Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 8th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Landowner's subsidies are docked after gamekeeper tried to kill birds of prey



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 January 2008
A SCOTTISH farmer has become the first landowner in the UK to have his subsidies cut after his gamekeeper was convicted of trying to kill birds of prey.
Under legislation which came into force four years ago, James McDougal will receive £8,000 less in European agricultural grants because of an environmental crime on his estate.

The landmark punishment has been praised as a step in the right direct
ion to support the Scottish Government's move to crack down on illegal poisoning of birds of prey.

George Aitken, 56, who works as a gamekeeper on Blythe Farm, near Lauder in Berwickshire, set traps holding live pigeons and placed dead pheasants laced with poisons on moorland close to the Southern Upland Way, a popular walkers' route.

He pleaded guilty to eight wildlife-crime offences at Selkirk Sheriff Court in June and was sentenced to 220 hours' community service.

It has now been revealed that the Scottish Government has imposed the grant cut on Aitken's employer for failing to protect local wildlife.

Yesterday, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Scotland praised the move, pointing out that landowners and shooting estates had to be penalised if their gamekeepers persecuted birds of prey or other wildlife.

Stuart Housden, director of RSPB Scotland, said subsidy cuts – under the terms of the Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition code – should be used "firmly but fairly" in cases of wildlife crime.

"Landowners and farmers receive significant public subsidies, in return for which they are supposed to be good stewards of the environment," he said.

"Where breaches of the regulations governing these subsidies occur, we would expect the government to review the subsidy payments and apply sanctions appropriate to the case.

"We are surprised that, according to the Scottish Government, only one case so far has been dealt with in this way, but we hope that in future the determination expressed by the present administration to bring this sort of crime to an end will see these regulations enforced more rigorously and consistently."

The Scottish Government docked £7,919 from last year's single-farm payment and beef-calf payouts to Mr McDougal, who runs a large cattle and sheep-farming business near Lauder. Under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, the maximum fine for a wildlife crime is £5,000.

Mr McDougal, one of Scotland's biggest recipients of EU agricultural subsidies, employs Aitken as a gamekeeper on a small pheasant shoot he runs for friends on his land.

Two "butterfly cage traps" were found near Mr McDougal's farm at Blythe, each baited with a live pigeon, during a joint operation in August 2006.

Pheasant carcasses dosed with carbofuran, a banned agricultural chemical, were also found beside nearby woods.

The investigation was launched after two poisoned ravens were found near the Southern Upland Way, one with "significant residues" of toxic chemicals in its stomach and liver.

Mr McDougal initially appealed against the subsidy cut, claiming it was excessive.

He said he had been unfairly singled out as, unlike grouse moors, his pheasant shoot was a small-scale, private affair.

Mr McDougal added that he had never authorised Aitken to use illegal poisons or traps and had since warned him he would be sacked for a repeat offence.

The RSPB found a record 367 cases of deliberate bird of prey persecution in the UK in 2006.

Early figures for 2007 show at least 48 confirmed and suspected cases in which birds such as eagles, hen harriers and red kites were deliberately persecuted in Scotland, and more than 100 in England and Wales.

HOW TO FIGHT KILLERS

THE Scotsman is committed to helping the Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals catch those responsible for killing birds of prey and other wildlife.

Information about raptor poisonings and other incidents of wildlife crime can be passed to police via the National Wildlife Crime Unit in North Berwick on 01620 893607.



The full article contains 662 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 January 2008 9:50 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Birds of prey
 
1

viking nz,

new zealand 08/01/2008 04:03:41
No wonder animal rights groups go to extreme measures when these guys like the above are in complete denial . But I still think the fine was a slap on the wrist , how much does he make on one shoot ? that should be taken into account the size of fine , the eu grant wow big deal .The only part he does not enjoy is his name in the paper apart from that . TWO FINGERS to the S S P C , I would guess from him .
2

Scozzy,

Aus 08/01/2008 04:26:13
His subsidies should have been withdrawn completely not just cut for this sickening offence. This won't act as a suitable deterrent to those of his ilk.
3

Jimmy the Pie,

08/01/2008 05:50:14
Jail the landowners - that would make the slimey b*stards think twice
4

Pilrig,

Livingston 08/01/2008 06:24:21
So the laird didn't sack the minion.
No taxpayers money for the benefit of criminals !
5

Cadgers,

Perth 08/01/2008 07:39:22
This is a step in the right direction and hopefully will act as some sort of deterrent.
6

Nomada,

08/01/2008 07:51:14
Excellent news. This approach should have been adopted a long time ago under cross-compliance rules. Let's hope the precedent stands for future cases.
7

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 08/01/2008 09:23:18
QUOTE
"Mr McDougal added that he had never authorised Aitken to use illegal poisons or traps and had since warned him he would be sacked for a repeat offence."
So...the landowner did not think the offence justified sacking his gamekeeper???? Clearer evidence of complicity could not exist.

This keeper should have been jailed for 6 months and the landowner should have been banned from running pheasants - that would change things fast.
8

viking nz,

new zealand 08/01/2008 10:31:54
HAS to be a tory ?or maybe the local judge shoots there .
9

scully,

Colchester 08/01/2008 11:01:18

If only these people would realise how important wildlife is to our survival. You are allowed to cull, BUT. only if you are being over-run by any speices and they are a threat to your life,. and also when you do cull it must be done humanely . You must never kill animals for sport that is forbidden in Holy scriptures. You must only kill animals for food, When is man going to stop abusing Nature. And children and anything else that is very vulnerable. It all goes down to mans grave misuse of power and greed.
10

Riley Hamish,

Edina 08/01/2008 11:12:38
Cut the trigger fingers off the two of them....despicable toads that they are !!!
11

Horrible Cankers..dans le Cyber Shebeen,

08/01/2008 11:19:49
Is that the best they can do?...pathetic...but still a result, got one of the dirty low life slimeballs.

Right Sam the God....out you come, come on...there's a good boy...give us your comments re this being an animal rights conspiracy...come on we are waiting...
12

sam the god,

08/01/2008 11:57:04
Just for the horrible canker some true facts (in the UK) and just out of curiosity in your adopted homeland do you eat frogs legs or are you upsetting the locals by protesting about that form of cruelty?


Lets get things into perspective the trap that is being used with a live call bird is usually set to trap the same species as the call bird (legal to trap certain types of birds).
The trap is normally in an open area so that the quarry species can see the call bird and as a result can be seen by the general public that are out in the countryside. This would be very stupid if the intended quarry was any of the raptor species being in plain view of the public walking in the countryside(close to the Southern Upland Way, a popular walkers' route) as they would soon inform the police (non quarry species have to be set free by law) and action would be taken.

As for the poisoning of the pheasant carcases this with the right type of poison (the only thing the gamekeeper legally did wrong was use carbofuran which is a banned agricultural chemical) and controls is a legal method to kill foxes,stoats weasels if he had laced the pheasants with the likes of a commercial rat type poison then nothing he did would have been illegal.
13

batzzz,

Perth 08/01/2008 12:17:45
Good result. No public subsidies for criminal activities.

On Sam the God's comments - the trap is only legal when used to trap those species covered by the general licence issued by SEERAD. Any other intention is illegal and any non-target birds caught incidentally must be released unharmed.

Intending to trap raptors "would be very stupid". How about illegal and morally destitute?

And on - "the only thing the keeper did wrong was to use carbofuran"... what about purchasing it, possessing it, illegally storing it before he thteatened the lives of people and wild animals by using it. And setting out any poison with the intent of killing protected wild animals would have been an offence.
14

Nomada,

08/01/2008 12:20:59
Sam writes: 'Lets get things into perspective the trap that is being used with a live call bird is usually set to trap the same species as the call bird (legal to trap certain types of birds)'.

So the keeper was trying to catch pigeons, was he? Or might he have hoped that along would fly something that eats pigeons laid out so attractively in a confined space?

Also: 'As for the poisoning of the pheasant carcases this with the right type of poison (the only thing the gamekeeper legally did wrong was use carbofuran which is a banned agricultural chemical) ... if he had laced the pheasants with the likes of a commercial rat type poison then nothing he did would have been illegal'.

No - whatever chemical he used he should ensure that only the target species would take the bait (that excludes leaving the carcase out in the open), and if a protected species was killed as result of inappropriate siting of the carcase he would commit an offence.

For a 'god', Sam, you are surprisingly non-omniscient.
15

ignorant townie?,

Scotland 08/01/2008 12:22:26
Not sure where you are living Sam the God...Planet Zog perhaps?

The use of poison in the open in Scotland has been illegal since 1912 [Protection of Animals Act]. Until about 20 years ago you could poison foxes by pumping CYMAG gas down their burrows - but thats now utterly illegal and CYMAG is a banned substance.

What this guy was doing had been illegal for almost 100 years - the fact that gamekeepers [and many farmers killing crows and foxes] were doing this routinely up until the 1980s is a fact - and was allowed to continue because the laws were not being applied - unlike now, when the public and our representataives are now aware of whats happening and wants it stopped.

As for the trap you are describing...the only one allowed for trapping crow species...thats a Larsen Trap, which has a specific list of decoy species, all crow species. No other species can be used as decoys. Pigeons are of course the preferred bait for catching birds of prey, not crows...as any licensed scientific trapper will tell you.

There was no excuse for what this man was doing - and I find the suggestion that the man in charge didnt know what was going on as laughable - large cage traps set in the open?...Come on!
16

sam the god,

08/01/2008 13:07:57
Where in the original article does it say that the poisoned pheasants were left out in the open? (this is illegal) all it said was that they were found nearby they could have been set properly but still have been found. So Ignorant townie under the right conditions the use of poison is perfectly legal although you may not like that.

Batzzz and ignorant townie yes I know about the general licence as you will see from the attached link it is primary use is for the corvid species but anything that is on the general licence can also be used.
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/921/0055151.pdf



17

Ananurhing,

08/01/2008 13:11:25
Just incredible! At long last a prosecution for this criminal act, and the punishment is to slightly reduce the amount of our money this man is given for free! Astonishing! This is a crime committed for profit. The SSPCA should pursue James MacDougal in court for his proceeds of crime. Futile perhaps, but it would get the message over in the right language for these people, and would be a greater deterrent than this pathetic stopping of pocket money.
Probably MacDougal's worst punishment will be derision from his landowning peers and betters. They're keeping their heads down in Scotland at the moment, and the last thing they want is some loose canon like MacDougal letting the side down.
Never mind MacDougal. You could always make up your losses by building an enormous wind farm. That way you could take out all the birds of prey, shoot anything else that moves, and get even more of our money than you can dream of at the moment! And if you happen to bag the odd sea eagle or otter or oik, you'll be able to afford it!
The guardians of the land eh! At one with the symbiosis of nature! Aye right!
18

Nomada,

08/01/2008 13:37:40
Hey Sam #16! You are not Alex Hogg in real life are you?

The article refers to the pheasants being 'on moorland' and 'beside nearby woods'. I think if they had been stuffed down fox dens, that fact would have been mentioned. Don't you?
19

yockel,

GSSB 08/01/2008 16:03:55
#18 Nomada, no certainty the Hootsmon would mention mitigating circumstances given their commitment to combating wildlife crime but the guy did plead guilty so it is all academic.
As for the statistics, 2006 - 367 cases, 2007 - 148 cases including all the fantasy may never have happened case. Either the animal rights lobby aren't planting so many dead raptors or as I have always maintained the RSBP can't count.
20

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 08/01/2008 16:26:17
Why does this arouse such strong feelings, when very few people mind eating chickens (which are killed birds) or object to killing rats?
21

ignorant townie?,

Scotland 08/01/2008 16:44:56
"So Ignorant townie under the right conditions the use of poison is perfectly legal although you may not like that..."

Youre right, I dont like that but I respect the law, unlike Mr Aitken and his apologists.

Poison in the open, or indeed placed in such a manner that anything except rats can get at it, is illegal [such as stuffed down a fox hole as one the above correspondents mentioned.

I have to wonder why you are spending so much effort in defending this guy?..who plead guilty, yes - but to a small selection of charges agreed by the Fiscal and Defence Agent in a plea bargain. The Sheriff , as usual with these cases of multiple offending by a gamekeeper, never got to see the whole picture.

I would agree with those above who said that the landowner got off lightly - he must have known what was going on and his fine was less than the maximukm for only two charges under the 1981 Act.
22

Horrible Cankers..dans le Cyber Shebeen,

08/01/2008 16:56:02
12.....Yes Sam I have upset them and will continue to do so...the French do have a tendency towards barbarity and they do require educating from time to time...
23

Bert Kwok,

08/01/2008 18:02:04
"Why does this arouse such strong feelings, when very few people mind eating chickens (which are killed birds) or object to killing rats?"
Raptors are the pinnacle of a finely balanced food chain, farmed chicken is just that, farmed. As for rats, there are plenty rats to go around, take out one million rats and another one million will soon take their place.
I think the landowner should have been fined the sum of his previous years shoot money. I trust he keeps books if he is running a business.
As for the sidewinding talk of poisons being legal, not on open moorland on unguarded carcasses with open access they are not. You do your cause no good with your fork-tongue words on poisons, people can see right through them.
24

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 08/01/2008 18:23:34
#23, so essentially it's a matter of numbers, and if there were as many raptors as rats, and if raptors were as prolific breeders, people would regard them in the way we regard rats now?
25

California Scot,

08/01/2008 18:46:09
I saw an article in a US newspaper. People guilty of killing Peregrine Falcons: $5000 fine and 6 months in jail. Birds of prey are quite often at the top of an ecological food chain and their survival is of the utmost importance. Americans talk a good game, but aren't really serious about protecting their wildlife from the eejits. Plus the jails in America are a lot like country clubs. Inmates with televisions in their cells are not exactly what I called being punished. And while many of the super maximum security prisons over here have gang violence, most are not so. Mostly, if you are a poor person in America, you can immediately move up to middle class as soon as you are jailed! 3 square meals, a cot and all medical covered.
26

sam the god,

08/01/2008 19:28:53
#18 nomada

No I am not Alex Hogg.

Also who said anything about stuffing the pheasants down the Earth? What I said was that “Where in the original article does it say that the poisoned pheasants were left out in the open?” it is you that is saying that they were in the foxes earths can I ask where you got this additional information or is that or is this more false information to cloud the situation? Try to at least stick to facts.
27

Schiehallion,

Scotland 08/01/2008 19:34:58
For too long the courts have taken too little action on wildlife crime. Gamie appears in court and gets a slap on the wrist, no change on the estate. I hope this will change attitudes across Scotland especially around the estates of Angus and Perthshire!
28

Wee Shuggy,

NZ 08/01/2008 19:52:33
#25 California Scot.
Plus the jails in America are a lot like country clubs. "Inmates with televisions in their cells" What a horrible punishment, having American TV inflicted on you should surely be classed as "cruel and unusual punishment"
29

OLD GIN,

KINGDOM O FIFE 08/01/2008 20:24:57
MOST LAND OWENERS KNOW THIS IS HAPPENING THE FINE SHOULD BE BACKDATED TO WHEN GAMEKEEPER TOOK CHARGE
30

Nomada,

09/01/2008 19:22:49
26 - read my post again Sam, and this time read it correctly. If you had done that first time you would not have written such nonsense.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.