Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Giant step forward with £45m investment and 200 jobs in the pipeline

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 March 2009
THE future seemed bleak a month ago but ambitious plans announced yesterday could see a wind turbine maker become a world leader, creating 200 jobs.
A £45 million investment package is expected to transform the troubled Kintyre economy into an area with almost full employment.

The Vestas wind turbine manufacturing plant at Machrihanish, near Campbeltown, is being taken over by a subsidiary of
another Danish firm, Skykon.

The deal will save the 100-strong workforce, with plans for it to be expanded to more than 300 over the next two years.

Another 150 indirect spin-off posts will be created among local supply chain companies, while expanding the plant for a new generation of off-shore and on-shore wind turbines will mean a further 400 construction jobs.

Alex Salmond, the First Minister, visited the site yesterday and said: "This is going to transform the economy of one of the remote parts of Scotland which has had most economic difficulty, particularly in harsh economic times."

Argyll and Bute has the second highest ratio of unemployed in Scotland with 31 people chasing every job vacancy, compared to a Scottish average of ten

Mr Salmond said: "We can look forward to virtual full employment on the Mull of Kintyre.

It creates high-quality and skilled employment in the local area, and gives Scotland a lead in the development of clean, green energy technology – putting our nation at the forefront of global developments."

The deal was confirmed as plans for some wind farms in England were called into question after Spanish power giant Iberdrola announced cuts to its wind power investment in Britain.

But Mr Salmond said the Campbeltown expansion was going ahead with an eye to a "large and expanding" market for off-shore-and on-shore turbines.

"Individual companies are going to take individual decisions," he said. "Within the next half-century, we have the potential in Scotland to produce up to 60,000 megawatts of primarily off-shore renewable power."

The £12 million Vestas development was opened in 2002 at the former RAF base in Machrihanish. The 100,000sq ft factory was secured against international competition with the help of £9.4 million of public funds.

But it shut last year when Vestas said the turbines it was making were not big enough for the international market. The Skykon deal includes private capital investment of £35 million, through its subsidiary Welcon Towers, to introduce new manufacturing techniques and equipment.

Scottish Development International is also providing a grant of £9.2 million and Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) about £500,000 in training support.

Jesper Øhlenschlæger, Skykon's chief executive, said: "Scotland is rapidly becoming the most positive and the most interesting renewable wind power market in Europe.

"The Scottish Government and local energy producers are now clearly focused on wind power and it is expected that up to 3,000 megawatts of wind energy will be installed in Scotland over the next four years."

Kenny Jordan, of Unite, said the news was "a nugget of hope in a sea of despair."





Page 1 of 1

 
1

S'me,

Edinburgh 27/03/2009 00:12:29
Great news, more of this solid practical stuff please and less on emotional politics...
2

Angoos,

Baku, Azerbaijan 27/03/2009 06:56:10
Stories like this always make me chuckle a little.

"The deal will save the 100-strong workforce, with plans for it to be expanded to more than 300 over the next two years."

"Another 150 indirect spin-off posts will be created"

"a further 400 construction jobs"

As anyone who knows anything about the construction industry this means that when construction of all these wind farms is complete there will be 850 people made redundant as the only jobs that will remain AFTER construction will be a few maintenance positions.
3

greenhill,

27/03/2009 07:32:17
Too many people are buying into a delusion that renewables can meet our power needs.They will not for a long time to come.

To provide base load the SNP intends to build coal burning power stations(as do Labour) in the hope that carbon capture and sequstration will work at some point in the future.In the meantime masses of toxins will be spewed out over Scotland.

Salmond is shouting renewables from the rooftops but not saying so much about where we will be getting that baseload.He is a con-man out to please an ignorant public who are impressed by highly visible windmills and reckon something is being done.Labour are not much better.


Their reticence re coal is to do with the fact that Coal power has released to the World far more radioactivity than all the nuclear power plants in the world. Air pollution from coal burning kills hundreds of thousands of people per year. Other nasties released by coal apart from the obvious C02 are: sulfur dioxide ,nitrogen oxides, and toxic mercury. If you were to take a Geiger counter around the vicinity of a coal power station you would find far more radiation than in the vicinity of a nuclear station.

Salmond and Labour do not care about the loss of human life all that matters to them is votes from fools .

Another element to this is the local investment angle.Often local people welcome the jobs but windfarms are unecenomic and rely on subsidy so the overall economy suffers .

4

The Strategist,

27/03/2009 08:27:50
If wind is such a huge commercial opportunity then where are the Scottish wind turbine companies?

5

greenhill,

27/03/2009 08:29:52
RE 20th Century boy,27/03/2009 07:49:23


You have made no incisive counter argument to the points made.All you have done is make a personal commentary and nothing else.

Where is the beef?
6

greenhill,

27/03/2009 08:34:53
Re The Strategist,27/03/2009 08:27:50

With so much subsidy on the go the building of wind turbines is "commercial".So I reckon a Scottish company could make a go of manufacturing.However take out subsidy then the demand would fall.
7

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 27/03/2009 08:55:30
The UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority website states quite clearly that it is responsible for the UK's civil nuclear LIABILITY.
The clear up work on sites in England, Scotland and Wales will take decades and cost the UK Taxpayer tens of billions of pounds!

Future generations will continue to pay for the massive clearance work.

Renewables are part of a mix of energy sources and unlike nuclear waste, which will have to be deposited in deep stores for HUNDREDS of years, wind turbine
and photovoltaic farms can be removed just as easily as they are erected.

According to the State of California website, another 8 MW photovoltaic farm has been planned to provide electricity for the next 20 years. It will take less than 6 months to construct and can be disassembled just as easily. The vast majority of the parts must be recyclable under Californian law.
The same can't be said for nuclear waste!
8

Los Angeles,

27/03/2009 09:10:37
Greenhill - why are you banging away on a keyboard when you should be out saving us from ourselves? (20th Century)
LoL. Neat.

And it's a word-for-word repeat of his post from yesterday.

Greensleeve is beating the hell out of his keyboard because he's telling Scotland its government is incompetent, and it WILL accept nuclear power imposed by Westminster.

And also because he wants to post well considered diplomacy such as this:

"Salmond and Labour do not care about the loss of human life all that matters to them is votes from fools." (Greensleeve)

Take yer medicine, Scotland, you know it will do you good!




9

Los Angeles,

27/03/2009 09:13:41
"As anyone who knows anything about the construction industry this means that when construction of all these wind farms is complete there will be 850 people made redundant as the only jobs that will remain AFTER construction will be a few maintenance positions." (Angoos)

So, you are arguing that with unemployment destined to reach 3 million next year the creation of medium-term jobs are worthless?

Some logic.
10

greenhill,

27/03/2009 09:20:11
RE Mr. Lachie Todd,Edinburgh 27/03/2009 08:55:30

This country has a legacy from being in the vanguard of the development of nuclear power.The waste we have will have to be dealt with no matter what we do in future.

Waste can been dealt with packaged in properly engineered containers. The very latest design of nuclear power station produces only a fraction of the waste of the old. With a new fleet of modern reactors (UK wide) they will only produce 10% of the current waste we have already got and we will be guaranteed 60 years of cheap clean electricity. It's a marginal additional waste burden added to the "waste" we have already got.

The main problem with waste is political. Those Political problems are caused by ignoramuses who ramp up public fear.That means that any specific proposal to store it underground would never be approved because of hysterical opposition.

In fact "waste" is a misnomer. The stuff is potentially very useful and I reckon it should be stored where we can access it in future.

Radioactive waste from nuclear power stations has a huge advantage over waste from conventional power stations. We can quantify it, measure it, know where it is and deal with it. The situation with radioactive waste from conventional power stations is far worse. It just goes out into the general atmosphere.

Your enthusiasm for renewables is commendable however it will be a long time before they provide the power we need.Labour and the SNP know this and plan to build new coal stations to meet our needs. That is disasterous.
11

greenhill,

27/03/2009 09:26:49
RE Los Angeles:... beating the hell out of his keyboard because he's telling Scotland its government is incompetent, and it WILL accept nuclear power imposed by Westminster."

I have not said anything of the kind.Labour and the SNP intend to build coal power.However Labour wishes to include nuclear in the "debate".I am not so sure that Westminster would impose nuclear power.
12

Faux Cul,

27/03/2009 10:01:25
With Brown gone surfing in South America and Merv King sending the tanks down the Mall to rescue the Country's finances the scale of Brown's lunatic Chencellorship can be explained in the most simple yet stagering form.

The national debt the Brown will pass on to his successor, what he he has enegendered personally, (he has nae feckin chance of being re-elected), will be greater than the accumulated National Debt that the UK has amassed since 1691 !

What a footnote for posterity, Broon the "cautious" and prudent Chancellor!

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4200f0f6-1991-11de-9d34-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1
13

Faux Cul,

27/03/2009 10:09:18
More to the Point of this article Greenhill, why has no one mentioned the technology of bio sequestration of CO2 , NOx and S copunds.

Algae can fix these, Antarctic experiment with Fe Filings (didn't work maybe), and some which grow very quickly can produce up to their biomass as crude oil which can be converted into biodiesel. Some will convert the CO2 into ethanol.

Seems to me a ore interesting prospect than sequestering it mechanically, i. e. sticking it in a hole.

I realise that the Algal technology needs refining but to stick back in a hole just to say that CO2 emissions nhave been reduced, overall, is a bit of a showboating tactic.
14

Mad Jock,

East Lothian 27/03/2009 10:24:22
My niece works at a Californian university in the microbiology department. She has a PhD in Botany, and is working with algae, to see if biofuels can be produced in commercial and sustainable quantities. Her department recently turned down a multi-million dollar grant from a major (British) oil company to extend the research, but it was turned down by the Green nutters who "wouldn't accept money from an oil company".
So, to make a political statement, the Green Movement is prepared to squander a major financial injection to further research that would ease our dependence on fossil fuels.
I will not name the university to protect my neice from having her house burned down.
15

Los Angeles,

27/03/2009 10:28:43
Her department recently turned down a multi-million dollar grant from a major (British) oil company to extend the research, but it was turned down by the Green nutters who "wouldn't accept money from an oil company". (Jock)

Whether it was "the Greens" or not, that issue is a difficult one. I've not known commercial sponsorship of any level without strings attached.

Remember the RBS's gift to an Edinburgh hospital - to be used for RBS staff BEFORE anybody else? Philanthropy as bribe somehow rubs the gloss off the gift.

16

Los Angeles,

27/03/2009 10:29:35
I am not so sure that Westminster would impose nuclear power. (Greenhill)

It will if it can find a way.
17

Arfur,

27/03/2009 10:40:37
#18 Los Angeles - they would have to out smart Alex - which clearly isnt going to happen.
18

,

27/03/2009 10:53:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

greenhill,

27/03/2009 10:54:16
REFaux Cul,27/03/2009 10:09:18

Capture and sequestration of co2 on a large scale has not been developed yet. I am sure there are all sorts of undeveloped ideas. The current plan is to build then retrofit if the technology can be made to work.

Then we are still left with all the other pollution including uncontrolled radioactivity.
20

,

27/03/2009 11:58:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

sceptic,

livingston 27/03/2009 12:18:51
"wind turbine maker become a world leader"
With the nuts and bolts being screwed together in Third World Scotland, the engineering design, the worthwhile jobs and the profits accruing in Denmark. All this achieved by offering the highest bribe(£9.2m). At the first downturn in the business the Scottish subsiduary will be the first to disappear, sadly a story we have seen repeatedly over the years.
22

noswod,

Honestas 27/03/2009 12:45:50
looks like the best part of £20m doon the windmills (£10m to start it up before it went bust) £9.2m for a few screwdriver and painting and storage jobs. Only when the design of the towers and windmills are in Scotland or the UK is Government expenditure worthwhile. The generators, wires, control systems, transformers all from overseas although we get tae dig the hole tae put everything in. This shows how deindustrailised we have become and we are on our way to become a third world nation. Mair free money wasted by the SNP and handed oot tae a bunch of foreigners who tak the cash and get back in their boats and head back to Denmark proto
23

The Strategist,

27/03/2009 13:05:38
#8 Greenhill

If you're right - and I think you are - then where are the Scottish wind turbine manufacturers?

#16 Mad Jock

Go Google Scottish BioEnergy .... It's a small Scottish company developing algae based technology..
24

Unimpressed one,

27/03/2009 13:08:16
Scotland embraces another dead-end industry. What a nation of losers.
25

Astonished,

Inverclyde 27/03/2009 13:18:00
27 :unimpressive one - You're a unionist then ?


This must be good news story about Scotland because the original story mentioned the SNP in the headline - And its been removed.


Well done the labour press corp.
26

greenhill,

27/03/2009 13:53:22
RE The Strategist,27/03/2009 13:05:38

It is a mystery.It is money for old rope when Government subsidys drive an Industry.
27

El Franko,

27/03/2009 15:11:49
A shocking waste of money! There are not enough ultra-wealthy people left to buy the things. The once-proud Californians have screwed up their economy in part due to being silly about energy, Shell and BP have enjoyed the dropping of pennies in their boardrooms and have stepped back, the Spanish bitterly rue the day they got hoodwinked by the greenies, and so too, no doubt do the Danes. 'Green' is becoming the new colour of nightmares.
28

Western Gael,

27/03/2009 15:46:35
Ambitious plans are just that - plans. Too many times in both the recent and distant past Scots have welcomed announcements of grand intent to build much or to hire many, only to be deeply disappointed. Until serious money actually changes hands on the Skykon project, it should be considered "written on the wind."
29

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 27/03/2009 20:08:27
Nuclear waste by its very nature is, has been, and always will be, the most dangerous material ever produced by man!

Nuclear research was carried out for one purpose and one purpose only: to produce nuclear weapons!

Civil nuclear power is only an offshoot of that initial research.

We can't throw nuclear waste out with the garbage. We can't keep it in a cellar and burn it on the fire. We can't bury it safely in the garden unless of course it is 10,000 metres deep wrapped in lead lined concrete which is 100 feet thick. We can't collect this waste for landfill or pile it up in slag heaps in the open air.

We can wrap up the nuclear power argument in as much hygienic rhetoric as we want but we have to admit to ourselves that, as much as it may well help to solve some of the earth's energy problems, it involves colossal cost, and is a deadly legacy to leave future generations to manage!

30

Sanny,

28/03/2009 00:13:17
13 greenhill,27/03/2009 09:26:49

As someone who spent 12 years as an Engineer in the nuclear research field perhaps ‘greenhill’ will accept I have a little knowledge of the subject. Perhaps, if you read this, you may wish to reconsider the true cost of nuclear energy both in the present and the future and the impossibility of dealing with the total of the waste.

Discussions on nuclear waste all seem to concentrate on spent fuel and other materials that form or have formed part of the reactor vessel. These waste materials present serious and difficult problems in storage and management over exceedingly long periods.

These are the downstream problems of the nuclear industry, that is, problems arising from the use of Uranium as a nuclear fuel. But this is only part and the easy part of managing nuclear waste. Consider the upstream problems which are infinitely greater an in my opinion insurmountable by man!

Waste discharge into the environment begins with mining uranium. Although the radioactivity of the wastes is low-level the volumes left behind at abandoned mining sites are huge.

Only about three kilograms of uranium oxide are recovered from each tonne of ore. The left-overs, looking like liquid mud and called tailings, are pumped into a tailings dam.

After mining ceases tailings dams become hills of fine sand which retain 80 per cent of the radioactivity in the ore body. Thorium-230 in the tailings decays into radium-226 which in turn decays into gaseous radon.
Before mining, these and other radioactive elements are locked into impervious rock; little of it reaches the open environment. Once mined they get into waterways and the atmosphere. Tailings are so finely ground that the radon escapes 10,000 times faster than from the ore body.

Tailings dams have a poor track record. Waterways have been polluted by radium after a sudden collapse or constant erosion. Radon gas and radioactive dust are carried downwind. Since radioactive decay will per
31

Sanny,

28/03/2009 00:14:33
Continued: -
Tailings dams have a poor track record. Waterways have been polluted by radium after a sudden collapse or constant erosion. Radon gas and radioactive dust are carried downwind. Since radioactive decay will persist for over 100,000 years the hazard will be virtually without end.

Most of the world's uranium has been mined in the poor African countries of Namibia and Niger and on the remnants of land left to the indigenous people of North America. The mining sites have become radioactive wastelands bringing devastating health problems to indigenous peoples.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.