Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Food price inflation is hard to stomach

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 June 2007
IN THE clearest sign yet that we have a food price problem, there is now a strawberry crisis. Prices are rising because there is a shortage of strawberry pickers. The EU migrants of recent years are staying at home as Eastern European wages have surged.
But the strawberry crisis is dwarfed by the Chinese pig crisis. China is currently suffering from a disease that has killed millions of pigs. The price of pork, the country's most important source of affordable meat, has risen by as much as 30% in Ch
inese cities over the past week.

Why should these crises matter? Because they are part of a growing problem faced by governments across the globe: a persistent and continuing rise in food prices.

And why should this matter? Because global inflation is being exacerbated by efforts to combat climate change and global warming. Central banks are now fighting to hold back inflation worldwide with rises in interest rates. The problem is that while higher rates may inflict a lot of pain on other sectors of economic activity, they have a limited effect on food prices. The world, after all, has to eat.

Climate change is the big issue at this year's summit of the Group of Eight (G8) of leading nations in Germany this week. Governments and corporate giants have been clambering aboard the great climate change bandwagon as it gathers pace. No one wants to be left behind. But one of the effects may be even higher prices for food, fuelling the very inflation that G8 central bankers have been trying to curb. So where, and how, does this all end?

Rising food prices have brought forth a new term in global economics: "agflation". And it is the behaviour of global food prices - an inflation none of us can avoid - that could come to rival global warming itself as one of the biggest problems on the planet.

"Given expanding constraints on food supply," wrote Merrill Lynch analyst Jose Rasco in a paper last month, "the changing demand for food and the entrance of the energy business as mass consumers of food products, it is not surprising to see food prices putting upward pressure on overall inflation."

Food input prices are now putting more upward pressure on producer inflation than at any time since the early 1980s. "I am surprised there are still so few people worrying about global inflation," wrote ABN AMRO economist Tim Drayson last week. "The latest inflation infestation is appearing in soft commodities. A wide range of basic foodstuffs have risen in price."

Between March 2005 and March this year, the price of US wheat rose 34%. Corn rose by 47.4%. Barley is up by 59.4% and cattle by 41%.

And, says John Parker, a food analyst at Deutsche Bank: "There is growing concern within the food industry that the present upswing in soft commodity prices is structural rather than cyclical." Put another way, that means permanent instead of temporary.

This is working through to the retail level around the world. For example, in the US, food prices in the first three months of this year rose at an annualised rate of 7.3%. Pressure on food manufacturers has been intense. US chocolate giant Hershey cut its 2007 profit forecasts last month because of rising milk prices, while Nestle has told investors that it will "not be able to cope with higher milk costs simply by raising prices".

In Britain, food price inflation is now running at around 6%, more than double the rate of the official CPI measure and the highest rate of increase for some six years. Food items account for some 10% of the CPI inflation 'basket'. What is worrying for members of the MPC is that between 1998 and 2005 food items in the CPI basket were recording lower than average inflation - an annual rate of increase of less than 0.1% a year. This had the effect, inter alia, of absorbing higher inflation in other areas. Today, food prices, far from acting as a shock absorber, are running well ahead of the basket average.

The policy dilemma is obvious, as widely expected further rises in interest rates will only have a limited effect in controlling prices that have been rising globally.

Rising energy prices have also contributed to the sharp increase in prices for grain and sugar. Corn output has been diverted towards ethanol production as an energy substitute. Planting of corn has now increased in the US. But this, as ABN AMRO's Drayson points out, is reducing the availability of other grains, such as wheat.

Second, these crops require fertilisation and transportation. Both rely heavily on hydrocarbons.

UK food inflation was a key factor in the recent spike of CPI inflation above 3% in April. The puzzle for analysts is why UK food prices appear to have been rising faster than elsewhere - and this despite the rise in sterling against most other currencies. One reason may be a drive by the food manufacturing and distribution industry to drive up prices higher in order to rebuild profit margins that have been eroded for the past 18 months.

And Britain may turn out to have got off lightly in the longer term. In the world's two most populous countries, China and India, food accounts for 33% and 45% of their consumer price indices respectively. Put crudely, the bigger the proportion of the population on lower incomes, the greater the hit from food price inflation on those households and the greater the potential for unrest.

The International Monetary Fund has already drawn attention to how the biofuels boom is causing corn and soyabean prices to start moving in tandem with crude oil prices - the latter up 30% since the start of the year. "Rising demand for biofuels", it warns, "will likely cause the prices of corn and soyabean oil to rise further and to move more closely with the price of crude oil, as has been the case with sugar."

Global warming, the growth in biofuels, the pressure on cereal prices, higher inflation, higher interest rates, but still a dramatic growth in biofuels as governments seek to meet their Kyoto emission targets: there is no easy way out of this vicious circle other than allowing cereal prices and those of other food raw materials to rise, encouraging farmers to grow more stock and thus increase supply.

Farmers need the confidence to do this. But so far there is little evidence of this happening in the UK. Farmers point out that very little of the higher prices is filtering back to them. Consumers, however, may compel a quicker change as the pressure on the weekly food budget grows.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 June 2007 12:47 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Climate change
 
1

www.scottwebb.co.uk..,

03/06/2007 00:13:20

Not ANOTHER crisis, no wonder the soaps ratings are going downhill.....the best scriptwriters are the ones in The New World Order :)

2

Organic peasant,

Rural Scotland 03/06/2007 06:40:06

No way of increasing production except by raising the price? Did all those years of production subsidies (now long since binned) slip your mind?
Politicians will not admit to the terrible damage they have done to Farming so they will now have to put up with inflation which will have to run at 20% a year for 4 or 5 years yet to give us a decent return and lead to higher production. Who will bet on a return to "targeted shortage incentives" in a few years? (subsidies)

3

Alexander,

edinburgh 03/06/2007 08:58:06

Those pathetic middle class hostesses salving their consciences and telling the dinner party guests how they are doing their bit for the planet with their bio fuelled Priuses. Meanwhile thousands are dying in the developing world from starvation worsened by the rising cost of cereals and commodities which they have induced.

4

H Callahan,

03/06/2007 09:12:57

EU food mountains to the rescue? Or maybe they've gone off by now?

5

Andra, Dundee,

03/06/2007 10:26:37

STOP growing / using / subsidising biofuels. The net effect is that we are cutting down rain forest to produce Biofuels; and Biofuels are putting up the price of food for the poor.

#2 will we ever require production incentives in the EU - food is dirt cheap in this country now - 20% inflation for 5 years will hardly be noticed. It's the poor parts of the world that will suffer - although many of them will also benefit greatly from higher food prices. Some economies in Africa and S America (net exporters) will benefit greatly. While I think Asia imports food - problems ahead for the Chinese economy?

6

Crofter Joe,

Highlands 03/06/2007 12:17:30

Iv'e said it for years that the the only way to get people to appreciate food producers was queues for food, We are still a long way from theSoviet style where people would join a queue because there must be something worth waiting for at the front, but it would do us no harm to get back to eating seasonal home produced food rather than expensivly produced & imported produce.

7

Bien E. Bien,

03/06/2007 12:22:23

What is this? Inflation being reported as something bad for consumers? Contrast this with the wondrous reports given to rising house prices (i.e. house price inflation)?

Shurely not!

8

Organic peasant,

Rural Scotland 03/06/2007 13:14:59

kevint EU food mountains are long gone, look back to those days of cheap plentiful food with envy , you will not see their like again.

9

Eric D,

Glasgow 03/06/2007 16:52:33

So food prices are rising at 6% per year and only
equals 10% of CPI. THere must be some very rich people out there as food takes up about 50% of my budget. Then again I'm only an average wage slave.

10

A Fairmer,

Aberdeenshire 03/06/2007 21:53:07

As far as I know, world cereal stocks run at only between 30 and 60 days supply. It won't take much increase in demand or shortage of production due to global warming to use up that buffer. I think the farmer knocking, subsidy criticising masses who think there are still EU food mountains and assume that they can have any amount of any food they want at a cheap price in the supermarket are in for a nasty shock in the not too distant future. They may soon begin to have to compete with developing economies for limited supplies. Maybe then they won't view home production and security of supply and quality from UK farmers with such derision.

11

Paula,

03/06/2007 22:00:37

If there are queues for food would that not sort out the obesity problem.

<sorry, being flippant I know>

12

Andra, Dundee,

03/06/2007 22:53:23

You are right Paula, we don't need to eat so much.
Plus there is massive waste in this country - I've heard that about a third of food is wasted - so we could cut all of that out before we go hungry.
And huge amounts of cereal is fed to livestock - so we could cut that out as well if we needed to - we could still get out meat from places where grass grows but cereals does not (like S America and Scotland).

#9 Eric - what do you spend your money on? Microwave meals? A loaf of bread is only £1; a few kg of potatoes or veg cost only £1. Food is only expensive if you buy the processed, "value" added stuff.

13

A Fairmer,

Aberdeenshire 04/06/2007 08:17:09

If you're thinking of relying on getting your meat from South America, I suggest you read today's Scotsman article by Dan Buglass concerning Brazilian Beef production.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.