Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Cancer survivor confronts the health secretary on 62-day wait

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 March 2009
WAITING times for cancer treatment need to be cut, the Scottish Government was told yesterday.
The Scotland Against Cancer conference in Glasgow heard Nicola Sturgeon, the health secretary, setting out what was being done to improve cancer care for Scottish patients.

But one cancer survivor, who spoke at the Cancer Research UK event, chal
lenged ministers to be more ambitious in reducing the time patients have to wait before starting treatment.

Cancer experts later said that patients elsewhere in Europe would be "outraged" by having to wait two months to start treatment, with most being seen within two weeks.

The current target of 62 days from urgent referral by a doctor to starting treatment has still not been met in Scotland, despite that originally being the target figure for 2005.

Ms Sturgeon stressed that the 62-day target was a maximum wait and many patients would start treatment much sooner.

Heather Goodare, who was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1986 when living in West Sussex, thanked Ms Sturgeon for the initiatives she had put in place to improve cancer care. But she challenged her over the "very unambitious" 62-day target.

"For some slow-growing cancers 31 days is perfectly OK, but for others it is just not acceptable at all," she told the health secretary.

Mrs Goodare, who now lives in Edinburgh, said when she was diagnosed over 22 years ago, she had to wait only two weeks before having surgery to remove the lump from her breast.

"I don't understand why things have gone backwards," she said.

Ms Sturgeon said everyone in the NHS had worked together to reduce waiting times and they were now very close to hitting the 62-day mark.





The full article contains 294 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 March 2009 7:40 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Cancer research
 
1

webwise,

Scotland 20/03/2009 20:44:57
The dignified concerns of a former cancer sufferer used and twisted by this so called newspaper in order to create yet another attack on an SNP minister.

A quality journal this certainly isn't, The Scotsman are rapidly alienating themselves from all but the most hardline fundamental Unionists.
2

webwise,

Scotland 20/03/2009 21:24:13
One need only look at the coverage Gordon Brown is receiving in the real press (English) to understand why The Scotsman are producing so many 'balancer' articles attacking the SNP.

This is how it works in Scotland, Brown's now diminishing Global reputation coupled with the shocking state of the UK economy amid revelations that toxic loans continued at Northern Rock AFTER the bale out have to be balanced in Scotland.

Newspapers are supposed to inform and educate. Instead we have a 'virtual environment' in Scotland as far as news is concerned where the Labour party must be protected.

Without the Labour party in Scotland the Union effectively ceases to exist.
3

Edward,

21/03/2009 01:34:36
#2 Webwise
Your spot on the money regarding Gordon Brown
On two occassions on the news yesterday it wasevident that Brown's standing is now no more than a blip in history. First I heard Robert Peston, he the sicophant Labour supporter on the BBC, actually puting Brown down when talking about t farce thats Northern Rock.
Then the BBC showed a clip about Barack Obama.In itself and on appearnce nothing to do with Brown. But there was a telling remark. Brown is projecting himslef as world statesman and pushing the G20 summit in London as the really big thing..world stage,Brown in charge etc. Now cut to this clip of Obama on the Jay Leno show talking about getting a dog for his girls.When asked when he will get the dog,Obama said'after the NATO summit'not 'after the very important G20 summit' but the NATO summit as if G20 just does not figure remotely on the radar!
This reflects just howmuch the much trailed G20 is being made into aside show of little importance in America and there is a lare group of european leaders who think the same.
Brown is now just a side show to be ignored, he is an embaressment!
Here is another example of how desperate Brown is. The D Day vetrans have been asking the government since last year for assistance in attending this years services in France.All other countries vetrans are being given help. But the Labour Government just ignored our vetrans. Now grudgingly the Government have had the Lottery help out.Surprise Surprise Brown now wants to attend,talk about grandstanding in order to get votes, the man now realises he is very unpopular and will do anything to hang his hat on anything for free publicity
4

donald anderson it's me,

glasgow 21/03/2009 04:57:57
The so called "Scotsman" has turned brown.
5

donald anderson it's me,

glasgow 21/03/2009 04:59:14
The Northbritishperson is part of the North British Brown press in Scotland.
6

Fi,

Edinburgh 21/03/2009 12:55:53
Comments 1 through 5 are despicable.

This article is about cancer. It's effective and expeditious treatment.

As someone who had to wait far longer than 62 days for a suspicious lump which the referring GP called urgent to be examined by a specialist, I agree that we need to look into this issue and work on referral times.

The first five posters should be ashamed for making this issue into a political football.
7

Ealasaid N,

21/03/2009 19:10:00
The UK has one of the poorest cancer survival rates in Europe, lagging a poor 15th out of 22. The reason is delay due to beaurocracy and red tape as well as a failure to effectively monitor and diagnose. As someone whose mother is currently undergoing chemotherapy I am only too conscious of the politicking that goes on within the hospital trusts with pennies before patients deciding on who gets the most effective treatment. In our authority they claimed it was not policy to offer FEC-T - a newer chemotherapy that is apparently significantly more effective than FEC. They claimed there is no difference yet they cannot explain why,having refused to allow my mother and other women this treatment (women who meet the licensing criteria for having FEC-T) Trust employees who do not meet the criteria and should be given FEC, are given FEC-T. If there is no difference, why are they giving it to their employees and not other patients who actually qualify for the treatment? It is time the number crunchers in the NHS were made to face the consequences of their actions through the criminal code because allowing people to die to save a few pence is criminal.
8

Suzi B,

21/03/2009 21:29:04
#7
I couldn't have said that better myself, particularly your last paragraph.
9

,

22/03/2009 07:05:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

,

22/03/2009 07:06:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Dunfesterin,

23/03/2009 12:41:51
If the Scotsman *is* using this story just for a dig at the SNP, then they surely are morally on a par with the Daily Express who hideously attacked the kids of Dunblane story (see Bloggerheads.com for more details on that hideous story) ...

They wouldn't stoop so low - would they?




 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.