Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Inspectors tell nursing home: take better care of residents

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 August 2008
A LOTHIANS care home has been told to make urgent improvements after an investigation by the Care Commission uncovered "serious" concerns about care quality.
The commission said it uncovered inadequate staffing levels and disorganised medical notes following complaints about Drummohr Nursing Home in Wallyford, East Lothian.

Investigators also found that care staff had failed to give a resident oxygen f
or three-and-a-half hours, and allowed another to develop serious pressure sores.

After upholding several complaints against the home, which is owned by Southern Cross Healthcare, the Care Commission said it needed to take immediate action to improve standards.

The news comes as Southern Cross announced that profits had risen 24 per cent in the 40-week-period up to July 6. The company is expected to make pre-tax profits of £53 million this year.

Lawrie Davidson, the Care Commission's regional manager, said: "We have a number of serious concerns about the quality of care being delivered. These have been raised both during our own inspections and as a result of complaints we have investigated.

"We are currently working extremely closely with the care home management, with Southern Cross, and with East Lothian Council to ensure improvements are made immediately."

Registered nurse Louise Sibbald, 50, of Pilrig, told the Evening News she quit her job at the home last month due to concerns over the standard of care. She said she had repeatedly raised concerns with the management and had also written to the Care Commission.

She said: "I've come on at night and found I was the only nurse on duty. I was working with two young care assistants who had very little experience."

The Care Commission upheld four complaints against the home in June, and partially upheld another two. It made four visits to the home in May and June.

It found a resident's pressure ulcer was not being effectively managed. It also found a resident was left waiting for oxygen because they did not have the correct equipment.

It said nursing notes were "poor and disorganised" and staffing was inadequate. On one occasion, a staff member was recorded as working, but the Commission found they were not on duty.

It partially upheld complaints about dirty wheelchairs.

A spokesman for Drummohr Care Home said: "Following an inspection by the Care Commission ten days ago we were informed that seven requirements highlighted during a previous inspection have now been met and three partially met.

"We will continue working closely with the Care Commission and East Lothian Council to ensure the delivery of a quality service to all our residents."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 August 2008 10:19 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Care for the Elderly
 
1

subrosa,

12/08/2008 12:32:58
What's more important, the lives of the elderly or profit? Messing around with detail isn't going to ensure these companies will raise their standards. They still claw in fees.

These private care companies know the standards required by now. Why can't the Care Commission just close them down immediately and stop this abuse of our elderly population.

Pound to a penny that standards would improve tout de suite if they didn't get their income.

2

Bill MacD,

12/08/2008 13:38:28
It's a basic economic fact that these businesses are motivated by profit, and care is a cost. But the public interest is in high standards of care. So it would make sense to link the two, legally.

Why not institute a law that all residents should be balloted annually, being asked one simple question - 'On a scale of 1-10, rate how happy you are with the quality of care you have received in the past year'. It would be a criminal offence to seek to influence any resident's rating.

Then the business should only be allowed to charge (or receive from public funds) fees that decrease with lower ratings. It's easy. It's fair. It's a real commercial incentive to the business to keep their residents happy.

Go on politicians. Do it!
3

Paul Voltaire,

12/08/2008 14:27:36
Sounds like a right midden of a place.
Our senior citizens deserve far better.
4

alex paterson,

edinburgh 12/08/2008 16:49:34
Our senior citizens fought for us,lets show them respect.
5

elayne,

13/08/2008 11:38:24
a lot of homes are very poorly staffed with 1 or 2 staff for around 30 residents,some with complex needs.how can 1 or 2 staff(usually at night)cope with people wandering,incontinance episodes etc.many years ago i worked in a home and morale amongst staff was low,everyone did their best for the residents but as long as profit is put before peoples needs its a no win situation.better staff training is needed,stricter hygeine practices and less emphasis on "bums on seats"by greedy home owners
6

Care Giver,

Edinburgh 13/08/2008 16:28:00
5* The Care Commission agree minimum staffing numbers- at any time- day or night- by assessing care needs on an hourly basis now. Homes should not be using 1 or 2 staff to 30 residents. This is impossible to deliver high standards of care. This ultimately affects all the standards on hygiene etc as you rightly state.

I have friends who have family in this home and I have no doubt they find these (continuing problems/press coverage) articles very upsetting.

Again this company flaunts the rules (as per Tranent Care Home) and they are warned. RUNNING THE HOME UNDERSTAFFED SHOULD BE MADE CRIMINAL!!!!!!!!!!!!

54 million pound profit on the elderly suffering is damnable!!!!!!!!!!! Yet it continues- does this company not believe in quality????

The senior management should be ashamed!!!!!!!!!!
7

Care Giver,

Edinburgh 13/08/2008 16:30:04
2* These systems are all ready in place!!!!!!!!!
8

Pocket Dictionary,

13/08/2008 20:41:01
The Care Commission should have looked at the qualifications of the care staff. Probably SVQ Health and Social Care level 2 which is a practical award. Anyone undertaking this award are observed on how they work with clients.

Two of the units are about helping clients to eat; and personal care. For the staff who have their SVQ level 2, who assessed them as being competent in their work to receive their qualification?

A company is going around offering care workers the opportunity to do a NVQ 2 in Health and Social Care in two weeks. And all it costs is £200. How can someone be deemed competent to receive a care qualification in two weeks? They need to be observed in real work activities to get their SVQ.

Another assessment centre employs staff to assess workers in residential child care. These assessors have never worked in a child care setting. Yet they are passing child care staff as being competent to work with looked after children.

SVQ's in the care sector are the cash cows of the 21st century. And no one seems to be doing anything about it.
9

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 10/03/2009 23:06:32
like.elayne.said.they.are.in.it.for.the.buck

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.