Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Our clubs will survive if they have the will

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 February 2009
SCOTTISH football has always been regarded as the poor neighbour of the English game. Now, as the recession starts to bite, it also bears unfavourable comparison with its own recent past.
With a domestic market which is roughly a tenth of that south of the Border, the Scottish game can only dream of the size of revenue from television deals which English clubs take for granted. In June last year, for example, the SPL agreed a four-ye
ar deal with Setanta for the broadcasting of live matches which is worth a total of £125million.

That deal, which takes effect from next year, is more than double the previous agreement, but it is dwarfed by the £1.3billion, three-year package currently in operation in England. Similarly, Scottish clubs today simply cannot afford the quality of player they could attract in the 1990s. The internal transfer market has almost collapsed, and even Rangers were looking to sell a player last month in order to raise revenue.

But, while such a state of affairs may suggest that times are tough, the lesson from even harder times in the past is that our national sport is remarkably robust. True, clubs have gone bust, but those which have not recovered have been exceptional cases.

Livingston, Dundee and Motherwell entered administration but live on, as do Airdrie, albeit under the guise of Airdrie United. It is very rare indeed for a Scottish club to go under when it is on a stable footing and being run by people who want it to continue as a going concern.

Gretna disappeared from the league after their owner, the late Brooks Mileson, was forced to retrench after over-extending himself. Clydebank only foundered after a long-term battle to stay afloat. And Third Lanark went bankrupt in 1967 after years of infighting.

The fate of those clubs should not be lightly disregarded. But the fact remains that the vast majority of Scottish teams have kept going through leaner periods than this.

In the mid-1970s, for example, the three-day week was introduced, putting millions on part-time working. Power cuts were introduced, the sale of candles rocketed, and the end of the world was nigh according to some.

But football adapted. Matches were rearranged to take place during daylight hours, and clubs were able to get by.

We have to go a lot further back, to the Second World War, to find a time in which football as it had been organised ceased functioning. Even then, the usual league and cup competitions resumed in 1946, and almost every club which had fallen into abeyance at the end of the 1930s was able to start up again.

Leith Athletic and St Bernard's did not make it, but they had been in some trouble before the outbreak of hostilities. Only the Stirling club King's Park could be regarded as casualties of the war – their ground, Forthbank, was bombed by the Luftwaffe.

Of course, in order to get going again after the war, many clubs had to make economies. Similarly, those clubs which have gone into administration over the past decade have had to learn to live more frugally before resuming normal commercial existence.

In retrospect, some clubs were allowed to live beyond their means for too long before finally being told by indulgent bankers that they had to rein in their spending. Since then, there has been a general recognition in Scottish football that the years of excess are over.

That recognition has not yet extended everywhere to practice. Many clubs, especially in the SPL, spend far too large a percentage of their turnover on players' salaries.

But the knowledge of what has to be done is there. Clubs are actively striving to remove their debt rather than telling themselves that speculating to accumulate will eventually produce results on the park and on the balance sheet.

They know how to survive, and if they want to they will. They may have to do so in reduced circumstances, and those footballers whose financial demands are too extravagant will probably have to ply their trade in another country. But they will live through this crisis, just as they have survived others of far greater severity.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 February 2009 10:11 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Stuart Bathgate
 
1

Wait a minute,

Town 24/02/2009 09:53:28
Great comment Jamboy.

The problem for the Scotsman is wider than just football. It has gone out of step with Scotland and sees any sign of Scottish confidence as a threat.

I used to BUY this paper as a badge as much as a read, but those days are long gone.

I hope it's not too late to save it, but it really needs to wake up to the fact that it is alienating both it's core and potential audience.
2

wayne bijlyeerheid,

24/02/2009 11:42:47
You'll have to point out the "fawning and embarassing little suck up articles about Rangers in this paper" that you "cannot move for".
I've never seen them.
Are the "Auld Tarts" supporters' monitors becoming as spittle flecked as the celtc minded?
3

Non OF Supporter,

Edinburgh 24/02/2009 13:28:07
#5 have you not read today's little suck up beauty "Rapid rise to top surprises Smith but he remains alert" or maybe you just can't read.
4

SOFBTRC,

Far, far from Glasgow 24/02/2009 14:57:49
I agree with the other Edinburgh posters who have commented above. The Scotsman is indeed a Scottish paper for all of Scotland, but it is an Edinburgh paper, and close behind that, it's an east coast paper.

There would be no need for the Scotsman to be as dismissive of the Old Firm as the weegie papers are about Hearts, Hibs and other east coast clubs, but at least get back to offering an objective viewpoint, and- yes - a viewpoint which, if any slight bias is necessary, errs in favour of the Edinburgh and east coast teams.

We can't complain about all of the reporting. For example, I think Alan Patullo regularly turns out excellent articles that are a thoroughly good read. But he doesn't make the editorial decisions. More's the pity.

I'd be delighted if the Scotsman actually took note of some of these concerns and considered acting upon those that it sees as valid. That would be a start. Perhaps we should take some consolation from the fact that the editors have already recognised Old Firm followers as a group that are not welcome, and who can not be trusted, to comment upon these threads, given that no commenting is allowed on stories involving the gruesome twosome. Maybe all is not lost after all.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.