Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Wake me when it's over, Darling



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 March 2008
I DON'T think it's ever happened to me before, and I'm a little ashamed to admit it. Hopefully friends will still speak to me and I won't be a social outcast. Maybe it's a sign of turning 50, but it's not as if I had been drinking!
But there it was. I fell asleep during Alistair Darling's dour, dull and desperately depressing budget speech.

In years gone by I've listened to and then watched the speeches of Dennis Healey, Geoffrey Howe, Nigel Lawson, John Major, Ken Clarke an
d Gordon Brown. Some made me incredulous, angry, impatient or frustrated, while others made me ecstatic, joyful and optimistic, but this, this budget by proxy, left me somnambulant with disinterest.

It was a budget by proxy because it was shaped by Gordon Brown's actions of the last ten years, and such is the Prime Minister's centralised command and control, that it might as well have been delivered by him. Only it wasn't, and how I snored.

When Brown first arrived on the scene he delivered some overdue and clever measures, not least granting a large slice of independence to the Bank of England in setting interest rates.

To use a term of the fashion industry, Brown was the new black – and how he wowed the critics. Now, boring is the new black and the critics, used to exuberance, panache and a large helping of arrogance, are leaving the latest policies on their hangers. Darling's latest designs are just not appealing.

Now this is not a personal criticism of the Edinburgh MP's dry monotone style. There is a place in political theatre for straight statistical delivery and the job of Chancellor is well suited to this, as it suggests the Second Lord of the Treasury actually knows what he's doing. No, my objection, my boredom, was due to the complete emptiness of anything interesting he had to say.

It was 51 minutes of sheer drudgery with – in the true fashion of the House of Brown – the pain delivered in the immediate future and the benefits, such as they are, delivered in a year or two to come.

The reason this budget failed on the catwalk is simple – the self-indulgence of Brown's haute couture has left his disciple with little room to wriggle now that more austere conditions are about to prevail.

It's not as if Brown wasn't warned for long enough that his tax and spend excesses would eventually unravel like a badly stitched hemline.

This is the seventh consecutive Budget in which the outlook for public finances is worse than the Government had previously forecast.

With little room to tax more (even so, Darling hopes to take £2 billion more out of our pockets) and an ideological unwillingness to cut his cloth to suit his means, we are about to borrow more (£43bn now and £140bn over the next four years to be precise), putting even greater strain on the public finances. And that's before any recession.

I've now woken up from my brief slumber and having watched Darling's speech on the internet, I'm now compos mentis like the rest of you – awake in the living nightmare of Brown's new world.

Taxing our sanity
Whatever one thinks of the council tax – and I've never been a fan – the SNP's proposal for a new national income tax of 3p in the pound is just plain mad.

John Swinney is calling it a local income tax but, as it will be set nationally and will not vary between localities, it will be nothing other than an extra 3p on our income tax.

John Swinney also thinks he should get the UK Treasury's £400 million that funds Council Tax Benefit (provided because council tax does not reflect ability to pay). But his new tax is earnings related and so reflects ability to pay – so there's no need for a benefit – making his calculations hopelessly wrong.

With such myopic economic vision John Swinney could give Alistair Darling a run for his money.

Ben the Kitchin
Terrific! Another Michelin-starred chef is heading to Edinburgh to set up a new restaurant and boutique hotel. I can't wait and will take out a new ISA to prepare for my first expedition there.

The be-starred chef, Paul Kitching – not to be confused with our own Tom Kitchin – will close his award-winning Juniper restaurant in Manchester and locate in Edinburgh's city centre.

I wish him well and look forward to his Weetabix and Horlicks like I've never experienced (although something I had in Kazakhstan once tasted like the two mixed together).

Meanwhile, Tom and Michaela Kitchin have become the proud parents of young Kasper Kitchin. With a terrific name like that he's bound to go far – although I like one of his middle names, Benjamin. How long before he's known as 'Ben the Kitchin'?





The full article contains 812 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 March 2008 11:11 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Brian Monteith , The Budget
 
1

donald,

glasgow 14/03/2008 08:34:41
Well, at least Brian does not pretend to be a socialist.
2

Porty Nat,

Edinburgh 14/03/2008 14:57:14
"John Swinney also thinks he should get the UK Treasury's £400 million that funds Council Tax Benefit (provided because council tax does not reflect ability to pay). But his new tax is earnings related and so reflects ability to pay – so there's no need for a benefit"

Cobblers. Council Tax benefit is part of the Scottish Block (see the Treasury's post devolution funding statement if you don't believe me). As such, it forms part of the support available to local government to alleviate the tax burden. That applies no matter what you call the tax or what form it takes.

Alternatively, if the sum arising from CT benefit is no longer going to be paid, Scottish taxpayers should receive a rebate equivalent to that £400m from Westminster. Otherwise, the money we are paying towards CT benefit simply becomes a £400m payment from Scotland to the Treasury for which we'll get nothing in return.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.