Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


McKie's father welcomes fingerprint jobs cull

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 April 2007
THE departure of four fingerprint experts at the centre of the Shirley McKie case was a "necessary cull", her father said last night.
All have agreed to a secret severance package complete with a gagging order.

The news was greeted with dismay by one MSP, who described it as "shameful".

But Iain McKie, who has campaigned endlessly on behalf of his daughter, said there was n
o other option.

He believes the move will allow the Scottish Police Services Authority (SPSA), which takes charge of fingerprinting in the country from today, to flourish.

The four experts were among a group of six who had identified McKie, a serving police officer, as leaving her fingerprint at a murder scene in Ayrshire. She vehemently denied ever being in the house and after a near 10-year probe was exonerated.

The now-retired officer received a £750,000 compensation pay-off from the Executive last year.

Iain McKie said: "This was long overdue but much needed. It was a necessary cull. The Scottish Fingerprint Service would never have gained worldwide acceptance until this had happened.

"People say they have been sacked, but they were not sacked. They sacked themselves."

Commenting on the SPSA, McKie added: "This is an ideal opportunity to move on.

"It is a new dawn and a massive opportunity and I hope they [the SPSA] will grab it."

Late on Friday, it was announced that Robert McKenzie, Allan Dunbar, Hugh McPherson and Charlie Stewart were to leave their posts with the Scottish Fingerprint Service (SFS).

It is claimed they were told to go, otherwise they would lose their jobs when the SPSA took over the running of the SFS.

Their remaining colleagues, Tony McKenna and Fiona McBride, are expected to follow suit - with similar restrictions over discussing the terms.

Ken Macintosh, Labour MSP for Eastwood in Renfrewshire, said the group had "basically been made unemployable".

He added: "There has been no special deal for these people. This is them being sacked effectively. They have children at university and mortgages to pay. Their careers are totally blighted by what has happened.

"I find it a most shameful episode. It is a scandal."

A spokesman for Unison, the union representing the six, said: "We can confirm that four of the staff of the Fingerprint Service have accepted a severance package and left the service.

"These members had to suffer constant and unfair pressure for the past nine years and it is entirely understandable that they have taken the option to leave and get on with their lives."

The experts' departure comes just two days after Ian Todd quit his post as acting director of the Scottish Criminal Record Office - the agency which, until it became part of the SPSA, oversaw the SFS.

He was appointed years after the McKie affair emerged, but Todd was known to be a firm supporter of the staff at the centre of the row.

It was also rumoured that he did not see eye-to-eye with the SPSA chief executive and ex-British Transport Police assistant chief constable David Mulhern either.

Commenting on the new agency, Mulhern said: "This move will deliver a far more effective approach to supporting the Scottish Police Service in the investigation and detection of crime by delivering a seamless evidential capture and analysis from crime scene to courts."

Justice Minister Cathy Jamieson said: "By bringing the [police services] together under a single national authority, we can build on the strengths of the past and find new ways to improve the way we support frontline police officers."



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Angus Lindsay,

Hong Kong 01/04/2007 01:54:00

This must be one of the most disgraceful and shameful episodes in Scottish criminal history. Well done Iain McKie, for standing up to a thuggish mafia culture that vilified your daughter, Shirley. No amount of money can properly recompense what the system put her through, and what she survived with dignity intact. A curse on all their houses, and a (non-religious) blessing on Shirley for toughing it out.

2

,

01/04/2007 09:21:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Crystal Ball,

01/04/2007 10:11:20

Colin R
15 out of 15 jurors?
Have you ever sat on a jury?
Those jurors were deneid knowledge of the first expert that Shirley McKie consulted when Shirley claimed not to know who she had consulted, under oath, at her perjury trial.

Her father claimes she didn't know, yet she met and corresponded with her solicitors about Peter Swann, but in court she didn't know who had looked at her case.

Unfortunately Peter Swann agreed with the SCRO, that the fingerprint belonged to Shirley McKie.
Thats why she had to trawl the internet to find the self-taught (okay, sorry, he was giving evidence after two weeks training) Pat Wertheim.

Her father claims he had power of attorney, yet she signed her own letters referring to Mr. Swann.

Shirley McKie was given a bagful of our cash and was placed under no restrictions about discussing the case, her daddy can even write a book about it, yet the SCRO officers (and their families), perhaps the only folk who can get to truth of this matter have been gagged.

4

Iain McKie,

Ayr 01/04/2007 10:46:32

Gagging orders in an open and accountable society are an anachronism. But in making comment we all have a duty to be accurate and fair in that comment. That lies and innuendo have been a way of life for some SCRO supporters for 10 years does nothing to advance the cause of free speech and gives the ‘gaggers’ the excuse they are looking for.

The book being published this month is our account of the ‘truth’ and a forum is being established so that those who wish to comment can do so. I hope that readers who disagree as well as those who agree will come forward with reasoned arguments to support their beliefs and reject the personal attacks and insinuation that has devalued some of the debate to date.

For further information: http://www.shirleymckie.com/

5

Rab McClair,

France 01/04/2007 12:25:39

Regardless of the ultimate truth of this case, (and I for one have no problem with the juries unanimous "Not Guilty" verdict) the fact is that the McKie family have stood up to an unparalleled examination of these events with both dignity and fortitude. On the basis of a decision of a jury, who FINALLY heard as much of the evidence that was available (as opposed to only those bits that known establishment figures WISHED us to know) it's clear that Shirley and her family are due every penny of the monies from the public purse.
This debate however, still needs to move on. As taxpayers we are STILL entitled to a PUBLIC examination of the sequence of these events which led to the paying of this money. What IS clear is that there are many publicly-paid dirty hands still in this particularly episode, and we should identify who's "mucky prints" attempted our deception.
As for the circling conspiracy vultures, its a classic time to PUT UP or SHUT UP and let this family attempt to repair its undoubted psychological wounds without any even "ethereal" stains.
Finally, Well Done Ian McKie.
Not all of us are always over well-disposed to former police personnel,sometimes for good reason, but if I was ever to need help in the trenches, this is one Bobby I'd be delighted to have alongside me. You and your daughter should be very proud, one of the other. Few family relationships are tested the way yours has. Enjoy what I hope will be many happy years with each other

6

Micjonger,

01/04/2007 12:27:11

There should be no such thing as "gagging orders" when Public Money is involved.
I want to know what my hard-earned money (in the form of taxes) is being spent on.

7

andy48,

duddingston 01/04/2007 13:13:44

"The news was greeted with dismay by one MSP, who described it as "shameful"."
Yes because it has taken so long!

8

Alexander,

Edinburgh 01/04/2007 13:39:08

Well, at the end of the day right has triumphed! Just a pity that the many "guilty" in this incredible case have not contributed to Ms McKie's very well deserved and many might say inadequate compensation award..

9

sceptic,

livingston 01/04/2007 13:55:30

3. Crystal Ball
And as we both know, despite any evidence, the Earth is FLAT.

10

Swilly Tisher,

Loch Maree 01/04/2007 15:43:09

I can't quite put my finger on it , but I strongly suspect Freemasory is behind the wicked persecution of Ms McKie. It lurks in so many aspects of Scottish life , too many to single out here.The funny handshake and the rolled up trouser leg reign supreme. There should be an EU inquiry into this pernicous "pastime" that blights the lives of so many non-adherents.

11

NorT,

Edinburgh 01/04/2007 18:00:08

They should have all been sacked - not allowed to walk out the door with a large sum of taxpayers money. We should be told what the package is.

12

Biker,

Ayr 01/04/2007 21:47:12

My sympathies go to Shirley McKie over this stupidity. She afterall is now without her highly paid job, and I suspect little prospects after such a public mauling. The people responsible should have been delt with earlier with greater impact to impress upon them that this sort of bullying would not be tollerated. Many others , MSPs and the like should also be scutinised after their condemnation of an innocent woman. The cuts have not been deep enough.
Well done Ian Mckie for your hard fought victory. Pity the purse did'nt pay more, but as No 10 aludes too, perhaps darker forces were at work.

13

Biker,

Ayr 01/04/2007 21:47:46

I look forward to reading the book

14

Santana,

02/04/2007 15:45:05

The gagging order on the experts is an absolute disgrace!!!! Why gag them if there is nothing to "cover up?"

They too have waited for 10 years to put their side of the story forward. They would have been allowed to do so had the Executive not "settled" out of court giving £750K of the taxpayers money away without letting us hear the "whole truth". Now after being thrown out of their jobs and make no mistake, this is what has happened, they are not allowed to tell "their truth". How unjust that The McKie Circus is allowed to speak freely to the press and has done so at every opportunity to drum up support without "all the facts" being given.

Too many questions are left unanswered by keeping all the evidence underwraps. Something has to be done to allow the (ex-) SCRO officers to have their say. Then the people of Scotland and U.K. can make up their own minds based on a balanced argument, and not just on the McKie propoganda!

I'll bet that the sacked officers didn't walk away with £750k each.

The whole thing stinks and it's about time we were allowed to hear everything!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.