Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Crisis casts doubt over £3bn warship work

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 November 2008
WORK to build two giant aircraft carriers may be delayed by the UK's worsening economic position, it emerged yesterday.
Union leaders expressed concern after the Ministry of Defence confirmed that all its major programmes were under cost-cutting scrutiny.

Work is scheduled to begin next spring in Glasgow on HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales, the biggest w
arships to be built in the UK.

They are due to enter service in 2014 and 2016, but fears have been expressed on the Clyde that there could be "slippage" in the contract.

The defence ministry said: "The MoD is looking at all its major equipment programmes over the next ten years, with a view to bearing down on costs and making sure the front-line troops are properly supported.

"We hope this work will conclude soon, but at the moment no decisions have been made."

The green light for the warships – to be built at Glasgow, Rosyth, Portsmouth and Barrow-in-Furness, creating or underpinning a total of 10,000 jobs – was given in May by the then defence secretary, Des Browne.

Contracts worth about £3 billion were signed in July. They included £1.3 billion for giant sections to be built in Glasgow and Portsmouth, £300 million for major work at Barrow, and £675 million for bow sections and final assembly at Rosyth.

Last night, Jim Moohan , chairman of the shipbuilding and engineering unions in Scotland, said the government must honour its commitment to the project. He stressed that shelving of the plans would be disastrous for the wider economy.

"It would throw a dark cloud over what have been the most successful years on the Clyde in relation to the programme of work," he said.


THE PRE-BUDGET REPORT: FULL COVERAGE



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Vaward,

25/11/2008 01:01:02
Wouldn't spending money on vital defence contracts boost the economy in the same way as spending on infrastructure?
2

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 25/11/2008 03:19:38
I predicted that if Labour won Glenrothes the Carriers would be cancelled by Christmas.

Looks like its all coming true.

Message From Gordon Brown to the people of Glenrothes:


——————/´ ¯/
—————--/—-/
—————-/—-/
———--/´¯/'--'/´¯`•_
———-/'/--/—-/—--/¨¯\
——--('(———- ¯~/'--')
———\————-'—--/
———-'\'————_-•´
————\———--(
————-\———--\
3

drunken proffet,

Tassy 25/11/2008 06:30:45
Get out and build more hydro schemes. They last longer than aircraft carriers.
4

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 25/11/2008 10:02:26
There would appear to be a drought of comment from all those jingoistic Little Scotlanders and Englanders who, only a few months ago after the contracts were awarded, were once again looking forward to Britain ruling the waves?

The US Navy has just completed the last of 10 Nimitiz design nuclear powered and armed aircraft carriers. It has plans for another 6!

The US Department of Defense is presently undergoing a refit or new build of some 250 surface vessels and
submarines. Despite the US downturn there are no plans to scale down this massive project.

The United States of America is the world's only true superpower. The US made sure of this when it humiliated the British and French into withdrawing from Suez! You can read it in the history books.
5

barrowlad,

GRANGEMOUTH 25/11/2008 11:46:07
Don't count on it who is the MP for Barrow non other than John Hutton Defence Minister, can't see him commiting political suicide
6

Mcsnagpile,

25/11/2008 13:10:37
Aircraft carriers are a thing of the past. The new missile systems on the market can take out the USA nuclear carriers never mind conventional carriers. I dread to think what a mess a nuclear carrier would make if it went down with a minimum of two nuclear power stations in the hold. I am all for UK effective defence in this brave new world,--with the emphasise on effective.
The USA can no longer afford the military it finances they just do not know it yet.
7

Number 6,

Germany 25/11/2008 15:06:13
Are we to continue with the Oylimpics in this critical economic climate. Does anyone believe that private money could possibly carry this project.

GM have just cancelled their sponsership for their most high profile sportsman. His name ? Tiger Woods.
That's how bad it is.

And yes, if funding has not been secured for the Commenwealth games then they should be cancelled too.

PS Any news on where they are going to dump London's toxic waste. Last suggestion was a landfill just outside Falkirk. We must be vigilant because you can bet your last euro Liebour will not let it leak out next time.
8

Martyk,

25/11/2008 16:48:17
Olympics. Should have its budget cut in half. Ridiculous frippery. The Carriers ? Scrap the whole idea. The 4 Tridents are enough for national defence. The carriers are simply a sad little pose on borrowed money. If I buy a Ferarri on my credit card does that make me rich?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.