Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 5th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Hotels want this tourism tax put to bed right now



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

HOTELIERS across Edinburgh and Scotland will share my concern about Councillor Tom Buchanan's remarks in the Evening News (Death of tourist tax plan 'is premature', Evening News, May 13).
Cllr Buchanan surely has to recognise that if the city's main hoteliers are not prepared to pay a proposed tourism tax (or bed tax), the proposal is indeed dead in the water.

The Edinburgh Principal Hotels Association has surveyed its members and
nearly two thirds of the hoteliers stated that they did not want to see the imposition of a tourist tax.

Cllr Buchanan claims that other organisations or companies should also have a say on a tourism tax, but it hardly seems fair that other wider stakeholders should have the ability to impose a tax on hotels – or is he suggesting that a tax could be levied on all tourist attractions as well? As the article stated that visitors would have an additional charge added to their bill, does this mean that local residents visiting tourist attractions would not be levied?

Edinburgh hoteliers have made it abundantly clear that they are not supportive of this tax on their business. The tourist industry in Scotland is trying hard to grow and develop, despite worldwide economic uncertainty. Such a tax would not only damage the hotel industry, but would also have an impact on the wider economy of the city. Edinburgh should drop these proposals now.

Bob Cotton, chief executive, British Hospitality Association, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London


Homes slowdown is not a surprise

I REFER to your article 'Scottish house prices fall for first time as slowdown bites' (May 13). This slowdown has been predicted for some time now and does not come as a shock. However, I do not believe that it is lack of properties on the market that is responsible for this.

In my professional view, estate agents, surveyors and mortgage advisers are beginning to look at the market in a more realistic light. Valuers have tightened up their valuations and banks are looking for sizeable deposits in order to reduce risk.

It is important that buyers have finance in place before looking at the market and under the current credit circumstances this process is taking more time. In addition it is also important that the purchaser has sold their own property.

However, it is worth noting that our branches in Fife are selling properties at an average price level which is between five and nine per cent higher than those sold during the same period last year. Whilst volume sales are down, this shows that the predicted price fall is not affecting every area of Scotland.

Matthew Gray, property services director, Pagan Osborne, Comiston Road, Morningside


Biofuels fools have ignored pitfalls

I THOUGHT we paid MPs and MSPs to look after our interests.

Look at the situation with biofuels where they have foolishly rushed in to prove their green credentials without considering the pitfalls.

Food inflation is now over 19 per cent. Experts say that the worldwide drive to produce biofuels is a major factor. The EU demanded that biofuel content of all petrol and diesel should be 2.5 per cent.

Farmers have switched from food production to biofuel crops.

With 6.4 billion people in the world we need all the food production possible, not some "green vision" that will lead to starvation for millions.

The increase in fuel prices is increasing the cost of animal feed and is adding to food inflation.

Since the Government "takes" 67p from every pound of fuel they could immediately help by reducing the VAT and fuel duty.

Clark Cross, Springfield Road, Linlithgow


School 'costs' were plucked from air

I COULDN'T agree more with the title of Stephen McIntyre's letter "Schools must make economic sense" (May 12). However it is difficult to agree with much of the content of his letter. For a start, the "independent consultant's report" he quotes could not possibly be independent when it was commissioned by the council who had already stated their intent to build PHS on Portobello Park.

The "costs" they provided for various options were plucked from the air with no supporting detail, and bear little scrutiny.

Mr McIntyre asserts that the supposed additional costs would relate to a "damaging decant". The "damage" could be limited and need not restrict the educational prospects of the pupils – it has been done at many other city schools.

Mr McIntyre goes on to talk about the capital receipt from the existing site – £15 million which could be used to build two primaries elsewhere. The council estimates that a new primary school costs £11m, and a new high school £38m, so these figures don't square. There is a danger with using benchmark figures that they can be misinterpreted and misquoted, and the only reliable figures would result from properly costed business cases, which have not been prepared.

We don't have a reliable estimate of how much could be raised from the sale of the existing site, especially now that it looks like St John's will remain on part of the site. If the council continues with the approach of selling off land for private housing, we will be in an increasingly difficult position in years to come in identifying space for the provision of facilities

One thing councillors didn't take into account in the decision to rebuild PHS on Portobello Park was the feelings of local residents, and they failed to acknowledge objections to the loss of this park.

When Mr McIntyre claims that "the wider community wants to use less than ten per cent" he is making two mistakes – the first is that only a very small single interest group in the community want this development, and not the "wider community", as he claims, and secondly he states that only ten per cent of the park will be used. Portobello Park is 4.5 hectares, and under the current council plans it would ALL disappear under concrete and school sports pitches, and none of it would remain as public park.

Alison Connelly, Duddingston Park, Edinburgh


Left cold by lack of hot dinners

THE Children and Families Department of Edinburgh City Council and all other officials and councillors who agreed to stop as from Monday, May 26, the provision of a midday hot dinner to nursery school children, supplying instead a cold packed sandwich lunch, should hang their heads in shame.

To save money by cutting hours and/or jobs of catering staff and closing kitchens, they are prepared to deprive the youngest and most vulnerable children of a daily hot meal. How could they even begin to think that way!

A child attending a nursery school must have the right to a midday nutritious hot meal. It is also a learning experience of table manners, use of cutlery and different foods.

A Delahoy, Silverknowes Crescent, Edinburgh






The full article contains 1150 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 May 2008 4:04 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Dragonlord,

15/05/2008 13:43:37
Biofuels:


The country is in ecomnomic decline. WHY? GB ha sbeen coining in millions in extra VAT due to the cost of fuel.Why can't he use this money, to help the UK through this down turn?
2

Rudi123,

Edinburgh 15/05/2008 14:51:02
Re 'School costs were plucked from air'.....Thank you Alison for constructing your letter which clearly outlines the facts & issues surrounding the unnecessarily heated debates about the rebuild/refurbishment of Portobello High School.
3

Porty Pirate,

The Beach 15/05/2008 15:37:05
Rudi123 - if you think the above letter outlines the facts and issues surrounding the new PHS then no wonder the debate gets heated sometimes!
4

Porty Pirate,

The Beach 15/05/2008 15:37:57
Rudi123 - if you think the above letter outlines the facts and issues surrounding the new PHS then no wonder the debate gets heated sometimes!
5

Porty Pirate,

The Beach 15/05/2008 15:55:52
Rudi123 - if you think the above letter outlines the facts and issues surrounding the new PHS then no wonder the debate gets heated sometimes!
6

Rollo Tommasi,

15/05/2008 18:36:57
Surprise, surprise. The big hotels don't want a tourist tax. But they're quick enough to hike up their rates in the height of summer and over New Year. Next to none of the excess profits they get at these times stay locally. They all get siphoned into the coffers of those multi-national conglomerates and their shareholders.

Introducing a tourist tax (at least for larger hotels and at peak times) would allow the people of Edinburgh to benefit from these profits, if only a wee bit.
7

seanie,

15/05/2008 22:15:06
The cost of a primary school depends, to a significant degree, on the size of the primary school. During the 2006 consultation the estimate for a two-stream school was £7M, which compares with other projects at the time. If the current projection is for £11 million, that might be reasonable given inflation within the construction industry. But that's still compatible with a claim that £15M could build two primary schools elsewhere. If those other schools were single stream.

The estimated cost of a decant in 2006 was between £5-6 million. That itself will be subject to inflation but that figure wasn't far short of the cost of a two stream primary school.

Any rebuild on site, apart from the inescapable problems of the site being too small, would involve both a huge decant cost and no generation of capital to fund the project. That either makes the project more expensive or poorer quality with fewer facilities.

Oh, and by no calculation is Portobello Park 4.5Ha. The total area is around 19 Ha, with the golf-course about 13.3 Ha. The area currently occupied by the three football pitches is about 5.7Ha.

The proposal in the consultation document, which is remember only based on a feasibility study, suggested that the high school and one all-weather pitch could be accomodated satisfactorily in 4.5 Ha (possibly the source of Alison's confusion) leaving 1.2Ha of the park that could accomodate 2 grass pitches.

In reality those two grass pitches would most likely be incorporated into the school, but in terms of facility, the proposals should be a benefit in terms of public use. The pitches/park aren't currently used much at present and the school could create more opportunities for community use.

8

west end girl,

edinburgh 16/05/2008 10:37:36
I presume by "failed to acknowledge objections" Alison Connelly means, she didn't get her own nimby way
9

RecentEXPupil,

Porty 16/05/2008 11:33:18
"One thing councillors didn't take into account in the decision to rebuild PHS on Portobello Park was the feelings of local residents, and they failed to acknowledge objections to the loss of this park."- Alison Connelly

Let me see:

Someone attends public meetings and makes their position clear.

They attend the council chamber to persuade councillors to vote for their cause.

The make written contributions to the community consultation.

Despite all of their efforts they fail to secure even a molecule of support.


Do they give up? Of course not, a genuine believer would carry on but they have to have a reason to believe. They say to themselves and all and sundry “the councillors didn’t listen or acknowledge” – to a believer it has to be the only explicable reason.

As a neutral my attitude is a tad more realistic - there is every chance our councillors listened very closely and simply didn’t like what they were hearing. “Bunch of Nimbys” was the most likely influence.



 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.