Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Whodunnit? Mystery over £3m prize to build new arts venture

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 November 2008
A £3 MILLION award to build a new "creative and elegant" arts venue in Edinburgh was unveiled yesterday.
Competitive bids were invited yesterday to win funding for a new or refurbished arts space of "exceptional architectural and cultural merit" for Edinburgh. The winning project, to be built by 2013, could be anything from a concert hall to artists' st
udios.

Speculation was intense over the identity of the anonymous donor behind the extraordinary scheme, who will have the last call on whether to pay for the project. JK Rowling and Sir Sean Connery have been ruled out, sources said. Speculation ran from wealthy Americans with Scottish ties to old Edinburgh families with a history of giving.

The Scottish Community Foundation (SCF)2, which usually funnels smaller donations to community projects, is handling the "arts funding prize for Edinburgh". Staff said yesterday it will take first-round applications in April 2009. Promising proposals could receive £10,000 in development money, with a final choice by a judging panel in 2010 – to be ratified by the donor.

"The donor behind this prize has a deep commitment to the arts in Scotland and wishes to remain anonymous," said Giles Ruck, the SCF chief executive, praising the "sheer generosity".

There are several arts buildings in Edinburgh that have languished on the drawing board for years for which £3 million would be a big jump-start.

Supporters have clamoured for a new red-carpet venue for the Edinburgh International Film Festival, for example, or a mid-sized concert hall, or the Scottish National Photography Centre on Calton Hill.

Directors of several major arts organisations were at yesterday's launch. Jenny Dawe, the City of Edinburgh Council leader, called it "extremely exciting". She continued: "In these financially fragile times, it's more important than ever that we don't lose sight of the benefits of the arts."

The SCF works with about 90 organisations or individuals, including JK Rowling's The Volant Charitable Trust, but no past donors were involved with by far the largest grant in its history, said Mr Ruck. Other names circulating included Carol Colburn Høgel, an American who oversees her family's Dunard Fund. It has given millions of pounds to the arts in Scotland.

However, the SCF said the donor was UK-based, ruling out Sir Sean, who lives in the Bahamas. Speculation ranged from the literary philanthropist Drue Heinz to Sir Gerald Elliot, a former chairman of the Christian Salvesen group.

Rules for the prize are strict. The new building must be finished by 2013 and the award cannot be used to fund repair, maintenance, or running costs.

A judging panel will select the most "creative and elegant" project to bring "joy and delight", but the donor will have the last say on whether the money is given out at all.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 November 2008 9:54 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Buttress,

04/11/2008 00:39:56
"In these financially fragile times, it's more important than ever that we don't lose sight of the benefits of the arts."

Yeah right.


Meanwhile, other cultural news :

The idiots on CEC planning committee voted for the demolition of a large part of the B listed Odeon cinema last Wednesday - the important part, the auditorium. It's one of only three of its type in the UK and the only one in Scotland. Historic Scotland wanted to upgrade the listing to A. It objected to the plans, as did the Theatres Trust, the Cinema Theatres Association and SAVE Britain's Heritage, but clearly the planning committee isn't interested in Scotland's cultural heritage.

Duddingston House Properties are the vandals involved with that, and Make Architects.

There were others willing to take it on as a cinema, but the owners found all manner of reasons to be discouraging. Mostly they centred around making a fat profit by demolishing (despite the flaunting of national planning policy) and putting up a hotel.



2

Ewan Oosami,

04/11/2008 08:59:07
Having endured the utter cr*p of the Turner prize for years the thought of another arty farty concept fills me with horror at the lengths people will go to when trying to satisfy their overinflated egos. Most 'arts' are rubbish and many mstakenly think culture is art and vice versa
3

Mallory,

Edinburgh 04/11/2008 10:49:16
What an excellent opportunit for a talented architect to transform the old school building threatened by the Mountgrange stuff. Given the 'credit crunch' the number of prospective luxury five star hotel visitors must be declining daily...
4

Studio Space,

Edinburgh 04/11/2008 11:02:12
I agree Buttress such a donation is absolutely wasted on Edinburgh.

"There are several arts buildings in Edinburgh that have languished on the drawing board for years for which £3 million would be a big jump-start."

Get out all yer old projects chaps, dust em off.

5

Buttress,

04/11/2008 11:20:15
A refurbished art space - now how about it Duddingston House Properties? Owner Bruce Hare?

"The developer is to revamp... listed city centre cinema.

Bruce Hare is an Edinburgh architect who specialises in buying difficult buildings for conversion..."

So buy a Category B listed building and then want to all but demolish it?

How about applying for the cash Mr Hare, and working with the CTA to find a better future for the entire building, using the gap site for enabling development? After all, J Dawe says

"In these financially fragile times, it's more important than ever that we don't lose sight of the benefits of the arts."

Think what a wonderful cultural venue it could make, if only the same council J Dawe is leader of had not voted to allow you to demolish the really important part!

But of course you will make more cash from removing a chunk of national heritage and building yet another hotel.

I'm wondering what all those tourists will be coming to see soon - hotels and conference centres?



6

Buttress,

04/11/2008 11:26:05
3 Mallory - now wouldn't that be a good idea too?

It's another listed building the council has voted to allow a developer to demolish in order to make a fat profit! Naturally it's all disguised as 'economic benefit'.

A developer only has to claim a nice round figure of jobs, which no-one ever actually checks, and too many (not all) on CEC planning committee fall over them selves to vote for it. The fact existing buildings can (and rather more sustainably) be repaired, refurbished and reused, retaining the history and character of the city, seems not to matter to them.

www.eh8.org.uk


I wonder what next week's UNESCO mission will make of it all?

7

Buttress,

04/11/2008 11:57:16
And now the Tron Kirk is to be sold off:

http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/topstories/Historic-Tron-to-go-on.4656939.jp#3402346
8

Buttress,

04/11/2008 12:53:02
UNESCO visit latest, check out:

http://www.independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/
9

Buttress,

04/11/2008 17:17:53
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7708088.stm


"Edinburgh City Council said it was relaxed about the scrutiny. It said planning proposals consider the impact any development will have on the cities heritage and they do everything they can to preserve the capital's unique historical character..."


Yeah. Pants on fire.

10

Donald, Edinburgh,

04/11/2008 22:58:49
Good to see such warm support for this generous, creative donation.
11

Buttress,

04/11/2008 23:57:26
The donation is (possibly) wonderful. The council guff is sick making, considering its record.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.