Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Million Afghan girls miss out on school

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 April 2008
HALF of Afghan children are still not going to school and girls are missing out the most, the United Nations said yesterday.
The Taleban banned girls from school when in power from 1996 to 2001.

"Despite the progress in school enrolment over the last two years, half of school-age children are estimated to be out of school," said Shigeru Aoyagi, the country's director of Unesco.

Working children, street children, children in prison and disabled children were among those excluded, the UN said, but by far the biggest group was girls.

"We still have 1.2 million girls of school age who do not have access to schools," said Catherine Mbengue, the head of Unicef in Afghanistan.

The main reasons for girls missing out were that many either work to support their families or marry young, Ms Mbengue said. There is also a lack of woman teachers. The literacy rate for women aged 15-24 is 14 per cent, against 51 per cent for men.

Nearly 150 Afghan students and teachers were killed and around 100 schools burned down by Taleban militants in the 12 months to March, the education ministry said, but a record 5.7 million children were now in education.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 April 2008 9:50 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Dáithí,

San Jose 22/04/2008 02:20:41
Well, here's another article that the 'anti-interventionist' crowd will ignore or rationalize with 'let them work it out for themselves' or 'that's just how they are'.
2

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 22/04/2008 07:08:14
Oh what?? now youre going to claim you invaded Afganistan to help School girls get an education??
3

,

22/04/2008 07:54:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 22/04/2008 09:44:15
The banning of girls from education is bad enough, but how can they justify 'working children' and 'children in prison' not being educated???

I bet the working children are not just delivering papers in the morning either, and the children's prison is not just 'the bad home' of my childhood days. This place truly seems like an abomination.

5

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

22/04/2008 12:14:15
Not a good idea...giving Afghan women an education...might get ideas above their station...
6

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 22/04/2008 13:20:30
5

Like ours you mean??
7

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 22/04/2008 13:21:13
4

That happens all over Asia Africa and South America as well.
8

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 22/04/2008 13:23:14
3

You make him sound like a Catholic priest.
9

Silence of the Yams,

22/04/2008 13:44:32
8. Not many priests murdered a higher percentage of jews within their reach han Adolf Hitler!
10

mike - across the pond,

foulkes 22/04/2008 15:12:05
yes, I AM going to claim that education is why we are there....

education IS the key... its their way out of poverty

its the way out of the intellectual inbred cess pits that breed groups like the taliban.... devout followers of sharia law.... even AIDS.... and even YOU are educated enough to claim a few other "causes".... };-P>

and while we could just turn our backs on these people, like all virulent bad ideas, if you dont shine the light of knowledge on them, they CRAWL OUT OF THEIR NASTY CESS PITS and become full blown plagues.... 9/11, Madrid, Bali, London...
11

,

22/04/2008 16:19:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 22/04/2008 17:05:07
According to Al Qaeda No.2...the women are "very brave and supportive" as they keep the houses for their menfolk, while they go out kidnapping and killing.!! THAT is their lot in life.
13

Dáithí,

San Jose 22/04/2008 17:45:03
#10 - Mike

Good reply, Mike. The appeasement crowd has been blabbering their 'no blood for oil' for so long that they believe their own 'straw man'.

Since their pursuit in life is money, they believe that everyone is like them and lose bladder control when introduced to the possibility that people (in this case NATO) can remove a common enemy (the ultra-right wing Islamic fundamentalists known as the 'Taliban') for the common good of everyone.

They clearly aren't interested in the 'common good', only their own, personal good - and being cynical, they believe everyone else to be so also.

After all, why else would they complain about an article that states that a 'record number of children' can now attend schools?

This is progress for everyone - except them.
14

Dáithí,

San Jose 22/04/2008 17:55:12
#12 - Lynne

>"According to Al Qaeda No.2..."

That's not all he said, Lynne! He released a tape:

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080422100510.qnl6rneq&show_article=1

"Al Qaeda chief slams Muslims for lack of support"

This comes on the heels of another report from last February 8th:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article3346386.ece

"Al-Qaeda leaders admit: 'We are in crisis. There is panic and fear'"

Despite the whining of the appeasement crowd, it's important to keep things in perspective. ;)
15

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 22/04/2008 22:34:54
10

Really then why didnt the US UK coaltion of the willing to it decades ago??? nobody gave a flying f*ck for Afganistan until 9/11 now suddenly everybody cares??? aye right!

9

Another spot on sensible post fae the blogs intellect.

14

Funny how our governments say exactly the same thing when they want to rob us of more of our civil liberties isnt it??
If Al Queada are in trouble and on the run then can we get our civil liberties back?? our government wants to increace detention time from 28 days to 42 and possibly 90 if they can get away with it but obviously that wont be necessary now will it???
16

Dáithí,

San Jose 23/04/2008 01:53:15
#15 - FO

>"Really then why didnt the US UK coaltion of the willing to it decades ago???"

Because sometimes the people listen to the rationalizations of the self-centered, whiny, navel-gazing crowd that refuses to spend a dime of their money on anyone else except themselves. You know the type - Socialists. Appeasers.

Until they see that their is a creditable risk to their own security they will do less to help others than the standard Socialist/Communist/Anarchist would do to give help to Darfur.

>"nobody gave a flying f*ck for Afganistan until 9/11 now suddenly everybody cares??? aye right!

Really? They were never 'fashionable'. Now they are a risk, and something will be done.

Following that line of thinking, the Sudanese Islamic government, aided with Chinese weapons, know that as long as they don't end up as front page news in the short-sighted, liberal Western media they will be able to rape and murder little black babies with little interference from the self-absorbed socialist/communist/anarchists.

Too bad that you don't care about the death of the people of Darfur as much as you do the time that a criminal has to spend behind bars.
17

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 23/04/2008 05:32:38
Dáithí,San Jose..he also said Iran will be attacked by the Taliban in the future, and he's very unhappy that Iran has come out with this 9/11 conspiracy theory.

Al-Qaida has previously claimed responsibility for the Sept. 11 attacks.

In an audiotape last week, al-Zawahri denounced what he called Iran's expansionist plans, saying Tehran aims to annex southern Iraq and Shiite areas of the eastern Arabian Peninsula as well as strengthen ties to its followers in southern Lebanon. He warned that if Iran achieves its goals, it will "explode the situation in an already exploding region."
The rhetoric is a stark change for al-Zawahri, who in the past did not seek to exploit Shiite-Sunni tensions. When the former head of al-Qaida in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, was waging a campaign of suicide bombings against Shiites in Iraq, al-Zawahri sent messages telling him to stop, fearing it would hurt al-Qaida's image.
Gunaratna said the change in tone could be because of al-Qaida's failure to win the release of al-Qaida figures detained by Iran since the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, including al-Qaida security chief Saif al-Adel and two of bin Laden's sons.
Gunaratna said that up to 200 al-Qaida figures and their families are under house arrest in Iran and that Tehran has rejected al-Qaida attempts to negotiate their release.
Al-Qaida doesn't have the strength to launch attacks in Iran, but it intends to do so "in the future," he said. "If al-Qaida becomes strong in Iraq ... Iran believes al-Qaida in Iraq could become a major threat."

18

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 23/04/2008 10:09:34
16

Ask a sensible question and get that for an answer.
Do you even think before you post??

Nobody invaded Afganistan before 9/11 in order to educate its young girls because the socialists stopped them?? Is that what you claiming now???
I dont know whether to laugh spit or scream.

"Following that line of thinking, the Sudanese Islamic government, aided with Chinese weapons, know that as long as they don't end up as front page news in the short-sighted, liberal Western media they will be able to rape and murder little black babies with little interference from the self-absorbed socialist/communist/anarchists.

Too bad that you don't care about the death of the people of Darfur as much as you do the time that a criminal has to spend behind bars."

And yer stupidity in making that statement is simply breathtaking.

You imply that a Western coalition of the willing is happy to invade Afganistan in order to educate its young girls
You have also claimed the invasion of Iraq was all about ridding the world of a despotic dictator
but the same c*nts wont invade any nation in Africa in order to prevent genocide and youre trying to blame it on "socialist appeasers" even though its the right wing nazi neocon demonic elite who are in power.

You trully are a f*ckwit.

It all proves the motivations for invading these countries was not to help the people but to help themselves.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.