Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


He should have turned 18 tomorrow, but James Bulger's legacy lives on

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 March 2008
TOMORROW should have been the day James Bulger became a man, celebrating his 18th birthday. And now, to coincide with that rite of passage he was so brutally denied, the mother of the toddler murdered in 1993 has launched an appeal to build a permanent memorial to her son.
To date, the world has had little more than memories of the two-year-old. There are only two physical tributes to his short life; his headstone in Kirkdale cemetery and, beside it, on a nearby tree, a small metal sign which reads, "James's special pl
ace".

But in what would be the first proper memorial to her son, Denise Fergus is hoping to raise £1 million for the James Bulger House Appeal to build an educational refuge on Merseyside.

The circumstances of James's death shocked Britain. The boy was murdered in February 1993 by Jon Venables and Robert Thompson, themselves only ten years old. The juveniles abducted the toddler from a shopping centre in Bootle before beating him to death on a railway line.

Ahead of tomorrow's anniversary, Ms Fergus, 38, has teamed up with children's rights campaigner Esther Rantzen, who came up with the idea of raising money to found James Bulger House as a learning centre run by the charity Red Balloon.

Describing the proposed facility as a "fitting tribute" to her son, she said that if it could help save even one child's life it would be worthwhile.

"Nothing can ever bring back James, and I have to live with that knowledge," she said. "His 18th birthday is going to be a particularly hard time for me and all our family, not having him with us.

"On 16 March, I should be celebrating with a party for him and buying him expensive gifts, but I can't do that. The most expensive thing I can get him is flowers on his grave."

Ms Fergus, who has three other sons, Michael, 14, Thomas, nine, and Leon, eight, added: "I will never forget my son and I still get messages of support from all over the world. So I was pleased when Esther explained her idea for a memorial to James. I want James's name to carry on long after I have gone.

"James was a child and although he didn't get the chance to go to school, I want to give these kids the chance to learn."

Andy Kelly, news editor of the Liverpool Echo newspaper, said he believed the entire city would welcome a lasting memorial to James. "In the Rhys Jones case (the 11-year-old shot dead in Liverpool last year], there are already plans for a community centre to be set up in his honour. There's never been anything like that with James Bulger.

"Obviously, there's still a lot of anger that the people who killed him are now free, but it will help to have a memorial like this, with an event which traumatised the city."

Speaking of James, Ms Rantzen added: "No life has been more cruelly cut short. It is extraordinary there is no memorial to him, no way for his family and his community to remember him with hope, to help other children in his name. Now there will be."

The Red Balloon charity already works with bullied children, who are referred by local authorities. Dr Carrie Herbert, the organisation's founder and director, said: "To be able to set up a Red Balloon in Liverpool in memory of James Bulger is the most important development yet in our ongoing work to help bullied children rebuild their lives."

THE 25-YEAR-OLD MEN STILL LIVING WITH GUILT

JON Venables and Robert Thompson, the two schoolboys pictured in the infamous, chilling CCTV images leading James Bulger from the Strand shopping centre in Bootle, Merseyside, were convicted of abducting and murdering the two-year-old on 12 February, 1993.

In November of that year they were sentenced at Preston Crown Court to secure youth accommodation with a recommendation they serve at least eight years.

In June 2001, amid protests outside its headquarters in London, the parole board announced the pair were no longer a danger and recommended they be freed as soon as possible.

Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss had ruled in January 2001 that the new identities and residences of Venables and Thompson should remain secret as there was a "real possibility of serious physical harm and possibly death" to them.

The Manchester Evening News was found guilty of contempt of court and fined £30,000 over an article about the young men's whereabouts published a few hours after the parole board ruled they could be released.

The court order prohibiting publication of any information likely to lead to their identification will probably remain in place indefinitely to prevent vigilante attacks on the men, both of whom are now 25.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 March 2008 10:48 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Fanling,

Guangdong 15/03/2008 00:22:21
And the pair of vicious brutes who ended that child's life in such despicable fashion are free to roam, new lives manufactured, money in pockets, thanks to a crap wrong-headed society that accords criminals of every stripe a compassion that is denied the families of victims. Utterly bloody shameful.
2

Douglas,

Bathgate 15/03/2008 00:43:37
#1 Fanling: Sadly, I think you've got it about right.
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 15/03/2008 01:13:16
Fanling @#1,

"And the pair of vicious brutes"

Agreed with your comment, but the parents of these,

"vicious brutes"

Should be brought to Justice also!

What 'Twisted' environment, were they brought up with,?
4

Kipling,

15/03/2008 03:14:57
How nice to have a centre for the bullied children. I hope not only that the fund gets enough to build the centre but that the funding continues to enable it to maintain itself and develop. Here's to the memory of James Bulger, may it long last!

It's always seemed to me that it's the judges who should've been castigated: their upbringing lacked something in backbone that they should have ignored James's mother's feelings and pandered to the peace of mind of Venables & Thompson & their social worker/psychiatrist supporters. Their prison experience was probably no worse than a extended stay in a boarding school. A little bit of fear on their part that they might be set upon doesn't seem that bad an idea, however anti-social it might be to say so.
5

Rozz Fyffe,

Scotland 15/03/2008 04:48:06
Until both those scum are dead (hopefully in a slow and very painful and lonely way) there will be two pieces of subhuman scum on this earth that should be dead.

If only we coul dall have new lives IN NEW ZEALAND yes thats where they are FUNDED BY YOU AND I

They new exactly what they were doing.
6

Ian Mackay,

shropshire 15/03/2008 08:00:44
I am usualy a forgiving man, however I find it hard to forget what these two now young men did to this child. I wonder if they now have families and does it cross their minds how they would feel if someone was to take their childern from them. I pray it does not happen only for one reason, the childern would be innocent.

Rozz Fyffe, Have heard a number of places they could be secluded, I would be shocked if the NZ government would have them in that country.

What is done is done, however it is not over, they have the Lord still to face, and he is without doubt an angry and vengefull God.

My thoughts are with the family of he who was taken so young.

His killers are certainly going to Hell.

7

Lesley,

EDINBURGH 15/03/2008 10:07:26
I remember this vividly as my own child was a toddler at the time. My heart goes out to the family, particularly today, and I am having the joy of celebrating a 15th birthday with my child, and could not even imagine the pain of having to spend it without her.
8

Mr_Right,

Australia 15/03/2008 13:01:06
#6 Ian MacKay

they were not young men they were children.

you cannot expect people to be judged on there actions as 10 year olds for the rest of there lives.




9

Rozz Fyffe,

Scotland 15/03/2008 13:18:19
# 6 yep NZ got them, great reward for being scum.

From Wiki

During the entire walk, the boys were seen by no fewer than 38 people. Some of these people reported that there were signs of bruising on Bulger's face, while others reported that he appeared happy and was seen laughing, the boys seemingly alternating between hurting and distracting him. A few members of the public challenged the two older boys, but they claimed they were looking after their younger brother, or that he was lost and that they were taking him to the police station, and the boys were able to avoid being foiled. They eventually led Bulger to a section of railway line near Walton, Merseyside.

From the facts disclosed at trial, at this location one of the boys threw blue modelling paint on Bulger's face. They kicked him and hit him with bricks, stones and a 22 lb (10 kg) iron bar. They then placed batteries in his mouth. Before they left him, the boys laid Bulger across the railway tracks and weighted his head down with rubble, in hopes that a passing train would hit him and make his death appear to be an accident. Two days later, Bulger's body was discovered; a forensic pathologist later testified that he had died before his body was run over by an oncoming train which sliced through him.

10

Rozz Fyffe,

Scotland 15/03/2008 13:20:56
You as tax payers paided for and continue to pay for the parents of the accused who were moved to different parts of the country and had to assume new identities following a series of death threats from vigilantes
11

seanie,

15/03/2008 13:23:58
Good.

I hope they're safe and well.
12

Rozz Fyffe,

Scotland 15/03/2008 13:26:30
Britain's Daily Mail has reported that Venables is getting married to a girlfriend who has no idea of his criminal history. He has been advised not to say anything to her about the Bulger murder
13

Rozz Fyffe,

Scotlnd 15/03/2008 13:28:44
Thompson was in a "settled relationship" with a gay male partner who was made fully aware of his conviction
14

Rozz Fyffe,

Scotland 15/03/2008 13:29:34
#11 I trust you mean the parents?
15

seanie,

15/03/2008 13:31:20
Not just them. Venables and Thompson too.
16

Mr_Right,

Rozz 15/03/2008 13:35:23
Calm Down.
17

Fanling,

Guangdong 15/03/2008 18:53:35
#3 Charles Linskaill, Edinburgh

"What 'Twisted' environment, were they brought up with,?"

Charles, many of us were brought up in unenviable environments yet did not resort to vicious murder or any other crime. That sounds simplistic, but it is true. Meanwhile, let's all spare a thought for the family of James Bulger on this poignant day.


18

indune1,

Canada 15/03/2008 20:31:09

11 - Safe and well . . . in hell.

8 - Mr. Right you are dead wrong.

These two monsters knew exactly what they were doing.

They should still be behind bars instead of in front of them.

19

Rozz Fyffe,

Scotland 15/03/2008 20:34:48
your opinion is yours Seanie
20

indune1,

15/03/2008 22:46:20
*Please enter your comment*
21

Evia,

15/03/2008 23:15:51
These two scumbags should never have been given new identities and their parents should never have been moved.

The boys knew full well what they were doing and this could have been the result of bad parenting. I hope that they will be found one day and forced to live with the knowledge that there was no hiding place.
22

seanie,

16/03/2008 01:20:20
The crime was horrific. But it was committed by children. They were ten years old.

The vindictive bloodlust of emotionally impaired half-wits, venting their ignorant spleen, is a far more worrying indication of just how dysfunctional our society is.

The murder of Jamie Bulger was, and is, horrific. But it was a crime committed by children.

What kind of sick depraved indivdual wouldn't want those children to be redeemed. To be re-habiltated. To go on and have meaningful lives.

I can't imagine the distress and torment experienced by the loved ones of Jamie Bulger. But at the same time I hope that the children who killed him are rehabilitated and, yes, happy.

It's pretty perverse to actvively want more misery.

23

most things - if in moderation,

16/03/2008 11:05:33
yes I'd like to see them killed slowly using a blender or alikes....

ones a pooph, apparently living in NZ, obviously with an English accent, likely comes across a bit twitchy and untrusting... shouldn't be hard to track him down...... ballpein over the head to start with, squeezy bottle full of petrol.... get the idea

I see the do-gooder brigade are typing their sh*te again today.... rehabilitation my ass.....
24

seanie,

16/03/2008 11:15:21
Ah...an emotionally impaired half-wit crawls out from under a rock.
25

Fanling,

Guangdong 16/03/2008 14:25:07
#22 seanie

"The crime was horrific. But it was committed by children. They were ten years old."
AND
"The murder of Jamie Bulger was, and is, horrific. But it was a crime committed by children."

You seem obsessed with the fact that this dreadful crime was committed by (innocent-my-@rse) children, as if that excused their culpability. Are you a parent, or a teacher even? Do you know what children of 10 years are capable of, or does your wisdom come from sociology textbooks? It appears that you are just another social-worker-type apologist who in this case bends over backwards by citing the relative youth, therefore implied reduction of responsibility, of those two monsters and presumably others like them.

Rehabilitation? A criminally irresponsible misuse of public money that only serves to keep the do-gooder brigade in well remunerated employment. A mother lost her baby in the most deliberately brutal of circumstances and your way forward, Seanie, is to airbrush the facts of the matter and cuddle the perpetrators. You call the poster above you #23 an "emotionally impaired half-wit ..." I suspect that most posters will come to a different conclusion as to who has crawled out from under a rock.



26

seanie,

16/03/2008 23:40:28
I've read #23 again.

Emotionally impaored half-wit doesn't quite do justice but it's close enough.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.