Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Return of the beaver 'will hit' £100m angling catch

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 May 2009
BRITAIN'S anglers have stepped up their campaign against controversial proposals to return beavers to Scotland, amid growing fears that the initiative could severely damage fish stocks and threaten a leisure industry worth £100 million a year to the Scottish economy.
Seventeen beavers, captured in Norway, are due to be released in Knapdale Forest in Argyll later this summer in a trial project spearheaded by the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland and the Scottish Wildlife Trust.

The leaders of the Scottish b
eaver trial project have insisted that a wealth of research, experience and knowledge gathered over the past 50 years suggests the introduction of the mammals will not have a detrimental impact on salmon stocks or their migration.

But the Salmon and Trout Association (STA), Britain's leading gamefish conservation body, yesterday said that a recent survey on the "catastrophic" impact of beavers on Atlantic salmon stocks in rivers in eastern Canada served to highlight the potential threat posed by the Scottish beaver experiment.

The report by the Atlantic Salmon Federation, North America's main salmon conservation organisation, concludes that, unless beavers are removed or culled on an ongoing basis, the result will be "the demise of salmon runs" in at least three rivers and will put salmon runs in jeopardy in a further seven.

Paul Knight, the executive director of the STA, said: "This report is unequivocal in its conclusions and it should be required reading for those who have granted the Knapdale beaver licence."

He added: "While the American beaver is a different species to its European cousin, both species share a propensity for dam-building whenever the available habitat is not to their liking. Beaver dams are, of course, the problem, and on either side of the Atlantic they can amount to insurmountable obstacles to migrating salmon, sea trout and brown trout, particularly when, as is normally the case, there is little depth of water below the dam.

"Surely this must cause alarm bells to ring within Scottish Government. It is vital that proper scientific research is now commissioned into the likely impact of burgeoning beaver numbers on migratory fish populations in Scotland and, indeed, the rest of Britain. Furthermore, there needs to be absolute clarity on what will happen to the Knapdale beavers once the trial period is concluded."

Nick Yonge, the director of the Tweed Foundation, said: "The report underlines how stupid it would be to introduce beavers. Introducing animals that make major changes to our countryside is only acceptable where those changes can be contained effectively to specific areas.

"The evidence from countries where beavers have been introduced is that they cannot be contained and that they would cause harm to our native fish stocks by building dams."

The organisers of the Scottish Beaver Trial insist that there are no migratory fish in the trial site and that there are no plans to reintroduce beavers in other sites in Scotland.





The full article contains 492 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 May 2009 9:35 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Beavers
 
1

Nevsky;,

Moscow 27/05/2009 23:37:32
Why are these 'souther' wilderness terrosists being allowed to upset a natural balance in Scotland.

Beavers build dams, stopping the salmon reaching their spawning grounds and they also eat salmon so hardly a constructive approach to maintaining a lucrative industry.

Still, on the positive side...it preserves jobs for the non-natives bent on making the highland a wildlife park without human habitation!
2

Fifi la Bonbon,

28/05/2009 00:35:54
What do beavers eat? Potatoes and cabbage?

I hope somebody shoots them at the earliest opportunity. Maybe their fur could be used to make sporrans now the vegetarians have banned sealskin.
3

Barney Thomson,

Reading 28/05/2009 00:39:47
Is this another case of shoddy old reporting? This sounds very much like a rehash of an old Tweed Foundation press release.

Beaver dams can serve are nurseries for young salmon, providing nutrients and deep water protection from predators. In Norway, dams have proved not to be a serious obstacle to salmon migration and there is evidence that beaver culls in Canada in the 19th century may have been responsible for catastrophic declines in the volume of runs.

Sorry for shouting, but -
BEAVERS ARE HERBIVOROUS i.e. they do not eat salmon!
4

Don Roberto,

28/05/2009 00:40:09
1. Nevsky, you've just demonstrated the same stupidity as the Nick Yonge, the director of the Tweed Foundation.

I'll say this carefully so you'll understand.


"BEAVERS - ARE - VEGETARIANS - THEY - DO - NOT - EAT - FISH."

These beavers will be tagged, so the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland and the Scottish Wildlife Trust will know where they are at all times and track their movements around Argyll.

This article is yet more uninformed gibberish from the Tweed foundation who should quite simply know better. Every other angling association in the country is aware of the scaremongering and stupidity Tweed appear to be indulging in. I suspect given the olde Tory scions in charge their complaint is more political than environmental.
5

Scotindy,

Los Angeles 28/05/2009 01:36:48
Britains Anglers, where on earths name is this country called britain ??? Should it not read Scottish Anglers up in arms ?
# 4 Well said Beavers are vegetarians and do not eat Fish!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Roll on Referendum Day so that the Beavers can do what they want.......
6

!Ya basta!,

28/05/2009 03:03:00
The environment is not just a resource for mans use.

It has an intrinsic value of its own irrespective of what value we ascribe to it.

All living beings have a right too life. We should respect that and try to live in more harmony with nature. We will also learn something from this approahc.

Restoring our ecosystems to their previous complex status is sustainable, unlike over fishing, and an improtant step in returning man to his rightful place as member or citizen of the biotic community, not top dog who can do what s/he wants with nature.

PS Fishermen have long been a pain in the ar*e, what special "rights' do they have to dictate to the rest of us anyway?
7

Rothiemurchus 55,

USA 28/05/2009 05:44:31
I was raised with beavers until I was 14 years old. They are active dam builders 24/7 and will eradicate rushing water and dam it as long as they live...Scotland is making a big mistake here!!! They love willow and other soft hardwoods which are not too common in Scotland. What was the expected benefit?
8

brian ogg,

Edinburgh 28/05/2009 05:52:15
For what it's worth, I've heard that the beavers are being released now.

By the way I think they are great animals. Canada and the Pacific North-west of the US have no problems with beavers and salmon (and bears, and people) living in an balanced ecosystem.

As for the Tweed fishing interest: these are sort people who would charge us for the cost of cleaning their moats.
9

Geoff,

sa 28/05/2009 06:45:45
"Nature never does anything uselessly". Reintroducing formerly extinct wildlife has to be beneficial as part of a reconstruction of the natural web BUT the overwhelming presence of Hom0 sapiens is a reality that has to be factored in. Man with his huge numbers is a cancer on the face of the earth and as long as his presence is given precedence then other species will suffer and the balance will be continually upset. Also in rebuilding the natural web,man must intervene to mimic missing parts. Here in Africa where large predators are missing in confined reserves, the effects of predation have to be mimiced by culling. Also where large mammals such as elephant are absent,bush can encroach on grassland destroying this habitat and its associated fauna.
A complex debate indeed!
10

Sandy Sahara,

Desert 28/05/2009 07:05:46
#3 & #4 completely moronic statements highlighting your obvious lack of understanding of the issue. Where in the article did it claim that Beavers ate salmon? If you don't know what you are talking about then best just sit in the background and say nothing.
11

madrab,

Edinburgh 28/05/2009 07:23:38
This year anglers will kill thousands of fish, hardly preserving fish stocks, maybe it's time to ban angling?
12

Am Fidhleir Lomartach,

28/05/2009 08:00:36
This project is now nearing its climax - the release of the Beavers this summer.

Several years ago there was an extended consultation with the public. It has the support of the Scottish Government under the Species Action Framework, and is encouraged by EU policy.

The fishing and forestry interests had their chance to respond then - I assume they did - and when all the responses were in the judgement was made that the reintroduction was to go ahead. Tough s**t, STA, your objections were discounted, so now live with it.

If problems arise, there are processes in place to identify these, and to solve them. All the animals will be radio-tagged and therefore easily locatable for trapping or killing if necessary.

BTW, the European Beaver is not the same as the American species, and has different habits. STA would be better employed ensuring that its own members do not introduce Gyrodactylus. Now that is a beast that *will* cause problems when it arrives - as it almost certainly will on the boots of a careless and irresponsible angler.
13

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 28/05/2009 08:01:57
#10 Sandy Sahara

There was nothing moronic in #3 and #4's comments and their reference to beavers being vegetarian was in response to the the ill-informed comments of #1 Nevsky.

I wonder why the Salmon and Trout Association is highlighting a largely irrelevant report about a different species in a different continent to try to make its case. European beavers have been re-instated in many European countries. Perhaps the reason that the STA does not use a report of major problems caused by European beavers in Europe is because no such report exists.

14

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 28/05/2009 08:32:24
whatever next,bears running about wild?,the thought of old firm fans staggering about a highland wood,would scare anybody
they tried this in devon in 2005,and the scottish parli spent £500,000 to no avail trying it in argyll
read here what the names given to the beavers were lol
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article583111.ece
15

Nevsky;,

Moscow 28/05/2009 08:44:07
i got me beavers and otters mixed up last night so aplogies (too much Barleycorn and rage).

The point is just WHY would anyone want to reintroduce this amimal...are all tourists wandering around with tears in their eyes wishing that there are still beavers in the Highlands? No?

What purpose will they serve other than protecting a few incomers jobs (beaver specialists) aka Barney from Reading and entice a few sandal and sock wearing tourists to state..'oh look Madge there's a beaver?'

I grew up in the Highlands and Islands and have watched this lot turn it into a place of boating trips run by incomers and park rangers from Essex...the most depressing place on earth for me must be Mull or (the officers mess as it is known)......

Full of wilderness hippies, 'artists' who paint cra**y pots with authentic 'celtic' designs, freaks and 5000 experts on whales and you would be hard pressed to find a native amongst them.

Let's hope the woles eat the beavers...do wolves eat beavers or just suck the lichen off rocks?

16

Am Fidhleir Lomartach,

28/05/2009 08:47:31
No. 14 - Wake up. There is no introduction to the wild in Devon. There are some in an enclosure there, as there are in various places in Scotland. This is different.

Knapdale *is* in Argyll, and the project is the result of the efforts that you seem to think were 'to no avail'.
17

Andy Ritchie's left boot,

28/05/2009 09:22:00
Scotland needs more beavers.

And I've just realised why beavers smell of fish.
18

Mandela,

Johannesburg 28/05/2009 09:22:26
No objection to some beaver
19

Beergut,

Embra 28/05/2009 09:28:17
What's all the fuss for about beavers building dams? Scottish Hydro did it years ago and well and truly bu**ered most of Scotland's finest salmon rivers. I don't think beavers are in quite the same league when it comes to wrecking the environment.
20

Alistair Macintosh,

28/05/2009 09:48:39
Whatever peoples views of salmon fishing are, it is worth £100 million to Scotland every year. It employs hundreds if not thousands across Scotland. It is an important part of our econimy, and in some rural areas a critical part.
The lice from the salmon fish farms have wiped out the stock of wild sea trout on salmon on many rivers down the West coast. Now some idiot has come up with the idea of beavers. I have seen beavers in the wild in the US. They are lovely animals, but why are we introducing them in Scotland?
Scotland's ability to shoot its own economy in the foot, is at times breathtaking.
21

Old Cartha Boy,

28/05/2009 09:56:29
The organisers of the Scottish Beaver Trial insist that there are no migratory fish in the trial site and that there are no plans to reintroduce beavers in other sites in Scotland.

So why have a trial site if the intention is not to release the critters elsewhere in Scotland?


22

Mad Jock,

East Lothian 28/05/2009 10:29:01
I don't really see the need to reintroduce Beavers to Scotland, especially if it's only a study. Go study them where they already live.
On the other hand, there seems to be a lot of fuss over Beavers v Fish.
Beavers and Fish have been living together for thousands, if not millions of years, and neither has succeeded in wiping the other out. Anywhere. Man, on the other hand..................
23

Maurice,

28/05/2009 11:18:23
Bloody island monkeys. You want to call your country wild but when people try do it good by re-introducing animals that you fools have wiped out, you complain? We want our salmon cos its worth £100m but we dont want midgies cos they bite or beavers cos they eat salmon. Minks do too when they get a chance and Toffs eat the most. Fools! we should be trying to re-introduce species that have been wiped out by stupid man because maybe the way we're carrying on, that beavermight be worth a lot more to our survival than we think and maybe even more than that fish (which I so lov catching - and release every time. Even my 1st)But is isnt the beaver or any other animal that is a threat to these fish, it is us, MAN.
24

The Strategist,

28/05/2009 11:19:22
Can you eat beaver?
25

Am Fidhleir Lomartach,

28/05/2009 11:40:07
No. 23. Believe what has been posted above. Beavers are vegetarian. Fish are not vegetation. Salmon are fish. Beavers don't eat Salmon.
26

TheDisplacedGlaswegian,

Edinburgh 28/05/2009 11:48:17
#24 beaver is better eaten when it's alive...
27

ddmc,

28/05/2009 12:11:17
the pools created by beaver dams provide shelter for young salmon
28

Am Fidhleir Lomartach,

28/05/2009 12:11:25
For all of those above who do not understand the issues (that does not stop some of them pontificating from a position of self-confessed ignorance), look at http://www.snh.org.uk/speciesactionframework/saf-europeanbeaver.asp.
29

Phil the Flooter,

28/05/2009 12:46:45
'Return of the Beaver'

Sounds a bit sexy to me.
30

Joe Macdelta.,

28/05/2009 16:36:35
#7 Wow, you were raised with beavers, you must be a good swimmer, how long can you hold your breath under water?.
31

Taz,

The Land of the Free 28/05/2009 23:09:43
Does this have anything to do with naekit wummin?
32

Kenny Fraser,

29/05/2009 09:32:27
Now that the official release has happened it may be a comfort to the naesayers that the impact of Beavers in the wild has already been proved to be next to nothing. That is the case with the European beavers that have been living in the wild for many years on the Tay. This group is doing very well indeed and have recently spread south from their original position and are doing very will indeed right under the noses of two of the most famous,productive and expensive fishing beats. Have we heard anything from anyone about any negative impact north of Stanley linn ? No ! I rest my case.
Welcome return to the west for an animal that has been in Scotland a lot longer than humans have been.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.