Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Warning on internet 'miracle medicines'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 November 2008
PATIENTS should not place "false hope" in promises made by untested internet miracle cures, medical experts warned.
An independent medical charity, Sense About Science, said yesterday that many vulnerable patients were being duped by "surreptitious promotion and misleading stories" online and were spending thousands of pounds on drugs that had no proven effectiveness.

The charity said it was worried about "the emotional and financial costs of over-hyped treatment claims that sell false hope".

Tracey Brown, the managing director of Sense About Science, said: "We've been contacted by so many people exhausted from the pressure they feel to try advertised treatments, dietary regimes and exercises.

"One person told us how the last years of his wife's life were spent endlessly pursuing new treatments, from goat's-blood serums to unlicensed stem-cell treatments abroad, all to no avail."

To assist, the charity has published a guide that explains how to tell the beneficial drugs from the bogus.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 November 2008 10:45 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

zeno,

www.thinkhumanism.com 11/11/2008 07:46:21
"...no proven effectiveness"

That'll include homoeopathy, reiki, reflexology, the vast majority of herbal preparations, crystal healing and every other pseudo scientific quack therapy out there.
2

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 11/11/2008 10:34:47
Anyone who buys drugs off the internet just has to be crackers. No doubt what they'll get, if they get anything at all is a mix of talcum powder, sugar and fine sawdust neatly compressed into tablet form - if they're lucky.

Also anything labelled "miracle" should be given a wide berth! Snake oil a la 21st century.
3

wheels5894,

12/11/2008 11:36:04
I certainly agree with Zeno on the various quack ideas. People practicing and of these ought to be licenced and the treatmnets themselves subjected to testing to show they work.

I mean, homeopathy is available on the health service and certainly has no science behind it and remains untested. Of course, any improvements patients feel is due to being talked with and so on but this is hardly the stuff of scientific medice is it?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.