Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 30th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Stone me, I've offended 1.3 billion people



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 May 2008
IT WAS a statement that demonstrated both classic Hollywood vapidity and a lack of karmic understanding.
Sharon Stone experienced some bad karma of her own yesterday, in a backlash over flippant remarks she made on the red carpet about the earthquake in China that killed up to 68,000 people this month.

The star of Basic Instinct and Casino was forced into a humiliating public apology after she suggested that China's "bad karma" over unrest in Tibet was linked to the disaster.

The luxury retailer Christian Dior, which has a modelling contract with the 50-year-old actress, had pulled adverts featuring Stone from its stores in China (population 1.3billion). Chinese bloggers had reacted with fury and there were threats to ban her films in the country.

Stone had made her remarks in a red-carpet interview at the Cannes Film Festival, which was later picked up and broadcast on the YouTube video website. Within less than 24 hours, she had retracted.

"In the course of the interview I made inappropriate remarks and for any harm created towards the Chinese people I am extremely sad and apologise," she was quoted as saying, in a Chinese translation of a statement released by Dior.

Film stars have frequently caused diplomatic storms, though sometimes by mistake. Cameron Diaz apologised after carrying a bag with Maoist symbols in Peru, home to the Shining Path guerrillas. Jane Fonda has been "Hanoi Jane" ever since appearing in North Vietnam during the Vietnam war.

When celebrities' words blow up in their faces, the key to defusing a row is "speed of reaction, in as few words as possible," said Mark Borkowski, a PR adviser to celebrities and brands from Noel Edmonds to Virgin Mobile.

Tibet has been a popular cause in Hollywood for years. Actor Richard Gere, Harrison Ford, Goldie Hawn and Uma Thurman have all spoken out.

But campaigners risk offending China, an increasingly powerful presence in the corporate and entertainment world.

Mr Borkowski said: "The problem is how do you deal with China. Most entertainment and commercial Goliaths have big deals with China. They can't have celebrity collateral pouring petrol on to this sort of fire.

"It doesn't help with a pretty crass statement but the speed of this apology expresses the difficulties that people have.

"Celebrity brands have to be very careful about who pays their wages. A hasty apology recognises just how powerful the China lobby is."

Hours after Stone's remarks, Antonio Belloni, managing director of LVMH, the luxury goods giant that owns Dior, made his views clear. The actress had to "put things in the right perspective" or the company would "detach" itself from her.

On the red carpet, the actress referred to the Tibetan Buddhist leader, the Dalai Lama, as a "good friend". She said: "I'm not happy about the way the Chinese are treating the Tibetans because I don't think anyone should be unkind to anyone else.

"And then this earthquake and all this stuff happened, and then I thought, is that karma? When you're not nice that the bad things happen to you?"

Chinese newspaper readers and internet bloggers exploded in anger. "Don't give any attention to this old lady – don't watch her movies, don't buy the products she represents," read one.

Celebrities slip up on sensitive global issues

LAST June, Cameron Diaz, one of the stars of Charlie's Angels, provoked painful memories in Peru by audaciously sporting a bag with the Chinese Communist slogan, "Serve the People", and the Red Star, symbol of Chairman Mao's China.

Diaz later apologised to the Peruvian people, for whom the memory of the Maoist "Shining Path" revolution, which claimed the lives of 70,000 people in the 1980s and 1990s, was all too recent.

The Maoists' brutality, destroying the native Incan culture and carrying out mass executions for offences such as independently selling vegetables, was clearly lost on the US actress as she visited the ancient Incan city, Machu Picchu.

"I sincerely apologise to anyone I may have inadvertently offended," the actress said. "The bag was a purchase I made as a tourist in China."

In April last year, the actors Shilpa Shetty and Richard Gere caused outrage among Indian nationalists and religious fundamentalists while campaigning against HIV.

A lighthearted display of affection, as Gere demonstrated a move from his latest film Shall We Dance and kissed Bollywood actress Shetty on the cheek, offended Indian nationalists, for whom public affection is taboo. Gere's position as a foreigner and non-Hindu exacerbated the situation. Shetty refused to apologise, claiming the reaction was "regressive", while posters of her were burned in protest.

The Academy Award-winning actress Jane Fonda caused a famous controversy by her campaigns against the Vietnam War in 1972. The image of Fonda posed sitting on an anti-aircraft gun that could have been aimed at US planes shocked and hurt many servicemen.

In 1988, Fonda expressed her regret to former US PoWs and their families, saying she was horrified by the photo and its implications of a betrayal.

The French actress Marion Cotillard, who won an Oscar for her portrayal of French singer Edith Piaf in La Vie en Rose, caused uproar this spring when she described 9/11 as a "conspiracy". Cotillard accused the US of lying "about a number of things" and contrasted the rapid destruction of the World Trade Centre with other constructions which had withstood fires.

The comments were made a year earlier, but resurfaced when she won the Oscar. The actress was deeply shocked by the way they were taken "out of context", her agent said.

The full article contains 940 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 May 2008 9:34 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Cannes Film Festival
 
1

Conan the Librarian™,

30/05/2008 00:31:23
Celebrity brands...

I'll go away and vomit now.
2

truthsleuth,

30/05/2008 01:27:46
WE live in fear of insulting Arabs, muslims, hindus, sikhs, jews, eskimos, blacks, browns, yellows, fat men, fat women, the disabled.

It seems none all of the above are proud to be so called, but not by one who is not one, or when there is advantage to yell 'discrimination'.
3

kitvancleave,

Houston TX 30/05/2008 04:44:37
You should have checked your facts better on this story. Marion Cotillard's remarks were not made immediately upon her receipt of the Oscar, but more than one year earlier (January 2007) in a French TV interview. For one year no one got excited about anything she said (or didn't say); when she became an international figure overnight, the rightwingers took out after her, in part because the British tabloids misquoted her and hid the time frame, and in part because they enjoy trying to ruin people. Actually, Mlle. Cotillard was ruminating about documentaries she'd seen and books she'd read. She accused no one of anything, but by the time the media got through, she was called an "America hater" and rabblerouser. The "uproar" you described lasted from March 1 to March 10, 2008; Cotillard's many fans and a lot of fairminded people who came to know her through the Oscarcast refused to allow this smear campaign to be waged. It is a dead story now, until you dragged it up again. Next time, call around and get some facts before you print this kind of nonsense. Marion Cotillard is a great artist and did not do what you accused her of doing.
4

Graeme,

Guangzhou 30/05/2008 05:14:28
Stones statement does not fall under ignorance, as you would expect from someone of her background, it is one of pure stupidity. Sadly though (and this in an attempt to explain to the Chinese nation), it is impossible to police stupidity.

The suffering of the people in Sichuan has been and is still incredible. Perhaps if Stone lost her family, all her possessions and lay buried for days she may crave others to try and understand the word compassion? Perhaps not…
5

,

30/05/2008 07:12:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

The Thrill ,

30/05/2008 07:18:52
#2 - truthsleuth - you make absolutely no sense, sort it out or don't bother.

#3 - kitvancleave - you should have checked your reading of this story...take a look at the last paragraph...you nitwit.

Stone's comments were idiotic. But really, who wants to hear the world views of pampered, over-privileged celebrities anyway.

7

Russell M,

Stirling 30/05/2008 07:44:50
Cult of the celebrity - downfall of western civilisation? Stay tuned!
8

eric,

30/05/2008 07:53:01
OSCAR OSCAR.
9

Boy Wonder,

30/05/2008 07:55:33
Who the heck gives a stuff what "celebrities" say about anything? Most of them are vapid, brainless twonks!

Anyone who gets "offended" by them, is a fool, because it shows up their level of intelligence!
10

Media 1,

south africa 30/05/2008 07:58:03
She should not have apologised, who did she offend?
Those are her beliefs, are we now saying that we are disrespecting her beliefs?

If you believe in Karma, AND BILLIONS DO, then you must accept that she has a point. I personally, do not believe in Karma and I find her comments dont appeal to me, but I respect her right to make them...

This world needs to take a real good look at itself because we are in danger of entering a very disturbing place in which all our freedoms will soon be gone. You cannot criticise anything or anyone these days without being slated. it is outrageous!
11

Unimpressed one,

30/05/2008 08:00:14
See Stone has lost her cosmetics contract now...oops!
12

Biker,

Ayr 30/05/2008 08:01:08
It seems to me that we are all allowed an opinionm, good or bad. The problem arises when the media hear and report it. Perhaps Sharon Stone was unwise to voice her opinion on the subject, but the press and media have made a meal out of this.
Dior has exsasabated this by their actions and are as culpable. Fear of loosing a market for this kind of infraction is simply knee jerk. There needs to be some level of balance when reporting this kind of thing and not the reaction which seems to prevail here.
13

Biker,

Ayr 30/05/2008 08:02:03
oops typo, opinion. Fat fingers this morning.
14

paulr,

edinburgh 30/05/2008 08:17:54
If you are a beleiver in Karma, Sharon may well have been correct, if you are not then she came across as an idiot.
Either way, at least she had the guts to stand up and critiscise the chinese government, more than Dior and other fatcats would do, might harm profits after all, and our governments are as guilty as the chinese for standing by and saying nothing.
All our athletes should boycott the olympics, the chinese government make a mockery of the principles behind the games.
15

deeks rearend,

30/05/2008 08:19:00
i agree with miss stones first comment about bad karma
16

deeks rearend,

making cheap fakes 30/05/2008 08:20:47
Tiananmen Square protests of 1989
17

deeks rearend,

30/05/2008 08:21:59
nice government china has the only way the west says nothing against them is thay have to much money to loose.Tiananmen Square protests of 1989
18

Scottie,

South Africa 30/05/2008 08:22:50
Since when can anyone prevent anyone else from having his or her own thoughts about something? That's insane. And surely one can express thoughts aloud if one wants to? Where's freedom of thought and freedom of expression gone to? I suppose she'd have been fine if she'd spoken about what kind of an idiot she thinks her President is? Such double standards suck imo!

I'm sure she's made more than enough money from her movies and advertising to live on comfortably for the rest of her life. She does look very good indeed for her age, but she's hardly an "old lady"!
19

voltaire's janny,

30/05/2008 08:28:30
Earthquakes in China are caused by India. This lump of crust has been drifting from Africa northwards for millions of years. It has raised, and is still raising the Himalaya. No gods, no karma, no fault, no avoiding it. However the bottom to top corruption in the Chinese system encourages shoddy buildings that collapse like a deck of cards when vibrated at seismic frequencies. I take great offence at that and I presume the 1.3 billion would also.
20

The Thrill ,

30/05/2008 08:42:03
there most definitely was a fault voltaire's...

21

,

30/05/2008 09:00:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

Mr Grumpy,

Fife 30/05/2008 09:17:59
Just goes to show.... we're not paying so called celebrities for their brains, are we?

But how do we explain the concept to George Bush? He's done it a dozen times. He just laughs and gets on with it, and so should we all.

Too many people are too easily offended, and we just pander to them. We live in the society we created, and deserve.
23

diadhaire,

Dunkeld 30/05/2008 09:19:58
With the current socio-political climate, where the media forces reign supreme and shape the thoughts and actions of too many, Joseph McCarthy would be right at home.
24

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

30/05/2008 09:27:02
21

* if i had one*
25

Media 1,

cape town 30/05/2008 09:30:43
I think that Africa would be a successful continent if it was predominantly white and governed by whites! Is that racist? No, but say those words and you will be slated for it. And why, because some people cannot handle the truth.

Sharon Stone thinks that karma played a part in the Chinese earthquakes. Is she right? She is if you believe in Karma, wrong if you dont. But should she not be permitted to comment?

If she apologised, she has turned her back on her belief system. She must now deal with that.
26

Toast,

30/05/2008 09:33:55
Dior is the foolish looking party here,Stone says what she thinks [be it stupid or not] China goes ballistic and Dior forces an apology,freedom of speech,that is a joke.
Boycott Dior. [if any of you are foolish enough to waste money on their overpriced products]
27

Graeme,

Guangzhou 30/05/2008 09:44:06
A number of you above should be ashamed or are at least as stupid as Stone. For a start the people are suffering in the earthquake not the Government in Beijing.

This has nothing to do with freedom of expression either. It’s the same as saying I deserved my house to fall down crushing my whole family just because we have an illegal war or some other political angle that someone in the world does not agree with. Karma! Get a grip.

Literally millions of people are suffering from a natural disaster and you fools blame it on the Chinese Government and/or Karma. Plicks.


28

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

30/05/2008 09:53:08
If i had a penny for everytime I said something stupid I would have 67 pounds and 25p.

Let it go.
29

voltaire's janny,

30/05/2008 10:07:42
Earthquakes are not natural disasters. They are frequent, normal seismic events. Huge death tolls are disasters, but they are far from natural.

The biggest earthquake in America in recorded history was in Mississippi & Louisiana and few or none were killed - folks did not use concrete in 19th century.

It is the collapse of man-made structures that causes the disaster. No one dies when a grass hut or flimsy shack topples. In most low-rise buildings, people escape.

It's apartment buildings, offices, schools that inflict the damage. All these are under building control and therefore Government is not blameless.

When the next big one hits in California and a quarter million homes flow away through liquifaction (sandy soil that becomes a fluid when vibrated) I don't expect Hollwood's moistened bints to be blaming Karma, but the very real negligence of construction companies, local zoning regulators and the condoning or complicit politicians.
30

The Thrill ,

30/05/2008 10:16:24
If it was Karma then the Gt Hall of the People would collapse on government officials, rather than schools collapsing on kids.
31

Keir Hardie,

Inverness 30/05/2008 10:18:16
#6 - i was going to say the same thing about #2, i literally can't work out what he's saying or what point (if any) he is trying to make
32

Nirvana,

30/05/2008 10:26:06
Ah Hollywood, lala land what do you expect
33

Kirsty Boyd-Williamson,

New Town 30/05/2008 10:50:37
I frequently eat Chicken Karma yet nobody seems to take offence. What's the problem?
34

Mr Grumpy,

Still in Fife 30/05/2008 10:55:02
Only the chicken could take offence at you eating chicken, and you just ate it, so no offence was taken, just chicken.
35

Gunn,

NW UK 30/05/2008 10:59:46
Damn, if she really thinks the disaster in China COULD be karma then why should she not be allowed to say so?! She's a Buddhist so she'll believe in karma. But then, I notice she apologised for for having offended people, not for what she said. Good for her!

The concept of Karma isn't quite as alien to us as many people like to think. It is little different from the Westernised Christian teaching something like 'as you sow, so shall you reap.'

And the concept of Karma is taken so seriously in Cambodia that many (most?) ordinary people ther are nowhere near as appalled by the Pol Pot regime as we are in the West! They believe the killing fields was their karma. They accept it, they get on with their lives. I ask you, what is more healthy to mental health? Getting on with your lives or festering what has happened in the past?
36

Captain Flint,

edinburgh 30/05/2008 11:17:48
#28 - best comment yet.
37

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 30/05/2008 11:22:01
I prefer chicken karma meself.
38

seillean a mhirdenibha,

Williamsburg 30/05/2008 11:22:39
So much for freedom of speech when big money owns you, lock, stock, and barrel.
39

Lochiel,

west of Glasgow 30/05/2008 11:25:07
Mr. Cornwell has no concept of gathering the facts to write a legitimate news article. He completely misses the crucial point here. Was she wearing panties at the time of her comments or not?
40

Douglas,

Bathgate 30/05/2008 11:44:45
Instant karma's gonna get you. :o)
41

WI in GA,

30/05/2008 11:53:23
#19 "Earthquakes in China are caused by India"

I musta been asleep when they taught that in geography! I thought that earthquakes were caused by tectonic plates moving under the Earth's crust, not by a specific country!!!
42

WI in GA,

30/05/2008 11:56:26
But on topic: I think she has a right to say what she thinks. It may have been inappropriate, hurtful, offensive...but if that's the way she feels *shrug* I'm glad she didn't "retract" her comment as the article suggests. She merely apologised for causing offence.
43

Gunn,

30/05/2008 12:26:22
#38 Note, Stone did not retract what she said, only apologised for upsetting people.

(I love the humour on these Scotsman comments sections - some of it is quite brilliant.)
44

Andrew, Peebles,

30/05/2008 13:03:23
Are posters on here being deliberately stupid?

The only person that seems to have hit the nail on the head is #27.

How the hell is it 'Karma' for an innocent population to be punished for the acts of its rulers? That is and utterly, utterly ridiculous thing to say, even if you do believe in Karma.

Bad Karma must surely be inflicted on the person responsible for 'bad act', not someone else.

Why am I even talking about karma...?


45

voltaire's janny,

30/05/2008 13:04:21
Wi in Ga

duh

Don't you recognise a literary device used precisely 'cause numpties lke you dont' know the difference betwen the crust and the mantle. The plates you think you know about ARE the earth's crust; the solid rocky bits floating on the less solid mantle, scraping past, thrusting up or subducting at the joins.

India (crust) is bashing into Asia (Tibet, Nepal etc - also crust) and building mountains (Himalaya).

Expect you've been asleep in more than just geography class.
46

voltaire's janny,

30/05/2008 13:09:56
Why are we all ranting against karma, china, each other when this is a golden opportunity to discuss the most frozen frames in history - the ones showing Shazza's lady bits?
47

Silence of the Yams,

30/05/2008 13:17:49
Offended? Wait till they see basic instinct 2!!!


48

voltaire's janny,

30/05/2008 13:27:38
Or how about Asian instict 3. Shaz meets mingita?
49

Lochiel,

west of Glasgow 30/05/2008 13:30:04
voltaire's janny:

In appreciation of your vast geological (geographical?)expertise, I hereby dub thee, "Crusty"

50

Douglas,

Bathgate 30/05/2008 13:31:17
Stop it janny. You've got me all of a flap.
51

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 30/05/2008 13:42:38
#37 Dave from Barra

Corny,corny (karmy?) joke but it did make me laugh out loud.

People get over it. Sharon Stone is NOT stupid and is renowned for being outspoken and speaking her considerable mind.

Being a Pisces comme moi she senses things that others may not and I believe in karma and there IS bad karma with the Chinese oppression of the Tibetans.

She DID apologise and let's move on to more substantive matters - and forget about that crotch-shot in one of her movies. GET OVER IT!
52

Media 1,

South Africa 30/05/2008 13:58:06
The problem is NOT so much with what she said, in fact Stone has no part in this at all. The problem is that she said what she said and people responded to it by disrespecting her views and basically making a meal out of it.
What she thinks is of no importace, all that matters is that we all respect her right to say what she feels and move on without getting our knickers twisted.
But there are people out there who just cannot help themselves.

The problem in this world is that too many people are unwillinging to let other people speak! Like I said earlier, Africa would be in a much better position if it was governed by whites. Those who are against freedom of speech and cannot handle the truth, will claim such comments are racist! But we all know they are true! So its all just a bunch of monologues and performances!
53

The Fifth Colm,

30/05/2008 15:59:05
Media 1 #25
What is the definition of, "....a successful continent"?
54

The Fifth Colm,

30/05/2008 16:12:00
27 Graeme.
You say that a number of people should be as stupid as Ms Stone. Why? What have they done to deserve such a fate?

"Literally millions of people are suffering from a natural disaster and you fools blame it on the Chinese Government and/or Karma." Really? Where? I've seen no one blame the disaster on the Chinese government and only one agree with the karma thing (Deeks rearend) so, are you reading the same thread as me? Pull your head out of your fundamental orifice and take in what you are reading.
55

Charles Sharpe,

Totnes 30/05/2008 16:14:36
Sharon Stone's comments were unacceptable and did not show the respect due to those who have died in the earthquake in China or the sympathy due to those who have lost their loved ones.
I do hope that the representative of Dior when he talks about people keeping the right perspective on China does not mean that we should not talk about what has happened in Tibet or protest about it merely because it is commercially expedient not to do so.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Yours sincerely,
Charles Sharpe
56

Proud to have Scots blood,

New York 30/05/2008 16:25:26
Entirely too much publicity given to these self important people. They are 90% blowhards. They have too much of nothing to say. Some are downright
traitors. Yet they continue to make money hand over fist because their films and DVD's are purchased by the film going public. I cannot relate to the majority of them and I can live without them & their films. I don't need to see their films nor buy overpriced products they endorse.
57

Douglas,

Bathgate 30/05/2008 17:12:34
On a more serious note [:o)] is there no possibility that radicalised elements may take the headline literally?
58

Lillig,

30/05/2008 17:47:15
Being in the public eye means that you have some responsibility because what you say or think is much more likely to be heard than what wee Jimmy at the Blue Blanket thinks, for example.

She knows that and she made a nasty mistake in saying what she did as it suggests that somehow the people are to blame. (You can't separate the government from all the people, some of them must agree with the government and its policies.

So it was grossly insensitive. And another example of why we should not be driven only by a religious belief - that cannot be proven to be true or to work.

I can't stand these celebs who jump on the bandwagon of publicity from the most recent good cause, or the religion which its hip to be at the moment. (sic Tibetan Buddhist cos the Dalai Lama is hip - and he is I like him a lot; or Scientologist cos Tom Cruise et al believe in it.

And, we all know that converts are more zealous than those brought up in the cultural environment of a religion. What does Sharon Stone really understand about Karma?

She showed how shallow, self-centred and idiotic she really is - and how touch she is with the real world.
59

Lillig,

30/05/2008 17:48:09
typo - should be scientology, not scientologist.
60

CASEY PURVIS,

WEST HILLS 30/05/2008 17:59:07
everyone babbles away about karma all the time.
if you believe in karma then i would say she was spot on!!
china is like england. england has lost her identity and wants scotland to be the same. china wants to take away the tibetians identity.
casey purvis
61

Friar Tuck,

30/05/2008 20:20:24
If you agree with her remarks, don't buy anything made in China. Check the labels before you buy ANYTHING! You'd be surprised at what is made in China. I recently purchased frozen Pacific Salmon and when I went to open the package, in very small print, on the back of the package, right at the very bottom, it said "Product of China". There are very few things that you can buy that are NOT made in China! Hopefully, as I heard on the radio a couple of days ago, manufacturers will stop using cheap Chinese labour because it is now costing too much to ship it from China.
62

WI in GA,

30/05/2008 20:47:28
#45 Don't you recognise a joke when you hear one???

Gah! CRUSTY!!!!! ha ha ha ha ha
63

WI in GA,

30/05/2008 20:49:38
nowhere in my post did i call u any kind of name but you had to take it to another level didn't you? get the defensive rod out of your smarter bits!
64

Tired of Hypocrites,

Mount Forest 30/05/2008 21:54:43
1- Sharon Stone has the right to say what she wants.
2- Christian Dior doesn't give a crap about anything except money.
3- The Chinese government is as corrupt as any government there just on a steeper learning curve.
4- Ya can't say squat about anything these days, cause you'll probably offend someone.
5 -Everything in this world comes down to power and money.
6- So sod them all and say what you want, cause you're gonna be wrong in someones opinion.
7- Should I guess whom I offended.
8- Just to make sure "Graeme,Guangzhou" you're a double speak idiot, Plick yourself, # 44Andrew, Peebles, You're the idiots friend.
65

Biker,

Ayr 30/05/2008 23:31:36
Seems to me that Grahame is confusing the stories somewhat. But being another mouthpiece for the corrupt regime in Beijing it comes as no surprise.
Grahame. We in the west have the right to freedom of speech!!!!
66

Gunn,

30/05/2008 23:42:11
#44 Andrew. You ask, "How the hell is it 'Karma' for an innocent population to be punished for the acts of its rulers? That is and utterly, utterly ridiculous thing to say, even if you do believe in Karma." Ridiculous? NOT if you a) believe in Karma and b) if you accept the similar Chaos Theory.
Chaos theory goes, like Karma, that any action has a reaction because EVERYTHING is interconnected, hence "the butterfly effect" which holds as an example, "a butterfly flaps its wings in Beijing, and the stock market on Wall Street flounders."

Thus (if my understanding is correct) the Karmic explanation for this would be that the victims of a natural disaster would, probably in a previous lifetime, have been the butterflies that flapped their wings that caused a disaster at some place else in the World. To receive Karma, you don't have to have realised you were doing something that would cause it!

Now, don't shoot the messenger! I'm only explaining how it's supposed to work.
67

McHoot,

BrisbBrisbane 31/05/2008 01:19:27
Not only should she have kept her knees together but also her botoxed lips, eh wot?
68

Gunn,

31/05/2008 12:10:50
Y'know, I can see we don't need censorship in this country - just a few boneheads who are prepared to intimidate by ridicule and aggression any folk whose opinions are different from their own. Makes ya proud to be Western ... pah!
69

AnneJ,

OLDHAM 31/05/2008 21:38:32
Don't often agree with #10 but do this time!
I do believe in karma, and think one day the whole world will take responsibility for their actions and effects!
We have no-one to blame but ourselves for letting evil events happen, yes it was a distressing earthquake where many around the world sent their prayers and donations; perhaps these are 'wake-up calls' to humanity!....brfore the whole earth is destroyed one way or another; and I thank God we still have the freedom to say that!
70

danielshaw,

Boston, USA 01/06/2008 05:07:41
The earthquake epicenter is located in a Tibetan-inhabited area. By referring karma, Sharon Stone is effectively cursing many Tibetan victims for the divine punishment. Check the Free Tibet web site for more information. The paragraph begins with: “Many people do not realize that the epicenter of the earthquake was in an area of eastern Tibet now ... China's Sichuan province”(www.studentsforafreetibet.org/article.php?id=1528).

Sharon Stone said that the Dalai Lama was her good friend, and "When you're not nice [to him], that bad things happen to you". She is not suggesting the Dalai Lama made the bad earthquake happened to the Tibetans, is she?
71

Rick Chen,

los angeles 03/06/2008 06:20:58
Ms. Stone started her comment by saying, "You know it is interesting..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16hTsRfSzQo&feature=related

She referred to the earth quick in China as interesting. Through out her entire speech, she did not showing any compassion for the victims of the earth quick and yet she said a lot on behalf of the Tibetan people.

With her own eyes she saw Tibetans suffer before that is why she has so much compassion for the Tibetans. She did not see with her eyes how the Chinese people suffered, like most of you, she saw the Chinese as communists, People from the East. She sees Chinese as adjectives not as human beings. only a number of you see the Chinese people as human beings.

Like most of you here, you did not show any compassion for the Chinese victims. Most of you talked about Freedom of Speech and the Chinese Government, there is a time for these kind of talk, but not here, not at the expense of the more than 60,000 victims.

Most of you do not know what is the true meaning of human being. that is why you did not show any compassion for these victims.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.