Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Call for boys to get cervical cancer jab

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 April 2009
EVERY schoolboy in Scotland should be vaccinated against the virus that causes most cases of cervical cancer to stop them passing the infection to girls, leading experts demanded last night.
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the Royal College of Nursing in Scotland, Cancer Research UK and a number of senior doctors want boys vaccinated before they become sexually active.

Schoolgirls are already receiving jabs tha
t prevent them being infected by the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV). The Scottish Government is currently refusing to back an extension of the vaccination programme to boys, saying such a move would not be "cost effective".

Ministers are spending £64m on the immunisation programme, which it is hoped will save up to 100 lives a year. Around 30,000 girls over 12 are being vaccinated by school nurses.

But Henry Annan, spokesman for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said the refusal to extend the programme to boys was "defeatist".

Annan, a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist, said: "Scientifically it makes sense that if you want to vaccinate young girls then boys should also be vaccinated, otherwise it's a bit defeatist, because they will still have HPV. It is sensible and it's a question of whether the Government wants to take it up."

His concerns were echoed by Ellen Hudson, associate director of the Royal College of Nursing in Scotland.

She said: "The HPV vaccination programme is extremely important in the battle against cervical cancer.

"Eradication of cervical cancer should be our goal, and to achieve this the vaccination programme should be extended to boys."

So far, 92% of Scottish schoolgirls had the first of the three required doses. But there are serious concerns that uptake is far lower among school leavers.

Plans to immunise up to 120,000 older girls over the next three years in a £1.7m "catch-up" campaign are in doubt because plans for all family doctors to provide the cervical cancer jab collapsed.

Instead school leavers are being invited to attend makeshift clinics and it is unclear whether this is proving successful.

The only NHS board to have released uptake figures for school leavers is NHS Dumfries and Galloway, where they are just 67%.

Sarah Woolnough, head of policy at Cancer Research UK, said: "The more girls who are vaccinated against HPV, the more effective the programme will be.

"If take-up is low amongst girls who have left the school system, the Government must do more to publicise the benefits of vaccination and ensure that girls can have the vaccine easily, close to where they live.

"Vaccinating boys against HPV could be helpful in achieving population-wide immunity."

Dr Anne Szarewski, a clinical consultant at the Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, said the move was necessary to create "herd immunity", where the vaccination of the vast majority of the population ensures that the few who are not vaccinated are protected.

She said: "It is extremely unlikely that uptake in girls will hit the 100% level.

"In order to get herd immunity we need to vaccinate boys as well."

The vaccine can also prevent some rare cancers in men.

Dr Sheila Graham, an HPV microbiologist at Glasgow University, warned that boys are not being immunised because the move would draw the Government into a moral debate.

She said: "If the Government was going to immunise boys as well as girls it would become clear to the general public that this vaccine is not against cervical cancer per se, but against a sexually transmitted disease."

Labour health spokesman Dr Richard Simpson said: "I understand the cost implications in the current climate but it should not be ruled out in the long term." However, yesterday a Scottish Government spokesperson said: "The priority for HPV immunisation is directly to protect girls against their future risk of cervical cancer.

"The question of whether to immunise boys against HPV was considered by the UK Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunisation.

"The JCVI did not consider immunising boys to be a cost-effective way to prevent cervical cancer in girls."

Should we vaccinate boys against the cervical cancer virus?

YES

Mark Ward, national co-ordinator of Men's Health Forum Scotland


In an ideal world I would totally support the vaccine made available to boys and men for the sake of their own health, but also for the impact that they can then have on cervical cancer in their partners.

It would empower men to have control over their own health and help them to share responsibility, which is very important in sexual health.

In particular communities of men, such as gay men, there's evidence to suggest the vaccine can have benefits in preventing penile and anal cancer which are very relevant issues. There's quite a lobby that says this vaccine should be made available to gay men. However politically there would be an uphill struggle to do that.

NO

Dr Martin Donaghy, Medical Director, Health Protection Scotland


The Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) immunisation programme protects young women against two strains of the virus which cause 70% of cervical cancer, which kills around 100 women in Scotland annually.

By vaccinating enough girls, the chances of boys coming into contact with girls carrying either of these strains will be greatly lowered. Over time, the strains will become far less widespread in the population. The immunisation experts who advise the Government considered evidence showing that if 70%-90% of girls were vaccinated, it was not cost effective to vaccinate boys to help prevent cervical cancer. They therefore did not recommend it.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 April 2009 12:12 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Cervical cancer
 
1

Douglas,

Bathgate 12/04/2009 00:12:03
Please insert inane drivel here and save Mr Linskaill the trouble.
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/04/2009 00:31:47


Douglas ~1,

Very Funny! :))

Of-Course, I will have my say on this topic, so let us start!,,

As you know my intense wisdom's can see the truths through this one.

To start with this soo-called, 'anti cervical cancer jab', has been sold with mistruths, Girls will now believe they will never contact 'cervical cancer, this is a miss-truth and a cruel one at that!

Boy's, are not soo easily 'brainwashed', I doubt very much the uptake will be anything like the Girls, if atall!, once again showing that Women are easy targets for the Drug Companies, to make them xbillion$,

Also this soo called 'Jab', sends out the wrong message, for the ones that interpret, because of their age, it is now 'Fab' to have 'unprotected sex'.

Because of this, STD's will now (and mark my words) increase 100fold!!

3

Fifi la Bonbon,

12/04/2009 01:58:01
May I be the first to use the meaningless expression "big pharma" before some nutter from the colonies does so, and then cuts and pastes a huge and unreadable screed.

For myself, I think the calculation about whether boys should get the jag is, as Dr Dinaghy suggested, purely economic. Will it stop more cases of cancer? Mr Ward thinks it might save some gay men from getting cancer, so that's fair enough.
4

Fi,

Edinburgh 12/04/2009 07:47:09
I'm disgusted, not least by Charles, whom, on a regular topic has a valid point or six to make.

This is a vaccine which prevents cancer.

What small minded, poorly defined argument can you bring to bear on this topic?

Herd immunity from cancer is not a political football.

Jab everyone who is willing, male or female and eradicate a horrific disease wherever possible.
5

Unimpressed one,

12/04/2009 08:48:09
"This is a vaccine which prevents cancer.2

No this is trying to prevent cancer by proxy. A bit like amputating everyone's right arm to prevent knife crime.
6

ChrisC,

South West 12/04/2009 09:23:57
I never elected doctors, 'charities' or purveyors of pharmaceutical studies to run my life or my Country.
7

soapy1,

Rainworth 12/04/2009 11:22:29
While saving lives is very laudable, and there is no nice pretty clean way to die can Scotland honestly afford £640,000 for each life saved?

Some sort of triage is needed here, £640,000 for one life could save a hundred more elsewhere.

8

Fifi la Bonbon,

12/04/2009 12:54:16
#8 - yes.
9

Fi,

12/04/2009 16:38:07
Hate to break this to you all, but cervical cancer is horrific.

I've had friends who've lost sisters to this disease.

I've had friends who had to have radioactive rods pushed up their vaginas to treat suspicious pre-cancerous cells.

This isn't a PR exercise. These young women who are being vaccinated are being spared the degrading and sickeningly painful treatment of a preventable cancer.

That's the key here: PREVENTABLE CANCER.

No one has the right to say that people should get cancer because it costs too much to vaccinate them - men or women.
10

mandyv,

cambs 13/04/2009 00:24:37
Google cervical cancer and smoking, someone will make their bl**dy minds up soon, what causes it? I have been to 3 funerals this year already, one was cervical cancer, non-smoker, never smoker. She still died in her early sixties, Would this jab of helped her? I do not know, the scientific community is so full of sh*t*, I, and many others, do not know what to believe anymore. I do know that big Pharma are too big and have caused lots of deaths, ie, misuse of medication, wrong medication, bad medication, lies about their medication. But as smokers are used as scapegoats, is the jab good or not? money, money, money.
Am I angry, yes I am, along with others, stop the lying!
freedom2choose.info fighting for choice and TRUTH

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.