Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 9th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Contraceptive pill cuts risk of cancer for many years, say scientists



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 January 2008
WOMEN were yesterday told not to worry about the risk of cancer when using the contraceptive pill – because it can actually reduce the risk of developing the disease for several decades.
Many women using the Pill have long worried about the increased risks of breast cancer.

But research has found that, in the long term, oral contraceptives cut the risk of ovarian and womb cancers.

Researchers, writing in the Lancet, said hundre
ds of thousands of cases of ovarian cancer had already been prevented worldwide because of women using the Pill.

They hope women will be reassured that, no matter how long they use this method of contraceptive, the benefits will outweigh the risks.

The new report, produced by a team at Oxford University, brought together evidence from 45 studies of ovarian cancer in 21 countries. The studies covered more than 23,000 women with ovarian cancer, 31 per cent of whom used oral contraceptives, and 87,000 women without ovarian cancer, 37 per cent of whom had used the Pill.

The research found a substantial drop in the risk of ovarian cancer among women who used oral contraceptives.

The protection against the disease, which kills some 370 women a year in Scotland, lasted for more than 30 years after a woman stopped taking the Pill.

It was also discovered that the longer the Pill was used, the greater the protection. Taking the Pill for 15 years halved the risk of ovarian cancer.

The researchers estimated that, in high-income countries, the use of oral contraceptives for ten years reduced the risk of developing ovarian cancer before the age of 75 from 12 cases per 1,000 women to eight per 1,000.

Professor Valerie Beral, the lead researcher, said: "Worldwide, the Pill has already prevented 200,000 women from developing cancer of the ovary and has prevented 100,000 deaths from the disease.

"More than 100 million women are now taking the Pill, so the number of ovarian cancers prevented will rise over the next few decades to about 30,000 per year."

Research also shows that the Pill gives protection against endometrial cancer – cancer of the lining of the womb – but causes a short-lived increase in breast and cervical cancer.

However, the researchers said that, while there were known to be some health risks among current and recent Pill users, these were outweighed by long-term protection against "the devastation of ovarian cancer" – one of the most dangerous types.

Co-author Sir Richard Peto, professor of epidemiology at Oxford University, said: "Young women don't have to worry about cancer from taking the Pill, because the eventual reduction in ovarian cancer is bigger than any increase in other types of cancer caused by the Pill."

Dr Lesley Walker, director of cancer information at Cancer Research UK, said: "All women who have taken the Pill or are currently taking it should be reassured by this study. Any woman with concerns about taking the contraceptive pill should discuss them with her GP or local family planning clinic."



The full article contains 517 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 January 2008 11:59 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Breast cancer
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 25/01/2008 01:14:22
This is all very well! and plausible!
But.? I see they never said, 'Peep' about the,
Breast Cancer Issue! infact it is 'neatly bypassed'.
I recon Women on the "Pill" should never take anything said about,
'Hormone taking' lightly,, its your Body you are chemically adjusting, to do so, it maybe at your 'peril'

Billions upon Billions of Profit Making, for the 'Drug Companies',, Have,..Do,..and will continue to do-so,, influence all aspects of research, Government Health issue dissuasion's, (All over the World) and what 'Drug' they want to,
'Pump-in-to-your-Body'..(Good or Bad)
They use 'Women' as the 'number-one' Target!,, history tells you this!

This report however I believe, as I have done 'mega' research in "ovarian" issues, because my DYW has PCOS.
(polycystic ovary syndrome)
And my Mother died from,.'Breast Cancer'.. due to an over prescribed,
(at the time,..'in-thing',,the,,NHS..belief's for women to take)
'Oestrogen's'
All I say is 'Tread carefully' and think for youself!
Dont believe ..'All you hear'
2

Saltiregirl,

25/01/2008 09:15:38
#1 I seem to remember you posting on a similar topic before and posting an "informative" link to a site becrying use of the contraceptive pill. As a pill user I'm always very interested on new reserach as it becomes available . I noted the site was peppered with mistruths and some downright lies, I clicked to the links home site and saw it was in fact a US pro-life groups take on combined pill use.

You may have passionate views however YOU and pro-life groups do us woman a disservice expecting us to swallow biased views from a group of people who don't beleive in contraception full-stop.

As you say "don't believe all you hear"- especially on your postings or links to pro-life groups.

The Combined Oral Contraceptive pill is the most studied pharmaceutical product int the world, rightly so when so many people take various versions of the drug worldwide.

The small increased risk of Breast cancer is mentioned -
"Many women using the Pill have long worried about the increased risks of breast cancer."

But the Lancet article goes on to explain that all-risk cancer is reduced by pill use.

Its also important to make a distinction between ovarian cancer and breast cancer. If discovered early which breast cancer lends itself more readily, the survical rates are significantly higher than that of ovarian cancer, which when symptoms become obvious has usually progressed too far for successful treatment.

As a scientist who takes care with my body and health generally, I always research any pharmaceutical product I am prescribed through the comprehensive means which are available to me.

I am comfortable with continuing the 16 years of combined pill use, safe in the knoweledge that the preferable risks/benefit balance of this most researched drug are available for all to see. That is if people are savvy enough to look beyond sensationalist media and biased internet links.

Everyone knows that all drugs don't suit all people, certain people with par
3

Saltiregirl,

25/01/2008 09:31:27
Cont...

Certain people with particular medical profiles should indeed not take the pill as its just not suitable for them.

PCOS is not linked to pill use though the pill is often offered as it alleviates symptoms in some sufferers. Oestrogens come in many forms, the risk/benefit balance for HRT for example should be very carefully considered a oestrogens "feed" breast cancer which is more prevelent in older ladies.

Drug companies do sponsor research, they have to prove a preferable benefit/risk balance, safety and efficacy to get the product on the market. The average drug is research for 12-13 years. However all pharma research is heavily regulated, transparent and patient safety is paramount. Particpation is entirely at the individuals discretion.

On a frivilous note to end- if you want to argue that its unnatural to take chemicals, synthetic hormones which mimic prolonged pregnancy, think back just one or two generations - most women spent the most of their fertile adult life pregnant....
4

Gothic Rose,

25/01/2008 09:42:43
If in doubt, there is always the option of sterilisation.
5

McMicrogal,

25/01/2008 10:01:44
This is not new research, we have known for years that the pill reduces the risk of ovarian cancer, but MAY increase the likelihood of breast cancer in certain individuals.

I should like to know who has funded this research, and which boards the leading professors involved sit on.
6

Geri,

UK 25/01/2008 10:47:36
I am 33 years old and took the pill for 10 years and was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2005. I strongly believe the pill caused it. I think the ovarian cancer protection is minimal compared to the risk of breast cancer. We need to hear opinions from real women and not from drug companies who have vested interests and who can manipulate statistics for their own ends. Check out the website http://www.youngsurvival.org/bulletin-board/ and click on the 'general' forum, then do a search for birth control pill. There are several threads where these young women believe the pill caused their breast cancer.
7

Doreen,

The Cyber Shebeen 25/01/2008 11:12:57
3...I am sure that I read somewhere that PCOS WAS linked to the pill...
8

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 25/01/2008 19:47:06
2 Saltiregirl, I am certainly not in any,
"pro-life groups" and I do not spend hours on the Internet, matching or looking for topics I talk about.
Neither do I spend hours on the Internet, looking for 'Medical evidences', there is just Too much 'rubbish out there!
All my comments on Women's health issues are through,
Real life experiences, I have had with, 'loved-ones',
close Friend's and people I know, or have known,
The 'medical evidences/knowledge's that I share are from, Doctors, Consultants and researchers, I have spoken to, through the above, health issues.

I have better things to do, rather than to come on here and..........'Splaff'....'Gobble-De-Goop'!

Also I did NOT say 'the pill' was in anyway linked to PCOS,
The 'Diet-Factor' if anything is the major player in PCOS.

Thankyou for your time, for reading,
CL.
9

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 25/01/2008 22:20:49
2 Saltiregirl, I am certainly not in any,
"pro-life groups" and I do not spend hours on the Internet, matching or looking for topics I talk about.
Neither do I spend hours on the Internet, looking for 'Medical evidences', there is just Too much 'rubbish out there!
All my comments on Women's health issues are through,
Real life experiences, I have and have had, with,
'loved-ones', close Friend's and people I know, or have known,

The 'medical evidences/knowledge's that I share are from, Doctors, Consultants and researchers, I have spoken to, through the above, health issues.

I have better things to do, rather than to come on here and.......'Splaff'....
...'Gobble-De-Goop'!

Also I did NOT say 'the pill' was in anyway linked to PCOS,
The 'Diet-Factor' if anything is the major player in PCOS.

Tha
10

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 25/01/2008 22:22:42
2 Saltiregirl, I am certainly not in any,
"pro-life groups" and I do not spend hours on the Internet, matching or looking for topics I talk about.
Neither do I spend hours on the Internet, looking for 'Medical evidences', there is just Too much 'rubbish out there!
All my comments on Women's health issues are through,
Real life experiences, I have and have had, with,
'loved-ones', close Friend's and people I know, or have known,

The 'medical evidences/knowledge's that I share are from, Doctors, Consultants and researchers, I have spoken to, through the above, health issues.

I have better things to do, rather than to come on here and.......'Splaff'....
...'Gobble-De-Goop'!

Also I did NOT say 'the pill' was in anyway linked to PCOS,
The 'Diet-Factor' if anything is the major player in PCOS.

Thankyou for your time, for reading,
CL.
11

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 25/01/2008 22:25:16
Repeats, (don't ask)..I blame the 'hootsman' :-((

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.