Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 8th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Edinburgh still ahead in an uneven contest



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 January 2008
PRIVATE bets are now being taken in the Scottish Parliament about who will be the first SNP minister to fall on his sword. Don't tell him but SNP sports minister Stewart Maxwell is attracting large wedges of notes following his appearance on Newsnight Scotland this week.
On Wednesday Maxwell had informed the parliament that sportscotland (based in Edinburgh) was to be merged with the Scottish Institute of Sport (based in Stirling) and that the new body would be relocated to (you won't have difficulty guessing) – yes, Glasgow.

Originally the SNP had said it would abolish sportscotland. It seems like the policy had been an SNP manifesto commitment since Lachie Stewart won the 10,000m at Meadowbank in 1970 – and so this merger had to be called an abolition to save face.

Maxwell adopted some contorted positions, as if he was trying out the pommel horse for the first time. Newsnight Scotland's Gordon Brewer pointed out the functions of the new body would be the same, its charter would be the same, the staff would be the same, and even the name would be the same.

Rather than be more efficient the number of staff is expected to rise and it will have more regional offices rather than one single headquarters.

Maxwell talks of the staff delivering more, but these employees are not gym teachers, they are not personal coaches they are in the main sports administrators trying to help others excel at the coaching and performance.

Yet again Glasgow benefits from the shifting of public sector deckchairs – but what else could we expect? There has not been a minister responsible for sport (or indeed culture) that has not been from the West coast, if not Glasgow itself. Of course, it is explained that this merger, abolition or whatever face-saving title it is to be called, is part of the successful bid for Glasgow winning the Commonwealth Games in 2014. What nonsense – when we won that bid the SNP government was openly saying that the organisation would be abolished – and still Glasgow won!

Glasgow needs more public sector jobs like it needs more local thugs carrying knives. To be prosperous and create jobs the Glasgow of now needs to become the Glasgow of the past, making things, selling things and generally being commercial.

As usual, Edinburgh shows the way – at the same time as the West Coast political mafia was shoving more taxpayer-funded jobs along the M8, the private Edinburgh Airport was announced as the busiest airport in Scotland – beating Glasgow by some 300,000 passengers. That's no mean achievement when Glasgow delivers so many chartered flights while Edinburgh relies mainly on scheduled services.

"Let Glasgow flourish" is that city's motto. Until the politicians stop trying to save the city and let the people do it for themselves Edinburgh will continue to be on target to become Scotland's largest metropolis – no matter how many public sector workers are forced to go west.


It's not such an ill-wind if it blows away the prejudice against cars

AS we are regularly being told how we should leave our cars at home and use public transport, I thought I should draw to your attention to the fact that, on Wednesday, the Forth Road Bridge (60,000 vehicles a day) was closed for a considerable period due to strong winds that caused an accident on the bridge. Not only were the allegedly selfish car drivers and aggressive truck drivers forced to go via the Kincardine Bridge (24,000 vehicles a day) but so too was public transport in the form of all those buses and coaches from Fife, Dundee, Angus, Perthshire and points North. Rather than being rescheduled some services were, quite abruptly, cancelled.

To add to the absolute mayhem, the weather also caused some rail delays, with the attendant problems of people being three hours late for work or not turning up at all. It also meant Edinburgh businesses letting staff away early – some had barely arrived, had a snack and it was time to go.

So what do you do when you've unselfishly given up the car but public transport doesn't function? Thumb a lift?

There are still politicians out there that think the Forth Road Bridge should not be replaced. They also tend to hate the car, not get in a lift unless there are more than three people in it and are appalled at the thought that in India a new low price "people's car" is about to transform the standard of living on that continent.

It might be unpalatable for some but the car is here to stay and when the buses and trains aren't working, it actually keeps some of us moving. Instead of raging against the moon we should embrace the car and make it work for us rather than wishing it would go away.


£125m home truth for the council house sale girners

IS it not wonderfully ironic that we now know that Edinburgh council has got by over the years by selling council houses?

The city has benefited to the tune of £125 million over the last ten years – and yet people still complain. The girners say that it deprives people on waiting lists of obtaining council houses and that fat profits are made by those selling on the houses (this being Scotland, profit being a nasty, dirty word).

Well there's another way of looking at it. Firstly, if a house is occupied and the tenant buys it to thus become a landlord the house is still occupied by the same person – only the nature of tenure has changed. The house, being occupied, would not have been available to anyone on the waiting list and so the sale has not deprived a single person of that house. Secondly, council houses cost the public money. They are heavily subsidised. Selling them to tenants actually can save councils money – and the discount is given in recognition that previous rental is a form of down payment.

There is no reason for councils to be landlords. They distort housing for political gain and regularly provide houses that need demolished after only thirty years. We should look to accelerate the process, giving tenants of flats new shared rights to the land and property – then see how they will be redeveloped and affordable housing made available.

The full article contains 1064 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 January 2008 11:15 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Brian Monteith , Meadowbank
 
1

,

11/01/2008 09:56:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Highland Mighty,

11/01/2008 11:23:31
1. Wrong!

So wrong, that's actually libel!
3

Logie Almond,

11/01/2008 11:37:31
Brian Monteith is wrong to say that council housing is subsidised. As an ex MSP he should be aware that legally all money spent on housing has to come from rents.
What has happened, particularly in Central Edinburgh, is that tnents have bought their flats then sold them on to private landlords. So flats which could have been used to house homelss families or people with medical problems are now let out at enormous rents to groups of people sharing.
4

Linda,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 12:41:27
1 is wrong. Brian Monteith had to resign and give up his MSP job after stabbing his Tory leader in the back.
5

spiggot,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 12:50:29
#4 So that's why the Scotsman gave him the job!
6

eric,

Lothian 11/01/2008 13:14:19
Yes and thats why we have to settle for 2nd best with tram link to our Airport and Glasgows going ahead with Train link .We have shot ourselves in the foot,I wont get upset about hanful of jobs,Glasgow is and always will be Scotlands Largest city as most folk choose to live in the west .Glasgows infrastructure is the largest outside London just waiting to be opened up,Sonds like sour grapes to me.
7

Southsider71,

East Ren, Glasgow 11/01/2008 14:01:30
If the jobs had been moved from Glasgow to Edinburgh, i suspect this paper would be telling us how good it is for Scotland. As weegie, i honestly could care less where Sport Scotland operates from, maybe it should have been moved to Dundee or Stirling, but i think this newspaper would still have managed an anti-Glasgow rant! Its this very attitude coming out of Edinburgh that would forever put me off voting for independence...
8

Southsider71,

East Ren, Glasgow 11/01/2008 14:04:46
#6, "While not wanting to upset my Glaswegian cousins is the reason the popultation so large is beacuase that so many of them are on the sick that they can't afford or want to move anywhere else as opposed to having a choice)" This weegie isnt on the sick and has more than enough money to move anywhere, i choose to live here and despite your thinking, not all of Glasgow is like the east end...
9

Kevin Connor,

11/01/2008 14:46:33
Is he really so ignorant on the topic of council housing or is he just trying to perpetuate a Tory myth in the hope that we never stop to question his assumptions?

Sad guy!
10

Watcher Man,

11/01/2008 14:58:19
eric aka d paterson from the herald is back i see, where's eric-shaun when you need him?
11

ratzo,

11/01/2008 16:38:22
My post at 1 was deleted because I mistook Brian Monteith for a sleazy tory. My apologies to him for that. It was a different sleazy tory I was thinking of.
12

a proud doonhamer,

Dumfries 11/01/2008 18:56:20
Brian Monteith has never met a back that he would refuse to stab, Tory or otherwise.

The smart money on the first resignation at Holyrood is on Charlie Gordon, followed closly by Wendy Alexander and Nicol Stephen. The first two for violations of the law and the last because he is tired of attending party meetings and keeping his back against the wall.
13

malcolmcean,

11/01/2008 19:20:33
What on earth is Brian talking about? Edinburgh, it is true, is a fantastic city, with lots and lots going for it, but 'on course to become Scotland's biggest metropolis'? Where are the 2 million people going to come from? The geographically tiny area which is Glasgow city (you can throw a pebble into the centre of Glasgow Green - the centre of the city - from South Lanarkshire!), it's true, has only one hundred thousand or so more people than Edinburgh (all of). However, Glasgow is surrounded by the huge population area of the greater Glasgow conurbation (which some 2.4 million people live in).

Where are all the people going to come from to make Edinburgh a comparable metropolis? It ain't going to happen.

Hopefully Edinburgh will continue to grow and grow (after the years of it being a shortbread-tin capital, it has finally once again become a political capital, and this has promoted it out of the ranks of the Baths and Yorks - a twee historical and architectural British curiosity - of this world) and become a truly European and world capital (with the political fully residing there).

And, also, Brian, comparing 'Paisley International Airport' with Edinburgh is silly. Edinburgh has the combined forces of the whole city concentrating its powers on promoting it as THE Edinburgh airport. "Glasgow International" is miles outside the city, and if anyone can avoid it (given the atrocious transport links to it) they will hop on the train to "Glasgow Prestwick" (which has direct flights all over Europe and is serviced by a direct rail link (into Glasgow Central)).

We should be trying to make sure that all of our airports and ferry ports (Rosyth) are capable of handling routes from all over the world. Not gleefully whinging on about how one airport is doing better than another (that sort of stuff betrays a rather pointless inferiority complex).
14

Southsider71,

East Ren, Glasgow 11/01/2008 19:31:48
#13, lets hope it is Charlie Gordon......and with any luck, he may even take some of his cohorts in the Glasgow city chambers with him....
15

Andrew from Dennistoun,

now in Edinburgh 11/01/2008 19:44:03
how unlike the EEN to indulge in a wee bit of weedgie bashing.


and #9. your comments about the east end are just childish.
16

Southsider71,

East Ren, Glasgow 11/01/2008 19:48:46
#16, your entitled to your opinion...as am i
17

Andrew from Dennistoun,

portobello 11/01/2008 19:53:47
why the dislike of the east end?

do you think we are all as you describe above cos thats absolute gash? just like edinburgh has its hovels and social scroungers - so does the south side of glasgow.



18

Southsider71,

East Ren, Glasgow 11/01/2008 20:03:35
#18, I dont dislike or like the east end, and i know not everyone living in the east end is a social scrounger but lets be honest, the east end of Glasgow has far more than its fair share of to quote your own words "hovels and social scroungers". As i said in a previous post, you are entitled to your opinion but so am i.
19

Andrew from Dennistoun,

portobello 11/01/2008 21:08:00
well IMO the district of the east end that i was brought up in has no more scroungers than most other parts of the Glasgow.

it might surprise you but people from the east end carry opinions about the south side too.

"lets be honest" yer a bit of snob ss71 and i cannae be doing with you, so i wish you goodnight
20

Southsider71,

East Ren, Glasgow 11/01/2008 21:10:04
Suits me mate.
21

Sevrup,

Edinburgh 12/01/2008 12:41:58
Was it not the Scotsman that stabbed Monteith in the back?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.