Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Memo to staff – art work, handle with care

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 December 2008
SHOWCASING complicated contemporary artworks by the likes of Tracey Emin can prove hazardous – as the National Galleries of Scotland has learned to its cost.
Three sculptures by the artist worth tens of thousands of pounds were among 14 works that suffered damage caused by staff or visitors.

Self Portrait: Bath, consisting of a tin bath, bamboo, barbed wire and neon, was part of the major Emin retrospective at the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art (SNGMA) this summer.

But a neon piece was snapped off after a woman visitor came too close, snagged her skirt on the wire and pulled away.

The catalogue of 14 incidents since 2006, including minor damage to works by Warhol and Magritte, was released under Freedom of Information laws.

Staff hotly defended their track record, insisting that all the pieces were easily repaired. But the casualties also included Balls, by the Turner Prize winner Martin Creed. The work comprises more than 800 inflatable balls of various sizes. At a press viewing, a staff member stood on one of them and crushed it.

Self Portrait: Bath was damaged during the Emin exhibition in August when "a piece of neon was broken after a piece of clothing was caught on the barbed wire", the incident log records.

A similar work by Emin sold last year for £60,000.

Patrick Elliott, a senior curator at the SNGMA, said the specialist who made Emin's neon came to Edinburgh to repair it. He has yet to bill for the work.

"We don't want any breakage, but it doesn't compromise the art work," Mr Elliott said.

"It's slightly more serious than a light bulb being broken, because it's quite difficult making neon, but he managed to repair it quite nicely.

"It's a case of whether you put rope barriers around these things. That's a work where the rope barriers would look part of the work if you put them around it."

In the past two weeks alone, the SNGMA has made about 500 changes to its displays, dismantling the Emin show and installing another by Scottish artist Charles Avery. More than 40,000 people came to see the Emin exhibition.

Another Emin piece, Feeling Pregnant III, was damaged when "a person backed into the stand and the wooden stand came adrift". The stand was reattached with larger screws.

Emin's My Uncle Colin – a tribute to a relative killed in a car accident – also suffered "minor holes created in back of object during hanging". The holes were filled in.

Last year Andy Warhol's Mark of the Beast was slightly damaged as staff screwed a mounting plate on to the back. La Representation, by the Belgian surrealist René Magritte, was damaged by staff putting sticky tape on its gilt frame.

"It's regrettable, but now and again it happens," said Mr Elliott. "I can't remember a single thing that's been damaged that we haven't been able to repair."

Accidents do happen - even to art

NONE of the incidents at the National Galleries of Scotland comes close to the near-disaster at the National Gallery in London, when a Renaissance painting broke in two while being moved from an exhibition.

Marcia, dating to 1519, was by the Sienese artist Domenico Beccafumi, whose works have sold for more than £1 million. Painted on three joined planks, it fell out of a temporary frame and broke along a joint. Nicholas Penny, the gallery director, has ordered a review of handling procedures.

Last year, the Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge put three Qing Dynasty vases back on display after a massive restoration. The 17th-century vases had stood in the museum undisturbed for 60 years until a visitor fell into them after tripping on his shoelaces.

In 1999, the casino mogul Steve Wynn was showing some guests in his office a Pablo Picasso painting he had just agreed to sell for $139 million. As he gestured to them he put his elbow through the painting, Le Rève (The Dream).




The full article contains 669 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 December 2008 9:54 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

googler,

03/12/2008 00:21:08
"That's a work where the rope barriers would look part of the work if you put them around it."

Oh my.

Nobody can tell where the art begins and the rope ends.

Money for old rope, anyone?
2

celtic4,

USA 03/12/2008 01:31:02
I would think that the rope would be cheaper than a broken art piece, and I would think it would have to be done to protect the pieces.
Put a sign on the rope, stating that it is for the protection of pieces of art , if people are that silly to begin with and I don't think they are,really.
3

Navvy,

03/12/2008 01:38:12
Let it happen

Surely this is part of contemporary art, installation art, interactive art or what effer
4

GrahamR,

Edinburgh 03/12/2008 02:30:54
Sure, the whole thing is a work of art, or perhaps 'Balls' would be a better description. Whatever happens to it in the context of being displayed as 'ART' is itself 'ART', so don't "repair it", document it as a work of art in progress. Or better still chuck the whole lot in a skip and make better use of the space.

And what sort of nutter pays £60000 for a junk like Emin's? Unless they expect there will be someone who will pay more than that for it in the future. Oh, I suppose that the folk at RBS and HBOS who really understand investments might go for it.
5

Scunnert,

03/12/2008 02:58:21
The modern art world is a mutual admiration society of talentless, workshy, waisters who indulge each others fantasy of being a "creative artist".

I remember once reading about an installation which was in fact a pile of rubbish. When visitors mistook the pile of rubbish for .. well ... rubbish - and added to it - the "artist" complained that the "integrity of the work had been compromised".

Gies a brek.
6

Evan Owen,

Uppergumtree 03/12/2008 07:31:33
It's a mystery to me.. who sang that?

Anyway, the whole thing is a mystery to the vast majority of the population, first you need someone to create it who is an 'artist', then someone else has to declare it as 'art', then the artist has to market him/herself, then the 'art' has to be valued by someone who 'appreciates' it, now it gets a little easier because you then find an institution with the money to blow on it and the space to put it in so small numbers of people can come and look at it, scratch their heads, wonder what it is and then rearrange it, accidentally or otherwise.

Yes it is Balls, particularly when you have an 'artist' putting his/her name on something someone else manufactured, half a cow in a tank or a light bulb for example!
7

akjem,

dundee 03/12/2008 07:51:14
Isn't 'Art' wonderful? I took my son to the Dundee Contemporary Arts Centre. There was an exhibit on display, hanging from the ceiling......a wooden rowing boat covered in six inch nails( driven into the hull) He said, "dad, that boat will sink"......I was about to say "no, you don't understand"......then I thought about it........
8

drunken proffet,

Tassy 03/12/2008 07:58:44
A lot of those artists believe that their inspirations are living entities. So if one or two get tramped, stood on or swept into the rubbish then that is not so much destruction as a random improvement of their original ideals. Personally I would look for a commission on their increased value.
9

paulr,

edinburgh 03/12/2008 08:15:54
I have a pile of old rubbish, a few bricks and broken pots lying in the back garden, I was going to hire a skip and clear it out BUT who wants to buy it? A bargain at £50,000 and it looks a lot more interesting than a bundle of barb wire and a broken neon tube
10

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 03/12/2008 08:48:56
No. 6:- Toyah Wilcox.
11

JayJay,

Right here 03/12/2008 09:18:24
I can't help but think of Homer Simpson's failed effort at building a barbeque attracting the attention of the artistic elite of Springfield who mistook his cack handed attempts at d-i-y for the work of an "angry and vital new talent".
Doubtless some polo-neck wearing, beard stroking art critic will dismiss my comments, and those above, as representing the voice of the philistines. However, I do sincerely doubt that, 500 years down the line, the likes of Tracey Emin and Damien Hirst will be mentioned in the same breath as Van Gogh or Reubens. Rather, bemused future types will look at such inspirational works as "an unmade bed" or "a pile of bricks" and conclude that the 21st century was indeed a cultural low point in the history of humankind.
12

Number 6,

Germany 03/12/2008 09:19:48
Nell, for a further bonus point, who did she marry ?.
13

Boy Wonder,

03/12/2008 09:19:49
Right there with you, JayJay@11.
14

Buspass,

Edinburgh 03/12/2008 09:22:41
Does anyone really believe that it makes any difference to this 'Emperor's clothes' dross?
15

Spondoolicks,

location location 03/12/2008 09:24:26
I thought it was rather nice of 'ol Tracey to bring her stuff to Edinburgh/Scotland and let us have it first.

The exhibition was packed and must have been a real earner for the gallery.

"14 incidents since 2006" not bad really

And as everyone knows Toyah Wilcox is married to Robert Fripp (King Crimson) - she also does the voice n Tellytubbies too - now that IS a Mythtereee.....

16

Ewan Oosami,

03/12/2008 09:27:17
If any of these 'masterpieces of art' (ha Ha!) got damaged how would one know.
Such rubbish as this should be consigned to the landfill sites together with the brain dead who pontificate on their merits, it is them and the so called artists who are taking the urine
17

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 03/12/2008 09:48:09
If it looks like it belongs in the garbage can, it probably does. Stop paying these so-called artists money, it just encourages them.
18

Anonym,

03/12/2008 09:55:01
When dealing with conceptual art I like to think that the idea alone is not enough, and that it needs to show evidence of skill beyond anything I could recreate myself with similar materials.

Some might argue that having the idea in of itself is a skill, but I cannot find enthusiasm for the idea that an unmade bed, for example, could be a valuable work of art. Yet this is indeed the case!

I suspect that some art work aquisitions are simply done in order to show off wealth, i.e. look at me, I outbid all the other rich people; as opposed to investment reasons.

Scunnert tells us of an artist complaining about the integrity of his work being compromised... now regardless of what you think of the work (pile of rubbish!) I'd have to agree that this would indeed be the case.

Especially if some multi-millionaire wants to buy that specific pile of rubbish for an equally specific pile of loot!

So, clumsy gallery staff everywhere... pay attention and be careful you numpties!
19

AJ Fife,

03/12/2008 10:07:41
'In 1999, the casino mogul Steve Wynn was showing some guests in his office a Pablo Picasso painting he had just agreed to sell for $139 million. As he gestured to them he put his elbow through the painting, Le Rève (The Dream)'

Now that IS funny! :D
20

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 03/12/2008 10:13:22
No. 12, Number 6:- Robert Fripp, guitarist with King Crimson.
21

Privateman,

Anywhere but here 03/12/2008 10:29:47
#11 JayJay: Van Gogh wasn't appreciated by the public in his lifetime, but his works now sells for millions, so who's to judge what's good and what's bad?

#19 AJ Fife: I've just come back from a trip to Tokyo where there's a huge Picasso exhibition on right now on loan from the French state. It was absolutely packed out. Anyone who still thinks Picasso wasn't a great artist doesn't know what they're talking about. Whether his art is worth that much money is down to someone being prepared to pay it.
22

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 03/12/2008 10:51:30
Did it suffer damage or was the woman trying to improve it??
23

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 03/12/2008 11:57:21
This isn't art, surely???

If it is then I'm going to get some of my old junk out of the box room, cart it off to the National Gallery and someone can give me £60,000 for it.

#21: Van Gogh and Picasso were painters and masters of the manipulation of imagery. They did not simply dump a load of junk in a pile in the corner of an art gallery and stick a £60,000 price tag on it.
24

MoiraMac,

03/12/2008 12:17:30
I'm just looking forward to seeing 'Tartan Tat' as a work of art displayed in the National Gallery.

They could call it 'Tartan-Tat-Ex-Vat'and put a string of 'CU Jimmy' hats around it to avoid any damage.

Geez! Perhaps I should present this idea to the Arts Council and get funding! What do you think?
25

MoiraMac,

03/12/2008 12:28:49
Oh! I've changed my mind! I'm going to call my 'Tartan Tat' installation 'The Best Fae Scotland'
26

Allan(handofgod137),

03/12/2008 12:31:05
As a taxpayer I'm disgusted that MY money is spent on keeping the places that exhibit this cr.@.p open. With the national debt at astronomical levels, lets pull the plug on the whole circus, and let the conceptual artists and the critics and state funded "art experts" get the McJobs that their talents and abilities have destined them for.
27

MoiraMac,

03/12/2008 12:33:08
#26 Allan(handofgod)

Steady on there Allan. Wait until I get my Arts Council grant for my 'Tartan Tat' installation.
28

Anonym,

03/12/2008 12:33:34
MoiraMac

I think you put the 'art' back into tartan.

The philistines will think the CU Jimmy hats are all part of the display though.
29

EmbraJack,

03/12/2008 12:49:02
It seems that one mention of the word "Emin" and everyone gets their knickers in a twist - if you don't like her work, fine; but how about Beccafumi or Magritte?
30

MoiraMac,

03/12/2008 12:53:15
#Anonym-Love it 'Put the Art Back in Tartan'Yes! the Arts Council will like that!

I'm just buzzing with ideas now! Remember way back the artist Christo wrapped the Reichstag in white polythene. I could cover Edinburgh Castle in Tartan Tat! Lovely! The visitors would be delighted and I would make a fortune. I could drop the 'p***' and just call myself an 'artist'!
Have to go to day job now! Hasta luego!
31

AJ Fife,

03/12/2008 12:55:24
#21,

I'm sure the 20th century genius would've see the funny side. Picasso was famous for his wicked sense of humour.
32

Anonym,

03/12/2008 12:55:47
Some ideas for MoiraMac:

Pile of Shortbread bricks with sugar - £50,000

Half a Haggis in Formaldehyde - £680,230

Diamond encrusted Sporran - POA
33

MoiraMac,

03/12/2008 18:02:48
Anonym you are brilliant! How about we get together and form an art duo like Gilbert & George. 'Anonym & Moira' has a nice ring to it!
Anonym & Moira put the Art back in tARTan!
34

The real dracula,

03/12/2008 19:04:53
I would say that any damage done would improve these (non) works of sh1te oh sorry art
35

we the people,

03/12/2008 23:44:14
what a load of harrumphing philistines on this thread. thought it was a very intersting exhibition, the paintings and some of the sculpture especially. found the photography a bit degree - showy.
but presumably far too challenging for youse "throw it on a skip" type knuckledraggers, for whom "art" is probably what you see on your shortbread tin and nowt else.
36

MoiraMac,

04/12/2008 09:51:56
#we the people!

Challenging! I'll have to remember that one when I prepare my application for the Arts Council. I do hope you find our upcoming 'Tartan Tat Installation' interesting and CHALLENGING! Yeh!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.