Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 12th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Capital Labour leader Aitken resigns to take up Kirk job



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 June 2008
THE former leader of Edinburgh City Council has quit as head of the Labour group to take up a key Church of Scotland post.
Ewan Aitken has resigned from his position as leader of the opposition to become secretary of the Kirk's influential Church and Society Council.

The move, announced yesterday, came just weeks after Mr Aitken was re-elected unopposed as Labour le
ader at the group's annual meeting.

He said he was standing down as it would not be "tenable" to speak for both Church and party, although he will remain as councillor for the Craigentinny and Duddingston ward.

Mr Aitken, an ordained minister, took over as leader of the council following the departure of Donald Anderson in 2006. Labour lost control of the capital the following year.

The 46-year-old father of two was elected to the council in 1999 for the Restalrig ward and served as city education chief before taking over as leader.

Commenting on the state of the Labour group and the national party, he said that it had to "re-engage with its roots" to regain the public's trust.

Mr Aitken refused to be drawn on a likely successor, saying he was "stepping well back from that". However, he hoped a new leader would be chosen before the end of summer.

Council insiders believe that former Lord Provost Lesley Hinds and ex-transport leader Andrew Burns will be the front-runners, though other challengers are a possibility.

Mr Burns said yesterday that the announcement had been a "genuine surprise". "At a personal level, I do wish him all the best for his new post with the Church of Scotland," he said.

"I believe he'll be a hard act to follow … despite the undeniable travails of Labour at Holyrood and Westminster, I think most people would acknowledge Labour have adjusted comparatively well to opposition in the City Chambers and are doing a decent job at what we're supposed to do – holding those in power to account for their actions, or inactions."

Mr Aitken said he was asked to apply for the Kirk job several weeks ago, but had only been offered it on Friday.

"It was a hugely difficult decision. There is a sense in which people have supported you but then you're saying, 'Well, that was great, but now I want to do something else'. But they've been brilliant about it. I formally told the group today and they just congratulated me on getting the job and understood that at times, opportunities just come."

The appointment is the first by the Church and Society Council's new convener, the Rev Ian Galloway. The post is highly politicised, setting down the Kirk's stance on political, social and ethical issues.

Both men are friends and past members of the Kirk's Iona Community, known for its liberal political outlook.

Though Mr Aitken is an ordained minister, he does not have a parish.

He said: "I hope that I will be able to help the Church to communicate what it means. One of the challenges the Church has had is that while it's had some very good thinking, it's not always been very coherent in its communication in terms of being clear and accessible."

Mr Galloway said that in addition to bringing a "wealth of experience" to the post, Mr Aitken would help efforts to make the Kirk more media-friendly: "He has a fair amount of experience relating to the media and in presenting to the media."



The full article contains 590 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Wisnaeme,

10/06/2008 01:26:40
So Bunty Backhander's name has disappeared from the "front runners". A possible challenger then?

Now about those Waterfront scams, Bunty ..,

or were those unintentional New Labour oversights as well?

"Re engagement with it's roots", is it Councillor Aitken?

..and who was leader of the council during the "disengagement"? Do tell.

So it would not be tenable to speak for both church and party? Why not? Do they not both operate on a "wing and a prayer" principles? Particularly where Edinburgh City Council finances were concerned.

Dearie me, yon chappie will be wearing a halo next and stepping down onto a cloud. That's what martyrs to a cause do, don't they?
.



2

Nikostratos,

10/06/2008 01:32:33
#1

you horrible man........shame on you
3

Copper,

Falkirk 10/06/2008 02:35:02

A man who if he has not been involved has stood back and watched the most corrupt regime ever in Edinburgh politics and who is now getting out as the Laaboor Party implodes now claims he is a Christian Minister

He and his Ilk are the reason the Church of Scotland are in decline

As in the most often cases if they accept him they are no better than he is
4

donald,

glasgow 10/06/2008 05:36:47
Shouldn't she be joining the Church of Engerland?
5

glassbenmhor,

10/06/2008 07:24:16
Nikostratos #2,

you horrible man/woman,

I dearly hope your just a party lackey, Labours' days in Scotland are over get a new lifestyle.
6

BIG EYE,

Paisley 10/06/2008 07:27:26
A giant step forward for politics and the devil!
7

McMadman,

Saor Alba 10/06/2008 07:38:30
Won't be missed. This is the person who tries to tell you Liebour left the Council with several millions in the pot. Yet when the books got audited, there was about £1/4m left in the reserves.

Don't let him near a collection plate.....
8

The Doctor's Assistant,

here in the real world 10/06/2008 08:14:28
#7 What are you talking aobut?

Have a look at the bottom of Page 5 here:

http://tinyurl.com/3xcgez

- that's a £5.53million overspend from a revenue budget of over £800million. Less than 0.7% just days before the May 2007 election.

Now can anyone provide a link - NOT TO A PRESS STORY - that proves otherwise?
9

The Doctor's Assistant,

here in the real world 10/06/2008 08:43:45
#7 and for good measure:

Have a look at the answer to Question 15 (on Page 24) here:

http://tinyurl.com/5p58qf

What do you know - just short of £52million in the Council's Reserves weeks before the May 2007 election.
10

Mist001,

Marseille 10/06/2008 08:45:30
To be fair, he's never hidden his involvement in religion. Well, he couldn't could he, given his position?

It smacks to me of a very small attempt to imitate Blair when he announced he was converting to catholicism.

What is it with politicians? Why do they always catch religion? Anybody normal would catch the measles or something.

Michael.
11

Anonym,

10/06/2008 08:45:46
What website is that, #8? It's a 'surf controlled' website where I work. (That means we are not allowed to view it.)

Anyway, good luck to the self important media savy wind bag with his political and religious career. (Apologies if I've made an incorrect assumption here! Sticks and stones, and all that.)

Love # 1's "wing and a prayer" comment. OMG! Religion is so annoying. Like politics, we have a bunch of characters assuming moral authority and that their way is the best way.
12

McMadman,

Saor Alba 10/06/2008 08:54:21
# 8 The Doctor's Assistant,here in the real world

"#7 What are you talking aobut?

Have a look at the bottom of Page 5 here:

http://tinyurl.com/3xcgez

- that's a £5.53million overspend from a revenue budget of over £800million. Less than 0.7% just days before the May 2007 election.

Now can anyone provide a link - NOT TO A PRESS STORY - that proves otherwise?""

But it is an overspend.......

I also note your tag says "here in the real world." More like in la la land. You posted this in the Evening News yesterday and I answered you there. For the record...

Council officers at the Council's finance department, who are professionally qualified, and subject to both internal audit and audit by government, confirmed that there was about £250,000 left in the reserves when the Liebour administration left. They spent all of the money. Fact.

As yesterday, if you want the truth, pick up the phone, and dial the Council's switchboard. 0131 200 2000. Ask to speak to a finance manager, any director of services, or indeed any manager with a budget to manage within the Council. All can confirm this. Hope that is enough corroboration for you.

All can confirm that there are significant budgetary pressures as a result which have led to difficult decisions on services and what to keep and cut. And when the inevitable happens, it is reported as the Council being useless or Holyrood being tight, when Holyrood has put more money than ever before into local government in the context of a very tight settlement received from Westmonster.

You need to come into the real world. Take off your (no longer particularly rose tinted, more like tory blue rinsed) specs. Liebour blew the cash. The city is skint and working very hard to build the reserves back up. Lots of corroboration is available if you wish it, rather than relying on your one url link.
13

,

10/06/2008 08:54:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

The Doctor's Assistant,

thanks for the link/s 10/06/2008 08:56:30
#13 that proves your point then?
15

Boy Wonder,

10/06/2008 09:01:57
Now if only the CoS would stop their lackeys standing as councillors.

16

The Real Deal,

waiting for a taxi 10/06/2008 09:05:10
#16 Actually, you're right - there are numerous Ministers (of one sort or another) on the Council at the moment! Only outnumbered (so I'm told) by Taxi Drivers - read into that what you will??
17

Mist001,

Marseille 10/06/2008 09:21:26
#17

And golfers!

Michael.
18

Doh,

10/06/2008 09:28:22

Big mistake to choose someone of such extreme partisanship and pettiness.

A more mature politician would have suited their needs better.

Still at least he realises that Labour are finished in Edinburgh - until they grow up.
19

CRAGman,

10/06/2008 09:34:30
It's nice to see that the Church of Scotland recognises the value of engagement in the public arena. Whatever your views of the Labour Party, Ewan Aitken has sought to engage with the issues facing us today and I wish him well in furthering that engagement through his work with the Church and Society Council.
20

McMadman,

Saor Alba 10/06/2008 09:56:49
Nice though he may be in person, fact is he was not spectacularly successful. He lost Liebour power in Edinburgh for the first time in a generation, losing them half their seats, and fiddled whilst the city headed for the financial rocks. Has hardly been a resounding success in opposition either, being highly critical yet not really proposing any solutions.

Wonder how much of this is a case of jumping before he was pushed, or simply quitting because he knew there was no danger of getting Liebour re-elected. We'll never know I suppose.
21

McMadman,

Saor Alba 10/06/2008 09:59:43
# 15 The Doctor's Assistant,thanks for the link/s

"#13 that proves your point then?"

Did you try speaking to anyone as I suggested ? I think you would find out the truth that way. Hmmmm. Who to believe ? A politician, twisting the facts for his own narrow political gain, or numerous professionally qualified council staff, subject to audit, with no reason to lie.

Tricky that, unless of course you are accusing these council officers of deliberately lying. Surely you are not...... or are you ?
22

The Doctor's Assistant,

here are the facts again 10/06/2008 10:12:40
#22 with all due respect, I've sent you a link to the accounts proving that the overspend was less than 0.7% of the revenue budget days before the 07 election; and I've also sent you a link to a formal Council answer proving that there was nearly £52million in Council Reserves days before the 07 election.

Here are the links once again:

http://tinyurl.com/3xcgez

http://tinyurl.com/5p58qf

These are facts, not filtered by Politicians or Council Management. I'm at a loss as to why you won't just accept them - or are you biased in some way?
23

The Doctor's Assistant,

seeking clarification 10/06/2008 10:15:37
http://tinyurl.com/3xcgez (see bottom of page 5)

http://tinyurl.com/5p58qf (see Q15 on page 24)
24

Calum Crubag,

10/06/2008 12:53:50
#19 - aye, Labour are finished but so are the Kirk. Religion is dying and not before time.
25

McMadman,

Saor Alba 10/06/2008 13:07:02
# 23.

http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/internet/council/council_tax_and_finance/council_budget/cec_council_budget_explained.

Quotes:

"our unallocated reserves are virtually used up."

Satisfied yet ? Try giving Donald McGougan, head of finance a call. I am not biased; simply someone who strongly believes in public service and resent Liebour saying there was/is pots of money available when this is plain wrong. We are expected to maintain services year in year out and deliver 2% plus efficiency savings (eg deliver more for less is what this means) with no reserves.

26

McMadman,

Saor Alba 10/06/2008 13:09:08
#24, Doctor's assistant

BTW are you or are you not saying that all of these council officers and managers are lying ? You are strangely silent on that.
27

McMadman,

Saor Alba 10/06/2008 13:17:31
# 24, for your further info.

"the overspend was around £5.9m which was a result of information coming through after the information that shaped the advice we got in February. It was almost entirely spent on vulnerable children and older people (Care packages, 75% increase of referrals to child protect register, foster care payments, home to school transport etc.). But, because we had put money aside, that over spend was adequately covered by the (unallocated general) reserves and left £0.762million in those reserves after the overspend had been dealt with."

Source:

Briefing note from Cllr Ewan Aitken. As posted on www.marklazarowicz.org.uk. He's a Liebour MP in case you didn't know. The final amount found to be left in the reserves was slightly over £1/4m.

Translation "We spent all the money. Sorry and all that, but we did leave you about £3/4m in the reserves." Excuse me, but "it wisnae me spent all the money" doesn't wash.
28

The Doctor's Assistant,

10/06/2008 13:45:47
#26

That link only states that the "unallocated" reserves were used up to help go towards the "Equal Pay" bill. The bulk of that was taken out in 2005/06 - see here:

http://tinyurl.com/54d9lx

And guess what, it was done with ALL-PARTY support.

Come on, you can do better than that surely?
29

Richard Lionheart,

10/06/2008 13:46:16
Church of Scotland goers should now look out for Parking permits being on sale at the church office.

Traffic calming measures may also appear in the car park along with the obligatory bus lane and cycle parking. Don’t worry; the tram stop will be within 2 miles.

Perhaps, Bendy has applied for a job there too.
30

McMadman,

Saor Alba 10/06/2008 14:28:04
#24 Doctor's assistant.

You appear to be financially illiterate. To quote from the good Reverend

"that over spend was adequately covered by the (unallocated general) reserves and left £0.762million in those reserves."

What this means is that (according to him)they overspent the budget to the extent that all unallocated reserves were gone except for £750k. This is emergency money; money for a rainy day, money to pay for an unexpected emergency and so on.

By definition, any reserve fund not "unallocated" is therefore "allocated." Monies are set aside to reserves to cover future expenditure commitments, and to enable the city to meet future loan covenants, and so on. They are not available to be freely spent as required. Yes this includes equal pay/sigle status but it has to as it is a legal requirement to implement this.

You appear confused about the monies set aside to cover the equal pay bill, which form the majority of the £50 million he referred to leaving behind. Factually it is wrong to represent this as reserve money available to spend on services and so on. It is not, it is committed money and cannot be freely spent. Giving the impression that it can be is dissembling at best if not downright disengenious.

That is why he says publically "We left £50m in credit behind, there's lots of money" when in private he knew almost all of it was allocated to meet future commitments and the "true" reserves - money to meet unexpected emergencies and spend needs was £750k according to him (or closer to £250k in reality).

Interestingly. The Liebour cooncil signed up to single status pay in 1999, but messed around for so long that it is still not in place 9 years later and only now are proposals for implementation being negotiated on with unions.

"Unallocated reserves" = money freely available to spend = £750k (Rev EA) or about £1/4m (me, many council officials). Eg as close to broke as made no difference and had there been, say, a flood or terorist i
31

McMadman,

Saor Alba 10/06/2008 14:32:26
-/cont

(finishes) g as close to broke as made no difference and had there been, say, a flood or terorist incident we would have not had the monies to pay for it.

Hope you are now clear. I note you still do not answer as to whether all of these council officers and managers are lying. Call the cooncil switchboard and speak to finance - 0131 200 2000.
32

The Real Deal,

no one is home 10/06/2008 14:48:32
I just called the Council switchboard, asked for finance, and they told me everyone was out for a long-lunch.

Financial crisis my a**e
33

McMadman,

Saor Alba 10/06/2008 18:24:07
#33

At least they won't be out for lunch permanently, unlike yourself. Plenty of reports of dire finances in the media and available from just about anyone working for the council.
34

The Real Deal,

willing to listen to mad men 10/06/2008 22:41:26
Audited accounts for 2007/08 due any day. I can hardly wait.
35

McMadman,

real deal, you've got a loose wheel 10/06/2008 22:46:06
You might find something of interest. The reserves may have improved slightly due to savings made and service cutbacks because of the financial mess left by the jolly reverend.

Vote red to stay in the red if you're daft in the head.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Can the Church of Scotland still claim to be a truly national Kirk?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.