Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Final Caltongate plan gets go-ahead after flats promise



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 March 2008
THE final part of the controversial Caltongate scheme has been given the go-ahead today.
Councillors have agreed to approve the final application for the £300 million Old Town project after developers agreed to preserve Royal Mile tenements for affordable housing use.

The majority of the scheme was approved last month, but a proposal
to demolish all but the facade of some tenements on the Canongate was put on ice by councillors.

But after developer Mountgrange altered the application to propose retaining the "majority" of the front and rear elevations of the McRae tenements as well as preserving the buildings at 221-223 on the historic street, the city's planning committee approved the plans .

At a meeting today, councillor Alastair Paisley said he was "very pleased" the developers had made changes to the scheme.

He said: "I am delighted that they (Mountgrange] have addressed the majority of concerns that we had about this application. This is a very important development for the city and I have no hesitation in moving to grant this plan."

Green councillor Steve Burgess had recommended that the proposals be put on hold, arguing the developers had failed to reduce the height of some of the buildings and make them fit in with the rest of the Old Town.

However, his motion was outvoted ten votes to two.

Following the meeting, Mountgrange spokesman Mark Cummings said: "We are delighted that Edinburgh council has granted this proposal. It has been a very long process that has been carried out thoroughly and the planning committee has dealt with it very well."





The full article contains 272 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 March 2008 2:14 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Caltongate development
 
1

Randan,

05/03/2008 14:26:46
Caltongate is a pile of b0ll0cks and this tinkering does not improve it enough to stop it being a big big mistake.
2

Old Town Resident,

edinburgh 05/03/2008 15:54:20
see www.independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com
for more on stopping this council/mountgrange act of vandalism on the city,
read how Mountgrange donated £4,000 to the Labour Party prior to the 07 elections, read about the developers company PPS headed by former leader Donald Anderson
yes a public inquiry is crucial to get to the bottom of this stinking mess
3

Buttress,

05/03/2008 17:15:58
Disgusting - what is the council thinking of? What is going on?

This re-arranging the deckchairs doesn't begin to address the concerns of local, national and international heritage bodies.

A public inquiry MUST be held.

see also

www.eh8.org.uk

What is the point of listing buildings and designating World Heritage Sites if a developer can do what it wishes with the Old Town, and the council rubber stamps it through?


4

John N,

Edinburgh 06/03/2008 13:43:44
Listed Building status is only one of the considerations. Another is economic benefit. Sometimes, one outweighs the other.
5

Buttress,

07/03/2008 11:39:58
Not in this case - and it should be bottom of the list.

The claimed economic benefits are unproven - they could be claimed for a scheme which respects the listed buildings.

This is developer greed, and council stupidity.
6

John N,

Edinburgh 11/03/2008 13:52:42
Claims of economic benefit are always unproven...
7

Buttress,

12/03/2008 22:44:08
Not really - if this goes to inquiry there should be a bit more than nebulous claims such have been made here. Where do you stop?

Planning policies need tightening up however - the latest draft out for consultation is equally as easily got round by developers and councils who don't give a damn about historic buildings.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.