Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Medical chief backs rise in alcohol prices

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 June 2009
CRACKING down on cheap alcohol sales will start saving lives in Scotland within a year, the nation's most senior doctor predicted last night.
Chief Medical Officer Harry Burns revealed he had overcome his own scepticism about the SNP's drink plans and now believed the evidence for imposing minimum pricing on alcohol was "overwhelming".

He said he was convinced deaths from liver diseas
e would fall within 12 months of the new strategy being put in place.

And he said deaths from other alcohol-related illnesses, including cancer, would start to tumble within five years.

Burns's fulsome backing for minimum pricing, given in an exclusive interview with Scotland on Sunday, comes as a huge boost for SNP ministers as they host a summit on alcohol tomorrow in Edinburgh. The Scottish Government finds itself lined up with doctors against ferocious resistance from the alcohol industry.

Burns said the time had come for Scotland to take a stand against alcohol problems believed to cause more than £2.25 billion worth of damage to the economy every year.

He said: "Prices for alcohol have fallen dramatically over the last few decades and government hasn't done anything to stop it. The evidence is overwhelming that when prices tack down, deaths tack up.

"There are lots of things we need to do. But a good place to start is minimum pricing. I am convinced we will see an impact within the first year. There would be people alive at the end of it who would have been dead without the policy. I am convinced the problem is serious enough that we should do it."

Burns said thousands of Scots were currently sitting with "fatty" livers "teetering on the edge of failure". The organs, however, could recover if they were given more breaks from drink. Pushing up prices for the cheapest alcohol would force some problem drinkers to cut back. "What we are talking about here is pulling people back from the brink," Burns said. But he said there would be other quick health benefits too, including a quick reduction in emergency admissions.

The Scottish Government is expected to introduce legislation next year to set a minimum price for a unit of alcohol, driving up the price of cheap beers, ciders, wines and supermarket own-brand spirits. A much-mooted 40p would put the cost of the cheapest bottle of whisky up to at least £11.20.

The government also plans to ban off-sales promotions and give local licensing boards the power to raise the minimum age for buying alcohol in an off-licence to 21. It is far from certain, however, to get the measures through parliament.

Scotland would be the first country to impose minimum pricing. But Burns is still confident of the evidence of its success. He points to Finland. The Nordic nation, where alcohol was traditionally very expensive, felt forced to slash tax on drink in the 1990s when thousands of citizens started making cut-price "booze cruises" to neighbouring Estonia.

Burns said: "They got significant health problems very quickly. Then they increased their taxation level again and my understanding is health problems are diminishing." Burns believes minimum pricing would be even more effective at raising prices than tax hikes, which supermarkets would be free to absorb if they wished. Researchers in England recently concluded that a minimum price of 50p could prevent nearly 100,000 hospital admissions a year there.

Burns, whose favourite tipple is alcohol-free Beck's lager, wants to go further, slashing the drink-drive limit and looking at ways of making low and non-alcoholic drinks cheaper. He has previously called for curbs on alcohol advertising and sponsorship.

But industry leaders argue that minimum pricing could provoke some countries to raise import barriers to whisky and have suggested it would fall foul of European Union rules. They have also cast doubt on its ability to improve our health.

David Williamson of the Scotch Whisky Association said: "We have seen nothing to suggest minimum pricing will have any impact on alcohol-related harm. The industry supports the vast majority of the Scottish Government's strategy on alcohol but not minimum pricing, which we believe would be illegal and likely to be ineffective."

Jeremy Beadles, chief executive of the Wine and Spirit Trade Association, said: "A national minimum pricing scheme has never before been introduced to tackle alcohol misuse anywhere in the world, so there is no real way of knowing what the impact would be. But what we do know is that countries with the highest prices, such as Sweden, Denmark and Ireland, also have some of the highest levels of alcohol misuse.

"It is unlikely a drinking culture that stretches back thousands of years can be changed in a year by putting prices up."



The full article contains 801 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 June 2009 9:41 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Alcohol & binge drinking
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 21/06/2009 01:35:18

This nonsense of 'Punishing' the many_for_the_few, must STOP IMEDITALY!! Herewith!
And as far as the few who find it fit to Abuse Alcohol, they will always do-so, come 'Hell_or_High_Water', no-matter what 'Price' Alcohol is on the shelves.

2

drunken proffet,

Tassy 21/06/2009 07:48:57
You are right Mr Linskaill, however the companies promoting the consumption of alcohol have increased the sugar content in certain drinks, introduced colours and labels to encourage youngsters to start drinking, and generally behaved like the deepest demons from hell. You serve booze up with brown paper labels and healthy drinks with a bit of razmataz you maybe get a small number of kids not following a very Scottish track.
3

MRab2,

21/06/2009 08:53:27
I dount it #2 Scotland & heavy drinking have gone together for CENTURIES, long before alcopops and alcohol advertising. It will not be broken by some simplistic piece of legislation. There's no quick fix for this problem.

Like most puritans Burns doesn't credit people with problem solving abilities. If this measures goes ahead, watch for the rise in sales of home brew kits, the emergence of home stills and daring bootleggers making booz runs from... Tescos in Carlisle.

I'm tired of legislation based on guesswork and the most tenuous of evidence, especially when said legislation adversely effects the majority, because you know, even when everyone knows it didn't work you'll have a hell of a time trying to get it repealed.
4

drunken proffet,

Tassy 21/06/2009 10:20:22
All Scots,well my friends and myself, are heavy drinkers. What I notice and talk about is the type of advertising linked to alcohol. When I was a kid I drank beer and lemonade, that was what kids drank. It was called a Shandy, very refreshing and not too addictive. I went through my National Service and apart from once or twice drank no alcohol. I got married and promptly became an alcoholic, well marriage is tough. Even then I drank dark rum,whisky and beer. What you have now is international companies prepping kids to drink alcohol, dress like hookers and having no where to turn for advice. You can forget about blaming the gays, this is serious hetrosexual stuff.
5

soapy1,

21/06/2009 11:16:23
You were all warned that this would happen, you were told repeatedly that if you allowed politicians and charities to dictate how you live one part of your lives they would try to run it all! Well now they are and you don'tlike it either!

If you want your freedom to anything you have got to put an end to government sponsered charities, you have got to replace your politicians with people who do not want to run your life for you, it is your freedom not theirs, it is your choice not theirs. there are sufficient statutes on the books which are not enforced that deal with these matters why do you need more?

Each and every one of you can be a William Morris, a Robert Burns, you have done it before. Pick up your pens and your votes and show these interfering busibodies that you do not want them, do it today, keep on doing it or lose what is left of your liberty.
6

peem birrell,

edinburgh 21/06/2009 15:51:54
Absolutely right #3 - Burns has to admit that no other country has a minimum alcohol price so how does he know what effect it would have? By extrapolating from what he 'understands' is the 'effect' of different policies in Finland. Why should we take this man seriously when he is so misinformed as to believe that prices of alcohol have fallen dramatically over the last few decades. No they haven't - people's disposable income has risen faster than the rela price of alcohol. So what he's really saying is 'Scotland's people have too much money and they're spending it on drink'.
As for the dramatic health improvements - rubbish. We were told before the smoking ban that 2,000 people a year died from passive smoking (which was and remains b*lls). Why are these idiots (well-meaning or not) never held to account for their policies not doing what they said they would?
7

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 21/06/2009 16:01:32
Let me see now. Hmmmm?

Charles@1 always sounds like he's inebriated when he's on here every night instead of fertilising his DYW's eggs. He doesn't mention his DYW anymore.

Lifestyle.

Reckon he's turned to the cheap booze to compensate for all the misery in his life. That would explain his stance on things.

What a waste of a life. Having said that, I bought 3 cases of Stella out of Asda yesterday - at £10 a case. 20x440ml cans a case. Eat your heart out.
8

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 21/06/2009 16:09:17
re 7. If anything, 440ml cans should be banned. I drink them quicker and it has nothing to do with price.

A Superking smoker will increase the number of cigarettes they smoke in a day if they can only get King Size.

500ml cans only, please.
9

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 21/06/2009 16:13:49
Better still, make all offsales 2 litre cans for beer and 10 litre bottles for wines and spirits.

That would sicken them.
10

Kenny A,

22/06/2009 10:28:37
7 That was a low hit if I may say, most posts were on the same track in general, booze will be bought or made regardless of price, Scotland is a heavy drinking country but far from the heavyist I know.

This regulation proposed will only harm the majority as the minority of trouble makers will carry on as per normal. Think drugs should be looked at more closly but you dont get tax revenue on them as they are illegal.

4 Yow, know the feeling bud, before getting married lots of friends, after just a wife who complained , second time round the same. Used to like a beer, play rugby go fishing and was a soldier. Now not allowed any of that. Going for a beer of the Bight and may just possibly catch a fish or two. Dont tell the missus.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you support Scotland’s new licensing laws, which come into effect now?
Yes, if they help curb our binge-drinking culture
No, people will still find the money to go boozing
No, these laws treat people like children

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.