Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


MSP wants 'high risk' names added to sex offenders register

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 January 2009
CALLS are being made today to expand the sex offenders register after it emerged some people considered to be "high risk" in the Capital, were not on it.
Registered sex offenders (RSOs) have to check-in with police every year, register a change of address within three days and inform police if they are away from home for more than seven days.

However, Lothian and Borders Police are also monitoring a number of "non-registered persons representing a high risk to the public", who are under no legal compulsion to disclose their movements but could strike "at any time" with "serious impact".

Now Conservative justice secretary Bill Aitken has demanded that those representing "a proven risk" – including children dealt with through the hearings system and those with lapsed registrations – be included after the News discovered that nearly one in eight people posing a "high risk" of committing a sex offence in the city are not on the register.

There are currently 14 high risk individuals – in addition to the 93 high risk RSOs known to be living in Edinburgh – not on the register because they are either too young, or are under "strong suspicion" of a sex crime but have not been charged or convicted.

Non-registered risks may also include those whose registration period has lapsed, but have generated enough residual suspicion to merit further monitoring.

As of November 1 there were 656 registered sex offenders of varying risk being monitored by Lothian and Borders Police. This is almost double the amount being monitored five years ago.

Mr Aitken said: "The bottom line is that the public needs to be reassured that everyone who is a potential risk should be on the register where it has been proven that they are a risk."

Mr Aitken also urged police to detain anyone charged with a serious sex crime pending trial, to prevent them walking the streets as a non-registered risk.

He added: "Where someone has been charged but not convicted the presumption of innocence must apply, but you would expect the police to be watchful of an individual of that type and were the offence to be a serious one you would expect them to be remanded in custody following a petition appearance."

The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPOS) has drawn up guidelines that allow police to monitor non-registered risks.

A spokesman said: "These people will generally present themselves to the police because of their behaviour. The definition of 'high risk' is that there are identifiable indicators of risk of serious harm. The potential event could happen at any time and the impact could be serious."

A Lothian and Borders Police spokeswoman confirmed that they continue to monitor high risk individuals with lapsed registrations "to ensure any ongoing risks or concerns are addressed and minimised".

A Scottish Government justice spokesman said they were committed to ensuring the public has access to information about the management of, and risks posed by, sex offenders and potential offenders in the community.

He added: "We have been developing information materials, to be published early next year, to raise awareness and to provide advice to parents, children and communities about minimising the risks of exposure to harm."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 January 2009 1:41 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Decent,

05/01/2009 12:53:55
Wow - So if they are registered they have to check in once a YEAR! Well that must really curtail their activities.
2

Wee Keef,

05/01/2009 13:00:44
Strange. I thought we used to have a system where people were presumed innocent until PROVEN guilty. Now Bill Aitken wants to register anyone he doesn't like the look of. Stupid man.
3

plord,

edinburgh 05/01/2009 13:11:20
Another for the sake of the children story. when will people wake up to the fact that our civil liberties are being taken away by scare stories that involve "sex crimes" and terrorists. Until proven guilty you are innocent used to be the case, that is now no longer the case. Conservative justice secretary Bill Aitken, the clue is in your title but why let bother you why not spout off on and get your face in the paper. This guy was a judge for 5 years, that frightens me more than anything in the story except maybe the bit "The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPOS) has drawn up guidelines that allow police to monitor non-registered risks" thats everyone
4

Decent,

05/01/2009 13:41:35
I suggest you two read the article again. Proven risk and high risk people are to be monitored.
Anything that helps protect children from these beasts is perfectly fine by me. But if by monitoring them they mean they also have to check in once a year - well whats the point?
Castrate them all and be done with it.
5

Wee Keef,

05/01/2009 13:57:39
#4 - "Castrate them all and be done with it"

Ah, the Josef Mengele approach. Well done! We are obviously supposed to consider your screen name as being ironic.
6

Decent,

05/01/2009 14:34:32
Consider it whatever you like. And yes any approach at all will do that keeps these filthy excuses for human beings away from our children.

I suppose you are one of these that harps on about their human rights?
As far as I'm concerned - the minute they make a desision to harm a child - they lose any rights they might have had.
7

fair scunnered,

edinburgh 05/01/2009 14:58:04
we should just whip off their tackle and be done with it,but no hand wringing fib dems bleating about the pervs rights,what about the victims rights?,or do they not count anymore
now with dna tests we can prove what they have done to a kid
but no there will always be some bleating away in the back ground
eqaulity and safety?,ma baws
8

brandy al,

embra 05/01/2009 15:15:51
These names should be top of the list,and made to report to the polis once a month,every month.
9

Wee Keef,

05/01/2009 15:58:14
#6

You suppose wrongly

#7

Which pervs are those exactly?
Which victims are those exactly?
10

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 05/01/2009 16:30:27
-- However, Lothian and Borders Police are also monitoring a number of "non-registered persons representing a high risk to the public", who are under no legal compulsion to disclose their movements but could strike "at any time" with "serious impact".

I DON'T expect they're monitoring the Procurator Fiscal Service home to many sexual criminals. It's a great cloak of anonymity. And when there IS information from the public, neither Police nor Lawyers will touch them. Too masonic. They're protecting us? I don't think so.
11

,

05/01/2009 18:14:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 05/01/2009 18:49:03
to quote verbatim from

Sheriff Thomas George Hughes

"Let's stop for a lesbian sexual"

It's very trivial, merely an everyday occurance in a Scottish Court.

As the Police obliged.

So we expect Courts, Lawyers and Proc. Fiscs. to protect us?

The Procurator Fiscal then conducted himself in a most lewd and obscene manner jerking himself off (but hides as anonymous).
13

Decent,

05/01/2009 21:28:21
Crumbs - they must be having a night off.
14

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 05/01/2009 21:45:01
-- There are currently 14 high risk individuals

Given that there are 8 Chief Constables, there are 6 on the loose so it must appear. Or covertly employed in anti terrorism and sex offences.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.