Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Wind, wave and tide can make country world giant in green energy

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 July 2008
SCOTLAND has the potential to be to the renewable energy world what Saudi Arabia is to oil, an international conference will hear today.
Professor Ali Sayigh, chairman of the World Renewable Energy Congress, thinks Scotland could lead the world in the research and development of renewable energy sources.

Alex Salmond, the First Minister, will tell the same conference that Scotland
is on track not just to reach its renewable energy targets but to beat them.

Speaking to The Scotsman ahead of the conference, which is taking place at the Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre in Glasgow all week, Dr Sayigh said: "The Scottish Government wants to be the Saudi Arabia equivalent of renewable energy in the world. They can be that.

"With the wind and wave and solar in Scotland, they could be leading in Europe."

He said Scotland's position globally in this field was one reason why Mr Salmond was invited to make one of the opening speeches at the congress.

And he thinks it will be by harnessing the potential of wave, tidal and wind power that Scotland, and the rest of the UK, can "carve a niche" in the renewables sector. As well as ambitious plans for renewable energy, the Scottish Government has set itself tougher emissions targets than any other country in the world.

At least 31 per cent of its electricity demand will be generated from renewable sources such as wind and wave power by 2011, and at least 50 per cent by 2020.

In the Scottish Climate Change Bill later this year it will pledge to cut emissions by 80 per cent by 2050.

Mr Salmond is expected to tell delegates that the country is on course to go further than these targets.

At one of the opening speeches at the conference, the First Minister will say: "

I am delighted to tell you today that we are not only on course to reach these ambitious targets but to exceed them."

There is almost three gigawatts of installed renewable energy capacity in Scotland, mainly in the form of hydropower and wind energy, and almost another gigawatt that has been approved but is yet to be built.

This means Scotland is more than two-thirds of the way towards meeting the target of 31 per cent of energy from renewable sources by 2011 – which would require an estimated five gigawatts.

And with planning applications lodged, or expected to be lodged soon, for seven gigawatts more, Scotland is well on track to meet its ambitions.

Mr Salmond thinks Scotland has about a quarter of Europe's tidal and offshore capacity, and 10 per cent of its potential in wave power, as well as opportunities in hydro-power, onshore wind, biomass and solar power.

"Scotland has vast potential in renewable energy, unrivalled in Europe," he will say.

"All in all, we have the potential to generate more than 60 gigawatts from renewables – enough to meet Scotland's peak electricity demand more than ten times over.

"So it's fair to say that Scotland has won the natural lottery for a second time.

"My government is working in partnership with business and academia to develop and commercialise key technologies, to ensure that Scotland has a truly world-leading renewable energy sector."

He said in order for the country to harness its renewable energy potential, it will need to have the necessary infrastructure in place.

He hopes Scotland will be able to share its technology and expertise in renewables, to help the EU meet its targets of generating 20 per cent of energy from renewable energy by 2020.

The tenth World Renewable Energy Congress, taking place at the Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre in Glasgow, is expected to attract hundreds of delegates from all over the world.

Subjects scheduled to be covered at the week-long conference, include renewable energy technologies from small scale solar panels in Africa to wave machines in the North Sea, energy policy, low energy architecture, and the social and gender issues of investing in appropriate renewable technologies in developing economies.

Climate at threat from 'carbon bomb' if wetlands are destroyed

THE world's wetlands – threatened by development, dehydration and climate change – could release a planet-warming "carbon bomb" if they are destroyed, ecological scientists said yesterday.

Wetlands contain 771 billion tonnes of greenhouse gases, one-fifth of all the carbon on Earth and about the same amount as is now in the atmosphere, the scientists said before an international conference linking wetlands and global warming.

If all the wetlands on the planet released the carbon they hold, it would contribute powerfully to the climate-warming greenhouse effect, said Paulo Teixeira, co-ordinator of the Pantanal Regional Environment Programme in Brazil.

"We could call it the carbon bomb," Mr Teixeira said. "It's a very tricky situation."

Some 700 scientists from 28 nations are meeting this week at the International Wetlands Conference at the edge of Brazil's vast Pantanal wetland to look for ways to protect these endangered areas.

Wetlands are not just swamps; they also include marshes, peat bogs, river deltas, mangroves, tundra, lagoons and river flood plains.

Together they account for 6 per cent of the Earth's land surface and store 20 per cent of its carbon. They also produce 25 per cent of the world's food, purify water, recharge aquifers and act as buffers against violent coastal storms.

Historically, wetlands have been regarded as an impediment to civilisation. About 60 per cent of wetlands worldwide have been destroyed in the past century, mostly due to draining for agriculture. Pollution, dams, canals, groundwater pumping, urban development and peat extraction add to the destruction.

"Too often in the past, people have unwittingly considered wetlands to be problems in need of a solution, yet wetlands are essential to the planet's health," said Konrad Osterwalder, UN Under Secretary-General and rector of United Nations University, one of the hosts of the meeting.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Free by '93,

21/07/2008 00:09:05
While I commend the work Alex Salmond has done in the first 15 years of independence, I will acknowledge he knows bu**er all about renewable energy.

But would you go back to the dark old days of the Union? Alex Salmond at least has a lot of talking shops that result in photos in the papers. That is SNP cutting edge politics.

Not to mention the scrapping of student debt for energy engineers and increase to engineering dept funding we did. We didn;t just invent a silly prize, the SNP has made leaps and bounds in the forst 15 years of an independent Scotland.
2

The Strategist,

21/07/2008 00:23:18
Scotland's financial institutions don't invest in new tech ergo there isn't a cat's chance in hades of us ever developing a renewables tech sector that's worth a damn...
3

Unimpressed one,

21/07/2008 07:11:18
Now are faced with carbon bombs. Hope Al Gore doesn't hear of this. LOL!

this country is as well placed to exploit 'renewables' technology as it was to become leader in microchip technology. We have a few companies expoliting tax and relocation loopholes and we think we are on course to be world leaders.

If Salmond and co want to drag us back to the 18th century and put a stranglehold on growth he will find a sizable exodus at the border. Still future tourists might want to visit a backward 'carbon neutral' country just to see what life would be like under a eco-dictatorship. By that time Scots might find North Korea an attractive holiday destination, since they will at least have a continuous supply of electrical power. Oh wait I forgot, there will be no air travel!
4

Greenheatman,

TAIN 21/07/2008 07:23:21
""There is almost three gigawatts of installed renewable energy capacity in Scotland, mainly in the form of hydropower and wind energy, and almost another gigawatt that has been approved but is yet to be built.""

What rubbish! 80% of the so called renewable energy in the UK comes from burning biomass and cogenration projects. Wind is NOT a major contributer and hydro has a capacity factor of just 20% in a good (wet) year.


5

Phil C,

21/07/2008 09:27:35
The above article states the obvious, even if a bit exagerated. Add in our oil, gas and maybe coal supplies and we heve a bountiful supply of energy which can be shared with whoever needs to buy some.

What other people in the world would tolerate their country being raped and pillaged of it's God-given riches for so long? I used to think that the Scottish people were rich in foresight and imagination. Unfortunately it seems many are still sheep, baaaing to the unionist tune.
6

GlenB,

21/07/2008 09:33:15
All these theoretical calculations of the energy that is available from renewable sources is all very well but what matters is how much of it can be harnessed in a way that provides predictable amounts of energy when it is required.
7

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 21/07/2008 10:10:32
Invited to speak at the opening of the conference due to Scotlands position globally!

Won't you come into my parlour said the spider to the fly. Close the door behind you, no one else is expected soon.
8

Neil,

Glasgow 21/07/2008 10:50:54
Perhaps Scotland should decide to become a "giant" & the wolrd leader in getting energy from cucumbers. Despite Jonathan Swift's admonition this technology has fallen into abeyance & we could become world leaders for a few hundred pounds. Since we subsidise windmills to the tune of £1 billion we could thus achieve world leadership & still be able to afford a 3p cut in our income tax.

A more useful mantle of world leadership would be achieved by putting £50 million over 10 years to build a British sub-orbital space plane.
9

carrottop,

Dumfries 21/07/2008 10:59:50
Surely the eyesore which is wind power must be outlawed before the whole country is cover in this ugly mass of metal. Bonny Scotland?
Wave power must be the way to go and is constant not like wind. We can see two wind power sites from our window in central Dumfries and its not pretty, who supports the continuation of wind power I wonder? maybe just the posters who never leave their cyber world or cash conscious politicians.
10

Doh,

21/07/2008 11:14:41
#13

Gosh that really sounds terrible.

What you need is a nice shiny concrete and glass nuclear power station with a dump right next door.

11

Geomac 1,

Scotland 21/07/2008 11:55:15
The Scotsman coverage of energy and specifically renewable energy gets worse and worse with each passing week.
Yet again Jeny Haworth displays her technical and mathematical illiteracy - there are too many issues to refute in this article but let me highlight just one to give a flavour of my concern.

In her article Haworth says:
"This means Scotland is more than two-thirds of the way towards meeting the target of 31 per cent of energy from renewable sources by 2011 – which would require an estimated five gigawatts." This implies that to meet 100% from renewable energy sources, we would need over 15 gigawatts.

Then there is the statement from Alex Salmond:
"All in all, we have the potential to generate more than 60 gigawatts from renewables – enough to meet Scotland's peak electricity demand more than ten times over" This implies that we require only 6 gigawatts to meet our electricity demand.

WHICH IS IT????
12

A Clamper,

Edinburgh 21/07/2008 12:05:42
Why all the whingeing about renewables ? Fossil fuels will run out eventually. Go for it now, and do the planet a favour at the same time.
13

Geomac 1,

Scotland 21/07/2008 12:15:59
#16 - Of course, you are correct - BUT let's now back expensive renewables horses which don't do what it says on the tin - the classic example of such a horse is wind energy.
There is no evidence that these massive structures reduce CO2 emissions and they are notoriously unreliable - so much so, that much of the energy they generate is NOT fed into the national power grid!! What a waste, don't you think? And we, as consumers, are subsiding this unusable electricity production to the tune of around 5 pence per unit (kWh) of electricity.
By all means let's have renewables or non fossil fuelled generation BUT we simply cannot afford to play around with a technology that has been well and truly discredited by both Germany and Danish experience.
14

Brian Hill,

21/07/2008 12:16:23
SNP Government forging ahead once again. What a great move electing them has been for Scotland.
15

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 21/07/2008 12:29:06
#10 It Wasnae Me

"What the Scottish Government's renewable energy policy seems to be is to say to the private sector 'you design it, build it, fund it, operate it' i.e. the Scottish Government will do sod all."

#5 Rulebutnotrulers

"Our shipyards could build submarine turbines that could power the world, but only when the necessary R&D and orders have been placed. This is too big to be left to private enterprise."

Though Scotland was the birth place of Adam Smith and his ideas, it seems there are still some that cling to the failed socialist model of having the the Government do everything.

Never in the history of mankind has government intervention produced one single useful product or technology. This can only be done by the private sector.

What Government can do is create an enviroment where entrepenuership can flourish. Like in Ireland where if you develope a technology you are exempted from taxes on any foreign royalty revenue.

Unfortunately for that to happen we will first need to gain our Independence.
16

The Strategist,

21/07/2008 12:36:42
#19

Sad to say it is the private sector that is letting us down. The levels of private sector investment in these new energy technologies is pathetically low and considerably smaller than in the USA, Germany, France and Scandinavia.

Ask the big banks and other financial institutions how much they're investing in clean tech start up and early stage companies in Scotland and the answer will be essentially zero.
17

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 21/07/2008 12:40:19
In Victorian times Scotland was renowned worldwide for its inventors, inventiveness, and brilliant minds.

Why not renew that commendable title and be the green energy powerhouse and innovator that the whole world so desperately needs now.
18

wattie>x 1,

PLYMOUTH 21/07/2008 12:55:57
The one country on planet earth that should NEVER have an energy problem is that of our wonderful nation Scotland. We don't require expensive and dangerous Nuclear sources of power or any other nonsensical methods. We are continually being bombarded almost daily by so-called energy experts promoting their ideas on how to secure future supplies, most of whom have a personal financial interest in making easy
cash. We have in our Scottish nation an abundance off water that can provide all our safe hydro-energy requirements as long as mother earth remains safely in circulation.
19

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 21/07/2008 13:04:47
Europe's biggest wind farm to be built in Lanarkshire:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/glasgow_and_west/7517176.stm

Excellent news.
20

AJ Fife,

21/07/2008 13:52:35
As per usual, Scotland's First Minister continues to show true Statesman-like quality.

Scotland has never been in better hands!
21

ThomasP,

21/07/2008 14:00:56
One problem...

Westminister has control of our Energy Policy...
22

Dylan fan,

Planet earth 21/07/2008 14:37:38

No. 8, I agree from all I read, ( though I don't claim to know as much as many), It truly is the independent citizens of Scotland who move forward with new ideas and who are leading the way to the future! It would be wonderful if the gov. would somehow recognize this and help many with some rather than one with much. You guys are just doin' great! Keep it up!
23

Geomac 1,

Scotland 21/07/2008 16:24:54
At a time when we are in grave danger of running out of energy in Scotland - don't believe the hype that emanates from the mouths of politicians and their acolytes - why are there so many sycophantic posts here doing nothing but praising the SNP? So far they've done a lot of talking but no meaningful action - other than interfere in areas of a highly questionable - eg planning, funding of Muslim SNP supporters etc
24

Saoghal Beag,

21/07/2008 17:31:24
26 Geomac, that's right up there with Al Gore scaremongering. The lights are not going out in Scotland, we have a massive overgeneration capacity, thankfully as our nuclear plants spend more time off line than on, but they really on supply one market that is south of the border.

We need a diversified and dispersed generation protfolio to secure our energy future. As pointed out above we have enough resources of our own, clean coal, wind, wave, tidal, community heat, combined heat and power, heat pumps the technology exists and is already ebing used. There is no need to lumber future generations with the legacy of nuclear because we have absolutely no need for the technology.
25

An Greumach Mor,

Scotland 21/07/2008 18:12:09
The technology is still to be invented to allow us to harvest energy from wind, sea, sun, river in a cost efficient manner but the resources required to generate that energy we have by physical location.

I am sure the first petrol engines were sneered at as useless and never replace the horse.

Remove the dependency on oil and we will be free in the future.
26

The Tin Man,

21/07/2008 19:02:49
If the big wind-farms were not subsidised by Westminster (which comes around in our ever-increasing electricity bills), they would not be being built. £1 worth of electricty generated by a wind-turbine also earns £1 subsidy.

The only practical involvement of the Scottish exec is in not calling-in the planning applications.
27

Blusween,

Scotland 21/07/2008 19:30:38
Fact: Scotland remains one of the least forested areas in Europe with only 16% of the land area covered by forest and woodland.

Whay don't we try and do something about this to improve our air quality as well as our health and well-being.
28

ThomasP,

21/07/2008 19:51:37
#30

Quite difficult considering our geographic surroundings of hills and mountins.
29

Blusween,

Scotland 21/07/2008 19:59:26
#31

Even excluding these hills (on which some of these trees can be planted) there are many areas of Scotland which lack any significant woodland - just travel along any motorway or major road and you will see for yourself.
30

Keander,

Wishaw 21/07/2008 20:07:55
Another Wind Farm to be built, this time at Biggar. When, like the Millenium Bug, will Global Warming be exposed as the con it is.

Who makes the money? Politicians from Taxes, Scientists from Grant Dollars and Energy Companies from Government kickbacks.

Good luck to the Scots companies looking to get their noses in the trough.

And if GW does exists? Will the ungrateful Ned Generation currently inhabiting our streets be too tanked up to notice the Sea boling?
31

ThomasP,

21/07/2008 20:27:28
#32

Some...

Hills are actually very unsuitable for trees/plants.

Motarways and major roads are also unsuitable for trees.
32

Saoghal Beag,

21/07/2008 20:43:24
29 tin man. there is no such thing as an unsubsidised generation technology. complete red herring

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.