Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Channel 5 quiz show admits using fake winners as TV row intensifies

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 March 2007
CHANNEL Five has been dragged into the row over premium phone quizzes on television after the broadcaster admitted some competition winners on its show Brainteaser were faked.
Producers of the popular lunchtime programme, which asks viewers to solve a word puzzle within five minutes, made up names of on-screen winners if the audience failed to get the answer. In one case, a production crew member went on air posing as a "w
inning contestant".

Five's chief executive, Jane Lighting, said: "We are shocked and disappointed and wish to apologise unreservedly to our viewers."

Blaming the show's production company, Cheetah, for failing to meet the network's "high standards", Ms Lighting added: "We have decided to suspend any output which involves any premium-rate services and to appoint an external auditor, though we have found no evidence involving any programmes other than Brainteaser."

Five, which was unaware of the cheating, is the latest TV network to become embroiled in a deepening controversy that threatens to shatter public confidence in how television quiz games are run.

Icstis, the premium-rate phone regulator, is investigating six shows: Channel 4's Richard and Judy; the BBC's Saturday Kitchen; ITV's entertainment series X Factor, Ant and Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway, Soapstar Superstar and I'm A Celebrity.

Five's Brainteaser show is being investigated by Ofcom as the problems concerned editorial content rather than phone-line irregularities.

The watchdog yesterday held a crisis meeting with UK broadcasters and said the TV industry had got itself into a "pretty grim mess" over the running of phone quizzes. Those attending the meeting included the BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Five and Sky, together with programme makers Endemol and Eckoh, the company which runs the phone lines for the Richard and Judy programme and Saturday Kitchen.

Sir Alistair Graham, the chairman of Icstis, warned that the police would be called in if evidence of criminal activity was found.

The watchdog announced the creation of a licensing regime for all premium-rate service providers and said it was considering the introduction of a kite-mark to restore confidence.

"It is in everyone's interests to ensure that services are reliable and trustworthy as well as entertaining and fun," he said.

ITV announced this week that it was suspending all of the premium-rate parts of its output while an independent auditor investigated their running.



The full article contains 401 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 March 2007 2:20 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Channel Five
 
1

Big Jock Mc,

09/03/2007 08:02:49

Cheating robbing bas****ds the lot of em. They´ve being screwing the lot of us with their prem. rate numbers.

Ban them all.

P.s I´ve just hit on an idea, file your tax returns with a couple of errors. Write on the form "for any quiries or or further information please phone me at: 0xxx xxxxxxx ( calls cost 100 spondulicks per minute)

2

Duncan in Edinburgh,

09/03/2007 08:10:23

And the show's production company is called "Cheetah" - lovely.

3

jim lad,

the capital 09/03/2007 09:03:37

When we conn people its fraud when the tv companies do it it's called a mistake, just like MSPs expense claims

4

fatboyslim,

Scotland 09/03/2007 09:23:03

thing was only the stupid believed they where real

5

Big I,

Edinburgh 09/03/2007 09:43:17

I've been a contestant on Brainteaser, and can safely say that their phone in questions are so simple that there would never be an occasion where a single member of the audience would fail to get the answer. And even if that was the case, why make up fake winners? This is fraud, pure and simple, and I hope that the regulator takes the strongest possible action against those responsible.

6

ChrisA,

Pennycook 09/03/2007 10:35:27

If you feel that you have been ripped off by any TV Quiz lines then call 0906 182838 and leave your details. (all calls charged at £5 per minute)

7

Bill, Dunblane,

09/03/2007 11:04:26

To hang with the regulators.

Surely this is a job for the polis - it's fraud.

All telephone calls are registered. It should be possible to trace EVERY single phone call made to these chancers and FULL refunds made - Plus compensation of course.

8

AJ,

Fife 09/03/2007 11:08:13

Does it mean Ant and Dec will get locked up?

What a shame that wid be!!!

9

JG,

Fife 09/03/2007 11:24:03

#8 AJ
It would be even better if they took the gibbering idiots off those all night quiz show things. And "Brainteaser" could be split into two - "brain" and "teaser" - an oxymoron!!!!

10

Bill, Dunblane,

09/03/2007 12:20:07

I thought Oxymoron was a stupid beef stock cube - until I discovered Smoffnir!

11

Unknown Masses,

09/03/2007 17:09:54

Im not surprised there are no winners. Has anyone tried to solve the puzzle.

You see things like 1+9+5+8+1 and the answer is never 24.

And when it is down to a 50:50 and the prize has been trebled for 5 minutes only, there are never any callers. Strange that.

F**king con!

12

ddmc,

09/03/2007 19:01:35

but where will the poor production companies get the money to pay the overinflated wages handed out to staff & presenters, if the premium rate services are axed


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.