Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 12th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Vodka, Mad Dog and Buckfast: This is Friday night for 'bored' 12-year-old



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 April 2008
IT WAS 4pm on a Friday afternoon and 12-year-old Nick was bored. He had finished school hours ago and there was nothing to do at home. The youngster rang his two best friends on his mobile phone and arranged to meet for a drinking session.
Providing shelter from the rain and away from prying adult eyes, an underpass in Deans, Livingston, was popular with teenagers wanting to indulge in some illegal fun.

And Nick was no exception.

Since launching "Operation Floorsweep", a revolut
ionary new approach to under-age drinking last September, police in West Lothian have caught about 120 teenagers under the age of 16 drinking .

The majority of the youths have been aged between 13 to 15, with three aged 12.

Last Friday, 15 teenagers, the oldest 15, the youngest 12-year-old Nick (not his real name), were found drinking alcohol – including Buckfast, Mad Dog 20/20 and vodka – in various areas around Livingston.

Nick and his friends, who were drinking a mixture of cherry cola, vodka and cider, were spotted by three plain-clothes policemen, tipped off that the underpass had become a hot spot for teenage drinkers.

At 8pm in a brightly-lit interview room, with a family member by his side, the 12-year-old admits this is not the first time he has been drinking .

"I've been p***** several times before – about four or five times I guess."

He said that his tipple of choice was a drink called Mad Dog 20/20 – a violent-coloured "raspberry flavoured grape wine- based drink" with a 13 per cent alcohol content which can be picked up at most licensed shops for £4.99 for a 75cl bottle.

"The last time I drank that was a few weeks ago. I guess I drank quite a lot. I don't really remember much about that evening. I know I did daft stuff and started fighting my friends but that's all I remember."

He said he drank simply because he was "bored" and because his friends did the same.

"It's peer pressure probably which makes me do it as well," he added.

And where did he get the alcohol? "Friends just get it, I guess," he said.

The chief inspector at Livingston police station, Jim Baird, then speaks to Nick trying to make him realise drinking at such a young age is not just against the law, but is putting him at risk from attacks, as well as causing lasting damage to his brain and liver.

Bringing under-age drinkers and their families to the police station for interview is a key part of Operation Floorsweep. As well as being spoken to by West Lothian Drug and Alcohol Services, a referral is also made to social services.

By early evening on Friday night, the reception area at Livingston police station is bustling with parents who have come to collect their offspring.

The first to be picked up was 14-year-old "James", who was taken to the station at 4pm. Using the £10 his mother had given him to go to the cinema he stood outside a Livingston off- licence and asked a stranger if they would buy him a bottle of Buckfast. Unfortunately for him, the man he chose to ask was a plain-clothes police officer who knew that youngsters were asking adults to buy them booze.

Shortly afterwards the patrol picks up a girl and two boys aged 14 and 15 huddled in a makeshift den swigging 15 per cent proof Buckfast tonic wine.

They are taken to the police station, swiftly followed by two 15-year-olds who have been found drinking their way through a crate of beer and singing loudly in a wooded area of the town.

The chief inspector said that most parents were mortified when they came to collect their children.

"In general the parents are shocked to find their offspring have been drinking. But the majority of them see it as a really positive thing that we are doing and use it as a wake-up call for both them and their kids that something needs to change."

The mother of one under-age drinker picked up on Friday said: "I'm totally shocked but I'm also very grateful to the police for picking him up. At least now we can both go home and talk about this and work out where we go from here."

Phil Hanlon, a professor of public health at Glasgow University, said that if children as young as 12 started drinking habitually then they could be dead within five years.

"Since the 1990s, there has been an epidemic, a massive rise in alcohol consumption, and the largest rise is the younger age group – and this is starting as young as 12.

"It is the death rate within this group that we are most concerned about.

"The reality is that if you drink heavily you can kill yourself in from anything between five to 15 years. And if a 12-year-old starts drinking heavily then it is not impossible that they wouldn't get past their teenage years because their liver would simply pack up. If that happens you die."

Last week it emerged that 87 out of 632 off-licences tested had sold alcohol to volunteers who were under-age. In the Lothian and Borders area, 17 out of 51 premises visited had supplied alcohol – a rate of 33 per cent.

While officers in Livingston were tracking down under-age drinkers, a separate team from "Operation Froth" were busy with a "test purchase" operation – to see if several licensed shops would sell a 16-year-old volunteer alcohol.

That night a shop in West Calder failed the test and the under-age teenager managed to buy a vodka-based drink called Blue Wicked costing £2.99.

The shop keeper and licensee will both be charged.

Chief Inspector Baird said: "We don't try and pretend that under-age drinking never happened when we were young but it was more beer and cider at parties where an adult was usually present.

"But the pattern of behaviour has changed. These days teenagers drink fortified wines and neat vodka and drink on the streets or pathways."

"Alcohol is cheap – in some places cheaper than bottled water – so it's much more affordable to youngsters."

At the end of the night, having poured the alcohol they took from the teenagers down the drain, Steven Duncan, temporary sergeant in the community department at Livingston police station, who was instrumental in setting up "Operation Floorsweep, surveys the empty bottles – a collection of Buckfast, Mad Dog 20/20, beer and soft-drink bottles which had contained vodka.

"It's about an average night," he said.

"What we are trying to do is not only catch teenagers drinking under-age, but reassure the public that we are doing something about it."

TARGETING TEENAGE DRINKERS

MINISTERS in Australia this week took drastic action to curb the rise in teenage drinking with a 70 per cent increase in tax on alcopops.

Health minister Nicola Roxon said the Australian government was particularly concerned about the increase in the number of girls who were drinking to excess.

She said: "They're full of sugar and marketed so you can't particularly taste the alcohol. We've seen an explosion in their consumption by young people and we want to turn that around.

"Young people are price-sensitive and if that means this is a deterrent, it will be a successful measure."

In the UK there has been some discussion of a tax on alcopops. But although the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, ended the freeze on the tax on spirits this year, he did not specifically target drinks associated with underage drinkers.

However, the Tories say they will target teenage drinking with a special tax.

Under their proposals a £2 can of super-strength beer would rise in price to £2.38, while a £1.25 litre of strong cider would rise to £1.66. Alcopops costing around £1.25 a bottle would cost £1.79.





The full article contains 1355 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 April 2008 10:30 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Alcohol & binge drinking
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 29/04/2008 01:12:30
15year old's not so controllable, that is granted, in the sense you cant keep 'tabs' on them 24/7, they may get the opportunity at some point, to get a drink with their associates,

But a 12year old is something else, 'never, never' did we NOT KNOW what our 12year old daughters were up to, or where they were at 8pm at night.
I blame the parents.
2

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 29/04/2008 06:31:45
Bring back the Scouts and Guides. Wonderful organisation (did attract pervs but I think this is sorted now).
3

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 29/04/2008 08:03:24
I can't believe the Police actually did something about it !? On the rare occasions time I used to call them about gangs of youths (clearly underage) drinking and vandalising stuff and letting off fireworks - They could not have been less interested ... In some instances they wouldn't even bother sending a cop car round (or if they did it was so many hours after amy 'incident' happened that nobody was there to see them or be seen.

Having said all this - it is weak, pathetic parenting that to blame not aided by the governments zeal to 'protect' children from any form of discipline.

All's alot of them need is a good clout around the ear and a swift reminder of who's boss in the parent/child relationship.
4

Lesley,

EDINBURGH 29/04/2008 08:24:13
Truely sad - totally agree with Charles that the 12 year old's parents should be taking better care. Rules - you also make a great point - there is nothing for these kids to do! More investment is needed to provide sports facilites and clubs - and parents need to get their kids interested.
5

Xena - Warrior Princess,

29/04/2008 08:33:21
#1 Spot on Charles - if my son had come in at 12 years of age drunk, I would definitely have noticed! I can't understand the parents that apparently don't notice.
6

Boy Wonder,

29/04/2008 08:37:00
Councils sell off playing fields and close down youth clubs to save money. It's being going on forever. I remember the 70s papers being full of the "problems of kids with nothing to do".

Remember Easterhouse? Sighthill? Craigmillar?

We need more children and youth clubs (not necessarily Scout and Guides, which are too structured for many kids) to be open from the end of the school day until late at night, offering all the activities kids need ... with parents helping to run them ... like they did in they 70s.

Since the early 90s, Councils have been "tightening their belts" and it's always Youth and Community service which gets hit hardest when the cutbacks start!
7

,

29/04/2008 08:54:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Jambo-ree,

29/04/2008 09:31:54
#2 - They never went away and membership figures are on the increase. Even more could join if more adult leaders could be found.

Don't forget it was the Scout Association that first rumbled Tommy Hamilton of Dunkeld infamy. All adults coming into contact with children now have to undergo the Disclosure Scotland process.
9

Anon,

Edinburgh 29/04/2008 09:59:30
Ofcourse it's the parents fault, fine them and that will help ease the situation I bet.

I have a 12 year old stepson and I would want to know where he was at that time and surely you would notice if your child came home intoxicated.

Okay we all did it but not at 12 years old.

The problem wtih today's society is parents who just don't give a fig and also a media/celebrity saturated society that encourages and enforces young people to grow up too fast.

Whatever happened to British Bulldogs and skipping and elastics.

I think it's really sad.
10

Anon,

Edinburgh 29/04/2008 10:00:54
As for kids not having nothing to do, they have more to do now than we had and we never did that sort of thing.

Kids are lazy, it's all computer games now and TV, if they made the effort and the parents, there is loads of activities out there, you just need to go and find them.
11

WJohn,

West Lothian 29/04/2008 10:58:27
Well, they cannot afford beer - like the rest of us old fogies.
12

Anglofile,

29/04/2008 12:10:22
#9

Agree, more focus on parenting, fine the parents, jail the parents for neglect. However, government won't do this as it costs votes. The government do not want to target parents when kids are in any sort of trouble. That is why they blame teachers, the police etc.
13

mac77,

Edinburgh 29/04/2008 13:36:53
#10 Quite. In the article it was even pointed out that one of the parents had given her offspring £10 so he could have something to do. There is plenty to do. But he spent it on drink. What is she supposed to do? Chain him to his bed? Our whole culture is obsessed with "getting trashed" and shows no signs of improvement. Once upon a time (70's) you got lifted , or at least ticked off, by the police if you were "drunk and disorderly": now people can lie unconscious in the street, or stagger about screaming, shouting and being aggressive and no-one bothers. Many Europeans drink more in quantity than we do; the crucial difference is that being drunk in public is not approved of in their society
14

r chee bold,

29/04/2008 13:52:36
Shops found selling drink to under agers, 1st time 500 pound fine, second time lose licence, never again booze allowed to be sold in that property, buy drink for underage, 1st time 200pound fine, 2nd time 500 pound fine, 3rd time jail.
15

stan free,

Cowtown, Alta 29/04/2008 15:13:36
few years back i dropped into the local community centre (westhill; outskirts abdn)to pick up some leaflets, was a youth club on at time ; pool tables, games etc - it was pretty empty , meanwhile back at the local shop loads of kids on the swallae - weekends numbers were in the hundreds - yards from where the police found a 'wasted' girl passed out in the height of winter - i seem to remember she was around 14?
point is this is a fairly affluent area where the parents obviously don't care or are in denial - we left couple yrs back - would hate my kids to be absorbed into that low life culture
16

Cwalker,

29/04/2008 16:51:51
what is violent coloured?
17

Gorgie_Tony,

Edinburgh 30/04/2008 03:47:48
This wouldn't have happened in my day. You could guarantee that if you tried something like this the local bobby would have been right onto you and given you a good thrashing. He would then take you home, where you would get another good thrashing - and guess what - 4 months bedroom detention for bringing shame to the family. It was a lesson you never forgot. Unfortunately in this day and age you cannot thrash kids - and guess what - yes - they run wild - abusing old folk, assaulting whoever they like, sticking knives in people and mugging innocent victims. Yes - bring back the old days when the good folk ruled the streets, and the scum were treated as pure scum.
18

Douglas,

Bathgate 30/04/2008 08:40:47
#16 Cwalker: Black and blue?
19

Worried Scot,

08/05/2008 21:09:48
Ah yes: "peer pressure", the excuse for parents everywhere to justify their kids bad behaviour.

So he comes home "pi55ed" and his parents either don't notice or don't do anything about it?

Then of course the other catch all excuse for every failure - blame the government! Not enough parks, activities might be the case, but you can't blame that on this kid being allowed to got out and get drunk more than once.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Would you give up drink if it meant you could live past your 100th birthday?
Definitely – it would be great to live that long.
I’d like to, but I haven’t got the willpower.
No way! If I gave up booze I’d feel about 200 years old.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.