Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Wind and wave power could generate £70bn and 250,000 UK jobs

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 July 2009
THE UK could generate up to £70 billion for the economy and almost 250,000 jobs from offshore wind and wave power, a new report has suggested.
The Carbon Trust says offshore wind and wave power can provide at least 15 per cent of the total carbon savings required to meet 2050 targets.

But it says a bold new approach is needed if Britain is to transform itself into a global hub of low c
arbon innovation.

In the first of a series of economic reviews, the report says that the UK could seize 45 per cent of the global offshore wind market but calls for up to £600 million in research and development, the removal of regulatory barriers and new incentives to speed up offshore wind power development around the coast.

The report also claims that, with a quarter of the world's wave technologies already being developed in the UK, Britain could generate revenues worth £2bn per year by 2050 and up to 16,000 jobs.

Carbon Trust chief executive Tom Delay said: "These technologies are not green 'nice to haves' but are critical to the economic recovery of the UK. To reap the significant rewards from their successful development we must prioritise and comprehensively back the technologies that offer the best chance of securing long-term carbon savings, jobs and revenue for Britain.

"We have known for a while that the UK has an important role to play in the clean tech revolution. But, rather than following in the footsteps of others, this new analysis shows it is an economic no-brainer to be leading from the front. The global race is clearly on and the clock is ticking."

David Kidney, minister for energy and climate change, said: "The government aims to secure Britain's green future, and seize the economic benefits of the move to a low carbon economy. We are determined to position our country as a hub of the advanced green manufacturing revolution.

"The £405m investment in low carbon industries secured in the recent Budget is a strong signal of our intention to realise that vision."

John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace, said every country needs a decarbonisation plan to solve three challenges: climate stability, energy security and economic prosperity.

"The UK has an enormous untapped supply of clean, green renewable energy and a world-class engineering industry well placed to develop it. Our economy can also save billions in energy costs by investing in an unprecedented energy efficiency drive."

George Smith, managing director of Aberdeen-based Green Ocean Energy, which has developed two wave power devices, said the potential for the UK to capitalise on wind and wave power is huge.

"If the wave and wind power industry is to achieve its potential it is essential that it attracts the investment needed and the skilled workers to develop this growing sector."

But James Cox, principal consultant at Pöyry Energy Consulting, said although wind and wave generation may create jobs and investments, there will be consequences for the electricity markets.

A Pöyry study published this week found that a third of the UK's power generation could come from wind, but the electricity system and the markets will have to adapt to face the implications of intermittency.

TURBINE PLANS TURNED ROUND

PROTESTERS were celebrating yesterday after planning chiefs rejected proposals for six giant wind turbines in a rural beauty spot near Madonna's former country estate.

Green energy firm Ecotricity submitted the plans to build six 395ft (120m) turbines near the village of Silton, near Gillingham, in Dorset.

North Dorset District Council's planning officers recommended the scheme for approval, but a development control committee yesterday unanimously rejected the plans.

The campaigners, who go under the name Save Our Silton, argued that the turbines would tower over the landscape and ruin the views from nearby Cranborne Chase, an area of outstanding natural beauty where Madonna and Guy Ritchie used to live.





Page 1 of 1

 
1

McNasty,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 08:05:38
Westminster seems to think; "What's yours is mine and what's mine is my own."

This is one "UK" resource that cannot be snatched away by a greedy neighbour.

Good times are coming if we just have the courage to take it.
2

Mad Jock,

Offshore Denmark 03/07/2009 08:06:07
Britain will never be a world leader in renewables while we obsess about creating jobs. Regional unmemployment is a fact of life, but instead of building the factories where the jobs are needed, build them where the markets are, or the ports. Move the jobs to the factories, not the other way around.
Denmark is already a world leader in the export of wind turbines. Our office in Esbjerg is 30 metres away from the dockside where the turbine towers, blades, gearboxes and propellor bosses are loaded onto ships for export. The generators, either Siemens or Vestas, come from Germany, but this is a relatively easy run up a motorway to Esbjerg.
Until Britain has the ability to fabricate and deliver all these components cheaply and easily, it hasn't a hope. All will need to be imported. Creating a few welding jobs on the West Coast or in the Hebrides is not the solution. Leith or Clydeside would be better suited.
Linwood failed, despite what the unions say, because it was too far from it's market, and too far from the component manufacturers (in the Midlands)to make it economically viable. It was set up with a massive regional development grant, at a time when the transport infrastructure was poor to say the least, and was doomed from the outset.
If we want Britain, but better, Scotland, to be world leaders in this industry, do it right first time. Unfortunately, politics will get in the way, so I don't hold out much hope.
3

Rob Royston,

Bishopbriggs 03/07/2009 08:48:57
#2 Mad Jock There is one big problem with your plan for moving production near to the Clydeside and Leith docksides and that is the fact that this land has now been sold off, and been re-developed in the disastrous UK property bubble, RIP.

If I recall correctly, three win turbines were produced on the continent, maybe at your yard, for erection on the Isle of Lewis. crossing the North Sea one of them was washed overboard at considerable cost in time and money. The irony was that these turbines were unloaded at the Arnish Yard at Stornoway were they could have been built, in this instance, a lot cheaper.
4

Unimpressed one,

03/07/2009 09:35:59
£600 million - that's half the cost of a new nuclear power station which would generate real power 24/7 with no 'emissions'. But of course the greenies only want 18th century technology because that's all they can understand.

Strange how if was oil companies proposing to decimate the countryside with their infrastructure, the beardies would be rioting in the streets. But for some warped reason millions of tonnes of steel and concrete is deemed acceptable in their eyes.

As for generating £70 billion - looks like swine flu has taken to the skies.
5

mr broon,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 09:40:35
2# IF, Scots yards can build oil, production platforms for the UK Sector of the North Sea then there is no reason why it cannot fabricate wind turbines close to the market?

Last week, at the site of the new Glen Doe power station, a spokesman on behalf of Scottish and Southern Energy made an interesting point about the construction of so many hydro-electric schemes in the post-War period.

Many large hydro schemes were built in Scotland and Wales at the same time as the new nuclear power stations came on stream because every nuclear power plant has to close down at some stage for repair and maintenance, and the hydro capacity was required to take up the loss of nuclear-powered electricity in the grid.

Despite the multi-billion decommissioning costs, and problems with the indefinite safe storage of nuclear waste, nuclear power will still be required for the foreseeable future but renewables will become even more important in the Uk's energy mix.
6

Lianachan,

Highlands 03/07/2009 10:12:11
There's an obvious solution to noth unemployment and power generation that I'm surprised Labour haven't considered yet - have the unemployed walking in treadmills. Perhaps this could be extended to anybody who can't produce an ID card when it's demanded of them.
7

Geomac 1,

Scotland 03/07/2009 10:19:29
When you add up the number of homes claimed by windmill developers to be supplied by their product, the number exceeds the number of houses in the UK - but this is clearly not the case - we are being hoodwinked left, right and center by these charlatans.
8

El Franko,

03/07/2009 10:49:18
With enough state inference, we could create 250,000 jobs in the blowing-up-of-paper-bags sector. Sounds great, but there even journalists would ask if the money could perhaps have been better spent, if just maybe we lost more jobs on the way.

Well, we shall certainly lose jobs and damage the environment through wind and wave power. As for the 'Carbon Trust', I wouldn't trust them with the carbon from a candle. They are rentseekers who will reduce our economic strength, weakened as it already is.

We are not wealthy enough for this extravagance.
9

El Franko,

03/07/2009 10:51:45
And who is 'John Ross'? A government spin doctor? Why do so many of these propaganda pieces in The Scotmans have bylines from people you've generally never heard from before, nor may do again? Are they concerned to cover their tracks? Can't say I blame them. I wouldn't want my name associated with such dangerous drivel.
10

Geomac 1,

Scotland 03/07/2009 13:30:30
If this is indeed possible, the where's the master plan to go with the rhetoric? At present we have a rag bag of windmill developers rampaging round the countryside seeking places to park their income generating spinning machines. We then have a myriad of quangos telling us that we're the wind capital of Europe (could that be becaue of all the politicains we have??) and telling us that we could be leaders in renewable technology - bo**ocks. The Danes, Germans and Americans lead on windmills, the Norwegians lead on hydro, we could have led on wave, maybe, but the pilot machine fell apart - what's left - ah tidal (The Saudi Arabia of Europe - A.S.) - here the pace of dithering is gathering speed - no doubt we'll be dragging our heels in this area as others race past us.
What is badly needed is leadership (coupled with action) and not more rhetoric and wishful thinking!
11

mr broon,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 13:49:37
Last year, the renewables market in the United States was worth $15.3 billion. The vast majority of the business went to American corporations.

In the State of California alone, $2.1 billion was spent on renewables by companies, and private home owners investing in micro-systems, especially solar
energy.

Despite resistance from many sections of US society tied to oil dependency, by 2012-2015 the market is expected to be worth in excess of $85 billion.
US companies must become more pro actively involved and the DOE estimates anything between 38,000 and 85,000 new jobs could be created.

Federal grants of between $3,600 and $15,400 are available to every American household to install micro renewable systems. In some cases, grants will be greatly increased to corporations building new homes to encourage renewables.

Source: US Department of Energy website.
12

El Franko,

03/07/2009 14:09:06
#11, you will note that California is all but bankrupt.
13

El Franko,

03/07/2009 14:45:59
Some Australian media have better guest-writers on the greenie-industrial complex which is hellbent on causing us all so much loss:

'Now there are calls for an international carbon-trading regime. The World Bank has proposed that it broker "carbon rights" between the developed and developing world. In the already international and informal world of "carbon offsetting", wealthy individuals in the West pay large sums to charities that fund "eco-friendly" farming and industry in the developing world. It was recently revealed that Prince Charles has made donations to a charity that encourages Indian farmers to use foot pumps rather than machinery to draw water for their crops. In short, guilt-ridden rich people are paying poor people to stay poor so that they can continue living carbon-rich lives over here.

Formalising such an unequal relationship with international brokerage of carbon-emission rights would be a disaster, a form of eco-slavery.

Far from ushering in a brighter future, the green-industrial complex's activities hinder economic experimentation, individual initiative and human aspiration. Theirs is a recipe for economic stagnation rather than recovery and for a new form of politics dominated by an elite green clique and closed off to us mere mortals. '

Source: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25724257-7583,00.html



'
14

nabodican,

Newton Stewart 03/07/2009 14:56:47
Wind and wave power are a non starter when it comes to producing significant quantities of energy 24/7
As for jobs, forget it. Just take a look at any operational wind power station and try and spot a worker.
You may find an occasional Dane or German across to repair a broken down turbine.
15

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 16:14:24
14. nabodican:

'Just take a look at any operational wind power station and try and spot a worker.'

I suppose it hasn't occurred to you that is one reason they cost so little to run?

The other reason is that the turbines are much more mechanically reliable than coal, oil, gas or nuclear reactors.
16

Geomac 1,

Scotland 03/07/2009 17:42:03
#16 Fred
Just look at the heading of this article - it's about JOBS created by wind. So far the only jobs created by wind are politicians jobs.
RELIABLE - just type in "wind turbines" into You Tube and you will see how reliable they are
17

mr broon,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 18:16:31
The State of California is responsible for 13 percent of the United States' gross domestic product.

California's GDP is larger than all but 8 other countries in the world.

For 8 of the past 10 years California's GDP has grown to such an extent that it has almost doubled whilst the UK's GDP has grown at a much slower rate.

However, for 2008-2009, California is facing a $16 billion budget deficit which should be brought back into the black by 2013.

The UK presently has a budget deficit of $12 billion.

This year, investment in the State of California is expected to exceed $135 billion. (Wall Street Journal)

Irrespective of California's financial problems, I know which of the two economies is more likely to return to surplus sooner.
18

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 04/07/2009 07:08:16
17. Geomac:

Wind: a few broken rotors;

Coal: thousands of deaths in the mines, countless deaths froom pollution;

Oil: many deaths on the rigs, countless deaths from pollution;

Nuclear: Chernobyl, deaths in and from mining and radiation.
19

Dragonfire,

17/07/2009 16:05:46
I say go for it. Better late than never eh?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.