Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Trump rejects alternative plan for greener golf course

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 May 2008
DONALD Trump last night rejected an alternative golf course design that environmental groups claimed would allow him to go ahead with his project without destroying the protected dune system at the Menie Estate.
RSPB Scotland and the Scottish Wildlife Trust (SWT) revealed they had commissioned Mike Wood, a respected golf course architect, to come up with a new plan for the Aberdeenshire resort.

They claimed the alternative showed Mr Trump could have a "c
hampionship level" course at Menie without damaging the vulnerable sand-dunes on the Foveran site of special scientific interest (SSSI) – the focus of the environmental objections to the £1 billion golf resort and housing development.

Mr Wood's design is to be formally submitted this week to the public inquiry into the Trump International Golf Links development as a potential way forward.

Anne McCall, the head of planning at RSPB Scotland, said: "The developers continually claimed they could not change the course design, but have said they might do so to take account of environmental destruction. Rather than the minor tweak that their new indicative plans would mean, we hope they will now agree with us that it's entirely possible for them to have a top golf course without building on the SSSI in the north or the sensitive dunes to the south."

Mr Wood, who chairs the environment committee of the European Institute of Golf Course Architects, said: "I believe there is ample room on this site to accommodate a golf course designed to the highest modern standards without using the valuable mobile dunes."

But George Sorial, the Trump executive in charge of the Menie development, said: "We sincerely appreciate the RSPB's efforts at golf course design, but on initial examination, the layout would not constitute a links course and is certainly not a championship course."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 May 2008 11:04 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Donald Trump
 
1

Beth Boyle,

NY 19/05/2008 07:32:30
Such a ugly man, send him packing! What does he think he is the last king of Scotland!?
2

Biker,

Ayr 19/05/2008 10:17:27
Clarry. It may be the case that the golf course will do no damage to the area, but the question remains, Does the area need another Golf course? Or is this just a plan to introduce more overly expencive houses in the area? Donald Trump needs to go elswhere.
3

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 19/05/2008 14:49:12
Biker.

Trump's proposed course in no more of a championship course than the suggested alternative nor any other course here.

To become one, it would have to be assessed & approved by one or other of the main tournament organisations. Which will simply not happen off the drawing board - The course would have to be built & established for some time before might qualify for consideration & then it might well be years before it gets a place on the roster.

If it happens at all, the process could take decades .
4

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 19/05/2008 14:50:11
Apologies Biker - #6 was directed at Jock! :-)
5

Greenbum,

Northampton 19/05/2008 14:52:30
My wife's late step father used to lose 1 metre per year of his fields to the sand dunes. He used to own Pitscaff and Mains of Foveran Farms (i.e. his land went from beach round to the Ythan, therefore stablisation of the dunes is essential. I think that most of the opposition is pure jealousy and "nimbyism", it can only help Aberdeens long term future (remember the oils is running out)
6

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 19/05/2008 14:55:11
Clarry - #3

The only "Professor of Ecology" I've read in connection with the Trump side of the application is actually a retired lecturer with an honourary title (As well as a rather narrow specialisation). Which is not quite the same thing.

7

Shawl,

Glasgow 19/05/2008 15:54:06
Trump - get the message. You are not welcome here. Go home.
8

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 19/05/2008 19:21:51
Beth Boyle:

You're a wind up merchant, ain't 'cha? :-)
9

Biker,

Ayr 19/05/2008 20:24:21
Jock Wilson. Thanks for the comment and yes indeed it was a rhetorical question. I am sceptical about Trumps real motives here, and wonder if the only reason he wants to make a championship links (albeit that it happens)is to introduce expensive housing in the area.
You are indeed correct about the number of Champoinship Courses down here and that begs the question, given the short season during which these facilities are used is another really required?
I would add that I am not a golfer.
10

Biker,

Ayr 20/05/2008 10:33:59
Jock Wilson. I never even considered golf to be an alternative to skiing. Well done.
The only problem as I see it is the lack of any meaningfull hill in Aberdeenshire rather excludes them from skiing.
Good comment though and it made me laugh.
11

Buttress,

22/05/2008 15:43:23

'The arrogance of Ford bears no limits. Now he is commissioning a golf course design on someone else's to land. Who does he think he is?

A lazy, useless unemployable twit. While he uses public money to hold up progress and much needed roads and houses. These councillors should be censored'


He presumably thinks he is someoen taking part in a public inquiry - when it is perfectly normal, nay desirable, to have an alternative to the plans to which you are objecting.

Lazy? Useless? Unemployable? Can you give some substance to these assertions?

Censored? Why, are they doing something requiring the attentions of a censor? In wht way should they be 'censored'?


The inquiry is because the plan has been called in, not because of one person. It is possible it does not comply with national policy, and that is what an inquiry is to investigate, surely?









 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.