Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Mothers told to breastfeed children until two

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 July 2008
EXPECTANT mothers are to be told they should breastfeed children up to the age of two in a bid to boost the health and IQs of Scottish children.
The new guidance from public health experts will be given to every pregnant woman later this year.

It states that they should give their newborns nothing but breast milk for the first six months, then continue breastfeeding once the baby is on s
olids for a further 18 months.

The recommendations have been issued amid growing evidence that breastfed babies may have a higher IQ and better general health.

But last night critics warned the move would make mothers who struggle to breastfeed feel guilty and could even put women off trying breastfeeding altogether.

The new guidance is being produced by the Scottish Government's health education body, NHS Health Scotland, in a DVD that will be given to all pregnant women.

The current advice is that women should breastfeed their babies for six months, with no other foods or drinks, for the best health benefits.

A spokeswoman for Health Scotland said the guidance was based on World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations. She said: "A breastfeeding DVD will be launched in the autumn. A copy will be provided to every expectant mother in Scotland."

Recent research suggests that women who breastfeed are at lower risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Their babies are at lower risk of a range of health problems than those fed on formula. Breast milk is believed to protect against the risk of cot death, childhood leukaemia, gastroenteritis, obesity, asthma, eczema, ear infections and diabetes.

But there is debate about whether breastfeeding offers significant benefits beyond the age of one. There is also concern that the WHO guidelines – which include developing countries where the quality of water supplies and food can be poor – are applicable in Scotland.

Scottish Conservative health spokeswoman Mary Scanlon said: "No-one could have missed the message that breastfeeding is good for baby and mother. But telling mothers to breastfeed for up to two years is becoming a political dictatorship.

"Some mothers find breastfeeding very difficult and painful and they should not be made to feel guilty if they can't breastfeed for one month, six months or two years. The Scottish Government has got a bit carried away with some of its public-health messages."

Carrie Longton, a mother-of-three and a founder of the popular parenting forum Mumsnet, said the prospect of breastfeeding for two years might put mothers off altogether.



"Some women stop breastfeeding after a couple of days because they find it difficult. They should be targeting those mothers instead, and getting these people to breastfeed at least for a little while.

"I can understand why the WHO has these guidelines as two years would be best for babies in developing countries. But we have to interpret these guidelines intelligently and I am not aware of any evidence for this to be recommended."

The number of Scottish mothers who breastfeed up to two is not known. However, it is likely to be very small. Around half breastfeed newborns, but just 20% are still doing so nine months later and many stop breastfeeding between six and 12 months as their baby's appetite for solid food grows.

However, Anna Burbridge, of the breastfeeding support group La Leche League, welcomed the move.

She said: "This is the optimal thing to aim for because the benefits of breast milk continue and it is still the optimal food for the child in terms of preventing allergies and illnesses."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 July 2008 11:27 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Anne,

Eaglesham 13/07/2008 08:21:35
All well and good, but for many breast-feeding mothers, when baby's teeth come in, good intentions are liable to fly out of the window!
Bad enough with a couple of milk teeth, but with a full set?
No thanks!
2

Crank Parent,

Livingston 13/07/2008 10:25:05
This advice isn't new. The WHO has recommended breastfeeding until at least two for some time. That's why the Breastfeeding etc. (Scotland) Act 2005 protects the rights of mothers to breastfeed in public up until this age. It's about time advice from health professionals in Scotland caught up.

I have breastfed all five of my children until they are two. I am still feeding my fifth who will be three in November. I am expecting number six soon. He will be breastfed until he wants to stop as well.

Evidence shows there are lots of reasons to carry on breastfeeding past the age of one - for mother and baby:
http://www.kellymom.com/bf/bfextended/ebf-benefits.html

Mother nature designed humans to be breastfed until they are between six and eight. The world average for breastfeeding is four. Two is nothing. People in the West have forgotten how to parent.

I agree that some women find it difficult - however, the problem often lies with society, not the mother. Mothers shouldn't feel guilty for asking for help and they should expect better support from their families and better advice from health professionals.

Attitudes towards breastfeeding in the West need to change. Around the world breastfeeding is seen as the normal thing to do. In the West it's seen as an optional extra.
3

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

13/07/2008 11:09:22
2....Aye 6 and 8 when there is no alternative food available...in this day and age it could be more psychologically damaging to a child than nutritionally beneficial.....society has changed and an older breast fed child could find itself struggling with dependancy issues.....
4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 13/07/2008 11:11:24

Gosh Crank Parent! 'sixth' soon 'Well-Done'!

We wish you all the best on the impending birth of 'bump' six!

And 'Well-Done' on your "Breast Feeding"!

(better start my sentence on a positive, cause I get told off now if I use the word "IF") Sooo...

WHEN! We get Pregnant (Pray) Suzs is 'Adamant' she will "Breast-Feed" our wee ones, and I will support her 101%, it was good to see the Breast feeding Act 2005 Brought into force, the situation on this however, should of NEVER arisen, more like the 'weird tatties' that complained about "Brest Feeding" in public, that have a Problem.
To see a Mother Breast feeding (you know what their doing, but see nothing) is really beautiful, the bond between them.

I know some Mothers cant "Breast Feed" and they should not feel guilty about this, but their is loads of help now for Mothers wanting to "Breast Feed", the times have changed..and remember "Breast Feeding" helps prevent, "Breast Cancer"...

catch-up soon,

Chas.
5

Crank Parent,

Livingston 13/07/2008 11:27:13
#3

Absolute rubbish. You clearly know very little about breastfeeding. Did you even read the link I provided? Breastfeeding is not psychologically damaging for mother or baby at any age and the benefits go well beyond nutrition. In fact, breastfeeding helps with bonding and encourages security and independence in older children.

I assume you are an adult. Do you drink cow's milk or eat dairy products? If so, why consume something designed for BABY COWS!
6

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

13/07/2008 12:21:04
5...Crank parent...every woman is an individual...an 8 year old child hungry in Africa will benefit enormously by being breast fed at that age...as long as the mother is not vit D deficient or the child will develop rickets...and if the remainder of the child's diet is deficient...an 8 year old child being breast fed in the western world will no doubt have its other nutritional needs met...but why stop there?...why not 9..10..11..or 12...or even 13?...they are after all...still classed as children....

You are correct that I know nothing about breast-feeding...well very little...the jury seems to be continually out on the long term benefits.....my concern for children who are long term breast fed...? is it perhaps the mother who is unwilling to break the bond and allow their children to make choices? Nutritionally the benefits are without a doubt...but emotionally are they being kept as babies just that little bit longer?

I only use soya products.
7

tracym,

Essex 13/07/2008 13:52:34
These kind of stories are great at bringing out the old myths from readers.
Children do not bite the hand that feeds them. 2 year olds are quite aware they will not get fed if they bite.
It does not prevent my husband and I having great sex (yes, I know ridiculous people would think otherwise but I have come across people who'd think it would ruin your sex life).
Children do not have breasts forced upon them by mentally disturbed lonely mothers, quite often we are pestered to nurse. Anyone who has encountered a toddler must know how stubborn they can be! It's totally up to the child. I have 2 year old who climbs in my bed and helps himself while I'm still asleep.
Science and anthropology proves this is healthy, natural and normal.
If we sold a drink with all the properties breastmilk has (it's impossible, nothing can ever come close to a basically living substance) it would sell out more than wii fit. We wouldn't hesitate in providing our children with it.
It doesn't hurt, it isn't sexual, it is great for their emotional and physical health..it is just amazing, there are no risks and no disadvantages. Everyone wins when you breastfeed. I just cannot understand why any parent would not want their chid to be breastfed while they still wish to be.
Grow up and stop getting icky because you all think breasts are just for sex. Get over it for the sake of children's health.
8

Crank Parent,

Livingston 13/07/2008 14:17:06
#6

Any 8 year old child who wants to be breastfed will benefit enormously, not just those in Africa. The mother's diet is irrelevant, she will still produce good quality breastmilk despite any nutritional deficiencies she may have. In any case, vitamin D comes from sunlight which is hardly lacking in Africa.

The shape of a child's mouth changes around age 8 so that they are not able to breastfeed any longer. Most mothers who breastfeed long term allow their child to choose when to stop. This could be anytime up to the age of 8.

The jury is not out on the benefits of long term breastfeeding. However, the evidence is regularly buried by those with a commercial agenda.
9

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

13/07/2008 15:00:50
8....A recent study has found that babies in Africa and asian countries, who have been longer term breast feeders have gone onto develop rickets....not a huge amount but some....the mothers have not had a healthy nutritional diet and they have kept their children out of the sun as babies...hence the rickets...

I would never dictate to any women how she should feed her baby or child....none of us should...it us up to each and every woman to decide (and their partner) however I would not breast feed a child past primary school stage...that would be my personal choice as I would prefer my child to be more independant....
10

Anne,

Eaglesham 13/07/2008 15:10:06
Traceym - i breastfed three and I can assure you it's not the hand that gets bitten!
11

Crank Parent,

Livingston 13/07/2008 16:00:48
#9

I assume you are referring to the research concerning 30 African American babies over a period of ten years living in North Carolina. The average duration of breastfeeding was 12.5 months.

12.5 months is not considered long term breastfeeding and they concluded that the dark skinned babies were more at risk because they weren't getting enough sunlight in a more western climate, partly due to advice from the American Academy of Paediatrics which recommends keeping babies under 6 months covered up to protect them from the sun!
12

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 13/07/2008 16:05:50

Well if I had "Breasts" I Would feed our 'wee ones', but since not, DYW has purchased "Breast Pumps" so I can feed our 'wee ones' during the day, when I become the 'house-daddy' :)
Also I will be changing 'yuk nappies' and feeding through the night :(

This is called 'being the modern loving husband'

BTW tracym ~7,,

Love your post also, and you made me laugh about your 2year old that helps himself,

Pity I cant get away with that one! even though she loves me, I would get a,..'Kick Slap and Shove'! :DD
13

Truthman,

Washington, DC 13/07/2008 16:15:18
Is this advice allowed? Isn't any suggestion that higher IQs are desirable considered racist these days?
14

Lanna,

13/07/2008 16:41:49
#7
The only disadvantages would be to the mother's health if she does not continue a well balanced healthy diet.


Breastfeeding until two, sure, but I agree with Horrible's comments in #9 in that I would want my child to be more independent.

ps. mother's diet usually affects quantity not quality. However, there are substances that make their way into the milk that the baby might react to, substances from foods the mother may have eaten.
(as mentioned above the mother's body will suffer if she doesn't eat well, not so much the baby, in that the majority of the nutrients needed will find their way into the milk at the expense of the mother's nutrient need...what's the old adage? ...have a baby lose a tooth)
It makes sense, though, that with extreme deprivation, the mother's body can only give so much, and eventually the milk would be affected.
15

Chalky,

Australia 13/07/2008 16:46:40
Re IQ ...I am one of those 'poor' mothers who was unable to breast feed my two Scottish born children. One of my children is a high school physics and maths teacher, whilst the other is an exploration driller earning over 15K US dollars per month. Pretty high IQ's I wld make a guess ...
16

Kitti Kat,

13/07/2008 17:54:26
Breast feeding until tqo years old? disgusting!!!!! Bad enough I have to witness mothers sitting on benches in the mall nursing (couldn't they go to the ladie's room).I am sick and tired of pro nursing pushing their views on those who don't want to or can't (as in the case of my daughter). My daughter tried but after three weeks, had problems and pain. She stopped nursing and is now fine. Unfortunately, some of these zealots have made her feel guilty. My mother raised four kids-NONE of us breastfed and we are all healthy . Ditto my kids. So, to those who find it distasteful or those women who can't nurse, stop worrying that you aren't doing the best for your baby. You are doing just as much as those who nurse. Those who criticize should be told to mind their own business.
17

Kitti Kat,

13/07/2008 18:01:45
Before anyone writes about the "emotional" aspect of nursing, we are a close knit family and not one of us have had problems of the emotional kind. WE know our mother loved us and in fact, doted on us. AND, she didn't nurse. Nursing should be a personal choice and not one dictated by over zealous people. No woman should be coerced into it by the "guilt trip".
18

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 13/07/2008 18:32:26

Kitti Kat, ~16/17,

I don't think anyone is decrying mothers who don't,
"Breast Feed"
And why should a Nursing Mother have to go to the ladies room to feed their Baby,? its like me saying you should go to the ladies room, for YOUR MEALS, I don't want to see you munching on your meal!
You don't need you binoculars out you know!
19

Douglas,

Bathgate 13/07/2008 18:51:09
Kitti Kat, I've just one word for you:- Bitty! :o)
20

Jerseyside,

US 13/07/2008 19:12:03
Response to comment #14, Lanna. You say, "However, there are substances that make their way into the milk that the baby might react to, substances from foods the mother may have eaten."

-Please understand that a child (up to age 8) that is not breast-fed will most likely be exposed to these substances through solid food that has not be 'filtered' by the mothers system.

Response to comment #16, Kitti Kat,
"You are doing just as much as those who nurse."

-Shopping for canned formula, heating & preparing it plus sterilizing the bottles & rubber teats is far more work than natures way. Mothering is not about how much you do, though, its about doing your best. Guilt is not even an issue for those who have attempted their best.

For those who are fighting for independence - I suspect you'll be wishing you held on just a bit tighter when that child is heading for their teens.

Sending an informative video to all expectant mothers is money well spent.
21

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 13/07/2008 19:12:47
Now, now you two - Horrible Cankers and Crank Parent.

Let us not get into an unseemly catfight about breastfeeding. You will both come out of it sounding like shrill fishwives when we all know that HC is a paragoness of femininity and womanliness.
22

tracym,

Essex 13/07/2008 21:08:10
10. Yes I have breastfed 3 too! You might get a bit of trouble when they first get teeth but a bit of position adjustment or taking them off if they bite will soon teach them how to nurse without hurting. It's well worth the effort when it's for their health.
The IQ link has not been dispproved by the way 22, see the research from the McGill University. It may also be due the fact breastfeeding mothers have more physical contact, this helps brain development significantly (see Odent's Primal Health book).
I see we have the token "I couldn't feed therefore all women who do are nazis, stop going on about it" post. It's to be expected. Don't take it out on us. Get angry at the health professionals that failed you, at the formula advertises that dupe you. Only 2/3% of women cannot physically feed, the rest are let down, poorly supported or misinformed.
I will not shut up about the benefits of breastfeeding (or rather the risks of formula), there's millions of pounds put into formula promotion (and it costs the NHS millions in treating sick babies) and barely a fraction of that is spent on breastfeeding promotion.
So what if someone feels guilty when the benefits are mentioned, if one mother reads it and realises she should give it ago then I am happy another life has been improved. I would be far healthier had I been breastfed.
23

Crank Parent,

Livingston 13/07/2008 22:03:15
#22

Breastfeeding is a great contraceptive whilst babies are exclusively demand fed (day and night). My youngest is nearly 3 and only has a comfort feed at bedtime. By coincidence this happens to be a typical age gap in cultures which use breastfeeding and natural family planning methods.
24

Crank Parent,

Livingston 13/07/2008 22:09:33
Oops, meant to add:

http://www.mothering.com/articles/new_baby/breastfeeding/extended-breastfeeding.html

"Breastfed toddlers are smarter
Numerous studies show that breastfeeding promotes a higher IQ, including increased reading comprehension, math skills, and scholastic ability, even into adolescence. In one study, breastfeeding was associated with a 4.6 higher mean in three-year-olds' intelligence. The fine motor and language skills of breastfed toddlers also develop more quickly. According to Ginger Carney, a clinical nutrition manager and lactation consultant at Le Bonheur Children's Medical Center in Memphis, Tennessee, "The unique coordination of the tongue, lips, and jaw during breastfeeding exercises the muscles used for speech." In other words, the act of sucking promotes oral development, which enhances language skills."

"Breastfeeding acts as a natural birth control
While not 100 percent effective, continued nursing helps suppress ovulation. Of course, if you aren't ready for another baby, you'll definitely want to use some sort of other protection as well. But here's an added perk: Your period usually won't return until a few months after your baby is weaned. Amanda Aaronson, a mom from Mountainville, California, calls her breastfeeding amenorrhea 'fabulous.' She says, "My daughter is almost 19 months old and I still haven't had a postpartum period.""

"Breastfed toddlers are emotionally healthier
Some opponents of extended breastfeeding worry that it will stunt a toddler's independence. However, forcing independence too soon can backfire, causing the child to be clingy and insecure. Dr. Jack Newman, founder of the Newman Breastfeeding Clinic in Toronto, Canada, and author of The Ultimate Breastfeeding Book of Answers, believes that extended breastfeeding actually promotes a child's independence and emotional development. He says, "The breastfed toddler is more independent in the long run because his independence comes from a deep-seated sec
25

Crank Parent,

Livingston 13/07/2008 22:10:51
cont.

"...security that comes from breastfeeding." Breastfeeding is a source not only of nutrition, but also of comfort, support, and security. Dr. Newman, whose three children were breastfed until they were between three and four, calls this time "a renewal of love"; it is a time for your child to rest and reconnect with you. The physical closeness and skin-on-skin contact provides reassurance of your unconditional love. With that assurance, your toddler feels free to explore and learn all about her bright new world."
26

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 13/07/2008 22:12:06

Crank Parent ~24,

"Breastfeeding is a great contraceptive whilst babies are exclusively demand fed"

Agreed, ex used this method, at that time though, hospitals were very pushy, for new mums to take contraception and did not believe in this method, not to conceive, we told them in no uncertain terms, we were NOT going to be brainwashed and forced into their method and told them,...

"to stick it where the sun don't shine"!

We were quite rebelious, and I still am! :)
27

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 13/07/2008 22:53:23

Janis ~28,

Sounds like you are being very "tyrannical" about mums who wish to feed their baby when needed, maybe the "BABY" is put of 'feeding' by watching you chomp YOUR Food!
28

Caz1311,

Edinburgh 13/07/2008 23:44:59
Hi, I'm a breastfeeding mother of a 6 month old baby. I hope I haven't offended anyone by exposing my nipple in order to nourish my child, but if I have I hope that people can be consoled in the fact that with a history of allergies in the family, my son has so far exhibited to sensitivity to anything, including the varied solid diet he is now beginning to experience.

Anyone being "put off" their dinner by the sight of a baby enjoying theirs should perhaps postpone their supper til a little later when the little ones are at home sleeping. This is the type of Victorian attitude that prevents many Scottish mothers feeling comfortable about breastfeeding, and a major reason why Scotland has one of the worst rates for breastfeeding in Europe, and consequently, perhaps, the reason for their position in the obesity, heart disease etc league tables...

I had intended to continue breastfeeding til my son was a year, but when I return to work I am not sure that this is going to be practical... What are the government and employers going to do to support working mothers who wish to continue to breastfeed til their children are 2? At present employers should provide somewhere for mothers to express if required, and somewhere to store the milk, or to allow mothers breaks to go feed if the child is nearby, up til the child is 1 year old.

I would not feel comfortable feeding a child past an age that their peers were being breastfed, and I think this is true of the majority of Scottish mums. Whether breastfeeding boosts the nations IQ or reduces obesity rates remains to be seen. I simply do it because I am lucky enough to be able to, and my baby enjoys it.

No one should criticise those who choose not to breastfeed, or those who cannot, not even smokers are ostracised in the way I have seen the parents of some formula fed babies treated.

Choice, compassion and tolerance people, please!
29

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 14/07/2008 00:02:04

Janis ~30,

The argument could go on forever and I have NEVER seen a "Breast Feeding Mother"....'Bare All'!
Most are Soo discrete as I mentioned in an earlier post, "you know what their doing but see nothing"
Maybe its a 'Jealousy' why others object, seeing this loving bond, a bond that they never had and/or cant relate to.
'Green Cheese' and all that! thinking subconsciously,..

"Why all this Loving Bonding" I cant have this, so why should they, I object!"

Beats me!

Also as I said, Restaurant or not, it would not put my wife off her food and neither me, infact it would enhance the meal out for us, knowing Baby was enjoying Her/His food as-well.

BTW; I think 'Crank Parent' has every right to be proud of her ongoing achievement's, again I think and feel a certain 'Jealously' is setting in, for others who, never did, or cant have, ("Why should She,?)
30

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

14/07/2008 00:23:57
21....Fraid to say Timothy Charles that I am as "Feminine" as a builders bum....well most of the time anyway....t'would not stop me, however, getting my udders oot for the kids if I was breastfeeding....I am all for women breastfeeding...in cafes...restaurants....church...you name it....just as long...as they can guarantee said child is not going to scream the place down when you are scarfing your oysters and champagne....that I do object to...and mobile phones....its a touchy subject and quite emotive...I agree with many posters that we do not, in our so called, civilised world, have the right attitude to breastfeeding...to either the women who do...or the women who dont....
31

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 14/07/2008 00:52:55

Cankers ~33,

You post made me smile, you are 'All Woman' like my Wife and Wont take Nonsense, as for the "udders" my wife would do exactly the same for any child in need, if she could! :DD (no 'pun' intended DD)

Hope you are well, catch-up soon, Chas.
32

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

14/07/2008 12:10:14
Hi Charles....I hope Charles...that you do not have to wait too much longer....
33

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 14/07/2008 12:40:48

Ohh' thanks Cankers, that is kind of you, DYW going soon to find out if and when embryo transfer takes place, its such an incredible, inner, nervy feeling all the time for me, think it is because I really do want it to work for DYW, she has waited Soo long.

Don't worry, I need you lot to speak to, apart from Boy Wonder, you lot keep me 'sane' so you will be the first to know. :))
34

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

14/07/2008 14:12:07
Mmmmmh...not sure about the "Sane" part Chaz....I am pretty sure any 'sane' person inadvertently reading the comments on this forum will be thinking..."What the féck have I stumbled across?"....I have this fantasy that one of us is a rich nutter who invites all the regular posters to his Dracula castle/mausoleum somewhere and we all have to remain anonymous whilst trying to identify who is who on the forum...shall the troll be unmasked?....will Boy Wonder be easy to spot because of his wee 'bat ears' and would everyone guess who I was because of the bottle of Irn Bru in my pocket and glam rock shell suit?.....you of course...would be unmasked immediately and made to leave...face it Charles...how long would you last without blurting out the words "DYW" and "Baby/ies" in the same sentance??
35

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 14/07/2008 14:30:33

Cankers ~37,

lol :D
36

MicheleS,

15/07/2008 15:26:22
What is disappointing about this article is that yet again, breastfeeding is described as "lowering" the risk of certain illnesses, and that breastfed children have a "higher" IQ. Breastfeeding is the physiological norm, and the health and intelligence of breastfed children should be taken as the baseline. It would make more sense to say if you decide to feed your child articial milk you are INCREASING the risk of certain illnesses, and LOWERING your child's potential IQ. When it somes to smoking, we don't tell people that if they don't smoke, they are at a decreased risk of heart disease, so why should our advice on breastfeeding be any different? Women should be told that 'breast is normal' and not 'breast is best' as if it were something magical that only some people can achieve. Likewise they should be told that feeding a child artificially could seriously affect its long and short term health.

I agree that we should not make mothers feel guilty about trying to breastfeed and failing, our anger should not be expressed toward individuals but at a society and government who are not doing enough to support women who try to breastfeed and run into problems. All well and good advising mothers to breastfeed for up to 2 years, but without substantial and long overdue investment in more staff midwives and health visitors with adequate training in supporting breastfeeding, it seems unlikely that things will improve.

- Mother of 21 month old, still breastfeeding.
37

Joanna,

Cambs, England 15/07/2008 16:24:01
I am a mother who did not breastfeed. The reasons I did not are my own and they are personal. My son knows he is loved and cherished by both his parents, and I bonded with him from the moment I knew I was pregnant.

I am glad that many women are very successful and enjoy breast-feeding. However there are reasons why some women do not nurse and I think once an expectant mother has been informed of all the options and given any help that she needs the decision should be hers. She should not be emotionally blackmailed by being told that she will not bond with her baby or that her child will be of low IQ. I am sure there are many people who have been breastfed as babies who are not particularly bright and vice versa.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.