Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Portobello station campaign builds up a head of steam

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 June 2009
A RAILWAY station in Portobello, which has not been in use since the 1960s, could be reopened under ambitious proposals being put forward by local campaigners.
Rail enthusiasts hope to reopen Portobello station which was closed as part of the swingeing cuts to the network following the publication of the Beeching Report in 1963.

City transport officials are investigating the idea following a motion put f
orward by local councillor Maureen Child.

Members of the Capital Rail Action Group (Crag) hope that the reintroduction of the station would allow trains from North Berwick and services on the Edinburgh crossrail line to stop at Portobello.

However, all that remains of the original station is the station master's house, which sits at Station Brae, off Brighton Place.

Lawrence Marshall, of Crag, said running trains through Portobello would dramatically reduce journey times for those travelling in and out of the city centre.

He said: "The station is fairly central and you can get down from Waverley in four or five minutes. Sometimes it takes up to half-an-hour to get to Portobello by bus from the city centre.

"Brunstane station serves the Joppa end, but it's quite far away from the rest of Portobello. Reopening the station would mean there would be four trains an hour at peak times during the week.

"There are some issues to be resolved, but I hope the council will see the benefits outweigh the drawbacks of the work needed to get it back into the network."

He added: "Everything so far has focused on people who commute in from outside the city, while those inside have been neglected. Reopening Portobello would make real journey time savings for those inside the city."

A report published last week at the Association of Train Operating Companies (Atoc) called for many of the stations closed during the Beeching era to be reopened.

Cllr Child said she hoped council officials would recommend the reopening of Portobello station be included in the Scottish Government's Strategic Transport Review Project (STPR), its list of long-term transport objectives.

She said: "I think it's very unfortunate that Portobello was not reopened at the same time as Brunstane and Newcraighall were opened. I am hopeful that the council will agree to write to the minister of transport and I would be very surprised and disappointed if they didn't."

A spokeswoman for the city council said a report was being prepared and would go before the transport and environment committee at the end of July.

Councillor Gordon Mackenzie, the city's transport convener, added: "The East of Scotland rail improvements package was put forward as part of the STPR as a means of improving services within the Edinburgh area. It did not specify any specific elements to be considered. It therefore makes sense for the council to highlight possible opportunities to make enhancements to services."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 June 2009 10:40 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The railways
 
1

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 12:02:45
Would Lawrence Marshall, of Crag, be the same ex-cooncillor Marshall of Embra Cooncil, who voted through the TramCar folly? Maureen Child is the irresponsible idiot photographed up a lamp post, illegally flyposting in support of the TollTax, who also voted Tram. Porty Station could have been reopened for a drop in the Tram White Elephant's feeding bucket and would have actually been of some benefit to their parishioners.
2

,

23/06/2009 12:17:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

,

23/06/2009 12:17:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

,

23/06/2009 12:29:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 23/06/2009 12:32:23
#1 Maureen Child is one of the best councillors Edinburgh has, just ask any of ther constituents.
Not sure what your big problem is, do you hate all democratically elected members, jealousy perhaps ?
6

Mince Pie Supper,

23/06/2009 12:40:42
Oh god, Maureen Child would be better placed sticking to the 29 bus than getting involved in any transport decisions.

Have you noticed how all Edinburgh Transport is "ambitious".

All good ideas adopted by these idiots are executed badly!
7

Mince Pie Supper,

23/06/2009 12:40:57
Sorry, 26 bus I mean.
8

Mince Pie Supper,

23/06/2009 12:43:13
Also, none of this will ever happen. Do not comment, what a waste of time.

That's 10 minutes of my life I won't get back.

Next...
9

the plum,

23/06/2009 12:45:26
open up all the stations where possible...the infrastructure is already mostly there...much easier and practical to reintroduce the rail network than the tram netwo...one overpriced and needed/wanted line. the scrapping of the railway and original tram network are as stupid as the building of the new tramline.
10

The Ayrshire Bard,

23/06/2009 12:53:15
My wife was able to travel from Joppa to the Waverley in 10 minutes in the 50's. She worked in St Andrew Square and could get home for her lunch and back again within the hour. Nowadays she'd be lucky to make it one way within an hour, but that's progress for you.
11

Linda,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 12:56:01
Yes Marshall and Child voted for Trams instead of Rail.

Also problem is lack of capacity at Waverley not helped by the previous Labour City Council which built new HQ on vacant site next to Waverley Station.
12

,

23/06/2009 13:03:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Hamish B,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 13:05:50
This is a defintiely a step in he right direction but whether it happens or not is a nother matter as the city of edinburgh council are good at talking but do nothing!. What happened to the hovercraft from portobello to fife?south suburban line?
14

Mince Pie Supper,

23/06/2009 13:07:35
The Hovercraft was too popular, cheap and useful to run.
15

Mince Pie Supper,

23/06/2009 13:08:25
Not a lot of free meals for Councilors with the Hovercraft.
16

,

23/06/2009 13:15:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 13:23:21
#5 - would that be Councillor Maureen ‘three houses’ Child who was formerly in charge of finance in the previous Soviet, and so responsible for the empty municipal coffers when they were flung out of office? I suspect not all of her parishioners would agree she's one of the 'best' cooncillors - by what standard, exactly? And, no nothing against 'elected members' - just the chancers on the make, on the take and those on ego trips.
18

Bling Crosby,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 13:26:21
#2

DUDE YOU SAID CUMMTER
19

,

23/06/2009 13:43:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

The Judge,

23/06/2009 13:57:53
Now everybody calm down and repeat after me.

This is never going to happen.

It'll will never get off the ground.

We cannot afford to finish the half a tramLINE to no-where let alone start another "world class" transport project.

Feeling better?
21

PaulB,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 14:01:04
An excellent idea - just hope there is capacity on this already overcrowded stretch of the East Coast Mainline. There should be quadruple tracks laid to the east of Edinburgh to cope with this..
22

the plum,

23/06/2009 14:11:39
we should all be given state funded hovercrafts...now. i demand this.

23

Anonymoose,

23/06/2009 15:47:45
it would be a good idea to open up the old stations. It would improve the transport infrastructure around the city, couple in with the trams (which we are getting no matter how poorly it's managed), and create a large number of jobs just now to get everything up and running.
24

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 23/06/2009 17:51:48
Please keep trains away from Porty.
25

Fifi la Bonbon,

23/06/2009 19:13:36
I bet Common Purpose are behind this outrage.
26

Andrew Kent,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 21:24:07
#5 Wrong, I am one of Maureen Childs constituents and she is off her rocker!

I am very much in favour of a train station in Portobello though and the reopening of the South suburban line. It has been costed and comes in much much cheaper and will serve far more people than the hated trams!
27

krusty the klown,

23/06/2009 22:18:48
#24 Trams won't be allowed to go to porty because the locals will try to nick the leccy from the lines
28

Andrew,

23/06/2009 22:25:46
Portobello & THE ENTIRE SOUTH SUBURBAN line electrified, East Linton (with 'locals' to Dunbar), Reston, (and in Fife, St Andrews & Leven) - JUST GET ON WITH IT!!!
29

Andrew,

23/06/2009 22:42:23
WHILST on the subject. Lines and stations LONG-overdue for provision, reopening or re-introduction of passenger services! EDINBURGH SUB! GLASGOW CROSSRAIL via Glasgow Cross, Gorbals & West Street (for Subway) THUS LINKING THE ENTIRE SCOTTISH RAIL NETWORK from north of Glasgow to the west & south west!! Aberdeen Crossrail (line and stations extant but NO LOCAL meaningful CROSSRAIL SERVICE)!! Aberdeen-Banchory AND Ellon Peterhead/Fraserburgh!! Alloa-Clackmannan-Kincardine-Culross-Dunfermline Town!! Larkhall-Strathaven (who demolished the viaducts?)!! Millerston & Abronhill (Cumbernauld-Falkirk Grahamston line)!!
Dumfries -Stranraer!! Parkhead Forge (on Airdrie-Bathgate line)!! Bridgeton-Parkhead Stadium-Tollcross (to Carmyle/Whifflet line)!! Cardonald-Braehead-Renfrew-Glasgow Airport-Paisley (loop)!! etc etc etc
30

Julian.,

edinburgh 23/06/2009 23:07:41
Andrew Kent,

Even by the anti-trammies estimates the trams will serve 25,000 of the population of Edinburgh.

And then there's all the non-Edinburgh residents they will serve like commuters, tourists and business people using them for at least part of their journeys.

How will the Portobello station, situated half a mile from Brunstane station serve far more people?
31

Julian.,

edinburgh 23/06/2009 23:14:34
Judge,

I know you like to keep saying half tram line but you're factually incorrect.

Both line 1 and line 2 are being built but are not going to be fully completed as per the original plans.

So I'm sorry to say that half two tram lines is what you should be saying. Doesn't have the same power of ridicule but at least it's more factually correct:-)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edinburgh_Tram_Network#Line_2_.28West_Edinburgh.29
32

brianmca3,

auld reekie 23/06/2009 23:33:38
#1 edinburgh sucks had an interesting article about marshall and childs
read on
NEW LABOUR FANTASY

Our Councillors claim in their election leaflet to have “seen off the threat of the Portobello Super Store”. Cllr Child has stated this in the past in an email but this is the first time she has touted this fantasy publicly. Let’s
get the facts right from the people who actually stopped the superstore. We first decided to hold a public meeting and asked, because we had no funds, Cllr Marshall to hire the Portobello Town Hall (he could get it free). He said that it was not worth our while to start a campaign or even hold a meeting .The subsequent meeting was the biggest ever and the crowd were 100 per cent against a Superstore except Cllr. Marshall who had the brass neck to turn up at the event and try to hog the microphone .It had to be wrestled away from him by one of our PCATS women!

PCATS (Porto Campaign Against the Superstore) was formed and we had a meeting with Marshall, Child and Cllr Davies, Chair of Planning. We were told that our appeal would not succeed and “we should consider co-operating with the developer” over peripheral details. Our request for financial assistance was met by a loud No from Cllr Child. (This from a woman whose council subsequently spent £7million on an ill thought out congestion scheme; and blamed the public for kicking out the plan in a referendum. A similar amount was also wasted on a housing stock transfer referendum. And needless to say the Council can always find money for the really important things like pay increases and (WAIT FOR IT!) redundancy payments in case we are churlish enough not to re elect them! Any pretence that the Council was against the Store vanished when they ducked out of putting a retail argument at the first Public Inquiry meeting in the Town hall with the official reporter.

Then in the midst of our campaign we discovered that the Council had hatched a plan to buy out the lease on the Pitz, mini
33

brianmca3,

auld reekie 23/06/2009 23:34:45
cont
Then in the midst of our campaign we discovered that the Council had hatched a plan to buy out the lease on the Pitz, mini soccer site, move it to the golf course, move the public library and the community centre to the promenade next to the Sports Centre, and sell off all three sites for PRIVATE housing. We argued successfully to stop this as it would compromise our appeal by allowing the developers to argue that the relocation of these facilities and the erection of housing would make the Store site more a central part of
Portobello
We managed to raise over £23,000 to successfully defeat the developers. Our Councillors attended many of our fundraising events; not to help in any useful way but to be seen and pretend to be on our side. Nobody was fooled by this faux, and somewhat distasteful, display of “friendship”.
The Superstore battle was won by PCATS and the community, despite the actions and inactions of the Council or its local representatives. Their machinations in relation to PCATS and the developers has left a nasty suspicious taste that won’t go away.
Personal P.S. Casting a disinterested eye over the New labour pamphlet I am intrigued by some other of their promises eg “NEED FOR GOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING Very laudable but when did the Council last build council houses? In 1987 that’s when. Is Cllr Marshall proud of this particular record? LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES and EXCELLENT SPORTING FACILITIES; How have they hoped to achieve this? Surely not by trying to sell off Meadowbank stadium and Portobello golf course for PRIVATE housing ?.
34

Andrew Kent,

23/06/2009 23:35:26
Julian.-

I meant that the South Suburban would serve more people, not just Porobello Station.
35

brianmca3,

auld reekie 23/06/2009 23:48:42
this station would be a great thing for portobello
as getting down by bus can be a pain,nearly every one in edinburgh has been down to porty at some time in their lives
many a hot summer spent in the icy waters of the open air pool,so sad its gone
fishing of the prom for flounders
the smell of burgers and fried onions
the rotten shows which spoilt it
CEC get off yer butts and get porty back to what it was,a great place to spend the day,great shops etc,i saw carry on cowboy when it came out in the cinema ,the george i think now a bloody bingo hall,the beach i always thought was better than snooty silveknowes,even the great unwashed from the west coast took a holiday at porty
get out and support this great part of the city
36

Julian.,

edinburgh 24/06/2009 01:31:48
#34,

Thanks for the clarification on that. If the South Suburban would serve more people than the trams then I'm in favour of opening that as well. Wasn't there some talk about linking it with the tram system?

Of course to make a fair comparison you would have to electrify it as well to put it on an environmental same basis as the trams. And that would cost a lot more. What's the estimate to reopen it anyway?
37

Duncan in Edinburgh,

24/06/2009 11:16:58
Surely there is already a group in Portobello campaigning against this?
38

The Corp,

Carlisle 29/06/2009 07:43:41
I woud guess that by the time the train got from N.B. to Portobello it would probably be full anyway. That said I am all for od stations re-opening

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.