Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 4th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Can we dare to hope we are winning the war on cancer?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 February 2008
CANCER is the one word that no patient receiving a diagnosis wants to hear.
Each day in Scotland, more than 70 people are told they have the disease. And during our lifetime, we all have a one in three chance of developing it.

Cancer is still the leading cause of death in Scotland, with more than 15,000 people dying from the disease every year.

These numbers are undoubtedly frightening – and cancer is the most feared of diseases.

But what is sometimes overlooked is the fact that cancer survival rates are improving so much that some experts have suggested it could one day be seen as just another chronic disease, like diabetes, which can be managed with treatment.

As the Scottish Government prepares to publish a new cancer strategy this summer, The Scotsman has visited cancer patients in hospitals, hospices and their homes to discover the truth about what it is like to live with the disease, and spoken to the key players shaping the future of cancer care in Scotland.

The consultation on cancer care, launched last week, poses serious questions about the way forward – are more challenging targets needed to cut waiting times for treatment? Is there more to be done to reduce cancer? How can we improve the care of the dying?

But for most patients the key question will remain: What are my chances of survival?

And while cancer survival is improving overall, for some cancers it is improving faster than for others.

In the last 20 years, the cancers with the biggest improvements include prostate, breast, leukaemia and Hodgkin's disease. In comparison, lung and throat cancer survival has improved very little.

The challenge for Scotland is now to address any deficiencies in cancer care, increase survival rates further and prevent cases of the disease in the first place.

Nicola Sturgeon, the Health Secretary, has a clear vision of where she would like to see cancer care heading.

"I would like to see cancer services that have state-of-the-art buildings and equipment and have staff that are as good as we have today," she said.

"But I would also like to see cancer services that are more patient-focused, that give people more information and have patients treated in their own home or as close to their own home as possible," she said. "One area where we do need to improve is palliative care, giving people choice and dignity about where they want to die."

Speaking to The Scotsman, Ms Sturgeon said there was a possibility of more challenging targets for NHS boards to cut treatment waiting times.

Boards have already struggled to meet a two-month target from a doctor urgently referring a patient suspected of having cancer to treatment starting.

Figures are expected to show this target was finally met at the end of 2007 – two years late.

Ms Sturgeon added: "It is going to lead to more challenges. While cancer mortality is going in the right direction, cancer incidence is going up. That is understandable. Cancer is a disease predominantly associated with ageing and we've got an ageing population."

But the new strategy will be about more than just targets.

Ms Sturgeon also wants to look outside the clinical setting, helping patients to get on with life while fighting cancer by giving advice on finances and other areas where they need support.

"We need to develop that side of cancer care much more than we have done in the past," she said, a call echoed by charities.

Elspeth Atkinson, Macmillan Cancer Support's director for Scotland, said: "More people are surviving cancer but can feel abandoned when they leave hospital and finish their treatment.

"Cancer affects every aspect of a person's life and Scotland's cancer services need to adapt to meet the complex needs of people living with cancer, through the integration of health and social care services."

The financial impact of cancer also has a major effect on the NHS itself.

With the incidence of cancer increasing, the health service has to treat more patients. But another concern is the rising cost of cancer drugs, as the pharmaceutical industry develops new, expensive treatments.

The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) decides which drugs are cost-effective for the NHS to use.

She said even where the SMC did not recommend a drug, doctors were free to prescribe it if they thought it appropriate.

Doctors, however, are sceptical about this claim, saying if a health board refuses to fund a drug, their hands are tied.

Ms Sturgeon said she wanted to work with drug manufacturers to try to drive prices down.

"I'm keen that we do look to talk to drugs companies about how they can help in terms of making drugs more available, more cost-effective," she said.

But whatever happens with treatment, a key focus of efforts to tackle cancer must now be on prevention in an effort to cut costs as well as suffering.

Ms Sturgeon said: "We are doing work now to develop a five-year anti-smoking plan and we are doing a lot of work around alcohol.

"We have got to continue with that because primary prevention is absolutely critical."

While politicians and doctors search for the much-needed answers to cancer prevention and treatment, the public continues to worry about the disease.

But with survival rates improving year-on-year, the future is starting to look brighter. Dr Grahame Howard, the clinical director of the cancer centre at Edinburgh's Western General Hospital, said: "We can now give the message to patients and the public that the results of cancer treatments and the outcome for patients is improving for almost all cancers."

'I don't want to know about the future'

WHEN Sophie Flood had pains in her knee, she blamed a fall she had suffered a couple of months earlier.

But when it failed to improve, her doctor referred her for further tests.

Finally, an MRI scan last August revealed the 19-year-old had osteosarcoma – a type of cancer affecting the bone, most common in the under-25s.

Being a medical student, Ms Flood knew immediately what the diagnosis could mean. "It was awful," she said. "I was in complete shock."

Speaking while having chemotherapy at the Beatson Cancer Centre in Glasgow, Ms Flood said the treatment had been tough, adding: "I do get sick, but the worst part of it is feeling tired and faint."

Patients with osteosarcoma also face surgery to remove the tumour, which can, in some cases, involve amputation. However, improved treatments have led to improving survival rates from the disease.

Despite this, Ms Flood, who lives in Glasgow's West End, said she had been reluctant to ask her doctors about the future. She explained: "I don't want to know, so I haven't asked."

Ms Flood has now had surgery to remove the tumour, which showed it had responded well to chemotherapy. She is now having physiotherapy to help improve movement in her leg.

She is also looking forward to getting back to her studies at the National University of Ireland in Galway.

She said: "I liked science at school, but I didn't want to do a lab-based job.

"I wanted a people job, so I decided to do medicine. It is really hard work, but I really enjoy it."

Liz Watt, a teenage and young-adult cancer nurse specialist at the Beatson, said a cancer diagnosis had a major impact on young people and their families.

She said: "They wonder whether they can be cured; is the chemo going to work? That is a scary thought for a young person to contemplate.

"Nobody thinks about dying at that age. Then someone is there telling you that you have a life-threatening illness and you have to start thinking about these things."


The full article contains 1312 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 February 2008 9:38 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Cancer research
 
1

,

20/02/2008 07:47:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Farky,

Edinburgh 20/02/2008 09:25:02
Cancer care in some parts of Scotland needs examined and improved. My friends father currently has terminal cancer and I am shocked, saddened and disapointed at the care he has received. It's been a disaster to be honest.

For obvious reasons I can't and won't give details, but here is a summary of what this individuals care has been like.

Operation to remove cancer done in Raigmore in Inverness. Follow up scans done in Belford in Fort William. Chemotherapy done in a local small general hospital close to his home. Doctors don't speak to each other. No joined up care whatsoever. GP sent him the other day to local hospital as drip feeding was required as he can't keep down any food or liquid. Hospital sent him hom same day with medication for constipation. Honestly, is this the way we sometimes treat people with this disease?

It's not my father or else Highland health board would be in court by now! Reading this article has just made me so angry though. My firends parents are like my own parents, and to see this happening to them makes me feel sick!
3

SeriouslyAmused,

Ayr 20/02/2008 09:45:23
2 Farky:

It's not just cancer care that fails patients. I have had experience of the lack of joined up and cohesive care too in another area. It seems to me no-one in the different departments and clinics talk to each other at all, and note-taking seems woefully inadequate. Follow up care is abysmal very often, and in my own case, promised but never materialised. I have the highest regard for doctors and nurses and their personal care is of the highest order, the failings seem to come from the system itself, and top-down policies.
4

subrosa,

20/02/2008 11:22:07
# 2

If anything like that was happening to me or mine, I would have been in touch with Nicola Sturgeon right away and also my MSP. We don't get a second chance with something like this so I'd pull out all the stops. Also we can't expect things to improve if our political representatives don't know about them.

I sympathise with you very much indeed and also with your friend's family. At this time of great stress they may say they don't want to 'rock the boat' etc but believe me, if someone complains directly to the top, it will be dealt with as a matter of priority. An email marked top priority to both Nicola Sturgeon and the relevant MSP, asking for an urgent response, won't take long to type. I speak from personal experience.
5

G,

dundee 20/02/2008 12:51:09
Don't expect doctors to speak to each other or specialists to think about the whole problem rather than their little bit - the NHS is designed around the doctors/surgeons/specialists - their interests are the most important thing - factor in that they cover each others backs then the NHS will never operate efficiently or effectively until they are forced to look at the whole problem from the patients POV!
Maybe some training in problem solving or pattern recognition would help.....
6

TheTerminator,

20/02/2008 13:44:30
How many people think that all the money they give to Charities such as Cancer Research UK and the British Heart Foundation is spent totally on medical research.These organisations make contributions to ASH and ASH Scotland ( a registered Charity ) who do nothing more than carry out Anti-Smoking studies and produce Anti-Smoking propaganda. Think twice before giving donations to these charities.
7

Invitrospud,

20/02/2008 13:45:01
# 3 "I have the highest regard for doctors and nurses and their personal care is of the highest order "

I beg to differ. Too often people assume this to be the case, but my personal experience is very different. My partner had a 4 month stay in hospital after the 'cancer expert' I took him to for an emergency appointment sent him home saying he was fine. This doctor could not recognise a very sick man when she saw one. I made a complaint about the doctor and finally after 11 months, and several letters, received an apology. I also wrote a 5 page letter of complaint about his nursing care and received grudging apologies for all points. Before my parner's 5th operation on his brain I was more worried about him coming back to the ward than I was about him going down to theatre.
8

Farky,

Edinburgh 20/02/2008 13:48:10
#2,

I agree with what you say. People concerned however are the kind who don't like to "ask" which of course doesn't help the situation. They never have asked for anything throoughout their lives, just not the kind of people who wish to be a burden to anyone.

There are few excuses for thefragmented care though. One doctor says one thing, only to be contradicted by another. One prescribes more powerful painkillers, one says it's not time for something so strong... It just goes on like that. One week after scans at Belford to see if there is any chance of furth chemo being effective, there is no word back from anyone. I just think that people deserve much better when such a serious and terminal illness is going to end their life. If it were my own parents, I'd of course have been complaining long before now.
9

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 20/02/2008 14:08:04
The short answer is "no". The long answer is also"no".

There are too many pollutants in our food and water and air - especially the noxious, toxic smog from China that is infiltrating the whole Earth - that it will take a miracle or drugs discovered in the Amazon rain forest - those parts that have not been burned for farmland or trees felled for lumber - to PERHAPS find a miracle drug like aspirin (acetylsalisylic [spelling] acid).
10

Em,

20/02/2008 15:21:23
I was wondering if anyone else had heard of this,

A couple of weeks ago I was watching a 1990's lecture on google video by a doctor named Robert Beck who claims to have a cure for cancer, aids and many other diseases. The treatment consists of blood electrification.

Dr Beck claims that this discovery has been suppressed because it is inexpensive and would cause the pharmaceutical industry to loose a great deal of money.
11

Robert,

Kirriemuir 21/02/2008 18:45:47
Ref to EM above; I have not (as yet) read Robert Beck's books but have read excerpts from them and he believes that the electricity that we so freely use has an adverse impact on our health. Thanks for reminding me about him; I will now buy his books.

The increase in cancer and diabetes and other related illnesses is solely due to the food we eat and the propaganda that is spoonfed us about its nutritional benefits by missionaries of the healthy diet brigade and by the food profiteers; like taking more polyunsaturated fat (vegetable oils) which are known to medical science to be potent immune suppressors and carbohydrates especially from grains that are equally harmful to us and so too is pasteurised milk and etcetera. Unfortunately, Mr & Mrs Joe Public, in trying to earn their 'corn' leave it to the so-called experts to spoonfeed this pure unadulterated excrement for which those boffins are paid exceptionally well! Anyone who desires to remain composmentis, fit, and healthy, to the bitter end then return to the traditional saturated fat and meat diets that prevailed pre-WW2 and enjoy those tasty meals and more, you are most unlikely to suffer from cancer or diabetes. All the vital information necessary for good health is on the Internet and here is one (of many) Web pages to agitate the grey matter and it is a UK one to boot: http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.