Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


151 escape death as passenger plane crash-lands at Heathrow

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
18 January 2008
A PASSENGER plane which crash-landed short of the runway at Heathrow Airport was forced to glide in after it lost power, it was claimed last night.
A PASSENGER plane which crash-landed short of the runway at Heathrow Airport was forced to glide in after it lost power, it was claimed last night.

Tens of thousands of passengers suffered travel chaos after the British Airways jet, with 151 people on board, hit the grass just inside a perimeter fence and skidded hundreds of feet before coming to a halt near the start of the runway.

A total of 13 "very minor" injuries were reported among the 135 passengers and 16 crew. Several suffered whiplash.

The wheels and undercarriage of the twin-aisle jet, which was little more than half full, were ripped off in the crash landing as it approached the airport after a flight from Beijing, China.

Last night, an unnamed airport worker was reported as saying the pilot of the seven-year-old Boeing 777 told him he had lost all power on the plane as it came in to land.

He said: "He told me that the aircraft shut down and he lost all his power and avionics. He just glided it in and lifted the nose up and managed to get it down. He lost power very close to coming in to land. He said he had no warning – it just went.

"It's a miracle. The man deserves a medal as big as a frying pan. He has done a fantastic job."

And Jeff Jupp, a fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, said: "It certainly looks consistent with a total power failure on the approach – except for emergency power for flight controls.

"The reason for the power loss is a mystery at this stage."

Eyewitnesses spoke of seeing the plane coming in very low and banking heavily.

One passenger said the plane had come in at a "funny angle" and "belly-flopped" on to the grass. Another, Antonio De Crescenzo, 52, from Italy, said: "We were coming in to land but the plane felt like it should have been taking off. The engines were roaring and then we landed and it was just banging. Some people started to scream.

"It was quite terrifying, although people seemed to be quite calm. I think people were quite surprised when they were told to evacuate down the chutes."

For more than an hour, the crash closed one of Heathrow's two runways, which is used for landings, but the other runway, used for take-offs, remained open. However, National Air Traffic Services nearly halved landings on the runway adjacent to the crashed aircraft because part of it remained shut.

Willie Walsh, BA's chief executive, said: "Our flight and cabin crew did a magnificent job and safely evacuated all the passengers. The captain is one of our most experienced and has been flying with us for nearly 20 years."

Some 100 Heathrow flights were cancelled, including almost all of BA's services to and from Scotland. About 20 Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen flights were grounded.

A BA spokesman warned that the disruption would continue today because aircraft and crew would be out of position, and restrictions may continue at Heathrow.

Liz Cameron, the chief executive of the Scottish Chambers of Commerce, last night criticised BA's decision to cancel so many Scottish flights.

She said: "We seem to be permanently the first victim when restrictions are imposed, but it would have been in BA's interests to work hard to keep customer loyalty."

BA would say only that the cancellations were for "operational reasons".

A plane carrying Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, on a visit to China was among the aircraft delayed.

'IMPECCABLE' SAFETY RECORD

THE Boeing 777 is an extremely reliable aircraft with an almost impeccable safety record, according to aviation experts.

Kieran Daly, of Flight International magazine, said no Boeing 777 aircraft had been lost in a crash since it was launched in 1995.

The plane involved in yesterday's incident is powered by two Rolls Royce engines but should still fly if one failed.

A large proportion of the British Airways fleet is made up of 777s and there are 667 in service around the world.

There are orders for 300 more on planemaker Boeing's books.

Mr Daly said: "The 777 is an extremely reliable aircraft. There have been no 777 losses to date, which is a fairly impressive record considering how long it has been in service.

"The 777 is pretty much state-of-the-art, even though it has been around for quite a long time.

"We're talking about one of the most advanced aircraft in the world, operated by one of the most safety-conscious airlines in the world, flying in to one of the safest airports in the world. It's quite a surprise."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 January 2008 12:51 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: British Airways
 
1

Kipling,

18/01/2008 00:44:59
Hmm. Gliding into a landing. A new way of reducing carbon emissions, perhaps? Like it.
2

Roger Irrelevant,

18/01/2008 01:38:37
The facts will come out all in due course.

Fact: Plane landed safely after all.

Fact: Nobody died.

Fact: Major disruption at airport - so you want to fly unsafely?

Fact. Dalton Scrap.

3

Mark Renton,

Edinburgh 18/01/2008 05:43:36
"Liz Cameron, the chief executive of the Scottish Chambers of Commerce, criticised BA's decision to cancel so many Scottish flights. She said: "We seem to be permanently the first victim when restrictions are imposed."

What planet is this clown from? How dare she criticise BA's efforts to make sure that safety was not compromised.
4

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 18/01/2008 07:19:33
Sounds like it ran out of gas. It has happened before...
5

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 18/01/2008 08:02:12
No. 3:- It would also seem more sensible to cancel internal flights, where people could at least travel by bus or train, than international flights where this would be virtually impossible.
6

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 18/01/2008 08:07:47
You only have this nwspaper's word for it that Liz Cameron did indeed say that! In real life, perhaps she didn't say that at all!
7

Paul Voltaire,

18/01/2008 08:18:41
#6
It must be true if The Scotsman print it.
I thought everyone knew that.
8

Jock ex 45Cdo RM,

THORNHILL 18/01/2008 10:37:44
Did we go into reverse thrust too early?
9

Irn-Bruce,

Edinburgh 18/01/2008 10:40:40
#5 - Agreed

Paris and Brussels flights were cancelled too, for the same reason.
10

OscarMacApfel,

Dumfries 18/01/2008 11:48:11
Saint Bob Geldof apparently went off on a rant because his BA flight was delayed.

'I don't like runways'.

11

Brisssac,

Glasgow 18/01/2008 12:12:09
re #3, 5, 10 & 11
Unfortunately, a sentence in the story was cut stating that BMI was running near normal flights between Heathrow and Scotland last night. BA cancelled almost all theirs.
12

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 18/01/2008 13:38:13
Leaving aside the Scottish cringe comments above - this pilot deserves standing ovation. When an airliner weighing 200+ tonnes loses all power it becomes a flying brick and the glide angle is very poor. It would be incredible if this was a lack of fuel because they would have been warned of low fuel a long time before - and they would have reported an emergency. Whatever happened they had no time to even contact air traffic control - so it happened in seconds. If it had happened one mile further out from the airfield we would have 200 dead people and possibly a major road disaster.

The fact that this pilot kept his nerve and managed to land that aeroplane, at night! - without breaking it in two - is just miraculous. He deserves the George Medal.
13

Daniel Craig,

Heathrow 18/01/2008 15:00:39
Nitpick: It wasn't at night, it was the middle of the day.
14

OscarMacApfel,

Dumfries 18/01/2008 16:34:31
#16 Mr Bond, you're forgetting that Coldstream is in perpetual darkness at this time of the year, and Tweedymouth's mistake was genuine.
15

scottish person,

paisley 18/01/2008 17:20:39
I thought Glasgow Airport was an international airport. Why then does almost every international flight have to go through the toilet known as london instead of flying direct. Could it be greed on behalf of BA who rake in a fortune in landing fees.
16

Kipling,

The DoomRay Lone Ranger 18/01/2008 23:11:26
Nothing mentioned here about Gordon Borwn being driven to a flight along the nearby road in order to fly in the opposite direction to China and ingratiate himself with Mao's heirs. Instead of finding himself an angel in heaven, he has instead sold British business and employment down the line in favour of cheap Chinese goods and a possible master several thousand miles away: totally unreachable to the local consumer and wage earner.
17

Kipling,

18/01/2008 23:14:33
Perhaps the power failure was a Labour engendered incident to swamp the news at the expense of a much longer term and more damaging economic agreement ?
18

Purlie Wilson,

Melbourne 19/01/2008 00:36:51
There seems to be some contradictions here. First we have a total loss of power as the given reason for the belly flopper but as Mr De Cresconza a passenger states, the engines sounded like full power at take off when landing! This refutes my first thought of dry fuel tanks.
I am much more acquainted with ship engine rooms but surely battery back up would have supported the necessary avionics. I guess few pilots actually manually control landing these huge aircraft but getting that one down was an accomplished bit of flying
from what we are told.

I'll bet Boeing are climbing all over the plane before the foam dries!!!


19

Roger Irrelevant,

19/01/2008 00:37:09
Hello, Earthlings.

I come from Planet Tharg, in search of intelligent life forms.

There are none here. Can you re-direct me?
20

Drum Major,

19/01/2008 01:28:53
#4 My thoughts entirely. No fire. Has anyone checked the fuel tanks?
21

Jock ex 45Cdo RM,

THORNHILL 19/01/2008 09:30:39
#12 Jed
This happened a lot lower than i mile!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.