Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Burma junta tells Suu Kyi: You're staying under arrest

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 May 2008
BURMA'S junta yesterday extended the house arrest of opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi.
Officials drove to the Nobel laureate's lakeside home in Rangoon to read out a six-month extension order in person, a government official said. However, one Rangoon-based diplomat claimed it was for a year.

The extension was issued despite a Burmese law that stipulates no-one can be held longer than five years without being released or put on trial.

Ms Suu Kyi, whose National League for Democracy (NLD) party won a 1990 election landslide only to be denied power by the army, has now spent nearly 13 of the past 18 years under some form of arrest.

Her latest period of detention started on 30 May, 2003 "for her own protection" after clashes between her supporters and pro-junta thugs in the northern town of Depayin. The last of a series of year-long extensions expired yesterday.

Although few expected Ms Suu Kyi, 62, to be freed, the extension is a timely reminder of the military's refusal to make any concessions on the domestic political front, despite its grudging acceptance of foreign help after Cyclone Nargis hit on 2 May.

Hours before the extension, order was delivered, police arrested 20 NLD members trying to march to Ms Suu Kyi's home.

Activists criticised Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, for not speaking out about her detention during his recent visit to Burma, which he said was purely a humanitarian mission.

"It is shameful that Ban Ki-Moon went to Burma and failed even to utter her name," Mark Farmaner, the director of the Burma Campaign UK, said.

"He is playing into the regime's hands. The UN is crawling on its knees before the regime, afraid to speak the truth in case it affects aid access deals, which the regime is already breaking in any case."

Meanwhile, state-controlled media yesterday praised the United Nations for the help it has given to the 2.4 million people left destitute in the Irrawaddy Delta, suggesting a thaw in the junta's frosty relationship with the outside world. The English-language newspaper New Light of Burma, the generals' main mouthpiece, said UN agencies had taken "prompt action" to provide relief supplies after the cyclone, which left 134,000 people dead or missing.

Three weeks after the cyclone's 120mph winds and sea surge devastated the delta, the UN says fewer than one in three of those most in need have received any aid.

Thousands of beggars line the roads, with children shouting "Just throw something" at passing vehicles. Witnesses say many villages have received no outside help, and the waterways of the Burma's former "rice bowl" remain littered with animal carcases, either grotesquely bloated or rotting.

Much of the blame for the aid delay rests with the junta, which has been reluctant to admit a large-scale international relief effort for fear of loosening the vice-like grip on power the army has held since a 1962 coup.

But diplomats who helped co-ordinate a donor conference in Rangoon on Sunday said there were small signs of the generals gradually overcoming their paranoia and admitting outside help. "I can sense that there is a sense of urgency, a sense of appreciation that the world, after all, is not all that hostile on some issues, particularly on humanitarian issues," Surin Pitsuwan, secretary-general of the Association of South-east Asian Nations, told a news conference yesterday.

And after the junta told Mr Ban that all aid workers would be given full access to the delta, foreign experts have started heading out of Rangoon to test whether anything has changed on the ground.

The United States told the aid conference it was ready to raise its $20.5 million (£10 million) offer if the junta opened up but was "dismayed" that it went ahead with a constitutional referendum in the middle of the disaster. The result – 92.5 per cent in favour on a turn-out of 98.1 per cent in a poll held with no neutral monitoring – is unlikely to enhance the credibility of the junta's "roadmap to democracy", that is meant to culminate in elections in 2010.

PROFILE

AUNG San Suu Kyi was born in Rangoon on 19 June, 1945. Her father, a national hero, was assassinated when she was two. His death came six months before Burma achieved the independence from Britain he helped negotiate.

After university in New Delhi, Suu Kyi studied philosophy, politics and economics at Oxford. In 1972 she married British academic Michael Aris. Suu Kyi returned to Rangoon in 1988 to look after her mother, just as resentment of military rule boiled over.

Named secretary-general of the National League for Democracy the same year, she called for an end to the military rule. She was put under house arrest in July 1989 for "endangering the state" and has been in prison or under house arrest off and on since.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 May 2008 1:01 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Burma
 
1

Alan Reid,

NZ 28/05/2008 00:45:53
Come on Bush, do something about this evil country, or is there not enough oil for you?
2

,

28/05/2008 04:20:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Proximaking,

Dundee 28/05/2008 07:29:59
Suu Kyi is yet another Bhutto type figure ..... out for her own family and class and to hell with the rest. Dynasties don't make for good democracies. The problem for the Burmese is they have no choice, a dynastic candidate on one side or the army place-men on the other is no choice at all.
4

Itchy,

28/05/2008 07:51:42
#1 then you can call him Adolf Hitler when he does intervene....
5

paulr,

edinburgh 28/05/2008 08:15:33
#1 You hit the nail squarely on the head, NO OIL... therfore of no interest to the Whithouse.
The UN is as our Asian neighbours would say a toothless lion, it has no power and the Burmese army junta know that.
6

57Nomad,

california 28/05/2008 13:00:44
#'s 1,3, and 5

For #1, The guy from NZ. New Zealand is much closer to Myanmar than the US, so the question arises, why doesn't New Zealand do something about this hideous regime. Don't New Zealanders have even a shred of human compassion.

Come on, you weenies, what's with you? New Zealand launched a defense program called Project Protector that gave them seven new powerful warships in the past half dozen years. The whole world wants to know why these fearsome men of war stand idle while New Zealands 'cold feet' response emboldens the vicious thugs to new, unheard of levels of barbarity.

When the entire sad story of this pitiful display of callousness becomes clear to everyone the cry of, "why, New Zealand, why?" will be heard the world around. "Why did you just sit and watch, with your sheep and your cricket. Couldn't you have sent at least one ship? These guys don't even HAVE a navy so it wouldn't be all that dangerous. Or maybe it was because you just didn't care."
7

57Nomad,

california 28/05/2008 13:02:31
#6 contd.

For 1 and 5, where have you been? Whatever gave you the idea that Myanmar didn't have any oil?
8

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 28/05/2008 14:15:03
Yes #1 and #5 - haven't you heard of the Burmah Oil Corporation?

9

Stefan,

NYC 28/05/2008 14:56:48
#6 Nomad. Sure, they have sheep and cricket, but their true warrior spirit is spent on the rugby field of battle.
10

postmark54,

Chongqing, China, 28/05/2008 15:00:00
#6, 57Nomad,
Go back to smoking more weed, you're delusional, as always. The whole world must agree with you on the part of New Zealand being such a powerhouse eh? New Zealand is a good country, and there's no need for you to run them into the ground.
Go back to canvassing your neighbourhood and see if the rest of the Americans agree with all the crap you always manage to spew out.
You must be smoking 'catnip' the way your brain is obviously being tossed around.

#1 Alan Reid,
Bush is equally as evil as the junta, the last thing Myanmar needs is for that idiot to interfere. Don't worry about 57Nomad, he's totally hooped in the head, completely clueless about anything, rumor has it that he was caught in a clothes dryer for more than half an hour, finished off what little brains he had.
11

57Nomad,

california 28/05/2008 20:32:15
#10 PM PM54

In my wildest dreams I could have never hoped for a response like yours. Hilarious. By the way, I learned the 'canvassing my neighborhood' from you, slick, so if you don't find that a reliable way of gathering data I suggest you stop doing it.

I also noticed that once again you: said I was smoking pot, I'm delusional, a crap spewer, and a brain tossed catnip smoker, whateverthehell that is. But, you did not address one single issue. Not one. Why is that, PM? Your entire post is ad ad hominem attack. Did you forget the rule we like to play with? For those who need it pounded into their bricklike skulls here it is again for the hundredth time.

First you must address an issue, a substantive issue, and make your point there, refuting the dim bulb whose point you disagree with. Have done that, naming the issue and then refuting your adversary's and putting forward your own, you may feel free to then attack the clown who holds the odious idea you have refuted.

See, it's fast, fun, and easy!! Even a child can do it. Why can't you?
12

57Nomad,

california 28/05/2008 20:44:16
#9 Stefan

They are excellent at rugby. My post was really just to poke fun at the sanctimonious dufus who managed to turn the Burmese junta's response to this tragedy into an anti-Bush anti-American screed. That's just one guy. As a group they are tough studs, great rugby players, marvelous sailors, and all around good people.
13

57Nomad,

california 28/05/2008 20:53:39
#5 Paulr

Paulr said:

"#1 You hit the nail squarely on the head, NO OIL... therfore of no interest to the Whithouse."

You are from Dundee? Dundee Scotland. You are from Dundee Scotland and you are slagging Bush and the US. Here's some news as the gentleman from post #8 can attest. What country was the first to exploit the considerable Burmese oil fields? Don't know? Let me tell you. It was Scotland, in 1896 David Sime Cargill founded the Burmah Oil Company. No point in the US invading them, you beat us to it.
14

BriGuyforJustice,

New Hampshire, USA 28/05/2008 21:04:48
Sui Kyi is NOT a part of any dynastic, political "royal Family," like the Bus$hes, Kennedys or Clintons here in America.
The Burmese junta will NOT, has not allowed her to hold her DULY-ELECTED(*and Honestly-elected) Office of The Presidency of Burma/Myanmar, since 1990.

And as far as the Junta's$ "representing" any of the Burmese People, they only have the Military, and a few other lackies, that I believe are mostly from the Burman Ethnic "Majority" in that Multi-Ethnic Land, and ethnic minorities like the KAREN and the MON, etcetera, are horribly oppressed, murdered, even living in outright SLAVERY under this Self-Appointed "Nationalis$T Burmese" Military regime, including many in the Irawaddy Delta region, just struck so horribly by the Cyclone, Nargis.
"Myanmar" is supposedly a more "nationalistic" name for this land "formerly known as" The Union of Burma, and I have NO knowledge of the Burman or other languages of that beleagured land, but I've heard some Burmese, or "Myanmarese" say that the word "Burma," Too, fits near-perfectly with what most Burmans were already happy to call their nation-state, before this Astrology and Numerology-consulting, ins$ane with Power Military junta changed it to "Myanmar".
Any southeast Asian language experts or Philologists out there, who could clear that one up?
Also, President Bush need not invade Burma/Myanmar, he only needs$ to tell his fellow "Former" Corporate Oil people, like Condi, "CHEVRON" RICE and VP Cheney, to tell these Multi-National Petroleum and gas companies$, to S$top immediately, all bus$iness with this damned Junta.
15

Stefan,

NYC 28/05/2008 21:09:48
#12. I know. I got it. I was too.
16

57Nomad,

california 28/05/2008 22:11:12
#15 Stephen

I thought so. Having two people on this forum as dense and humorless as PM would be too much to take. Well done.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.