Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 6th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Change of culture demands health becomes a priority



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 February 2008
LOOKING after their health is not a huge priority for many men. But when it comes to cancer, doctors and campaigners are trying urgently to raise awareness about the importance of seeing a doctor quickly with any suspicious symptoms, rather than putting it off until it is too late.
That men are so reluctant to see a GP has been blamed for the fact that in many cases cancers are diagnosed too late for treatments to be effective.

Each year about 7,700 men in Scotland die from the disease, with lung cancer the most deadly type, accounting for more than 2,100 deaths in 2006. But an increase in cases of prostate cancer – up 16 per cent in a decade – is also causing concern.

Much of this increase has been put down to a rise in PSA (prostate specific antigen) testing, but there are several concerns about the test.

Firstly, only about a quarter to a third of men with abnormally high PSA levels will have prostate cancer.

The rest will not have cancer, but will still have to endure anxiety and discomfort with further tests to confirm if they have the disease or not.

The test can also miss some prostate cancers, with up to a fifth of men with the disease having normal PSA levels.

These drawbacks mean it is unlikely that PSA screening will be introduced until a more sensitive test is devised, to avoid treating men who did not need it.

The recent discovery of new genetic links to prostate cancer could help to speed up such a test. But even without a screening programme, more men are now surviving prostate cancer. The disease causes around 800 deaths a year – down 8 per cent in ten years.

Campaigners would like to reduce this even further. The same is true for testicular cancer, which accounts for only 180 cases annually in Scotland.

Nadia Ramsey, of the Everyman Campaign, said: "More than 37,000 men are diagnosed with prostate and testicular cancer in the UK each year.

"It has now overtaken lung cancer as the most common male cancer. Testicular cancer is the most common cancer in younger men, a group who often don't think they'll be affected by the disease."

Ms Ramsey said that raising awareness of the symptoms of cancer is also vital to reducing diagnoses.

"This is particularly important for testicular cancer, as it is 99 per cent curable if caught in the early stages," she said.

While lung cancer cases in men are falling, as smoking rates decrease, it is still by far the biggest killer – accounting for almost 30 per cent of cancer deaths.

Survival rates have improved very little in 20 years, and campaigners believe a lot more could be done to increase the numbers surviving the disease.

Mike Unger, chief executive of the Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation, said: "You only have to compare our survival rates with the rest of Europe, and only Malta has lower survival.

"Part of the problem is that people don't go to their doctor with their symptoms early enough."

Bowel cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in men, making up almost 15 per cent of cases and 11 per cent of deaths.

While increasing numbers are surviving the disease, there are still issues over access to treatments across the UK.

The drug Avastin has been rejected for use on the NHS in Scotland as it is not deemed cost-effective.

Ian Beaumont, of the charity Bowel Cancer UK, said: "

There are still significant issues around lack of access to these treatments, which is forcing people to pay for them privately.

"Many patients are, however, campaigning to get them on the NHS, by appealing against health-authority decisions."

Lab-based battle goes on for drugs that will save lives

ACROSS Scotland, more than 1,000 researchers are hard at work searching for the next generation of treatments to tackle cancer.

In Glasgow alone, 400 scientists are looking into possible new drugs to target the disease.

Among those leading the effort is Professor Jim Cassidy, professor of oncology at the Beatson Institute, funded by Cancer Research UK and with strong links to Glasgow University.

He said the research being carried out in Scotland covered a large number of areas.

"Part of the research is what we call basic – people playing with cells and looking to see what are the mechanisms that drive cancer in a cell.

"The other extreme of that is clinical research, which is trials in patients," Prof Cassidy said.

"Then there is a team in the middle who try to take those ideas from the lab into the clinic, and vice versa, so we can learn and test ideas in humans."

Prof Cassidy said around 12 new compounds were being tested in early trials in Glasgow.

But he said only around one in ten would go on to be used in later, large-scale trials.

"Sometimes they work well in animals, but in humans they don't work," he said.

The researcher, speaking in his lab in Glasgow, said it could take as long as 11 years for a drug to go from early trial to commercial use.

But development times were getting shorter, although drugs still cost millions of pounds to bring to market.

"It is essentially a thing that only a drug company with its investor base can take on.

"Even a big charity like Cancer Research UK would find it difficult on its own, so they tend to get into partnership with a company at the stage where a drug looks interesting," he said.

Prof Cassidy predicted that personalised medicine would be the future of cancer treatment.

"The next big thing in cancer is going to be the ability to select which patients will respond to which drugs – an individualisation of therapy based on the molecular profiling of their tumour. "That is just around the corner. Within five years I am convinced we will be doing that with the vast majority of people with cancer."

Prof Cassidy said such an approach could also be used to solve the problem of drugs being too expensive for the NHS.

He said another aim was to create treatments which had fewer side-effects so people could get on with their lives with as little disruption as possible.

"That in itself would be a good thing," he said.

"So it is not all about cure. It would be lovely if we could cure everybody, but I'm not naive enough to think that within my lifetime we'll get there."

Positive thinking in battle to beat disease

FROM the start, Kenny Falconer had suspicions about the lump that appeared on his arm last year. "I had a fair idea of what it was," he said. "You can't help thinking about these things."

After a series of X-rays and MRI and CT scans, the lump was found to be a cancerous tumour. Almost immediately, he began treatment at Glasgow's Beatson Cancer Centre, with chemotherapy to shrink the growth.

He said: "I thought right from the start that I had to approach this and fight it positively."

Mr Falconer, 43, a Ministry of Defence policeman from Cove, Dunbartonshire, said the hardest thing was when he and his wife, Fiona, told their twin girls, aged 15, he had cancer.

He was relieved to learn it had not spread, and after chemotherapy, he underwent radiotherapy. He says he has continued to fight the disease in a positive way.

Fought disease twice with help of surgery

BRIAN Mason was diagnosed with prostate cancer over three years ago. Having successfully fought off the disease, he was shocked to discover that cancer had returned last year.

This time, doctors diagnosed olfactory neuroblastoma – a tumour behind his eyes and under his brain. The 67-year-old was at first told his breathing problems could be down to a polyp blocking his airway. But tests revealed something more sinister.

"The consultant described slicing across my head, peeling back the skin, taking away the forehead bone and removing the cancer. After that he said they would cut down the side of my nose, take that out of the way and take the cancer out of the bottom bit.

After the operation, Mr Mason, from Coldstream, went in and out of consciousness for several days. But the operation was a success. He went on to have chemotherapy and radiotherapy at the Western General in Edinburgh.

He has now finished treatment and is looking forward to a holiday in Disneyland, Florida, with his wife and grandchildren.

Disease hit after lifetime smoking

PATRICK O'Neill was aged just 12 when he started smoking.

Then last year, at the age of 60, he was diagnosed with lung cancer.

"I was not really worried about smoking and cancer," he said. "You don't really think about it when you are doing it. I was about 12 when I started but

it's not going to make any difference now; the doctors told me that, otherwise I would stop. It is one of my last pleasures."

Speaking at the Western General Hospital in Edinburgh where he was having radiotherapy, Mr O'Neill said his diagnosis was a shock. The social care worker collapsed at work with a suspected heart attack. Further tests revealed he was suffering from cancer. Mr O'Neill, from Glenrothes, Fife, said: "The doctors are just slowing it down, that's all they can do."

Sadly, Mr O'Neill died last month in a hospice near his home. His wife, Grace, said: "We had expected it for a while, but it was still a big loss."

Day by day, hoping for better times

IN THE past two years, William Benson has had to deal with the deaths of his two sons and a brother.

At the same time, he has also been undergoing treatment for bowel cancer.

"I've really had a bad time of it," he said. "They were all just found dead.

"You always expect your sons will bury you, rather than the other way round.

"It has been a really hard time, with the cancer to cope with as well."

Mr Benson, from Paisley, began his battle with the disease in 2006.

"They cut a bit of the bowel out and sent it away. The biopsy came back saying it was a rare cancer," the 57-year-old said.

Further tests found a shadow on his bladder and abdominal wall.

"To start with it was a bit of a shock," he said. "But after the first operation I got back on my feet and I did not feel too bad."

After major surgery, in which surgeons took out part of his abdominal wall and filled it with a nylon mesh, Mr Benson also had to go through chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

He continues to go to the Beatson Cancer Centre for check-ups and repeat doses of his chemotherapy drugs. Mr Benson even returned to work as a bus inspector after six months off sick.

"I don't know what the drugs inside me are doing but I feel OK and I feel fit enough to work," he said.

His wife, June, added: "He's never been one to sit around. He could not wait to get back to his work."

The family members are now keen to get on with their lives and look forward to a happier future.

"We are just going day by day and hoping everything is OK," Mr Benson said.

"I try not to worry about it or think about it too much," he added.

"If I go not well again, I go not well again, but for now I feel OK and just want to get on with life."








The full article contains 1958 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 22/02/2008 01:31:17
Problem is us guys are conditioned to be like'

'Bits of Wood'

Not meant to have,..'feelings'

Meant to,..'Only Provide'

Never to..'Be Ill'

Its to late to think about us when we are dying!

Give us..'A Break'..We..DO,, have..'feelings'..and DO get Ill!
We are NOT..'Machines'!

We NEED the Understanding and love,
That you girls/ladies get!
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 22/02/2008 01:35:07
Problem is us guys are conditioned to be like'

'Bits of Wood'

Not meant to have,..'feelings'

Meant to,..'Only Provide'

Never to..'Be I'LL'

Its to late to think about us when we are dying!

Give us..'A Break'..We..DO,, have..'feelings'..and DO get I'LL!
We are NOT..'Machines'!

We NEED the Understanding and love,
That you girls/ladies get!
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 22/02/2008 01:40:42
I am NOT saying my DYW, does not love me!

More saying, us guys DO feel we are unloved, albeit, the stigma of what we are conditioned to be!

Is it any wonder,

"LOOKING after their health is not a huge priority for many men",??
4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 22/02/2008 01:41:59
Charles has spoken and feels Sad!
5

John Blackley,

Winter Garden, FL 22/02/2008 01:47:20
I'll make you a deal. Let me see a doctor when I need to see a doctor - and not a week or two later - and let me see that doctor's record before I place my life in his or her hands. Then, when I need treatment, let me get it when I need it and not eighteen weeks to a year later.

Do that for me and I'll be more diligent about seeing a doctor.
6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 22/02/2008 01:54:14
John Blackley @#5,
That comes into it to!

'Well-Said'!

Looks like we are..'Nomards'
7

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta 22/02/2008 04:07:40
5
John Blackley,
Winter Garden, FL

Dude are U a physician, if Yes I partly understand u checking a doctor's work record.

If you are not . then u are not qualified to determine the quality of any doctor's work.

But I still understand, Since U and I live in the US where litigation , Insurance companies control our Doctors.

99.99% of US doctors are terrific . Only the very few bad apples get the US media attention..

Sounds like U are an old timerswith fixed mind opinions. That is a common trait with old timers everywhere.

Chill Dude

GC
8

fife runner,

22/02/2008 06:52:23
I would not have gone to the doc with what to me was a mole unless my wife had forced the issue. Turned out to be skin cancer which was successfully treated. If it had been up to me I would not have bothered and then it would have been too late.
9

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 22/02/2008 08:26:23
We should pay doctors only when we are well. When they allow us to get sick, they should pay us. In other words, let's have annual health MOTs (but let's also make certain that the equipment works well: the tales I could tell you!)
10

G,

dundy 22/02/2008 10:25:15
The reticence of men to see their doc is exaclty why we need worker friendly GP hours!!!!!
11

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 22/02/2008 10:32:49
Charles Linskaill

Don't feel sad - you will give yourself a depressive state and neglect your health and family and then where will you be?

If more men took care of their health and saw their medical professionals more often they would lose weight, feel better in the morning,and the general feeling of well-being would improve their sex life because they would have the energy to "do the deed', as it were.

So, men, AWAY with the crisps and fish and chips and beer and fizzy drinks and Macdonald's burgers and Pizza Hut garbage and Taco Bell mush.

Your wife and girlfriends or boyfriends will notice the difference and you will once again start having wild and wacky and sexy sessions with your partners - safe sex, of course.
12

,

22/02/2008 10:59:30
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

G,

dundee 22/02/2008 12:31:44
Dear Harder (I will not use the other part of your NDP as it will contravene good sense) my suggestion does not need the docs to do more. I accept that our health is our concern and responsibility. But opening surgeries at weekends (perhaps closing an afternoon a week)or (dare I say it) working shifts to improve men's attendance would bnot entail more work and might just help the health of the male population...but maybe that is not macho enough for you....
14

Em,

22/02/2008 16:34:15
Recently I was reading about the research of a Doctor who claims to have a cure for many illnesses including cancer and AIDS.

The treatment consists of blood electrification (passing small amounts of electricity through the blood stream similar to that produced by a cardiac pacemaker) which kills off any parasites and viruses in the blood and also helps to boost the immune system allowing it to fight off cancer.

He has used this method of treatment on terminal cancer patients who quickly went into complete remission, one such patient was told by doctors he had 2-3 weeks left as the cancer had spread throughout his body but as a last resort he decided to try blood electrification, he bought all the components required to build the device costing him a total of $39.00 three weeks later he stunned doctors who found that he was rid of all cancer.

Dr Beck claims that the medical establishment has known about the use of electricity and it's ability to cure serious illnes for years but it has been suppressed because it is inexpensive and does not generate the same profits as conventional methods for treating cancer. If society had knowledge of this it would end the monopoly the pharmaceutical industry has over our health.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.