Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


A pint raises risk of liver and bowel cancer by 20%

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 December 2008
DRINKING just one pint of beer a day increases the risk of liver and bowel cancer by a fifth, experts warned yesterday.
A large glass of wine or a couple of spirits such as vodka or gin can have the same damaging effect, according to scientists at the World Cancer Research Fund.

Dr Rachel Thompson, science programme manager at the WCRF, warned that just two units o
f alcohol a day significantly increases the risk of bowel and liver cancer.

"If you are drinking a pint of lager or a large glass of wine every day, then this might not seem like a lot," she said.

"But the science shows you are increasing your risk of bowel cancer by 18 per cent and your risk of liver cancer by 20 per cent.

"When you consider how many cases of these types of cancer are diagnosed in the UK every year, it is clear that drinking even relatively small amounts of alcohol can make a significant difference.

"Yet, despite strong evidence, most people still do not know that alcohol increases risk of cancer, so it is clear we need to do more to get this message across."

Bowel cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK, with more than 36,500 people diagnosed with it every year and around 16,000 dying from it.

In addition, more than 3,000 people in the UK are diagnosed with liver cancer each year and a similar number die.

According to the WCRF, there is also convincing evidence that drinking alcohol increases the risk of breast cancer and cancers of the mouth, pharynx, larynx and oesophagus.

The charity recommends not drinking alcohol at all in order to reduce the risk of cancer, but says if people do drink, they should limit it to two drinks a day for a man or one for a woman.

One drink contains about 10g to 15g of pure alcohol. This is the same as half a pint of normal-strength beer, lager or cider, and is also the equivalent of one 25ml single measure of vodka, gin or whisky, or one small glass – 125ml – of wine.

The government recommendations are that men should not regularly drink more than three to four units of alcohol per day and women should not drink more than two to three units.

Previous studies have shown that modest amounts of alcohol may have a protective effect when it comes to heart disease.

But Dr Thompson said this was relevant only for people at particular risk of heart disease, such as men aged over 40 and post-menopausal women.

A spokesman for the Department of Health said: "We recognise the risks of cancer arising from alcohol consumption.

"In some cases, these begin to rise at or below the government's guideline levels for regular consumption.

"As the WCRF notes, health advice on regular alcohol consumption takes account of a wide range of conditions, including a protective effect for heart disease in men over 40 and post-menopausal women.

"This study appears to be broadly consistent with known estimated risks, although we look forward to examining it in more detail."





The full article contains 536 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/12/2008 00:22:51


OMG! Lets all live in 'Plastic Bubble', connected to a life support system that feeds us preservatives, and brain dead, for 160years!


2

Fifi la Bonbon,

27/12/2008 00:47:43
Yes, please just f*** off with these carp out-of-context "health" news stories. I had a pizza tonight. It will probably kill me. Or not.

I do not believe that any scientist warned anybody about anything on Boxing Day. Any more than I believe that the reporter went to a news conference that almost certainly didn't happen, or that a spokesman for the Department of Health said anything to the reporter yesterday.

It's all b*llocks, in other words. A made up story.

What probably actually happened is that a press release got put out by the charity some time ago. The reporter was given the job of writing a filler piece, and hammered out this pile of old twass.

It's meant to catch your eye - "YOU ARE GOING TO DIE HORRIBLY!!! - but it really doesn't matter if it is going to have any effect. Nobody takes it seriously. The reporter and her editor certainly didn't - if they did they would refuse all alcohol advertising.

What happened to proper reporting - you know, going out and finding a story that involves real people who did things or to whom things happened? These days, it seems reporting is a career route for well-off kids whose daddies can afford to support them through unpaid internships and a meaningless college degree in Preston or Cardiff till they get a post turning out this kind of carp.
3

Guga II,

Rockall 27/12/2008 01:27:50
#1 Charlie.

Couldn't agree more.

In any event, one minute this is bad for us and that is good. The next minute it is the other way around.

Sensationalist garbage instead of news.
4

Brodric,

27/12/2008 01:35:30
These so-called experts obviously don't know what they are talking about. All the statistics spouted is not only based on what people drink, there are predispositions to certain types of disease, for example. Not to mention the whole problem of environmental and issues and stress of modern living.
5

DeniseX,

27/12/2008 09:27:04
RISK. We heard the same with passive smoking. The scare stories are now starting with drinking. There are RISKS in drinking water and milk and even breathing in air. There are RISKS in everything we do.
6

drunken proffet,

Tassy 27/12/2008 09:43:35
The answer is to join your local church. I have heard that you get special dispensation for the odd ciggie and alcoholic refreshment. Being non denominational I obviously cannot comment on that, but it seems to be the way to go. You get a guaranteed three score years and ten, plus I hope purely from personal reasons, bonus years. You just have to pray harder.
7

thunderdog,

27/12/2008 11:23:44
So the Gallon of lager I had last night 'might' be dangerous then. Where do they find these 'experts', in an infant school? or do the health fascists believe everyone to be so gullible. WHAT UTTER C>*P.
8

Mcsnagpile,

27/12/2008 14:02:35
Countries where alcohol is banned or not part of their culture ---what do you know –there life expectancy is not as long as the UK even with better health care than us. Of course the English have quite a good record of longevity on the world stage. The Scots are doing something un-English somehow.
9

DaveA,

Room101 27/12/2008 21:21:21
There was a study out from California that for every glass of red wine you drink per month, if you are a non smoker it reduces your chances of lung cancer by 2%. If you are a smoker it is 4%. So if you drink 25 glasses of red wine per month your chances of getting lung cancer are Zero. So cutting back on red wine to their limits would raise your chances of getting lung cancer by 50%.

I know which one I prefer. It all sounds very like passive smoking rubbish, scare tactics based on questionable science. The study is below, enjoy!!


http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/17/10/2692





10

Yankee girl,

California 27/12/2008 22:52:47
How sad. Take away my Chardonnay and I've got nothing!
11

mandyv,

28/12/2008 00:43:58
And a Happy scare-mongering New year to the Scotsman too.
I should have died years ago then, what with the Coffee, red wine, ciggies, the water, the milk, the radon, the diesel, the perfumes, ect ect.
As long as it keeps me out of the old peoples homes, I will be happy.
I do not want my children working until they drop, to keep all those old health puritans, who want to live forever.
12

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 28/12/2008 02:43:28

Yankee girl ~12,

OMG! You must be a Ghost! I have not seen you on here for ages!

Welcome Back!, Lovely to see ya!


13

Cadwallon,

The far south 28/12/2008 08:45:20
Science, journalism and politics simply don’t mix. Science tries to define exact risks – truths, if you like. To scientists, alcohol is an average sort of food/ drug that’s beneficial in small doses and dangerous in excess. But, this isn’t good enough for journalists and politicians who want simple brain-tugging messages. So like any other newsworthy celebrity, one day alcohol’s evil side is played up- and on another, it becomes a saint. Confusing init?
14

Axl,

Edinburgh 28/12/2008 12:21:18
Well if this is the case, I reckon I should have died in 1998..

More sensationalist claptrap.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.