Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Boys should get cervical cancer jab too, say experts

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 April 2009
BOYS as well as girls should be immunised against the virus that causes most cases of cervical cancer, medical experts say.
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the Royal College of Nursing in Scotland and charity Cancer Research UK have all said the immunisation programme against human papilloma virus (HPV) should be extended to boys.

However, the S
cottish Government is currently refusing to back an extension of the vaccination programme to boys, saying it would not be cost effective.

Henry Annan, a spokesman for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said: "Scientifically it makes sense that if you want to vaccinate young girls then boys should also be vaccinated, otherwise it's a bit defeatist, because they will still have HPV."

Ellen Hudson, associate director of the Royal College of Nursing in Scotland, said: "Eradication of cervical cancer should be our goal, and to achieve this the vaccination programme should be extended to boys."

Sarah Woolnough, head of policy at Cancer Research UK, said: "Vaccinating boys against HPV could be helpful in achieving population-wide immunity."

However, a Scottish Government spokesperson said: "The priority for HPV immunisation is directly to protect girls against their future risk of cervical cancer. The question of whether to immunise boys against HPV was considered by the UK Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunisation.

"The JCVI did not consider immunising boys to be a cost-effective way to prevent cervical cancer in girls."





The full article contains 248 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 April 2009 9:21 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Cervical cancer
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 13/04/2009 00:55:27


To start with this soo-called, 'anti cervical cancer jab', has been sold with mistruths, Girls will now believe they will never contact 'cervical cancer, this is a miss-truth and a cruel one at that!

Boy's, are not soo easily 'brainwashed', I doubt very much the uptake will be anything like the Girls, if atall!, once again showing that Women are easy targets for the Drug Companies, to make them xbillion$,

Also this soo called 'Jab', sends out the wrong message, for the ones that interpret, because of their age, it is now 'Fab' to have 'unprotected sex'.

Because of this, STD's will now (and mark my words) increase 100fold!!


2

Dippy,

13/04/2009 09:22:03
HPV vaccine has already been implicated in 11 deaths.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnTvAneWBZs
3

Dippy,

13/04/2009 09:26:10
"A media hoax has fooled parents in Texas and other areas of the country that the HPV vaccine, which experts have slammed as untested and has already been linked to dangerous side-effects, is now the law and young girls must take it. Merck Pharmaceuticals are set to capitalize on this fraud by making obscene profits from a crony deal with Governor Rick Perry, while children are put at risk."
http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/vaccines_tx_no_law_mandate_hpv_drug.htm
4

drunken proffet,

Tassy 13/04/2009 09:27:10
Could you not just birch them for having unprotected sex under the age of twenty one.
5

Dippy,

13/04/2009 09:27:51
"Merck makes 360 dollars per shot, equaling billions of dollars in fat profits from bullying or paying off legislatures to mandate the vaccine."
6

Andrew,

13/04/2009 18:09:00
I'VE MADE CLEAR NOTE of the use of the terms BOYS and GIRLS (come out to play?) rather than YOUNG MEN and YOUNG WOMEN (ie presumably over 16)!!! Therein lies the crux! Don't play with fire if you can't put it out!!!
Furthermore, what's the difference between a jab and a pri*ck for 'boys' when it comes to these VACCINATIONS/
INJECTIONS/INNOCULATIONS/IMMUNISATIONS or whatever you care to call them? A NEEDLE'S a NEEDLE!!! OUCH!!!!!!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.