Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


NHS staff flock to bargain Bupa deals

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 February 2008
THOUSANDS of doctors, nurses and dentists have taken out cut-price private health insurance amid claims that the NHS is not up to standard.
Figures obtained by Scotland on Sunday reveal Britain's biggest private insurer is giving NHS staff discounts of up to £636 a year under a controversial 'preferential scheme' for health workers.

Under the Bupa scheme, doctors and dentists receive
a discount of around one third and nurses a discount of one-quarter off the standard price of health insurance.

This has led to a total of 31,000 health professionals joining the Bupacare private scheme, including 12,000 doctors (5% of the UK total) and 15,000 nurses (2%).

But senior doctors and patients' groups criticised the move, saying it suggested some NHS staff had no confidence in the service they were providing.

The disclosure comes in the wake of an admission from Scotland's biggest health board, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, that it is

in talks with private company Capita Health Solutions, to provide occupational health care for its staff, a scheme currently run in-house.

Peter Fisher, president of the NHS Consultants' Association, which campaigns on behalf of the NHS, said of the Bupa scheme: "This demonstrates a lack of confidence in the NHS services they are providing if they won't take it themselves."

Margaret Watt, chair of the Scotland Patients Association, said: "NHS patients are second class citizens. If NHS staff are getting private care, it makes it look like the NHS is not fit for purpose. Why are they doing this and yet telling us we have the best health care system in the world? This raises questions about ethics and smacks of a two-tier health system."

But Dr Hamish Meldrum, chairman of the British Medical Association's GP committee, said family doctors took out private health care because they were self-employed rather than because they lacked faith in the health service.

"Like any other self-employed people, when GPs are away, the services they provide suffer," he said.

"Until waiting list times fall even further, private heath care will buy faster treatment. If they did not believe so strongly in the NHS they would not work for it."

Bupa is Britain's biggest private health insurance firm, with three million patients, accounting for almost half of private medical care in the UK.

Last night the company insisted that offering a cut-price deal for health staff did not undermine the NHS.

Jason Pettit, head of sales operations at Bupa, said: "Some of the reasons people take out private health insurance include the availability of choice over who they are referred to and speed of access. They can also be treated at a time convenient to them. Doctors also tell us it gives them privacy – it can be difficult for a doctor or nurse to go for treatment at the hospital where they work.

"This gives them the ability to step outside the system to get the requisite degree of privacy.

"I don't believe this undermines their role as NHS employees. NHS consultants are hugely proud of the work they do and of the clinical standards of their hospitals. But they recognise what other people understand, that the demands on the medical service are enormous, with waiting lists for example. Privacy and fast treatment are important to them so they can get back to their jobs of caring for others."

Bupa targets doctors and nurses by advertising its cut-price rate in trade magazines and newspapers, as well as at conferences. All health workers are eligible for the discounts whether they work privately or in the NHS.

As well as the doctors and nurses, a total of 3,000 dentists and 1,000 other health workers have joined Bupa.

The firm also applies discounts for other professions, such as lawyers and teachers, with the size of the discount calculated on the likely risk of members of that profession needing medical attention.

The insurance firm's standard monthly charge for health insurance is £152 a month for a family of four but, at the discounted rate, it offers certain professional groups a discount depending on the work they do.

This means a 40-year-old doctor would pay just £99 for the same policy and a nurse just £115 a month. Nurses' premiums are higher because Bupa says they are more likely to suffer from work-related conditions such as backache.

Typical private health insurance policies offer patients cover for a wide range of inpatient and outpatient treatment including tests and diagnoses for a number of conditions including cancer and heart treatment. Private patients can choose which private hospital they would like to be treated in and which consultant they would like to see.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 February 2008 7:16 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Health of the NHS
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 17/02/2008 00:20:32
Quite a lot of Doctors that work for the NHS do work for "Bupa" as-well,!

Does this mean they will be treating themselves,??
2

,

17/02/2008 02:27:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

C.U. Jimmy,

BUPA-land 17/02/2008 03:06:46
There are 2 lessons for our political leaders here:

1) Taxpayers want freedom of choice in healthcare.
2) The professionals working in the NHS are no fools.

Not that our leaders would ever listen.
4

,

17/02/2008 03:33:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Old Siggy,

Dunbar 17/02/2008 08:48:32
Rats and sinking ships..............
6

Max Born,

17/02/2008 09:15:05
5% of Doctors and 2% of Nurses have joined BUPA, hardly a flood is it ?
Yet another non-story.
7

It's me!,

17/02/2008 09:59:27
Why does BUPA give bigger discounts (one third) to highly paid Doctors and Dentists but only one quarter discount to nurses who are poorly paid in comparison?
8

Max Born,

17/02/2008 10:46:58
#7
Because doctors and dentists make fewwer claims,you don,t see BUPA trying to flogg cover to sqaudies on their way to Afganistan.
9

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 17/02/2008 11:45:48
There are all sorts of reasons offered for why doctors and other medical staff choose BUPA cover rather than rely on the NHS, but fundamentally you have to ask yourself why they will trust private care over NHS?

The truth may be more to do with the fact that they are using the NHS as a generous base salary whilst doing lucrative 'homers' to top up to opulent level. They know that the NHS as presently formed is failing, hopelessly overloaded and like dentists now see their own futures in private practice, along with their own healthcare. It's just a natural cull of a dying organisation and the obvious question is - how long is it going to take? The starting point will be GPs' surgeries.

On the bright side it may mean tax reductions but I think I just saw a squadron of pigs whizz past there.
10

Roberta Burns,

17/02/2008 17:44:51
The only way for the NHS to survive in the commercial environment is to price its rivals out of business. So, the hiring of NHS equipment, employees, hospital space etc. should reflect the market.

What other business gives away its capital to rival businesses?
11

,

17/02/2008 20:02:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA...bye Bush -Cheney..u. evil leaders. 17/02/2008 22:10:57
1
Charles Linskaill,
Edinburgh

Hey Dude ,
Two of my 1st cousins are doctors . And in an emergency they can treat themselves, excluding a major surgical procedure.

Happy Haggis Day Dude.

GC
13

worldtreker,

singapore 18/02/2008 00:10:04
of course they take out private health insurance.
so do I,and I run an occupational medical service here in singapore.
you need to be seen fast,by a doc who isnt connected to your practice.
used to happen in nhs years ago.
in the days when a war heros hip replacement was done first,and they didnt get mrsa from it.
we have a good system here.
no welfare as you know it,but a welfare system does exist.
the difference is its yours-your own account.
you dip in for your benefits-health costs,education,housing etc.
your fund-your benefits-top up by govt and employment.
no subsidising the guy in his bed drinking cider next door.
he can do that if he wishes-but you aint paying for it.
hospitals are public or private-private costs more and public takes a bit longer.
both faster and cheaper than NHS.
govt subsidises the poorer-not everyone.
here means testing and charity arnt bad words.
the madness of having a free at point of care system is obvious-everyone will use it-its free!
get drunk,take drugs,eat a horse-the nhs will fix it-work-why?,benefits take care of things,let the other fools work and pay tax.
oh and they hang drug dealers and murderers here as well.
casualty depts have a cop on duty-armed.
never any trouble.
no one assaults the staff.
and folk wonder where all the scots nurses and docs are-places like here,practicing in an environment of care not fear.
14

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 18/02/2008 00:43:49
GalacticCannibal @#12,
Thats 'COOL' Dude!
15

Scottabroad,

Ardross 18/02/2008 03:30:19
why does the whole private health care thing upset so many people? it's choice, pure and simple. if people want to pay to access a better, more efficient service then why not? as far as I'm concerned for every patient who goes private it frees up a place in the health service system. and the people paying privately should be able to claim tax rebates for not burdening the NHS.
16

Dr Strangelove,

Glasgow 18/02/2008 16:21:55
Poor Kate Foster - displaying her statistical inadequacies again! Some story - 95% of doctors and 98% of nurses choose not to go private - despite bargain basement incentives to do so. They must know something about the state of the NHS and the relative merits of private versus public healthcare. Don't let the facts get in the way of a cheap shot at the NHS, though, Kate!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.