herself has called for the enquiry .
All of this happened several years ago.
There are those , still in Government ,who must be oops a daisying expenses at this very moment.
11

Jock MacTamson 2,

Highlands 18/06/2008 11:50:52
These are intellegent people and they would not make such mistakes. There are many published procedures on what is and is not allowed.

They should pay the money back, have their pensions withdrawn, and then be handed over the the police for investigation for fruad, perverting the course of justice, abusing public office and funds, etc, etc.

Alternatively they can sit round a table with their mates and write a statement saying they are sorry.

Typical Westminster Sleaze. They make me sick. The criminal parasites.
12

gloop,

18/06/2008 15:49:47
Sturgeon 'knew of C.diff deaths'

Nicola Sturgeon

Scotland's health secretary knew of several deaths from a hospital bug four days before an expert team met to control the outbreak.

Nicola Sturgeon will make a statement to parliament on the C.diff outbreak.

She is expected to address calls for an independent inquiry to take place
13

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 18/06/2008 16:51:06
My God!

The Westminster government is presiding over the biggest rip-off of the population since time immemorial, the Scottish government is planning to restrict freedoms and punish the innocent and all they can think of is how much someone's nanny got paid?
14

LEAL,

18/06/2008 21:14:12
MPs seem to believe that they are entitled to ALL their living costs as expenses.Their priority is to get as much for themselves and the taxpayer is there to be swicked out of as much as possible.We all remember Alexander begging money for an election campaign that never happened.She was ,it seems,calling in favours from those whom she felt should be grateful for past favours,but the principle is the same.But why did she think that other people should pay for her attempt to get promotion?And then what happened to all the donations when no contest or campaign materialised?
15

Joe Macdelta.,

07/07/2008 17:13:09
Is there sutch an animal as a sleaze free polotician, investigate them all, lets see who comes out clean.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.